Del. C. » Title 11 — Delaware Criminal Code · CHAPTER 5. Specific Offenses · Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Delaware Code

11 Del. C. § 861 (2026)

Forgery; class F felony; class G felony; class A misdemeanor; restitution required

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section DE-DELCdelcode.delaware.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A person is guilty of forgery when, intending to defraud, deceive or injure another person, or knowing that the person is facilitating a fraud or injury to be perpetrated by anyone, the person:

(1) Alters any written instrument of another person without the other person’s authority; or

(2) Makes, completes, executes, authenticates, issues or transfers any written instrument which purports to be the act of another person, whether real or fictitious, who did not authorize that act, or to have been executed at a time or place or in a numbered sequence other than was in fact the case or to be a copy of an original when no original existed; or

(3) Possesses a written instrument, knowing that it was made, completed or altered under circumstances constituting forgery.

(b) Forgery is classified and punished as follows:

(1) Forgery is forgery in the first degree if the written instrument is or purports to be:

a. Part of an issue of money, stamps, securities or other valuable instruments issued by a government or a governmental instrumentality; or

b. Part of an issue of stock, bonds or other instruments representing interests in or claims against a corporation, business enterprise or other organization or its property.

Forgery in the first degree is a class F felony.

(2) Forgery is forgery in the second degree if the written instrument is or purports to be any of the following:

a. A deed, will, codicil, contract, release, assignment, commercial instrument, check, or other instrument which does or may evidence, create, transfer, terminate, or otherwise affect a legal right, interest, obligation, or status.

b. A public record, or an instrument filed or required to be filed in or with a public office or public servant.

c. A written instrument officially issued or created by a public office, public servant, or governmental instrumentality.

d. Part of an issue of tokens, tickets, public transportation transfers, certificates, or other articles manufactured and designed for use as symbols of value usable in place of money for the purchase of property or services.

e. A prescription of a duly licensed physician or other person authorized to issue the same for any drug or any instrument or device for which a prescription is required by law.

Forgery in the second degree is a class G felony.

(3) All other forgery is forgery in the third degree, a class A misdemeanor.

(4) If the written instrument is or purports to be provided to an individual by a vaccine provider documenting that an individual has been vaccinated, which bears a government logo or other indication that the written instrument is created by a governmental instrumentality and includes information such as the date an individual received a vaccination and the type of vaccine and lot number, forgery is classified and punished as follows:

a. A first offense by an individual involving a single written instrument under this paragraph (b)(4) is forgery in the third degree, a class A misdemeanor.

b. All other forgery under this paragraph (b)(4) is forgery in the second degree, a class G felony.

(c) In addition to any other penalty provided by law for violation of this section, the court shall require a person convicted of a violation of this section to make restitution to the party or parties who suffered loss as a result of such forgery.

11 Del. C. 1953, §  861;  58 Del. Laws, c. 497, §  1;  62 Del. Laws, c. 241, §  1;  67 Del. Laws, c. 130, §  8;  70 Del. Laws, c. 186, §  1;  83 Del. Laws, c. 498, § 1; 
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2001–2019 · leading case: Khaimraj Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. of the United States of Am., 383 F.3d 144 (3rd Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Khaimraj Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. of the United States of Am., 383 F.3d 144 (3rd Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “at 249, it became easy to conclude that 11 Del. C. § 861 came within the wide sweep of the offenses described in 8 U.”
Trevor Drakes v. Charles W. Zimski, Acting Dir. of Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. Janet Reno, Attorney Gen., 240 F.3d 246 (3rd Cir. 2001). “Drakes pled guilty to forgery in the second degree under Delaware law, which provides, as relevant here, that a person is guilty of forgery when he or she alters, makes, possesses, or transfers certain written instruments while “intending to defraud, deceive or injure another…”
McCleaf v. Carroll, 416 F. Supp. 2d 283 (D. Del. 2006). “11 Del. C. Ann. §§ 861(b)(2)(b), 4205(b)(7); Crosby v.”
Apanpa v. Attorney Gen., 276 F. App'x 227 (3rd Cir. 2008). “” 11 Del. C. § 861. We held that the Delaware forgery statute was related to forgery, and that the BIA’s decision that a conviction under the Delaware statute was a conviction for an aggravated felony was correct, whether viewed through the deferential lens of Chevron v.”
Khaimraj Singh v. Atty Gen USA (3rd Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “” (3) Possesses a written instrument, knowing that it 8 In relevant part, 11 Del. C. § 861 was made, completed or provides: altered under (a) A person is guilty of circumstances constituting forgery when, intending to forgery.”
Hickman v. State (Del. 2018). “16 (7) Under 11 Del. C. § 861(a)(3), “[a] person is guilty of forgery when, intending to defraud, deceive, or injure another person, .”
Evans v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2019). “§ 907(1) and the language “the act of another person, whether real or fictitious” found in Delaware’s forgery statute at 11 Del. C. § 861(a)(2)). -12- textual evidence that the General Assembly purposely intended to narrow the other persons whom one might criminally impersonate…”
— 11 Del. C. § 861(a)(2) — 1 case
Evans v. State (Del. Super. Ct. 2019). “§ 907(1) and the language “the act of another person, whether real or fictitious” found in Delaware’s forgery statute at 11 Del. C. § 861(a)(2)). -12- textual evidence that the General Assembly purposely intended to narrow the other persons whom one might criminally impersonate…”
— 11 Del. C. § 861(a)(3) — 1 case
Hickman v. State (Del. 2018). “16 (7) Under 11 Del. C. § 861(a)(3), “[a] person is guilty of forgery when, intending to defraud, deceive, or injure another person, .”
— 11 Del. C. § 861(b)(2)(b) — 1 case
McCleaf v. Carroll, 416 F. Supp. 2d 283 (D. Del. 2006). “11 Del. C. Ann. §§ 861(b)(2)(b), 4205(b)(7); Crosby v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.