neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lafayette David Patrick
v.
Fleta E. Patrick
v.
Fleta E. Patrick
Alias Divorce, No. 19; No. 53.
Superior Court of Delaware.
Feb 4, 1918.
William S. Prickett for plaintiff., Edward W. Cooch for defendant.
Curam.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Per Curam:
We think; that petitions in divorce proceedings, and answers when necessary, are the pleadings in those cases, and we see no reason why the court should not, in its discretion, allow an answer to be withdrawn and other action taken. Of course, if it were apparent that this course was being pursued for the purpose of delaying the hearing of the case, that would be a matter for the court to pass upon, but that question is not raised in this case.
We think we should allow the answer to be withdrawn at this time.