neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boggan R. WRIGHT
v.
Ouida WRIGHT
v.
Ouida WRIGHT
No. Z-426.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 9, 1976.
Joe J. Harrell, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Stone & Swearingen, Pensacola, for appellant., David H. Levin, of Levin, Warfield, Mid-dlebrooks, Graff, Mabie, Rosenbloum & Ma-gie, Pensacola, for appellee.
Mills, Rawls, Smith.
Published
Lead Opinion
PER CURIAM.
That portion of the final judgment which awards to appellee $1,000.00 on account of & reasonable fee for the services of her attorney is vacated. Spears v. Spears, 311 So.2d 397 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975). The judgment is otherwise
AFFIRMED.
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH, J., concur. MILLS, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.Concurrence in Part
MILLS, Judge,
concurs in part and dissents in part:
I agree with the majority that the $1,000.00 attorney’s fee awarded appellee should be vacated.
I disagree with the majority that the $400.00 a month permanent alimony awarded the appellee should be affirmed. Based on the facts presented to us and the applicable law, I would reverse this part of the judgment because the trial court abused its discretion. I would reduce the permanent alimony to $200.00 per month.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.