Delaware Code
11 Del. C. § 4371 (2026)
Statement of policy
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The General Assembly finds that a criminal history is a hindrance to a person’s present and future ability to obtain employment, housing, education, or credit. This subchapter is intended to protect persons from unwarranted damage which may occur when the existence of a criminal history continues indefinitely.
62 Del. Laws, c. 317, § 2; 82 Del. Laws, c. 83, § 1;Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: State v. Spence, 367 A.2d 983 (Del. 1976).
State v. Spence, 367 A.2d 983 (Del. 1976). “North Carolina and related cases ?* [* Including the questions of the constitutionality of both sentences of § 4209(a) and the separability thereof.] “2. If the answer to question 1 is no, what sentence may be imposed ? “3.”
Fatir v. Thomas, 106 F. Supp. 2d 572 (D. Del. 2000). “If the answer to question 2 is “life imprisonment without benefit of parole,” what does that sentence mean in light of 11 Del.C. § 4371 et seq.? 3 State v. Spence, 367 A.”
McCoy v. State, 277 A.2d 675 (Del. 1971). “This was a mistake since that date was McCoy’s short-time termination date which came about by reason of 11 Del.C §§ 4371 and 4372 permitting- a reduction in a period of confinement by virtue of good behavior.”
State v. Bender, 283 A.2d 847 (Del. Super. Ct. 1971). “11 Del.C. § 4371 et seq. and § 4346. Compare State v.”
Nardini v. Willin, 245 A.2d 164 (Del. 1968). “By 11 Del.C. § 4371, it is provided that a prisoner “may merit diminution of his confinement by his behavior, fidelity and compliance with the rules.”
Osgood, Qaiymah, & Fritz v. State (Del. 2023). “20 11 Del. C. § 4371. 6 “protect[s] persons from unwarranted damage which may occur when the existence of a criminal record continues indefinitely.”
Cornette v. State (Del. 2026). “40 11 Del. C. § 4371. 12 Recent amendments to the Act have clarified that Section 4375 was intended to stand as an independent path for expungement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.