Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek, 805 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Pulchtopek v. Pulchtopek, 805 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yvonne PULCHTOPEK
v.
Paul PULCHTOPEK
No. 4D01-833.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 16, 2002.
805 So. 2d 71
Gary S. Israel of Gary S. Israel, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant., No brief filed for appellee.
Farmer, Gross, Warner.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final order of dissolution. The wife complains about the amount of alimony and the trial court’s failure to award attorney’s fees. Neither is an abuse of discretion. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1203 (Fla.1980). In particular, as to the attorney’s fees, the attorney had received a significant temporary award of fees, and the wife[*72] actually received more than the husband in equitable distribution.

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.