SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, In L. H. L. LLC, v. BNP S. A., 594 B.R. 167 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . that "ensure[d] judgments" against the defendants and "enable[d] the estate to immediately recover $1.025 . . .

IN RE BREITBURN ENERGY PARTNERS LP,, 582 B.R. 321 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . value, but the value of LegacyCo ranged between $904 million and $1.147 billion with a midpoint of $1.025 . . . price and assumed escalating prices and costs, I find that the midpoint value of the Legacy Assets is $1.025 . . . Once the value of the Permian Assets is backed out, the $1.025 billion midpoint NAV of the Legacy Assets . . . that the Permian Assets are worth $800 million at the midpoint value and the Legacy Assets are worth $1.025 . . .

PREFERRED DISPLAY, INC. v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK,, 288 F. Supp. 3d 515 (D. Conn. 2018)

. . . irrelevant to whether Great American has denied a benefit under the policy (namely, the approximately $1.025 . . .

J. ABRAHAM, H v. WPX PRODUCTION PRODUCTIONS, LLC, f k a LLC, LLC, LLC,, 317 F.R.D. 169 (D.N.M. 2016)

. . . The average Btu factor of processed natural gas in the United States is 1.025. See EIA FAQs. 73. . . .

ANDERSON LIVING TRUST f k a H. W. SWMF v. WPX ENERGY PRODUCTION, LLC f k a WPX LLC LLC WPX LLC, f k a RMT LLC,, 306 F.R.D. 312 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . The average Btu factor of processed natural gas in the United States is 1.025. See EIA FAQs. 73. . . .

SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, d b a v. STATE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,, 141 So. 3d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . In particular, AHCA adopted rule 59G-1.025 of the Florida Administrative Code, which allows counties . . . Utilizing the refund process under rule 59G-1.025, Broward County filed a BERR for a Medicaid contribution . . .

In UTNEHMER v., 499 B.R. 705 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2013)

. . . For example, in November 2005, Debtors borrowed $1.025 million from Bay Area Financial Corporation. . . .

JOHNSON, v. MERITER HEALTH SERVICES EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN, 702 F.3d 364 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . discount rate of 2 percent, the 60-year old employee in our example would receive $39,690 (= $43,821 / 1.025 . . .

NIITSOO, v. ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., 902 F. Supp. 2d 797 (S.D.W. Va. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to the merger agreement, Massey shareholders received $10 and 1.025 shares of Alpha common stock . . .

In LOTHIAN OIL INCORPORATED, L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. v. USA I, II, I, II, I JVGP,, 650 F.3d 539 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . The settlement awarded Grossman $1.025 million in full payment of most of his claims. . . .

In LOTHIAN OIL INCORPORATED, L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. v. USA I, II, I, II, I JVGP,, 650 F.3d 539 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . The settlement awarded Grossman $1.025 million in full payment of most of his claims. . . .

ASARCO LLC, LLC, v. AMERICAS MINING CORPORATION,, 396 B.R. 278 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Navigant, Plaintiffs' expert, found that the value was between $1.025 billion and $1,026 billion, according . . .

In GRAND THEFT AUTO VIDEO GAME CONSUMER LITIGATION No. II, 251 F.R.D. 139 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Because the total value of filed claims failed to reach the $1.025-million Settlement floor, Lead Counsel . . . If the defendants' out-of-pocket expenses fall below $1.025 million, the Settlement requires that they . . . make charitable contributions in an amount equal to the difference between $1.025 million and the total . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. TRACY, UNITED STATES v. L. TRACY, UNITED STATES v. L. TRACY,, 989 F.2d 1279 (1st Cir. 1993)

. . . This calculation produced a total weight for all three offenses of 1.025 grams (.110 + .320 + .595), . . .

In MSR EXPLORATION, LTD. a MSR a a a a MSR a, 147 B.R. 560 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1992)

. . . of proposed price decreases by Montana Power with an attendant new pricing schedule of .0575/Mcf to 1.025 . . .

In BROAD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 125 B.R. 707 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1991)

. . . PV 56 FVq 2> (l+r)n n=l FVb (l+r)56 56 67,500.00 2> (1.025)" n = 1 2,203,000.00 (1.025) 56 $2,575,307.60 . . .

HOWING COMPANY, v. NATIONWIDE CORPORATION,, 927 F.2d 263 (6th Cir. 1991)

. . . $42.50 paid by defendants is only slightly greater than book value, with a resulting multiplier of 1.025 . . .

In BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, Co. SS EDGAR M. QUEENY, In VILLANEUVA COMPANIA NAVIERA, S. A. CORINTHOS,, 503 F. Supp. 350 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . He placed a factor for the x/2 knot difference at 1.025. . . . Thus, he multiplied $144.76 by 1.025 and obtained a figure of $148.38 per deadweight ton in making his . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 372 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1979)

. . . Rule 1.025 is repealed in its entirety. 3. . . .

SNITZER, v. W. ETZEL, 531 F.2d 1062 (C.C.P.A. 1976)

. . . millimicrons with a line width ±4 millimicrons, and Brauer and Brauer report emission lines at approximately 1.025 . . . line at 971 mu (.971 micron) having a line width of ±4 mu, or with emission lines at approximately 1.025 . . .

UNITED STATES v. AMTRACO COMMODITY CORPORATION,, 389 F. Supp. 1084 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)

. . . specified butter having 82% milkfat content, the volume of such butter for export would be adjusted by 1.025 . . .

In CONFERENCE OF COUNTY COURT JUDGES, 290 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Appended to this order is Rule 1.025, of the Rules of Civil Procedure, authorizing the Conference of . . . APPENDIX RULE 1.025. . . .

KRANK, 438 F.2d 609 (C.C.P.A. 1971)

. . . depressions to the eccentricity ei of the ellipses formed by the corrugation ridges is held in the range of 1.025 . . . If the ratio es/ei is less than 1.025, indicating for normal sizes and thicknesses that the corrugations . . . of length ds, and an eccentricity eg equal to A/l-(ds/Ds) ; and the ratio es/ei being greater than 1.025 . . .

In Re, 58 C.C.P.A. 976 (C.C.P.A. 1971)

. . . depressions to the eccentricity ex of the ellipses formed by the corrugation ridges is held in the range of 1.025 . . . If the ratio es/e* is less than 1.025, indicating for normal sizes and thicknesses that the corrugations . . . of length ds, and an eccentricity es equal to Nl— (ds/Ds) ; and the ratio eB/ei being greater than 1.025 . . .

GEORGETOWN v. CHEW, 10 F. Cas. 234 (C.C.D.C. 1838)

. . . common council of Georgetown] upon a bond for $2,030, conditioned to pay to the plaintiff tlie sum of $1.025 . . .