The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 1
DEFINITIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1.025

1.025 Sunshine Protection Act.—

(1) This section may be cited as the “Sunshine Protection Act.”

(2) If the United States Congress amends 15 U.S.C. s. 260a to authorize states to observe daylight saving time year-round, it is the intent of the Legislature that daylight saving time shall be the year-round standard time of the entire state and all of its political subdivisions.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2018-99.

F.S. 1.025 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1.025 on Casetext

Amendments to 1.025

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 1.025

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 1.025.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, In L. H. L. LLC, v. BNP S. A., 594 B.R. 167 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . that "ensure[d] judgments" against the defendants and "enable[d] the estate to immediately recover $1.025 . . .

IN RE BREITBURN ENERGY PARTNERS LP,, 582 B.R. 321 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . value, but the value of LegacyCo ranged between $904 million and $1.147 billion with a midpoint of $1.025 . . . price and assumed escalating prices and costs, I find that the midpoint value of the Legacy Assets is $1.025 . . . Once the value of the Permian Assets is backed out, the $1.025 billion midpoint NAV of the Legacy Assets . . . that the Permian Assets are worth $800 million at the midpoint value and the Legacy Assets are worth $1.025 . . .

PREFERRED DISPLAY, INC. v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK,, 288 F. Supp. 3d 515 (D. Conn. 2018)

. . . irrelevant to whether Great American has denied a benefit under the policy (namely, the approximately $1.025 . . .

J. ABRAHAM, H v. WPX PRODUCTION PRODUCTIONS, LLC, f k a LLC, LLC, LLC,, 317 F.R.D. 169 (D.N.M. 2016)

. . . The average Btu factor of processed natural gas in the United States is 1.025. See EIA FAQs. 73. . . .

ANDERSON LIVING TRUST f k a H. W. SWMF v. WPX ENERGY PRODUCTION, LLC f k a WPX LLC LLC WPX LLC, f k a RMT LLC,, 306 F.R.D. 312 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . The average Btu factor of processed natural gas in the United States is 1.025. See EIA FAQs. 73. . . .

SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, d b a v. STATE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,, 141 So. 3d 678 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . In particular, AHCA adopted rule 59G-1.025 of the Florida Administrative Code, which allows counties . . . Utilizing the refund process under rule 59G-1.025, Broward County filed a BERR for a Medicaid contribution . . .

In UTNEHMER v., 499 B.R. 705 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2013)

. . . For example, in November 2005, Debtors borrowed $1.025 million from Bay Area Financial Corporation. . . .

JOHNSON, v. MERITER HEALTH SERVICES EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN, 702 F.3d 364 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . discount rate of 2 percent, the 60-year old employee in our example would receive $39,690 (= $43,821 / 1.025 . . .

NIITSOO, v. ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., 902 F. Supp. 2d 797 (S.D.W. Va. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to the merger agreement, Massey shareholders received $10 and 1.025 shares of Alpha common stock . . .

In LOTHIAN OIL INCORPORATED, L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. v. USA I, II, I, II, I JVGP,, 650 F.3d 539 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . The settlement awarded Grossman $1.025 million in full payment of most of his claims. . . .

In LOTHIAN OIL INCORPORATED, L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. v. USA I, II, I, II, I JVGP,, 650 F.3d 539 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . The settlement awarded Grossman $1.025 million in full payment of most of his claims. . . .

ASARCO LLC, LLC, v. AMERICAS MINING CORPORATION,, 396 B.R. 278 (S.D. Tex. 2008)

. . . Navigant, Plaintiffs' expert, found that the value was between $1.025 billion and $1,026 billion, according . . .

In GRAND THEFT AUTO VIDEO GAME CONSUMER LITIGATION No. II, 251 F.R.D. 139 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Because the total value of filed claims failed to reach the $1.025-million Settlement floor, Lead Counsel . . . If the defendants' out-of-pocket expenses fall below $1.025 million, the Settlement requires that they . . . make charitable contributions in an amount equal to the difference between $1.025 million and the total . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. TRACY, UNITED STATES v. L. TRACY, UNITED STATES v. L. TRACY,, 989 F.2d 1279 (1st Cir. 1993)

. . . This calculation produced a total weight for all three offenses of 1.025 grams (.110 + .320 + .595), . . .

In MSR EXPLORATION, LTD. a MSR a a a a MSR a, 147 B.R. 560 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1992)

. . . of proposed price decreases by Montana Power with an attendant new pricing schedule of .0575/Mcf to 1.025 . . .

In BROAD ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 125 B.R. 707 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1991)

. . . PV 56 FVq 2> (l+r)n n=l FVb (l+r)56 56 67,500.00 2> (1.025)" n = 1 2,203,000.00 (1.025) 56 $2,575,307.60 . . .

HOWING COMPANY, v. NATIONWIDE CORPORATION,, 927 F.2d 263 (6th Cir. 1991)

. . . $42.50 paid by defendants is only slightly greater than book value, with a resulting multiplier of 1.025 . . .

In BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, Co. SS EDGAR M. QUEENY, In VILLANEUVA COMPANIA NAVIERA, S. A. CORINTHOS,, 503 F. Supp. 350 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . He placed a factor for the x/2 knot difference at 1.025. . . . Thus, he multiplied $144.76 by 1.025 and obtained a figure of $148.38 per deadweight ton in making his . . .

In FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, 372 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1979)

. . . Rule 1.025 is repealed in its entirety. 3. . . .

SNITZER, v. W. ETZEL, 531 F.2d 1062 (C.C.P.A. 1976)

. . . millimicrons with a line width ±4 millimicrons, and Brauer and Brauer report emission lines at approximately 1.025 . . . line at 971 mu (.971 micron) having a line width of ±4 mu, or with emission lines at approximately 1.025 . . .

UNITED STATES v. AMTRACO COMMODITY CORPORATION,, 389 F. Supp. 1084 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)

. . . specified butter having 82% milkfat content, the volume of such butter for export would be adjusted by 1.025 . . .

In CONFERENCE OF COUNTY COURT JUDGES, 290 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Appended to this order is Rule 1.025, of the Rules of Civil Procedure, authorizing the Conference of . . . APPENDIX RULE 1.025. . . .

KRANK, 438 F.2d 609 (C.C.P.A. 1971)

. . . depressions to the eccentricity ei of the ellipses formed by the corrugation ridges is held in the range of 1.025 . . . If the ratio es/ei is less than 1.025, indicating for normal sizes and thicknesses that the corrugations . . . of length ds, and an eccentricity eg equal to A/l-(ds/Ds) ; and the ratio es/ei being greater than 1.025 . . .

In Re, 58 C.C.P.A. 976 (C.C.P.A. 1971)

. . . depressions to the eccentricity ex of the ellipses formed by the corrugation ridges is held in the range of 1.025 . . . If the ratio es/e* is less than 1.025, indicating for normal sizes and thicknesses that the corrugations . . . axis of length ds, and an eccentricity es equal to Nl— (ds/Ds); and the ratio eB/ei being greater than 1.025 . . .

GEORGETOWN v. CHEW, 10 F. Cas. 234 (C.C.D.C. 1838)

. . . common council of Georgetown] upon a bond for $2,030, conditioned to pay to the plaintiff tlie sum of $1.025 . . .