United States v. Lawrence Secrease, 334 F. App'x 1001 (11th Cir. 2009). · Go Syfert
United States v. Lawrence Secrease, 334 F. App'x 1001 (11th Cir. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lawrence SECREASE, A.K.A. Law, Defendant-Appellant
09-12882.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Oct 21, 2009.
334 F. App'x 1001
E. Bryan Wilson, Terry Flynn, U.S. Attorney’s Office, N.D. of Florida, Tallahassee, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Gwendolyn L. Spivey, Randolph P. Mur-rell, Federal Defender Office, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
Tjoflat, Wilson, Cox.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Lawrence Seerease in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Secrease’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.