Cases from cite.case.law:
KNUTSON, v. VILLAGE OF LAKEMOOR,, 932 F.3d 572 (7th Cir. 2019)
. . . . § 41-1/2.01. . . . Instead, reading Lakemoor Municipal Code §§ 1.01, 41-1/2.01, and 41-1/2.14(C)(4)(c) together, they contended . . .
FRANKLIN, v. STATE,
275 So. 3d 192 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)
. . . See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .
NICOSIA, v. AMAZON. COM, INC., 384 F. Supp. 3d 254 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)
. . . Mar. 2, 2017) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006) ). . . .
J. MAGER, WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD., 924 F.3d 831 (6th Cir. 2019)
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.01 - .03 ; Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers §§ 26 . . .
ESTAPE, v. B. SEIDMAN Ph. D. B. Ph. D, P. A. a,
269 So. 3d 565 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)
. . . See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . . See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. . . .
MCKENNAN, v. MEADOWVALE DAIRY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN LLC., 374 F. Supp. 3d 771 (N.D. Iowa 2019)
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 3.01 (2006) ("Actual authority, as defined in § 2.01, is created . . .
BJD PROPERTIES, LLC v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY CO., 380 F. Supp. 3d 560 (W.D. La. 2019)
. . . . § 2.01 (3rd ed. 2019 supp.). . . .
HENDERSON, v. UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC. USA, 918 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2019)
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (requiring the agent's belief be reasonable); see id. cmt. c . . . Restatement §§ 2.01, .01. . . .
DOYLE, v. PALMER,, 365 F. Supp. 3d 295 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)
. . . Middle District of Local Rule Yes 2 Sponsors must affirm that the applicant is of Florida 2.01(b) good . . .
UTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, v. DIESEL POWER GEAR LLC, LLC, LLC, W., 374 F. Supp. 3d 1124 (D. Utah 2019)
. . . (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 ). . . .
S. PATEL, P. v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,, 917 F.3d 1319 (11th Cir. 2019)
. . . . & Regs. 375-3-2.01(1)(a). . . .
DUBAY, v. KING, 366 F. Supp. 3d 1330 (M.D. Fla. 2019)
. . . Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A],[B] (1990) ). . . .
IN RE REPUBLIC AIRWAYS HOLDINGS INC., 598 B.R. 118 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)
. . . Financial Support Agreement § 2.01. . . .
LEHMAN XS TRUST, SERIES LXS BY U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, XS LXS U. S. XS LXS U. S. v. GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC., 916 F.3d 116 (2nd Cir. 2019)
. . . J.A. 387, § 2.01(a). In other words, the depositor's role was to create the Trusts. . . .
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, v. ACRES OF LAND, OWNED BY SANDRA TOWNES POWELL, No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- LLC, v. D. POA ID No. An a WV B. POA N. ID No. An a WV, LLC, v. No. MVP No. VA- GI- S. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- V. Sr. V. II, No. MVP No. VA- GI- V. Sr. V. II, No. MVP VA- GI- B. W. No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- C. R. No. A- A- MVP No. VA- CR- W. No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- No. MVP No. VA- MO- AR- MN- No. MVP No. VA- MO- AR MN- W. W. No. MVP No. BVA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- S. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- M. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- a No. MVP No. VA- GI- LLC, v. L. No. B MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- RO- A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- G. L. No. MVP No. VA- FR- M. M. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- W. D. No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- No. A- MVP No. VA- CR- W. W. No. MVP No. BVMO- A. P. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- W. W. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- AR- MN- W. G. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- M. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. A. E. A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. A. E. A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- B. No. MVP No. VA- FR- R. B. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- LLC, No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- a k a D. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- D. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- B. B. R. No. MVP No. VA- FR- AR FR- L. C. No. MVP No. VA- FR- W. No. MVP No. VA- FR- B. Sr. E. No. MVP No. VA- FR- A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- LLC, v. No. MVP No. VA- GI- No MVP No. BVGI- f k a No. MVP No. VA- GI- s No. MVP No VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- D. J. No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- LLC, No. MVP No. VA- GI- LLC, No. A. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- MO- W. No. MVP No. BVRO- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- T. E. No. MVP No. VA- RO- T. E. No MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- D. B. No. MVP No. VA- RO- LLC, v. A. No. MVP No. VA- RO- S. R. F. L. M. A, a k a a k a I. a k a a k a M. a k a H. Co. No. MVP No. VA- RO- B. A. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- GI- No. MVP No. VA- MN- AR MN- C. D. No. MVP No. VA- MN- AR MN- D. M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- S. R. F. L. M. a k a a k a I. a k a I. Co. No. MVP No. VA- MO- W. B. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- M. No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- MO- C. D. No. MVP No. VA- MO- D. D. No. MVP No. BVRO- M. E. No. MVP No. BVRO- III, No. MVP No. VA- RO- H. Jr. III, a k a No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- J. No. MVP No. VA- RO- a k a No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- M. W. No. MVP No. VA- RO- G. A. No. MVP No. VA- RO- H. Jr. III, H. Sr. No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- J. No. MVP No. VA- RO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- B. R. No. MVP No. VA- RO- AR RO- a k a No. MVP No. VA- RO- ATWS- No. MVP No. VA- RO- W. I. No. MVP No. VA- RO- A. No. MVP No. VA- RO- E. L. L. Jr. S. No. MVP No. VA- FR- BYL. Jr. S. E. L. No. MVP No. VA- FR- A. J. No. MVP No. VA- GI- I. No. MVP No. VA- FR- H. No. MVP No. VA- FR- J. B. No. MVP No. VA- FR- W. S. No. MVP No. VA- FR- K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- K. No. MVP No. VA- FR- No. MVP No. VA- FR- ATWS- R. Jr. No. MVP No. VA- FR- E. D. No. MVP No. VA- FR- O. Jr. A. No. MVP No. VA- PI- M. M. a k a MVP No. VA- PI- No. MVP No. VA- MO- No. MVP No. VA- RO- LLC, v. L. ID No. N. ID No. ID No. A. ID No. D. ID No. F. ID No. M. ID No. ID No. Jr. ID No. ID No. ID No. ID No. ID No. J. ID No., 915 F.3d 197 (4th Cir. 2019)
. . . VA-GI-200.041; 2.01 Acres of Land, Owned by George Lee Jones, Giles County Tax Map Parcel No. 47-1-2 . . .
WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC. v. NAMBE PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D.N.M. 2019)
. . . Federal Charter § 2.01(b), at 2.
The third factor, Nambe Corp.' . . .
BOOTH, v. GALVESTON COUNTY,, 352 F. Supp. 3d 718 (S.D. Tex. 2019)
. . . ART 2.01 ("Each district attorney shall represent the State in all criminal cases in the district courts . . .
MEADOR, L. M. a v. APPLE, INCORPORATED,, 911 F.3d 260 (5th Cir. 2018)
. . . Code §§ 2.01 -03; Smith v. Sewell , 858 S.W.2d 350 (Tex. 1993). . . .
SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC v. UNIFIED RECOVERY GROUP, LLC,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 537 (E.D. La. 2018)
. . . That is because the Security Agreement begins its grant as follows:
Section 2.01. . . . Article II, which describes SEPH's security interest, states:
Section 2.01. . . .
FORMULATRIX, INC. v. RIGAKU AUTOMATION, INC., 344 F. Supp. 3d 410 (D. Mass. 2018)
. . . (See PEx. 1 Arts. 1.01, 1.02, 2.01, 2.04, 3.01). . . .
IN RE CARR,, 591 B.R. 474 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2018)
. . . to practice in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida pursuant to Rule 2.01 . . . District Court Local Rule 2.01, in turn, requires attorneys admitted to practice in the Middle District . . .
FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY, v. J. MCROBERTS,,
257 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . .) ; see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (Am. Law Inst. 2006). . . .
IN RE WOODBRIDGE GROUP OF COMPANIES, LLC, De La v. LLC,, 593 B.R. 200 (Bankr. Del. 2018)
. . . Section 9-2.01 (b) of the UCC provides that "[a] transaction subject to this Article is subject to any . . .
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION, v. ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED, USA M., 344 F. Supp. 3d 724 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)
. . . . ¶ 2; SPA § 2.01 (Dkt. 7-1). . . .
CITY OF NEW YORK, v. TAVERN ON THE GREEN INTERNATIONAL LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 680 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)
. . . (Use Agreement § 2.01.) . . .
CIT BANK, N. A. v. NWANGANGA a k a, 328 F. Supp. 3d 189 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)
. . . D § 2.01(a) ), which included Defendant's Mortgage Loan, (id. § 2.01(a)(iii); id. Ex. . . .
IN RE GREEN FIELD ENERGY SERVICES, INC. GFES v. B. MOR MGH LLC LLC LLC LLC II, LLC,, 594 B.R. 239 (Bankr. Del. 2018)
. . . Section 2.01(a) of the 2012 SPA established that MOR MGH and MMR would purchase $10 million of Green . . .
ZURBRIGGEN, v. TWIN HILL ACQUISITION COMPANY, INC., 338 F. Supp. 3d 875 (N.D. Ill. 2018)
. . . Stuart Madden, Products Liability § 2.01 (2018), there are some shared principles that characterize product . . .
ABS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. a a a v. CBS CORPORATION, a CBS a, 900 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2018)
. . . Bleistein , 188 U.S. at 251, 23 S.Ct. 298 ; 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B][1] (2018). . . .
ABS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. a a a v. CBS CORPORATION, a CBS a, 908 F.3d 405 (9th Cir. 2018)
. . . Bleistein , 188 U.S. at 251, 23 S.Ct. 298 ; 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B][1] (2018). . . .
CITIZENS ALLIED FOR INTEGRITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. v. M. SCHULTZ,, 335 F. Supp. 3d 1216 (D. Idaho 2018)
. . . The Law of Pooling and Unitization , 3rd Edition § 2.01 (2017). . . .
CROWE, v. GGNSC RIPLEY, LLC d b a GGNSC LLC, 318 F. Supp. 3d 970 (N.D. Miss. 2018)
. . . Restatement (Third) Of Agency § 2.01. . . .
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. v. NATIONWIDE MARKETING SERVICES INCORPORATED,, 893 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2018)
. . . Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A], [B] (1990) ). . . .
A. CLEMONS, R. W. v. NORTON HEALTHCARE INC. RETIREMENT PLAN,, 890 F.3d 254 (6th Cir. 2018)
. . . Benefit, a reduced Monthly Retirement Income equal to his Accrued Benefit determined under Sections 2.01 . . . See, e.g. , Plan Amendments § 4 (Jan. 2004); Norton Plan § 2.01(a). . . .
IN RE EP LIQUIDATION, LLC, A. Jr. EP LLC, v. P. A., 583 B.R. 304 (Bankr. Del. 2018)
. . . See APA §§ 2.01 and 2.02. See also fn. 84. . . .
QINGDAO QIHANG TYRE CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 308 F. Supp. 3d 1329 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)
. . . per kilogram was aberrational because it was higher than the Thai-based values for natural rubber, ($2.01 . . . Commerce chose a surrogate value of $2.01 per kilogram for technically specified natural rubber and a . . . rubber, the competing values were $2.34 per kilogram (based on the Peruvian GTA data) as opposed to $2.01 . . .
BROWN, v. POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY,, 306 F. Supp. 3d 194 (D.D.C. 2018)
. . . The CBA regulated the bargaining, CBA § 2.01, promotion, id. at § 8.09, and discharge, id. at §§ 16.01 . . .
BIGSBY, Jr. v. BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., 298 F. Supp. 3d 708 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)
. . . (emphasis in Rajamin; quoting § 2.01(a) of a sample PSA). . . .
BLAIR v. TRANSAM TRUCKING, INC., 309 F. Supp. 3d 977 (D. Kan. 2018)
. . . brought a KWPA claim for "back wages" owed under "an employment agreement" which provided payment at $2.01 . . . The waiter was paid $2.01 per hour with the employer "claiming full legal tip credit" of $1.34 per hour . . .
IN RE BREITBURN ENERGY PARTNERS LP,, 582 B.R. 321 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)
. . . As I read his chart, he valued the Legacy Assets under three assumptions at midpoints ranging from $2.01 . . .
IN RE GREEN FIELD ENERGY SERVICES, INC. GFES v. B. MOR MGH LLC MOR DOH LLC LLC LLC LLC LLC LLC II, LLC LLC LLC LQT LLC k a LLC,, 585 B.R. 89 (Bankr. Del. 2018)
. . . Section 2.01(a) of the 2013 SPA established that MOR MGH and MMR would purchase $10 million of GFES preferred . . . Ex. 1; at ¶ 59; Ex. 32, at p. 10; Ex. 35, at § 2.01(a). . . . Section 2.01 of the 2013 SPA required the initial purchase of $10 million for GFES preferred stock upon . . . Ex. 78, at § 2.01. . . . Ex. 1; at ¶ 59; Ex. 32, at p. 10; Ex. 35, at § 2.01(a). . . .
GOMEZ, v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 704 F. App'x 25 (2d Cir. 2017)
. . . 15, 20 (2d Cir. 1993)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 . . .
JAMIL, v. SPI ENERGY CO. LTD., 713 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2017)
. . . The parties stipulated to the over-the-counter share price on the dates of breach ($2.01 on April 16, . . .
WEAVER, v. C. MYERS, M. D.,
229 So. 3d 1118 (Fla. 2017)
. . . . § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish such a right without providing a reasonable . . .
UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ- ORTIZ,, 875 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2017)
. . . Model Penal Code § 2.01(1). . . . Id, § 2.01(|), (3) (noting that omission liability must be based on a legal duty to act or an express . . .
J. MARTINEZ, v. HERNANDEZ,,
227 So. 3d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . Martinez’s complaint boils down to a legal argument that “2 consecutive terms” in section 2.01(d) of . . . the ordinance includes a partial term of less than four years (which section 2.01(c) refers to initially . . . First, as a matter of statutory interpretation and plain meaning, the text of section 2.01(b) expressly . . . filling a vacancy in the office of Mayor) as a “term” for purposes of the term limitations in section 2.01 . . . Martinez remains free, of course, to support an amendment to section 2.01 for consideration by the voters . . .
IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 576 B.R. 325 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)
. . . Bank (collectively, the “Bank Lenders”) committed upfront to fund the Term Loan, (Term Loan Agreement ¶2.01 . . .
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST, FOR IXIS v. P. MOYNIHAN,, 270 F. Supp. 3d 497 (D. Mass. 2017)
. . . Section 2.01(a) of the PSA conveyed all of Morgan Stanley’s rights, title, and interest in the “Trust . . . (Docket Entry #65-9, § 2.01(b). . . . Section 2.01(b) further states that, “In connection with the transfer and assignment of each Mortgage . . .
E. DOWLING, v. PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES A. Co, 871 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2017)
. . . (See Plan § 2.01-2.76, App. 131-54 (defining 76 terms, over 23 pages, but providing no definition for . . .
UNITED STATES Of v. IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,, 869 F.3d 1062 (9th Cir. 2017)
. . . Substantive Criminal Law § 11.4; see Model Penal Code § 2.01 cmt. (Am. . . .
CITY OF EL CENIZO, v. STATE, 264 F. Supp. 3d 744 (W.D. Tex. 2017)
. . . Fourteenth Amendment—Vagueness
Plaintiffs argue that SB 4 Sections 1.01, 2.01, and 5.02, Tex. . . . These challenges are directed against language in Sections 1.01, 2.01, 5.02, and 6.01 of SB 4, Tex. . . . SB 4 Section 2.01, Tex. Grim, Proc, Code Art. 2.251(b). . . . that the provisions of SB 4 that require local entities to fulfill all ICE detainer requests (Sections 2.01 . . .
SFF- TIR, LLC GST GST LLC M. v. C. STEPHENSON, Jr. A. III TR, LLC CEP LLC LLC LLC,, 264 F. Supp. 3d 1148 (N.D. Okla. 2017)
. . . Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . .
A. P. MOLLER- MAERSK A S, TRADING AS MAERSK LINE, v. SAFEWATER LINES PVT, LTD., 276 F. Supp. 3d 700 (S.D. Tex. 2017)
. . . See generally 1-2 Goods in Transit § 2.01 (Lex-isNexis 2014)(“Goocfe in. Transit”). . . .
A. JONES v. ROYAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, INC., 866 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2017)
. . . Restatement (Third) Of Agency §2.01. . . .
IN RE ACTOS PIOGLITAZONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION., 274 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. La. 2017)
. . . MSA, § 2.01.
. 10,782 claimants alleged that they developed bladder cancer caused by Actos. . . .
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COOPER CARRY INC., 861 F.3d 267 (D.C. Cir. 2017)
. . . Agreement Art. 2.01, J.A. 17. . . .
CITIBANK, N. A. FOR WAMU SERIES TRUST, v. J. MANNING, f k a N. A. WAMU, a k a,
221 So. 3d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . Section 2.01 of the PSA, titled “Conveyance of Mortgage Loans,” provides that:
In connection with such . . .
IN RE SUNEDISON, INC., 572 B.R. 482 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)
. . . (PSA at §§ 2.01, 2.03; see Declaration of Patrick M, Cook Pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 1007-2 and . . .
REZAC LIVESTOCK COMMISSION COMPANY, INC. v. PINNACLE BANK, 255 F. Supp. 3d 1150 (D. Kan. 2017)
. . . authority as “stated in very specific or detailed' language” (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 . . . Id. at 1188-89 (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 cmt. b; further citations omitted). . . .
UMB BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. AIRPLANES LIMITED U. S., 260 F. Supp. 3d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)
. . . D § 2.01(c), (e). . . .
UNITED STATES v. DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, LLC,, 253 F. Supp. 3d 89 (D.D.C. 2017)
. . . Boese, supra, § 2.01[C]. . . .
UNITED STATES EX REL. PETRAS, v. SIMPAREL, INC. a f k a LLC, 857 F.3d 497 (3d Cir. 2017)
. . . Boese, Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions § 2.01[L], 2-83 (2014)).
. S. Rep. . . .
HOUSTON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, LOCAL v. HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 251 F. Supp. 3d 1168 (S.D. Tex. 2017)
. . . P.Ex. 64 at 15 ("There is no meaningful difference between a teacher with a TGI of - 2.01 and one with . . .
SFF- TIR, LLC GST GST LLC M. v. C. STEPHENSON, Jr. A. III TIR, LLC CEP LLC LLC LLC,, 250 F. Supp. 3d 856 (N.D. Okla. 2017)
. . . See Merger Agreement §§ 2.01-.03. . . . Merger Agreement § 2.01. . . . See Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . . Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . . Merger Agreement § 2.01(a). . . .
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. STRATEGIC GLOBAL INVESTMENTS, INC., 262 F. Supp. 3d 1007 (S.D. Cal. 2017)
. . . (Id,, ¶ 2.01(f).) . . . (Id., ¶ 2.01(g).) . . .
MAVRIX PHOTOGRAPHS, LLC, a v. LIVEJOURNAL, INC., 873 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2017)
. . . Campbell-Ewald Co., 768 F.3d 871, 878 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.01, . . .
MAVRIX PHOTOGRAPHS, LLC, a v. LIVEJOURNAL, INC., 853 F.3d 1020 (9th Cir. 2017)
. . . Campbell-Ewald Co., 768 F.3d 871, 878 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.01, . . .
TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, v. AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING PENNSYLVANIA,, 274 F. Supp. 3d 1278 (N.D. Fla. 2017)
. . . ECF No. 21-4, at 3 (Article II 2.01(g)). . . .
CLARK- WILLIAMS, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 244 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2017)
. . . .”); id, at 3 (Policy § 2.01(a)(2)) (defining “[e]x-ternal Candidates” to include “Returning represented . . .
FINJAN, INC. v. SOPHOS, INC., 244 F. Supp. 3d 1016 (N.D. Cal. 2017)
. . . In this case Sophos ultimately elected SWEEP-2.72 & InterCheck-2.01. . . . ; and (3) it actually asserted SWEÉP-2.72 & InterCheck-2.01 in the Delaware case. . . . Finally, Sophos argues that SWEEP-2.72 & InterCheck-2.01, the combination asserted in this case, was . . . or shipments of InterCheck 2.01 to U.S. . . . Lammer’s somewhat speculative testimony that it was “impossible to imagine” that InterCheck 2.01 was . . .
TAVARES v. WHITEHOUSE, 851 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2017)
. . . Cohen’s § 2.01[1], at 110; see also Washington v. . . .
IN RE TSAWD HOLDINGS, INC. TSA TSA TSA FSB, v. M J LLC a k a M. J. LLC,, 565 B.R. 292 (Bankr. D. Del. 2017)
. . . owned by the Debtors, and Soffe retained title to the Disputed Goods pursuant to sections 1.02 and 2.01 . . .
GDG ACQUISITIONS LLC, v. GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE,, 849 F.3d 1299 (11th Cir. 2017)
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006). . . .
KELLY, K. v. GEORGIA- PACIFIC, LLC, Co.,
211 So. 3d 340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . See also § 2.01, Fla. . . .
PETEDGE, INC. v. GARG,, 234 F. Supp. 3d 477 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)
. . . it agreed in Section 2.05 that there were no representations other than those contained in Sections 2.01 . . .
J. LEWIS, v. STATE,
211 So. 3d 279 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . . §§ 2.01 & 775.01, Fla. Stat. . . .
JAMIL, v. SOLAR POWER INC., 230 F. Supp. 3d 271 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)
. . . parties agree that the mean over-the-counter share prices for unrestricted Solar Power common stock were $2.01 . . . contrary, the parties agree that Solar Power’s unrestricted common stock was worth between $1.87 and $2.01 . . . fallen to $1.87 on November 3, 2015 (the date of breach for the Time-Based Restricted Stock) from $2.01 . . . Power stock was $2.01 on the date of breach for the other blocks of stock. . . .
JONES, R. R. C. R. v. UNITED STATES,, 846 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
. . . .”); Model Penal Code § 2.01(3) (2015) (“Liability for the commission of offense may not be based on . . .
U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. T. D. BANK, N. A., 569 B.R. 12 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)
. . . The “Basic Agreement” of the Parties is set forth in section 2.01 of the Intercreditor Agreement:
[T] . . . Intercreditor Agreement and recited as one of the Parties’ basic agreements, see IA Preamble; IA § 2.01 . . .
UNITED STATES v. AETNA INC., 240 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2017)
. . . . § 601.105, IRS Revenue Procedure 2016-24, § 2.01. . . .
GENUINELY LOVING CHILDCARE, LLC, M. E. v. BRE MARINER CONWAY CROSSINGS, LLC,,
209 So. 3d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . Sections 2.01(b) and 2.01(c) of the lease limited the leased premises to indoor areas, and section 22.11 . . .
D AGOSTINO, v. INC. J., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016)
. . . Boese, Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions §§ 2.01[A][3], 2.05 (4th ed. 2016). . . .
IN RE MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION, 223 F. Supp. 3d 514 (N.D.W. Va. 2016)
. . . [Restatement (Third) of Agency] § 2.01. . . .
W. JUSTICE, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, I, L. L. C., 674 F. App'x 330 (5th Cir. 2016)
. . . Pooling and Servicing Agreement § 2.01 (Feb. 1, 2007), , https://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/1388968 . . .
WE SHALL OVERCOME FOUNDATION LLC, v. RICHMOND ORGANIZATION, INC. TRO INC., 221 F. Supp. 3d 396 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)
. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B][3] (2015). . . .
MAURER, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL AFL- CIO, 219 F. Supp. 3d 1017 (S.D. Cal. 2016)
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01. . . .
W. BOLOUS, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CSFB,
210 So. 3d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . Additionally, section 2.01 of the pooling and servicing agreement, titled “Conveyance of Trust Fund,” . . . Marciano, 190 So.3d 166 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016), the Fifth District found that a similar section 2.01 of . . . Section 2.01 of the pooling and servicing agreement provided:
The Depositor, as of the Closing Date, . . .
DIAL CORPORATION, v. NEWS CORPORATION,, 317 F.R.D. 426 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)
. . . Thus, Counsel’s fee request is enhanced by a lodestar multiplier of approximately 2.01. . . . reflecting an inscrutable division of labor among the five firms, this Court reduces the multiplier from 2.01 . . .
UNITED STATES v. FROSTMAN,, 221 F. Supp. 3d 718 (E.D. Va. 2016)
. . . District Court Judges § 2.01 “Taking pleas of guilty or nolo contendere” (6th ed. 2013) (recommending . . .
MAPP v. UMG RECORDINGS, INC., 208 F. Supp. 3d 776 (M.D. La. 2016)
. . . ownership between the record producer and the performing artists.’ ’’(quoting 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01 . . .
MELANDER, v. WYOMING, 661 F. App'x 521 (10th Cir. 2016)
. . . P. 2.01. . . .
WATCHTOWER BIBLE TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE,, 197 F. Supp. 3d 340 (D.P.R. 2016)
. . . SECTION 2.00—DEFINITIONS
2.01—[... ]
1. . . .
IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 552 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)
. . . (Term Loan Investors’ Mot. at 3 (citing Term Loan Agreement ¶2.01, Ex. 1).) . . .
ONEWEST BANK, N. A. v. W. MELINA, FSB, N. A. R., 827 F.3d 214 (2d Cir. 2016)
. . . App. 73 (§ 2.01(a)). . . .
L. VOISINE E. III, v. UNITED STATES., 136 S. Ct. 2272 (U.S. 2016)
. . . Prosser and Keeton § 8, at 34; see also Model Penal Code § 2.01 (defining the voluntary act requirement . . .
BIRCHFIELD, v. NORTH DAKOTA. Jr. v. v., 136 S. Ct. 2160 (U.S. 2016)
. . . See 1 Erwin, § 2.01[1], at 2-3 to 2-4. . . .
IN RE LARSON, M. v., 553 B.R. 646 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2016)
. . . (citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006)). . . .
BERHAD, v. ADVANCED POLYMER COATINGS, INC., 652 F. App'x 316 (6th Cir. 2016)
. . . The key provisions of the Insurance Guarantees state:
2.01 Insurance company will reimburse the Customer . . .
WESTPHAL, v. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, St. v.,
194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016)
. . . Florida, or where such right has become a part of the common law of the State pursuant to [section 2.01 . . . . § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish such a right without providing a reasonable . . . . § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish such a right without providing a reasonable . . .
UNITED STATES v. ALL ASSETS HELD AT BANK JULIUS BAER COMPANY, LTD. In In, 315 F.R.D. 103 (D.D.C. 2016)
. . . Proc. 2016-1 § 2.01, 2016 WL 20933 (Jan. 4, 2016). . . . Id. § 2.01. . . .