(a) A debtor is insolvent if the sum of the debtor’s debts is greater than all of the debtor’s assets, at a fair valuation.
(b) A debtor who is generally not paying debts as they become due is presumed to be insolvent.
(c) A partnership is insolvent under subsection (a) of this section if the sum of the partnership’s debts is greater than the aggregate, at a fair valuation, of all of the partnership’s assets and the sum of the excess of the value of each general partner’s nonpartnership assets over the partner’s nonpartnership debts.
(d) Assets under this section do not include property that has been transferred, concealed or removed with intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors or that has been transferred in a manner making the transfer voidable under this chapter.
(e) Debts under this section do not include an obligation to the extent it is secured by a valid lien on property of the debtor not included as an asset.
70 Del. Laws, c. 434,
§
1;
70 Del. Laws, c. 186,
§
1;
Notes of Decisions
ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp., 396 B.R. 278 (S.D. Tex. 2008).
· cites it 2× “§ 25:2-23(b); 6 Del. C. § 1302(a). According to New Jersey and Delaware’s version of the UFTA, a debtor is presumed to be balance-sheet insolvent if it “is generally not paying debts as they become due.”
PHP Liquidating, LLC v. Robbins (In Re PHP Healthcare Corp.), 128 F. App'x 839 (3rd Cir. 2005).
“§ 548 (2002) with 6 Del. C. §§ 1302 -1306 (2002). To properly plead a fraudulent transfer claim against the Robbins Family, the Liquidating Company would have had to allege either, pursuant to Section 548(a)(1)(A), that the debtor redeemed the stock with actual intent to defraud…”
United States v. West, 299 F. Supp. 661 (D. Del. 1969).
“” 6 Del.C. § 1302(a). 7 . From the testimony adduced at the first hearing it is quite apparent that although legal title to the property in question was conveyed to their son, David, Mr.”
United States v. van der Horst, 270 F. Supp. 365 (D. Del. 1967).
· cites it 2× “Title 6 Del.C. § 1302(a) defines insolvency as follows: “A person is insolvent when the present fair salable value of his assets is less than the amount that will be *368 required to pay his probable liability on his existing debts as they become absolute and matured.”
Monroe (D. Del. 2026).
“” Cleveland-Cliffs, 2023 WL 5688392 , at *9 (quoting 6 Del. C. § 1302(b)). Collectively, these allegations plausibly support (1) a transfer by USA of $90 million of equity, (2) for no consideration, and (3) leaving USA with unreasonably small or no assets relative to its…”
— 6 Del. C. § 1302(a) — 6 cases
ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp., 396 B.R. 278 (S.D. Tex. 2008).
“§ 25:2-23(b); 6 Del. C. § 1302(a). According to New Jersey and Delaware’s version of the UFTA, a debtor is presumed to be balance-sheet insolvent if it “is generally not paying debts as they become due.”
United States v. West, 299 F. Supp. 661 (D. Del. 1969).
“” 6 Del.C. § 1302(a). 7 . From the testimony adduced at the first hearing it is quite apparent that although legal title to the property in question was conveyed to their son, David, Mr.”
United States v. van der Horst, 270 F. Supp. 365 (D. Del. 1967).
“Title 6 Del.C. § 1302(a) defines insolvency as follows: “A person is insolvent when the present fair salable value of his assets is less than the amount that will be *368 required to pay his probable liability on his existing debts as they become absolute and matured.”
— 6 Del. C. § 1302(b) — 5 cases
ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp., 396 B.R. 278 (S.D. Tex. 2008).
“§ 25:2-23(b); 6 Del. C. § 1302(a). According to New Jersey and Delaware’s version of the UFTA, a debtor is presumed to be balance-sheet insolvent if it “is generally not paying debts as they become due.”
Monroe (D. Del. 2026).
“” Cleveland-Cliffs, 2023 WL 5688392 , at *9 (quoting 6 Del. C. § 1302(b)). Collectively, these allegations plausibly support (1) a transfer by USA of $90 million of equity, (2) for no consideration, and (3) leaving USA with unreasonably small or no assets relative to its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.