Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 2.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 2.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 2.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES
Chapter 2
COMMON LAW IN FORCE; REPEALED STATUTES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 2.01
2.01 Common law and certain statutes declared in force.The common and statute laws of England which are of a general and not a local nature, with the exception hereinafter mentioned, down to the 4th day of July, 1776, are declared to be of force in this state; provided, the said statutes and common law be not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the acts of the Legislature of this state.
History.s. 1, Nov. 6, 1829; RS 59; GS 59; RGS 71; CGL 87.

F.S. 2.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 2.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 2.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 2.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 2.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

FRANKLIN, v. STATE, 275 So. 3d 192 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

NICOSIA, v. AMAZON. COM, INC., 384 F. Supp. 3d 254 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Mar. 2, 2017) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006) ). . . .

J. MAGER, WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., 924 F.3d 831 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.01 - .03 ; Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers §§ 26 . . .

ESTAPE, v. B. SEIDMAN Ph. D. B. Ph. D, P. A. a, 269 So. 3d 565 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . . See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

MCKENNAN, v. MEADOWVALE DAIRY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN LLC., 374 F. Supp. 3d 771 (N.D. Iowa 2019)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 3.01 (2006) ("Actual authority, as defined in § 2.01, is created . . .

BJD PROPERTIES, LLC v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO., 380 F. Supp. 3d 560 (W.D. La. 2019)

. . . . § 2.01 (3rd ed. 2019 supp.). . . .

HENDERSON, v. UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC. USA, 918 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (requiring the agent's belief be reasonable); see id. cmt. c . . . Restatement §§ 2.01, .01. . . .

DOYLE, v. PALMER,, 365 F. Supp. 3d 295 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Middle District of Local Rule Yes 2 Sponsors must affirm that the applicant is of Florida 2.01(b) good . . .

UTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, v. DIESEL POWER GEAR LLC, LLC, LLC, W., 374 F. Supp. 3d 1124 (D. Utah 2019)

. . . (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 ). . . .

S. PATEL, P. v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 917 F.3d 1319 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . . & Regs. 375-3-2.01(1)(a). . . .

DUBAY, v. KING, 366 F. Supp. 3d 1330 (M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A],[B] (1990) ). . . .

IN RE REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC., 598 B.R. 118 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Financial Support Agreement § 2.01. . . .

LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES LXS BY U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, XS LXS U. S. XS LXS U. S. v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., 916 F.3d 116 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . J.A. 387, § 2.01(a). In other words, the depositor's role was to create the Trusts. . . .

MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, v. ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY SANDRA TOWNES POWELL, No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- LLC, v. D. POA ID No. An a WV B. POA N. ID No. An a WV, LLC, v. No. MVP No. VA- GI- S. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- V. Sr. V. II, No. MVP No. VA- GI- V. Sr. V. II, No. MVP VA- GI- B. W. No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- C. R. No. A- A- MVP No. VA- CR- W. No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- No. MVP No. VA- MO- AR- MN- No. MVP No. VA- MO- AR MN- W. W. No. MVP No. BVA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- S. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- M. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- a No. MVP No. VA- GI- LLC, v. L. No. B MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- RO- A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- G. L. No. MVP No. VA- FR- M. M. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- W. D. No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- W. W. No. MVP No. BVMO- A. P. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- W. W. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- AR- MN- W. G. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- M. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. A. E. A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. A. E. A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- B. No. MVP No. VA- FR- R. B. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- LLC, No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- a k a D. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- D. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- B. B. R. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- L. C. No. MVP No. VA- FR- W. No. MVP No. VA- FR- B. Sr. E. No. MVP No. VA- FR- A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- LLC, v. No. MVP No. VA- GI- No MVP No. BVGI- f k a No. MVP No. VA- GI- s No. MVP No VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- D. J. No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- LLC, No. MVP No. VA- GI- LLC, No. A. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- MO- W. No. MVP No. BVRO- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- T. E. No. MVP No. VA- RO- T. E. No MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- LLC, v. A. No. MVP No. VA- RO- S. R. F. L. M. A, a k a a k a I. a k a a k a M. a k a H. Co. No. MVP No. VA- RO- B. A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- MN- AR MN- C. D. No. MVP No. VA- MN- AR MN- D. M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- S. R. F. L. M. a k a a k a I. a k a I. Co. No. MVP No. VA- MO- W. B. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- C. D. No. MVP No. VA- MO- D. D. No. MVP No. BVRO- M. E. No. MVP No. BVRO- III, No. MVP No. VA- RO- H. Jr. III, a k a No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- J. No. MVP No. VA- RO- a k a No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- M. W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- G. A. No. MVP No. VA- RO- H. Jr. III, H. Sr. No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- J. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- B. R. No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- a k a No. MVP No. VA- RO- ATWS- No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. I. No. MVP No. VA- RO- A. No. MVP No. VA- RO- E. L. L. Jr. S. No. MVP No. VA- FR- BYL. Jr. S. E. L. No. MVP No. VA- FR- A. J. No. MVP No. VA- GI- I. No. MVP No. VA- FR- H. No. MVP No. VA- FR- J. B. No. MVP No. VA- FR- W. S. No. MVP No. VA- FR- K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- ATWS- R. Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. D. No. MVP No. VA- FR- O. Jr. A. No. MVP No. VA- PI- M. M. a k a MVP No. VA- PI- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- LLC, v. L. ID No. N. ID No. ID No. A. ID No. D. ID No. F. ID No. M. ID No. ID No. Jr. ID No. ID No. ID No. ID No. ID No. J. ID No., 915 F.3d 197 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . VA-GI-200.041; 2.01 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones, Giles County Tax Map Parcel No. 47-1-2 . . .

WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC. v. NAMBE PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D.N.M. 2019)

. . . Federal Charter § 2.01(b), at 2. The third factor, Nambe Corp.' . . .

BOOTH, v. GALVESTON COUNTY,, 352 F. Supp. 3d 718 (S.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . ART 2.01 ("Each district attorney shall represent the State in all criminal cases in the district courts . . .

MEADOR, L. M. a v. APPLE, INCORPORATED,, 911 F.3d 260 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . Code §§ 2.01 -03; Smith v. Sewell , 858 S.W.2d 350 (Tex. 1993). . . .

SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC v. UNIFIED RECOVERY GROUP, LLC,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 537 (E.D. La. 2018)

. . . That is because the Security Agreement begins its grant as follows: Section 2.01. . . . Article II, which describes SEPH's security interest, states: Section 2.01. . . .

FORMULATRIX, INC. v. RIGAKU AUTOMATION, INC., 344 F. Supp. 3d 410 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . (See PEx. 1 Arts. 1.01, 1.02, 2.01, 2.04, 3.01). . . .

IN RE CARR,, 591 B.R. 474 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida pursuant to Rule 2.01 . . . District Court Local Rule 2.01, in turn, requires attorneys admitted to practice in the Middle District . . .

FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. J. MCROBERTS,, 257 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . .) ; see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (Am. Law Inst. 2006). . . .

IN RE WOODBRIDGE GROUP OF COMPANIES, LLC, De La v. LLC,, 593 B.R. 200 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . Section 9-2.01 (b) of the UCC provides that "[a] transaction subject to this Article is subject to any . . .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION, v. ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED, USA M., 344 F. Supp. 3d 724 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . ¶ 2; SPA § 2.01 (Dkt. 7-1). . . .

CITY OF NEW YORK, v. TAVERN ON THE GREEN INTERNATIONAL LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 680 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (Use Agreement § 2.01.) . . .

CIT BANK, N. A. v. NWANGANGA a k a, 328 F. Supp. 3d 189 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . D § 2.01(a) ), which included Defendant's Mortgage Loan, (id. § 2.01(a)(iii); id. Ex. . . .

IN RE GREEN FIELD ENERGY SERVICES, INC. GFES v. B. MOR MGH LLC LLC LLC LLC II, LLC,, 594 B.R. 239 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . Section 2.01(a) of the 2012 SPA established that MOR MGH and MMR would purchase $10 million of Green . . .

ZURBRIGGEN, v. TWIN HILL ACQUISITION COMPANY, INC., 338 F. Supp. 3d 875 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . Stuart Madden, Products Liability § 2.01 (2018), there are some shared principles that characterize product . . .

ABS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. a a a v. CBS CORPORATION, a CBS a, 900 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Bleistein , 188 U.S. at 251, 23 S.Ct. 298 ; 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B][1] (2018). . . .

ABS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. a a a v. CBS CORPORATION, a CBS a, 908 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Bleistein , 188 U.S. at 251, 23 S.Ct. 298 ; 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B][1] (2018). . . .

CITIZENS ALLIED FOR INTEGRITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. v. M. SCHULTZ,, 335 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (D. Idaho 2018)

. . . The Law of Pooling and Unitization , 3rd Edition § 2.01 (2017). . . .

CROWE, v. GGNSC RIPLEY, LLC d b a GGNSC LLC, 318 F. Supp. 3d 970 (N.D. Miss. 2018)

. . . Restatement (Third) Of Agency § 2.01. . . .

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. v. NATIONWIDE MARKETING SERVICES INCORPORATED,, 893 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A], [B] (1990) ). . . .

A. CLEMONS, R. W. v. NORTON HEALTHCARE INC. RETIREMENT PLAN,, 890 F.3d 254 (6th Cir. 2018)

. . . Benefit, a reduced Monthly Retirement Income equal to his Accrued Benefit determined under Sections 2.01 . . . See, e.g. , Plan Amendments § 4 (Jan. 2004); Norton Plan § 2.01(a). . . .

IN RE EP LIQUIDATION, LLC, A. Jr. EP LLC, v. P. A., 583 B.R. 304 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . See APA §§ 2.01 and 2.02. See also fn. 84. . . .

QINGDAO QIHANG TYRE CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 308 F. Supp. 3d 1329 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . per kilogram was aberrational because it was higher than the Thai-based values for natural rubber, ($2.01 . . . Commerce chose a surrogate value of $2.01 per kilogram for technically specified natural rubber and a . . . rubber, the competing values were $2.34 per kilogram (based on the Peruvian GTA data) as opposed to $2.01 . . .

BROWN, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,, 306 F. Supp. 3d 194 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . The CBA regulated the bargaining, CBA § 2.01, promotion, id. at § 8.09, and discharge, id. at §§ 16.01 . . .

BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 298 F. Supp. 3d 708 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (emphasis in Rajamin; quoting § 2.01(a) of a sample PSA). . . .

BLAIR v. TRANSAM TRUCKING, INC., 309 F. Supp. 3d 977 (D. Kan. 2018)

. . . brought a KWPA claim for "back wages" owed under "an employment agreement" which provided payment at $2.01 . . . The waiter was paid $2.01 per hour with the employer "claiming full legal tip credit" of $1.34 per hour . . .

IN RE BREITBURN ENERGY PARTNERS LP,, 582 B.R. 321 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . As I read his chart, he valued the Legacy Assets under three assumptions at midpoints ranging from $2.01 . . .

IN RE GREEN FIELD ENERGY SERVICES, INC. GFES v. B. MOR MGH LLC MOR DOH LLC LLC LLC LLC LLC LLC II, LLC LLC LLC LQT LLC k a LLC,, 585 B.R. 89 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . Section 2.01(a) of the 2013 SPA established that MOR MGH and MMR would purchase $10 million of GFES preferred . . . Ex. 1; at ¶ 59; Ex. 32, at p. 10; Ex. 35, at § 2.01(a). . . . Section 2.01 of the 2013 SPA required the initial purchase of $10 million for GFES preferred stock upon . . . Ex. 78, at § 2.01. . . . Ex. 1; at ¶ 59; Ex. 32, at p. 10; Ex. 35, at § 2.01(a). . . .

GOMEZ, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 704 F. App'x 25 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . 15, 20 (2d Cir. 1993)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 . . .

JAMIL, v. SPI ENERGY CO. LTD., 713 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . The parties stipulated to the over-the-counter share price on the dates of breach ($2.01 on April 16, . . .

WEAVER, v. C. MYERS, M. D., 229 So. 3d 1118 (Fla. 2017)

. . . . § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish such a right without providing a reasonable . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ- ORTIZ,, 875 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2017)

. . . Model Penal Code § 2.01(1). . . . Id, § 2.01(|), (3) (noting that omission liability must be based on a legal duty to act or an express . . .

J. MARTINEZ, v. HERNANDEZ,, 227 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Martinez’s complaint boils down to a legal argument that “2 consecutive terms” in section 2.01(d) of . . . the ordinance includes a partial term of less than four years (which section 2.01(c) refers to initially . . . First, as a matter of statutory interpretation and plain meaning, the text of section 2.01(b) expressly . . . filling a vacancy in the office of Mayor) as a “term” for purposes of the term limitations in section 2.01 . . . Martinez remains free, of course, to support an amendment to section 2.01 for consideration by the voters . . .

IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 576 B.R. 325 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Bank (collectively, the “Bank Lenders”) committed upfront to fund the Term Loan, (Term Loan Agreement ¶2.01 . . .

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, FOR IXIS v. P. MOYNIHAN,, 270 F. Supp. 3d 497 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Section 2.01(a) of the PSA conveyed all of Morgan Stanley’s rights, title, and interest in the “Trust . . . (Docket Entry #65-9, § 2.01(b). . . . Section 2.01(b) further states that, “In connection with the transfer and assignment of each Mortgage . . .

E. DOWLING, v. PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES A. Co, 871 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . (See Plan § 2.01-2.76, App. 131-54 (defining 76 terms, over 23 pages, but providing no definition for . . .

UNITED STATES Of v. IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,, 869 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Substantive Criminal Law § 11.4; see Model Penal Code § 2.01 cmt. (Am. . . .

CITY OF EL CENIZO, v. STATE, 264 F. Supp. 3d 744 (W.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Fourteenth Amendment—Vagueness Plaintiffs argue that SB 4 Sections 1.01, 2.01, and 5.02, Tex. . . . These challenges are directed against language in Sections 1.01, 2.01, 5.02, and 6.01 of SB 4, Tex. . . . SB 4 Section 2.01, Tex. Grim, Proc, Code Art. 2.251(b). . . . that the provisions of SB 4 that require local entities to fulfill all ICE detainer requests (Sections 2.01 . . .

SFF- TIR, LLC GST GST LLC M. v. C. STEPHENSON, Jr. A. III TR, LLC CEP LLC LLC LLC,, 264 F. Supp. 3d 1148 (N.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . .

A. P. MOLLER- MAERSK A S, TRADING AS MAERSK LINE, v. SAFEWATER LINES PVT, LTD., 276 F. Supp. 3d 700 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . See generally 1-2 Goods in Transit § 2.01 (Lex-isNexis 2014)(“Goocfe in. Transit”). . . .

A. JONES v. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC., 866 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Restatement (Third) Of Agency §2.01. . . .

IN RE ACTOS PIOGLITAZONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION., 274 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. La. 2017)

. . . MSA, § 2.01. . 10,782 claimants alleged that they developed bladder cancer caused by Actos. . . .

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COOPER CARRY INC., 861 F.3d 267 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . Agreement Art. 2.01, J.A. 17. . . .

CITIBANK, N. A. FOR WAMU SERIES TRUST, v. J. MANNING, f k a N. A. WAMU, a k a, 221 So. 3d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Section 2.01 of the PSA, titled “Conveyance of Mortgage Loans,” provides that: In connection with such . . .

IN RE SUNEDISON, INC., 572 B.R. 482 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . (PSA at §§ 2.01, 2.03; see Declaration of Patrick M, Cook Pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 1007-2 and . . .

REZAC LIVESTOCK COMMISSION COMPANY, INC. v. PINNACLE BANK, 255 F. Supp. 3d 1150 (D. Kan. 2017)

. . . authority as “stated in very specific or detailed' language” (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 . . . Id. at 1188-89 (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 cmt. b; further citations omitted). . . .

UMB BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. AIRPLANES LIMITED U. S., 260 F. Supp. 3d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . D § 2.01(c), (e). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC,, 253 F. Supp. 3d 89 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Boese, supra, § 2.01[C]. . . .

UNITED STATES EX REL. PETRAS, v. SIMPAREL, INC. a f k a LLC, 857 F.3d 497 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . Boese, Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions § 2.01[L], 2-83 (2014)). . S. Rep. . . .

HOUSTON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, LOCAL v. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 251 F. Supp. 3d 1168 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . P.Ex. 64 at 15 ("There is no meaningful difference between a teacher with a TGI of - 2.01 and one with . . .

SFF- TIR, LLC GST GST LLC M. v. C. STEPHENSON, Jr. A. III TIR, LLC CEP LLC LLC LLC,, 250 F. Supp. 3d 856 (N.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . See Merger Agreement §§ 2.01-.03. . . . Merger Agreement § 2.01. . . . See Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . . Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . . Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. STRATEGIC GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, INC., 262 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (S.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . (Id,, ¶ 2.01(f).) . . . (Id., ¶ 2.01(g).) . . .

MAVRIX PHOTOGRAPHS, LLC, a v. LIVEJOURNAL, INC., 873 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Campbell-Ewald Co., 768 F.3d 871, 878 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.01, . . .

MAVRIX PHOTOGRAPHS, LLC, a v. LIVEJOURNAL, INC., 853 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Campbell-Ewald Co., 768 F.3d 871, 878 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.01, . . .

TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA,, 274 F. Supp. 3d 1278 (N.D. Fla. 2017)

. . . ECF No. 21-4, at 3 (Article II 2.01(g)). . . .

CLARK- WILLIAMS, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 244 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . .”); id, at 3 (Policy § 2.01(a)(2)) (defining “[e]x-ternal Candidates” to include “Returning represented . . .

FINJAN, INC. v. SOPHOS, INC., 244 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . In this case Sophos ultimately elected SWEEP-2.72 & InterCheck-2.01. . . . ; and (3) it actually asserted SWEÉP-2.72 & InterCheck-2.01 in the Delaware case. . . . Finally, Sophos argues that SWEEP-2.72 & InterCheck-2.01, the combination asserted in this case, was . . . or shipments of InterCheck 2.01 to U.S. . . . Lammer’s somewhat speculative testimony that it was “impossible to imagine” that InterCheck 2.01 was . . .

TAVARES v. WHITEHOUSE, 851 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . Cohen’s § 2.01[1], at 110; see also Washington v. . . .

IN RE TSAWD HOLDINGS, INC. TSA TSA TSA FSB, v. M J LLC a k a M. J. LLC,, 565 B.R. 292 (Bankr. D. Del. 2017)

. . . owned by the Debtors, and Soffe retained title to the Disputed Goods pursuant to sections 1.02 and 2.01 . . .

GDG ACQUISITIONS LLC, v. GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE,, 849 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006). . . .

KELLY, K. v. GEORGIA- PACIFIC, LLC, Co., 211 So. 3d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See also § 2.01, Fla. . . .

PETEDGE, INC. v. GARG,, 234 F. Supp. 3d 477 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . it agreed in Section 2.05 that there were no representations other than those contained in Sections 2.01 . . .

J. LEWIS, v. STATE, 211 So. 3d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . §§ 2.01 & 775.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

JAMIL, v. SOLAR POWER INC., 230 F. Supp. 3d 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . parties agree that the mean over-the-counter share prices for unrestricted Solar Power common stock were $2.01 . . . contrary, the parties agree that Solar Power’s unrestricted common stock was worth between $1.87 and $2.01 . . . fallen to $1.87 on November 3, 2015 (the date of breach for the Time-Based Restricted Stock) from $2.01 . . . Power stock was $2.01 on the date of breach for the other blocks of stock. . . .

JONES, R. R. C. R. v. UNITED STATES,, 846 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . .”); Model Penal Code § 2.01(3) (2015) (“Liability for the commission of offense may not be based on . . .

U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. T. D. BANK, N. A., 569 B.R. 12 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . The “Basic Agreement” of the Parties is set forth in section 2.01 of the Intercreditor Agreement: [T] . . . Intercreditor Agreement and recited as one of the Parties’ basic agreements, see IA Preamble; IA § 2.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. AETNA INC., 240 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . . § 601.105, IRS Revenue Procedure 2016-24, § 2.01. . . .

GENUINELY LOVING CHILDCARE, LLC, M. E. v. BRE MARINER CONWAY CROSSINGS, LLC,, 209 So. 3d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Sections 2.01(b) and 2.01(c) of the lease limited the leased premises to indoor areas, and section 22.11 . . .

D AGOSTINO, v. INC. J., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016)

. . . Boese, Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions §§ 2.01[A][3], 2.05 (4th ed. 2016). . . .

IN RE MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION, 223 F. Supp. 3d 514 (N.D.W. Va. 2016)

. . . [Restatement (Third) of Agency] § 2.01. . . .

W. JUSTICE, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, I, L. L. C., 674 F. App'x 330 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . Pooling and Servicing Agreement § 2.01 (Feb. 1, 2007), , https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1388968 . . .

WE SHALL OVERCOME FOUNDATION LLC, v. RICHMOND ORGANIZATION, INC. TRO INC., 221 F. Supp. 3d 396 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B][3] (2015). . . .

MAURER, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL AFL- CIO, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1017 (S.D. Cal. 2016)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01. . . .

W. BOLOUS, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CSFB, 210 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Additionally, section 2.01 of the pooling and servicing agreement, titled “Conveyance of Trust Fund,” . . . Marciano, 190 So.3d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), the Fifth District found that a similar section 2.01 of . . . Section 2.01 of the pooling and servicing agreement provided: The Depositor, as of the Closing Date, . . .

DIAL CORPORATION, v. NEWS CORPORATION,, 317 F.R.D. 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Thus, Counsel’s fee request is enhanced by a lodestar multiplier of approximately 2.01. . . . reflecting an inscrutable division of labor among the five firms, this Court reduces the multiplier from 2.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FROSTMAN,, 221 F. Supp. 3d 718 (E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . District Court Judges § 2.01 “Taking pleas of guilty or nolo contendere” (6th ed. 2013) (recommending . . .

MAPP v. UMG RECORDINGS, INC., 208 F. Supp. 3d 776 (M.D. La. 2016)

. . . ownership between the record producer and the performing artists.’ ’’(quoting 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01 . . .

MELANDER, v. WYOMING, 661 F. App'x 521 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . P. 2.01. . . .

WATCHTOWER BIBLE TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE,, 197 F. Supp. 3d 340 (D.P.R. 2016)

. . . SECTION 2.00—DEFINITIONS 2.01—[... ] 1. . . .

IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 552 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . (Term Loan Investors’ Mot. at 3 (citing Term Loan Agreement ¶2.01, Ex. 1).) . . .

ONEWEST BANK, N. A. v. W. MELINA, FSB, N. A. R., 827 F.3d 214 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . App. 73 (§ 2.01(a)). . . .

L. VOISINE E. III, v. UNITED STATES., 136 S. Ct. 2272 (U.S. 2016)

. . . Prosser and Keeton § 8, at 34; see also Model Penal Code § 2.01 (defining the voluntary act requirement . . .

BIRCHFIELD, v. NORTH DAKOTA. Jr. v. v., 136 S. Ct. 2160 (U.S. 2016)

. . . See 1 Erwin, § 2.01[1], at 2-3 to 2-4. . . .

IN RE LARSON, M. v., 553 B.R. 646 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2016)

. . . (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006)). . . .

BERHAD, v. ADVANCED POLYMER COATINGS, INC., 652 F. App'x 316 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . The key provisions of the Insurance Guarantees state: 2.01 Insurance company will reimburse the Customer . . .

WESTPHAL, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, St. v., 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016)

. . . Florida, or where such right has become a part of the common law of the State pursuant to [section 2.01 . . . . § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish such a right without providing a reasonable . . . . § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish such a right without providing a reasonable . . .

UNITED STATES v. ALL ASSETS HELD AT BANK JULIUS BAER COMPANY, LTD. In In, 315 F.R.D. 103 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Proc. 2016-1 § 2.01, 2016 WL 20933 (Jan. 4, 2016). . . . Id. § 2.01. . . .