FW v. State, 459 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
FW v. State, 459 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Acacia E. Davis, individually v. Deborah Hengen, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Clifford Davis, Acacia E. Davis, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Clifford Davis, and The Estate of Clifford Davis (fladistctapp, 2016-05-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Acacia E. Davis, individually v. Deborah Hengen, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Clifford Davis, Acacia E. Davis, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Clifford Davis, and The Estate of Clifford Davis
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Newman v. Newman, 459 So.2d 1129, 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
cited Cited "see" Ticktin v. Kearin
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Newman v. Newman, 459 So.2d 1129, 1131 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) and cases cited therein.
discussed Cited "see" SHUFFLEBARGER BY OKTAVEC v. Shufflebarger
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Newman v. Newman, 459 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Massey v. Massey, 443 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Cronebaugh v. Van Dyke, 415 So.2d 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (Sharp, J., dissenting), pet. for rev. denied, 426 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1983).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lawrence v. Hershey
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence medium
See id.; see also Newman v. Newman, 459 So.2d 1129, 1130-31 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Kranz v. Kranz
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Shufflebarger v. Shufflebarger, 460 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); see also Newman v. Newman, 459 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 466 So.2d 218 (Fla. 1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nowell v. Nowell
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1994 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, Robinson v. State, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services on Behalf of Robinson, 473 So.2d 228 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. den., Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Robinson, 478 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1985) (the court held that the circumstances were sufficiently compelling to allow the former husband to raise the defense of laches as a bar to enforcement of child support arrearages) with Newman v. Newman, 459 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), rev. den., Newman v. Newman, 466 So.2d 218 (Fla. 1985) (the court rejected the former husband's argument that the doctrine of laches should bar …
F.W., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
83-2900.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 20, 1984.
459 So. 2d 1129
Barkdull, Nesbitt and Ferguson.
Published

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Richard E. Doran, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Because the state failed to establish the market value of the property so as to classify it as a felony under sections 812.012(9)(a)(1) and 812.014(2)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (1983), the juvenile's conviction for grand theft is reversed. Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104, 108 (Fla. 1974); Taylor v. State, 425 So.2d 1191, 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Consequently, the defendant's adjudication of delinquency is reduced from grand theft to petit theft. J.J. v. State, 438 So.2d 988 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

As modified, the adjudication and sentence for delinquency is affirmed.