Cramer v. State, 103 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). · Go Syfert
Cramer v. State, 103 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for cluster 4987217.
Mark CRAMER
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 5D10-4043.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Dec 28, 2012.
103 So. 3d 1039
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Roller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Ap-pellee.
Griffin, Palmer, Sawaya.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Mark Cramer appeals his judgment and sentences entered by the trial court after a jury found him guilty of three counts of sexual battery upon a minor under the age of twelve[1] and one count of lewd or lascivious act upon a child under the age of sixteen.[2] We affirm in all respects. However, as the State properly concedes, Cramer’s judgment incorrectly designates his lewd or lascivious conviction as a life felony rather than a second-degree felony. Accordingly, we remand so that the scrivener’s error contained in count four can be corrected to read that the statute violated was section 800.04(4), Florida Statutes (1995), and that the offense was a second-degree felony.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, SAWAYA and PALMER, JJ., concur.
1

§ 794.011(2), Fla. Stat. (1995).

2

§ 800.04(4), Fla. Stat. (1995).