S.R. v. State, 135 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). · Go Syfert
Search
S.R. v. State, 135 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Foster v. State (fladistctapp, 2017-12-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Foster v. State (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
See § 800.04(5)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2015); cf. Henderson, 135 So. 3d at 1095 (stating that the motion seeking suppression of evidence obtained from a computer tablet was not dispositive as the State "may have [nonetheless] been able to proceed to trial" based upon the additional evidence possessed by the State); Campbell, 386 So. 2d at 629 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Foster v. State (2×) also: Cited "see"
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
See § 800.04(5)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2015); cf. Henderson, 135 So. 3d at 1095 (stating that the motion seeking suppression of evidence obtained from a computer tablet was not dispositive as the State "may have [nonetheless] been able to proceed to trial" based upon the additional evidence possessed by the State); Campbell, 386 So. 2d at 629 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Russ v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fla Stat. § 924.051(4) (2015); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114, 119 (Fla. 2000) (holding that when the [district] court determines that an appeal does not present ... a legally dispositive issue that was expressly reserved for appellate review,” the district court should summarily affirm); Henderson v. State, 135 So.3d 1092, 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (holding that where “there was no finding or agreement that the motion was disposi-tive, [the defendant] may not appeal the denial of the motion”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
S.R.
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 2D12-5478.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Aug 9, 2013.
135 So. 3d 1092
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defendant, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant., Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Christina Zuccaro, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
Altenbernd, Black, Northcutt.
Published
PER CURIAM.

S.R. appeals his adjudication of delinquency and disposition for resisting an officer without violence. We affirm, but we note a probable disposition error.

According to the record, S.R. was born on November 26, 1994. Thus, he was seventeen years and approximately eleven months old at the time of his disposition on October 24, 2012. The court adjudicated him delinquent and placed him on probation for an indefinite period of time not to exceed his nineteenth birthday. Because the court adjudicated S.R. delinquent, his juvenile probation could not exceed one year for a first-degree misdemeanor. See §§ 775.082(4)(a), 843.02, 985.435(5), Fla. Stat. (2012); R.F. v. State, 42 So.3d 333, 334-35 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). If S.R. serves a term of probation until his nineteenth birthday, this term may exceed the statutory maximum by approximately one month.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.