No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ARKANSAS GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION, a foreign corporation
v.
Leroy HACKETT and Patricia Hackett, his wife, Glens Falls Insurance Co., Riekes Container Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Alco Container Company of Tampa
v.
Leroy HACKETT and Patricia Hackett, his wife, Glens Falls Insurance Co., Riekes Container Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Alco Container Company of Tampa
Nos. 81-1684, 81-1969.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Apr 14, 1982.
David A. Danielson of Brennan, McAliley, Hayskar & McAliley, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellant., Michael K. Sullivan of Hamilton, James, Merkle & Young, West Palm Beach, for appellees Leroy Hackett and Patricia Hack-ett., R. Fred Lewis of Magill, Reid, Kuvin & Lewis, Miami, for appellees Riekes Container Co., Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. and Aleo Container Co. of Tampa.
Anstead, Dell, Walden.
Published
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. We agree with the trial court’s determination that the appellant’s sales activities in Florida were sufficient to render appellant amenable to the court’s jurisdiction under the provisions of Section 48.193(f)(2), Florida Statutes (1979). See generally, Ford Motor Co. v. Atwood Vacuum Machine Co., 392 So.2d 1305 (Fla.1981).
ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.