Wright v. Wright, 516 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Wright v. Wright, 516 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Cerase v. Dewhurst (fladistctapp, 2006-08-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cerase v. Dewhurst
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · confidence medium
See Robinson v. Robinson, 928 So.2d 360, 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (trial courts are bound by a magistrate's factual findings if supported by competent substantial evidence and by a magistrate's findings and recommendations unless they are clearly erroneous or the magistrate has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence); De Clements v. De Clements, 662 So.2d 1276, 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (en banc) (noting that "the trial court may only reject [a magistrate's] findings and conclusions if they are clearly erroneous or if the [magistrate] has misconceived the legal effect of the evidence presen…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Millard B. WRIGHT
v.
Cecelia S. WRIGHT
No. 87-199.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nov 3, 1987.
516 So. 2d 9
Fred E. Glickman, Miami, for appellant., Richard W. Aschenbrenner, Miami, for appellee.
Baskin, Ferguson, Schwartz.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Pinpoint authority: bottom 25%
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order finding that the report of the general master is supported by competent evidence. See Landis v. Landis, 486 So.2d 28 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (“A trial court is bound by a master’s factual findings when they are supported by competent evidence.”); Shaw v. Shaw, 369 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (trial court must uphold master’s findings unless report was clearly erroneous or master misconceived legal effect of evidence).

Affirmed.