Florida Statute 2.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 2
COMMON LAW IN FORCE; REPEALED STATUTES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 2.01

2.01 Common law and certain statutes declared in force.—The common and statute laws of England which are of a general and not a local nature, with the exception hereinafter mentioned, down to the 4th day of July, 1776, are declared to be of force in this state; provided, the said statutes and common law be not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the acts of the Legislature of this state.

History.—s. 1, Nov. 6, 1829; RS 59; GS 59; RGS 71; CGL 87.

F.S. 2.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 2.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 2.01

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 2.01

Total Results: 460

Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe

472 So. 2d 1145, 53 U.S.L.W. 2573, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 249, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3238

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1985 | Docket: 1793751

Cited 872 times | Published

Emmanuel, 91 So.2d 653 (Fla. 1956). See also section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1983), which provides: The

Hoffman v. Jones

280 So. 2d 431, 78 A.L.R. 3d 321

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1973 | Docket: 2035671

Cited 724 times | Published

statute law of this State by virtue of Fla. Stat., § 2.01, F.S.A. As we stated in Duval v. Thomas, 114 So

Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of Alabaster

881 F.2d 1570, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13245

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 18326

Cited 419 times | Published

denial to the City Council." Article III, Section 2.1(D) (1986) 4 The

Witt v. State

387 So. 2d 922

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1980 | Docket: 1706242

Cited 339 times | Published

This category of law changes was adapted from Section 2.1(a)(vi) of the ABA Standards Relating to Post-Conviction

United States v. Bradley

644 F.3d 1213

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 639209

Cited 253 times | Published

rulings in section 1, and the other rulings in section 2. 1. We review the district court's evidentiary

Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States

865 F.2d 1197, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1302, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1767, 1989 WL 6270

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 16, 1989 | Docket: 1326877

Cited 211 times | Published

house state prisoners in its facilities); 8 C.F.R. § 2.1 (the authority of the Attorney General to enforce

CAMP Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

451 F.3d 1257, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14407, 2006 WL 1623279

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 13, 2006 | Docket: 213172

Cited 196 times | Published

administration.” Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.1, at 44. First, “the plaintiffs complaint [must]

Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. The Toy Loft, Inc.

684 F.2d 821, 215 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 745, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25928

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 3, 1982 | Docket: 27071

Cited 178 times | Published

Cir. 1980). See generally 1 M. Nimmer, Copyright § 2.01 (1981). Although the originality concept defies

Smith v. Department of Ins.

507 So. 2d 1080, 55 U.S.L.W. 2608

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1987 | Docket: 2450631

Cited 166 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

United States v. Buenaventura Martinez, Juan Martinez, Jaime B. Salcedo, United States of America v. Manuel Suarez-O'neill

763 F.2d 1297, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30784

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1985 | Docket: 1423262

Cited 165 times | Published

U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 The district court subsequently granted

Major League Baseball v. Morsani

790 So. 2d 1071, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1401, 2001 WL 776662

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 249004

Cited 163 times | Published

So. 315 (1921) (on rehearing). [7] Id. [8] Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1991), provides in full:

Leonard J. Klay v. All

389 F.3d 1191, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 23277, 2004 WL 2480781

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 5, 2004 | Docket: 398186

Cited 162 times | Published

and abetting RICO violations under 18 U.S.C. § 2; 1 (3) direct RICO violations under 18 U.S

James Dwight Thomas v. James Crosby

371 F.3d 782, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10367, 2004 WL 1162208

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 26, 2004 | Docket: 398013

Cited 158 times | Published

or not presented to them by the parties. In Section 2,1 explain how this power is not curtailed by any

Kluger v. White

281 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1973 | Docket: 1262129

Cited 158 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Leib v. Hillsborough County Public Transportation Commission

558 F.3d 1301, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3286, 2009 WL 399990

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 19, 2009 | Docket: 1591702

Cited 135 times | Published

public highways. Act of May 25, 2001, Ch.2001-299, § 2(1). The Commission denied Leib's request on the ground

State v. Egan

287 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1973 | Docket: 1653026

Cited 126 times | Published

appropriate. The legislative antecedents of Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, expressly made the common

Camden I Condominium Association, Inc. v. John B. Dunkle

946 F.2d 768, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 819, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26049

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 4, 1991 | Docket: 1170907

Cited 125 times | Published

8 H. Newberg, Attorney Fee Awards § 2.01 at 28-29 (1986). See also Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite

Gates v. Foley

247 So. 2d 40

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1971 | Docket: 239425

Cited 109 times | Published

discussed in Ripley v. Ewell, supra, Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., adopts the common law of England. The

Johnson v. State

904 So. 2d 400, 2005 WL 977017

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2005 | Docket: 1716737

Cited 99 times | Published

Standards Relating to Post-Conviction Remedies § 2.1 cmt. at 37 (Approv. Draft 1968)); see also State

Askew v. Cross Key Waterways

372 So. 2d 913, 9 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1978 | Docket: 1695808

Cited 90 times | Published

applications to alter fresh water wetlands. Section 2-1-21 requires anyone who would alter the character

Overland Const. Co., Inc. v. Sirmons

369 So. 2d 572

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1979 | Docket: 470751

Cited 86 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Martinez v. Scanlan

582 So. 2d 1167, 1991 WL 94287

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1991 | Docket: 1363162

Cited 84 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Hopper v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

588 F.3d 1318, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 26381, 2009 WL 4429519

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 4, 2009 | Docket: 133126

Cited 73 times | Published

Boese, Civil False Claims and Qui Tam Actions § 2.01[B], at 2-20 (2d ed. 2003) ("[A] plaintiff must

Peart v. State

756 So. 2d 42, 2000 WL 373760

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2000 | Docket: 471329

Cited 73 times | Published

Justice, Standards Relating to Pleas of Guilty § 2.1 (1968)); see also Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(i) ("Failure

United States v. Depace

120 F.3d 233, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22640, 1997 WL 450144

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 25, 1997 | Docket: 201483

Cited 72 times | Published

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 They first contend that their pleas to

Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus County, Florida, Robert A. Butterworth

29 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, 1994 WL 419484

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 1994 | Docket: 167120

Cited 72 times | Published

agency must notify the Administrator. Id. § 2^1(b). Section 2-5(c) provides the reasons for

Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co.

357 So. 2d 401, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4729

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1978 | Docket: 453773

Cited 67 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co.

357 So. 2d 401, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4729

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1978 | Docket: 453773

Cited 67 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Miami Water Works Local No. 654 v. City of Miami

26 So. 2d 194, 157 Fla. 445, 165 A.L.R. 967, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 762, 18 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2169

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1946 | Docket: 3265992

Cited 67 times | Published

grievances of any kind relating to employment." See Section 2 (1). By section 3, Union employees are given "the

Advanced Bodycare Solutions, LLC v. Thione International, Inc.

524 F.3d 1235, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8584, 2008 WL 1775001

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 21, 2008 | Docket: 399108

Cited 66 times | Published

agreement regarding their dispute." Unif. Mediation Act § 2(1). Simply stated, mediation does not resolve a dispute

Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County

451 F.3d 777, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14191, 2006 WL 1567244

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 180411

Cited 63 times | Published

the Zoning Board of Appeals, 2005 Sign Ordinance § 2-1(B). Tanner's complaint that the 1998 Sign Ordinance

United States v. William Henry Davenport, A/K/A "Bill"

935 F.2d 1223, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15247, 1991 WL 114779

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 17, 1991 | Docket: 1286901

Cited 60 times | Published

violation of 21 U.S. C.A. § 959 and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2. 1 Appellant was given two consecutive fifteen-year

NORTH FLA. WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES v. State

866 So. 2d 612, 2003 WL 21546546

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2003 | Docket: 1680167

Cited 55 times | Published

Kogan's concurring opinion). [57] See generally § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1999). [58] See Tyson v. Mattair

Eller v. Shova

630 So. 2d 537, 1993 WL 502594

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1993 | Docket: 2518340

Cited 55 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

City of Boca Raton v. Gidman

440 So. 2d 1277, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2904

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1983 | Docket: 1430093

Cited 54 times | Published

v. Englar, 104 Fla. 329, 143 So. 152 (1932). Section 2.01, Boca Raton City Charter, provides: Powers.

Camden I Condominium Ass'n v. Dunkle

946 F.2d 768, 1991 WL 208974

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 4, 1991 | Docket: 66268801

Cited 53 times | Published

class members. H. Newberg, Attorney Fee Awards § 2.01 at 28-29 (1986). See also Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite

Agency for Health Care v. Assoc. Indus.

678 So. 2d 1239

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1996 | Docket: 1736936

Cited 52 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

First National Bank of Leesburg v. Hector Supply Co.

254 So. 2d 777, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1971 | Docket: 1347086

Cited 51 times | Published

common law adopted by this State through Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A. and its predecessors, we now consider whether

State v. Iacovone

660 So. 2d 1371, 1995 WL 555298

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 1635148

Cited 49 times | Published

greatest possible protection. See, e.g., Ch. 89-100, § 2(1), Laws of Fla. (enacting section 775.0823) ("[L]aw

Oswaldo Jaramillo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Executive Office for Immigration Review

1 F.3d 1149, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23356, 1993 WL 325276

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 14, 1993 | Docket: 846239

Cited 48 times | Published

Commissioner of the INS. 8 U.S.C. § 1103(a), (b); 8 C.F.R. § 2.1. Immigration Judges conduct hearings on show cause

Warren Publishing, Inc., Counter-Defendant v. Microdos Data Corp. Robert Payne, Counter-Claimants

115 F.3d 1509, 43 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1065, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13649, 1997 WL 308837

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 10, 1997 | Docket: 593632

Cited 47 times | Published

B. Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B], at 2-13 (1996). And [Ojriginality for copyright

Ripley v. Ewell

61 So. 2d 420, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1795

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1952 | Docket: 1291057

Cited 47 times | Published

acts of the legislature of this state." F.S.A. § 2.01. We are bound by this Statute. But that does not

Cauley v. City of Jacksonville

403 So. 2d 379

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1981 | Docket: 1250787

Cited 46 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

ITPE Pension Fund v. Roger Hall

334 F.3d 1011, 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1943, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12477, 2003 WL 21403477

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2003 | Docket: 76140

Cited 45 times | Published

14 R2-44, Ex. 2, Ex. A at § 2.01 (emphasis added). The argument is that because

Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Reno

86 F. Supp. 2d 1167, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3225, 2000 WL 289604

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2000 | Docket: 2244647

Cited 45 times | Published

other officer or employee of the [INS]." 8 C.F.R. § 2.1 While there are multiple defendants in this action

State Ex Rel. Martin v. Michell

188 So. 2d 684

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1966 | Docket: 1490528

Cited 42 times | Published

A. § 905.16. [10] F.S.A. § 90.11. [11] F.S.A. § 2.01 specifically adopts the common and statute laws

Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Abril

969 So. 2d 201, 26 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1343, 32 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 635, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 1902

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2007 | Docket: 1404038

Cited 41 times | Published

rule, that part of the common law codified by section 2.01 should be changed through legislative enactment

Sasso v. Ram Property Management

431 So. 2d 204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1983 | Docket: 456088

Cited 40 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

American Home Assur. v. NAT. RR CORP.

908 So. 2d 459, 2005 WL 1580639

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2005 | Docket: 1397399

Cited 39 times | Published

codified by the Florida Legislature. See generally § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2004). The original justification

Raisen v. Raisen

379 So. 2d 352

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1979 | Docket: 380751

Cited 38 times | Published

Florida in 1829 by the enactment of what is now section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1977).[1]Corren v. Corren

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

789 F.3d 1206, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10036, 2015 WL 3653162

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 2015 | Docket: 2664899

Cited 34 times | Published

administrative criteria. See 9 C.F.R. § 2.1(d). First, the exhibitor certifies by signing the

Mitchell v. Moore

786 So. 2d 521, 2001 WL 359630

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2001 | Docket: 748406

Cited 34 times | Published

the common law of the State pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Williams v. City of Lake City

62 So. 2d 732, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 2086

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1953 | Docket: 1251860

Cited 34 times | Published

jury, we now pass to the question of venue. Section 2.01, F.S.A., provides that the common and statute

The News-Press v. U. S. Dept. of Homeland Security

489 F.3d 1173, 35 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2289, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 14817

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 2007 | Docket: 163164

Cited 33 times | Published

Files” System of Records 32 indicates (at § 2.1), “[i]ndividu-als always have the right not to apply

University of Miami v. Echarte

618 So. 2d 189, 1993 WL 152668

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1993 | Docket: 405771

Cited 33 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-WEST v. News-Journal

729 So. 2d 373, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 52, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1353, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 48, 1999 WL 20562

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1999 | Docket: 1172132

Cited 32 times | Published

the debts or other obligations of the lessee. Section 2. (1) The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity

United States v. Theresa M. Sellers

871 F.2d 1019, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5537, 1989 WL 33642

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 1989 | Docket: 819208

Cited 31 times | Published

Sellers was tried as a principal under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2. 1 This section does not make aiding and abetting

Schiffahartsgesellschaft Leonhardt & Co. v. A. Bottacchi S.A. De Navegacion

773 F.2d 1528, 1986 A.M.C. 1, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21852

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 1, 1985 | Docket: 536064

Cited 31 times | Published

(2d ed. 1975). . Act of Sept. 29, 1789, ch. 21, § 2, 1 Stat. 93. . Unlike common law, the history of

Donna J. Beaulieu v. City of Alabaster

454 F.3d 1219, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16465, 2006 WL 1791401

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1115746

Cited 30 times | Published

Official” before a sign is erected or altered. Id. § 2.1. Anyone seeking a permit must submit an application

Timothy McElroy by His Legal Guardians, Thomas McElroy and Vivian McElroy v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a Foreign Corporation

894 F.2d 1504, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2751, 1990 WL 11650

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 1, 1990 | Docket: 823515

Cited 30 times | Published

*1506 1986 Fla.Laws, ch. 86-272, § 2. 1 On March 4,1986, the district court granted

Timothy McElroy by His Legal Guardians, Thomas McElroy and Vivian McElroy v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a Foreign Corporation

894 F.2d 1504, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2751, 1990 WL 11650

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 1, 1990 | Docket: 823515

Cited 30 times | Published

*1506 1986 Fla.Laws, ch. 86-272, § 2. 1 On March 4,1986, the district court granted

United States v. David Thomas

676 F.2d 531, 10 Fed. R. Serv. 1446, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19223

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 17, 1982 | Docket: 484927

Cited 30 times | Published

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 In this appeal, Thomas asserts several

Becker v. King

307 So. 2d 855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1975 | Docket: 1335585

Cited 30 times | Published

statute is of force in this state by virtue of Section 2.01, F.S., but the power of the court to enter judgments

Becker v. King

307 So. 2d 855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1975 | Docket: 1335585

Cited 30 times | Published

statute is of force in this state by virtue of Section 2.01, F.S., but the power of the court to enter judgments

Williams Farms of Homestead, Inc. v. Rain & Hail Insurance Services

121 F.3d 630, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 23623, 1997 WL 527658

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 9, 1997 | Docket: 335614

Cited 29 times | Published

House, see H.R. 4217, 103d Cong. § 2(1) (April 14, 1994), as reported to the full House

San Pedro v. United States

79 F.3d 1065, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 6955

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 9, 1996 | Docket: 606280

Cited 28 times | Published

the INS. 8 U.S.C. § 1103(a) and (b); 8 C.F.R. § 2.1 (1995); INS v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183, 185 n

Stone v. Wall

734 So. 2d 1038, 1999 WL 424384

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1999 | Docket: 1730947

Cited 27 times | Published

constitutions of Florida and the United States. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1997); State ex rel. Clayton v. Board

State v. Ashley

701 So. 2d 338, 1997 WL 674215

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1997 | Docket: 1470394

Cited 27 times | Published

and the acts of the Legislature of this state. § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). Even where the legislature

Seymour v. Adams

638 So. 2d 1044, 1994 WL 277906

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1994 | Docket: 1271097

Cited 27 times | Published

said Chapter 83, viewed in the light of Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., effectively superseded common law distress

Finney v. State

420 So. 2d 639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1982 | Docket: 1306781

Cited 27 times | Published

the plea agreement ABA STANDARDS, PLEAS OF GUILTY § 2.1 (Approved Draft, 1968). The prosecutor may find

Stowell v. Ted S. Finkel Investment Services, Inc.

489 F. Supp. 1209, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9301

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1980 | Docket: 1882948

Cited 27 times | Published

"investment contracts" within the meaning of Section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933.[2] The classic

Coastal Petroleum v. American Cyanamid

492 So. 2d 339

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1986 | Docket: 478294

Cited 25 times | Published

substance, is still in effect and is now codified as section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1985), and provides as follows:

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Bailey

41 F. Supp. 647, 2 SEC Jud. Dec. 435, 1941 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2495

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1941 | Docket: 2218521

Cited 25 times | Published

contracts" and hence "securities" as defined by § 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. 77b(1)

Legal Environmental Assistance Foundation, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

276 F.3d 1253, 154 Oil & Gas Rep. 318, 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20383, 53 ERC (BNA) 1711, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 27066, 2001 WL 1643528

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 21, 2001 | Docket: 767809

Cited 24 times | Published

(1998 Draft), appearing at LEAF Comments, Exh. C § 2.1. Second, EPA determined that a finding that hydraulic

Crigger v. Florida Power Corp.

436 So. 2d 937, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1983 | Docket: 1701106

Cited 24 times | Published

England as the law of the State of Florida (see § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1981)) the statute of James 1, 21

Baker v. State

336 So. 2d 364

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1976 | Docket: 1720898

Cited 24 times | Published

England only "down to the 4th day of July, 1776." Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1975). Cf. Donnelly v. United

Shiver v. Sessions

80 So. 2d 905

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1955 | Docket: 1440708

Cited 24 times | Published

common law, as adopted in this state in 1829, Section 2.01, Fla. Stat. 1953, F.S.A., and it has not been

United States v. Rivera

613 F.3d 1046, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 15984, 2010 WL 2998747

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 2, 2010 | Docket: 88431

Cited 23 times | Published

government." Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.1, at 45 (5th ed.2007). As former Judge Robert Bork

United States v. Gunby

112 F.3d 1493, 1997 WL 228566

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 1997 | Docket: 73837

Cited 23 times | Published

“is compensated, in whole or in part, from fees.” § 2(1). Under compensation plan “A,” the county would

Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster

881 F.2d 1570, 1989 WL 91569

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 66246555

Cited 23 times | Published

the denial to the City Council.” Article III, Section 2.1(D) (1986). .The complaint also alleged an equal

Raimbeault v. Accurate Machine & Tool, LLC

302 F.R.D. 675, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140318, 2014 WL 5795187

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2014 | Docket: 66053857

Cited 22 times | Published

Subordinated Creditor, the “Subordinated Note”). Section 2.1 Subordination of Subordinated Debt to Senior

Carr v. Broward County

541 So. 2d 92, 1989 WL 23391

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1989 | Docket: 23554

Cited 22 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Kama v. State

507 So. 2d 154, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1987 | Docket: 460009

Cited 22 times | Published

in his or her care. Florida has by statute, Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, adopted the common law rule

Villeneuve v. Advanced Business Concepts Corporation

698 F.2d 1121

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 6, 1983 | Docket: 477298

Cited 22 times | Published

purchaser agreement is a security as defined by section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 and section 3(a)(10)

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Florida-Texas Freight, Inc.

357 F. Supp. 977, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13994, 1973 WL 302630

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1973 | Docket: 2024930

Cited 22 times | Published

Paragraph 2.1 Undertaking of the Telephone Company; Section 2.1.3(a) Liability: The liability of the Telephone

Florida Dhrs v. Sap

835 So. 2d 1091

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 1643385

Cited 21 times | Published

436, 131 N.E.2d 721 (1956). [5] See generally § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). [6] See Public Health Trust

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Friendly Power Co.

49 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8072

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 12, 1999 | Docket: 2334287

Cited 21 times | Published

Offered or Sold with No Registration Statement 1. Section 2(1) of the Securities Act defines a "security" as

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Gulf Intercontinental Finance Corp.

223 F. Supp. 987, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8094

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1963 | Docket: 2114465

Cited 21 times | Published

10b-5. [6] In fact there could be none since Section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77b(1)

Christine J. Williams v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians

839 F.3d 1312, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18717, 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,661, 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1105, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 883

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2016 | Docket: 4479978

Cited 20 times | Published

[and] political subdivisions.” Pub. L. No. 92-261, § 2(1), 86 Stat. 103-113 (1972) (alteration supplied)

Christine J. Williams v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians

839 F.3d 1312, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18717, 100 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,661, 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1105, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 883

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 2016 | Docket: 4479978

Cited 20 times | Published

[and] political subdivisions.” Pub. L. No. 92-261, § 2(1), 86 Stat. 103-113 (1972) (alteration supplied)

Langfitt v. Federal Marine Terminals, Inc.

647 F.3d 1116, 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 994, 2011 A.M.C. 1819, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15658, 2011 WL 3207771

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 2011 | Docket: 1890999

Cited 20 times | Published

cmt. e. [14] See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 2(1) (defining a "master," that is, an employer); see

Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc.

403 So. 2d 1325, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2807

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 1250542

Cited 20 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc.

403 So. 2d 1325, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2807

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1981 | Docket: 1250542

Cited 20 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

State v. Hubbard

751 So. 2d 552, 1999 WL 1211589

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1999 | Docket: 1712551

Cited 19 times | Published

Austin W. Scott, Jr., Substantive Criminal Law § 2.1 at 90 (1986), DUI manslaughter is strictly a creature

Pulte Home Corp., Inc. v. Ply Gem Industries, Inc.

804 F. Supp. 1471, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14565, 1992 WL 237386

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1992 | Docket: 1241278

Cited 19 times | Published

liabilities of the Division not assumed under Section 2.01 of this Agreement (collectively, the "Retained

United States v. Miguel Jorge Asseff, Nestor Jesus Mena, Jorge Lopez

917 F.2d 502, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20197, 1990 WL 167925

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 20, 1990 | Docket: 828259

Cited 19 times | Published

of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) and (c) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 Defendants-appellants’ respective plea

Acton v. Fort Lauderdale Hosp.

440 So. 2d 1282

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1983 | Docket: 2238767

Cited 19 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

In Re Estate of Caldwell

247 So. 2d 1

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1971 | Docket: 1461844

Cited 19 times | Published

enacted a statute in this state now appearing as Section 2.01 which declared the common law and statute laws

Corren v. Corren

47 So. 2d 774, 1950 Fla. LEXIS 1076

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1950 | Docket: 1384542

Cited 19 times | Published

the enactment in 1829 of what now appears as Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A., declaring

Warren v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

899 So. 2d 1090, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 593, 2005 WL 729173

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2005 | Docket: 306738

Cited 18 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Williams Management Enterprises v. Buonauro

489 So. 2d 160, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1204, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1528902

Cited 18 times | Published

Florida has adopted the common law of England, see § 2.01, Fla. Stat.) English law had extended the action

Purk v. Federal Press Co.

387 So. 2d 354

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1980 | Docket: 1355265

Cited 18 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.

454 F. Supp. 2d 1185, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45702, 2006 WL 2423784

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2006 | Docket: 1860752

Cited 17 times | Published

members")(quoting H. Newberg, Attorney Fee Awards, § 2.01 at 28-29 (1986)); In re Everglades Air Disaster

Lathrop v. Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Vessel

817 F. Supp. 953, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9882, 1993 WL 105397

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 9, 1993 | Docket: 1022360

Cited 17 times | Published

park regulations requiring a permit. See 36 C.F.R. § 2.1. One month later, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Preliminary

Villeneuve v. Advanced Business Concepts Corporation

730 F.2d 1403

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 1984 | Docket: 679495

Cited 17 times | Published

contract and therefore a security as defined in section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. Sec

Bencomo v. Bencomo

200 So. 2d 171

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1967 | Docket: 1687415

Cited 17 times | Published

State constitutions and state laws. See: F.S. Section 2.01, F.S.A., which provides in part that the "common

Barnes v. State

743 So. 2d 1105, 1999 WL 72206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 1243389

Cited 16 times | Published

General. While Mr. Raft correctly notes that section 2.01 adopts the common law in Florida, he conspicuously

United States v. De Varon

136 F.3d 740

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 3, 1998 | Docket: 422516

Cited 16 times | Published

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2(1). She was convicted in the U.S. District Court

Abdala v. World Omni Leasing, Inc.

583 So. 2d 330, 1991 WL 111442

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 1684164

Cited 16 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Cate v. Oldham

450 So. 2d 224

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1984 | Docket: 2517781

Cited 16 times | Published

the first question certified in the negative. Section 2.01 of the Florida Statutes (1981) declares that

State Ex Rel. Shevin v. Yarborough

257 So. 2d 891, 93 P.U.R.3d 401

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 1972 | Docket: 1287034

Cited 16 times | Published

acts of the legislature of this state." See F.S. § 2.01, F.S.A. (italics supplied) Public policy on the

Interface Kanner, LLC v. JP Morgan CHase Bank, N.A.

704 F.3d 927, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 715, 2013 WL 104984

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 2013 | Docket: 890206

Cited 15 times | Published

limitation, when read together with language from section 2.1, which provides that “[JPMorgan] agrees to pay

Bowers v. Keller

651 F.3d 1277, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17871, 2011 WL 3760891

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 2011 | Docket: 151509

Cited 15 times | Published

Appeals Board" are still applicable. See 28 C.F.R. § 2.1(c),(e). Instead of having separate Regional Commissioners

Bowers v. Keller

651 F.3d 1277, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 17871, 2011 WL 3760891

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 2011 | Docket: 151509

Cited 15 times | Published

Appeals Board" are still applicable. See 28 C.F.R. § 2.1(c),(e). Instead of having separate Regional Commissioners

Henderson v. Crosby

883 So. 2d 847, 2004 WL 1877369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 2004 | Docket: 1718199

Cited 15 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Enterprise Leasing Co. South Central, Inc. v. Hughes

833 So. 2d 832, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18205, 2002 WL 31769176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2002 | Docket: 2482790

Cited 15 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

United States v. Dallas County Commission

850 F.2d 1430, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9461

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 1854829

Cited 15 times | Published

of members to the County Commission violates section 2).1 The government contends that a single-member

Brown v. City of Vero Beach

64 So. 3d 172, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10188, 2011 WL 2555637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 60301386

Cited 14 times | Published

common law as of July 4, 1776, adopted under section 2.01, Florida Statutes”). With the enactment of section

Barber v. MacKenzie

562 So. 2d 755, 1990 WL 62853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 1231931

Cited 14 times | Published

the extent modified or repealed by statute. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1989); Choctawhatchee Elec. Co-op

United States v. Silbert Mills

760 F.2d 1116, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29991

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 20, 1985 | Docket: 561625

Cited 14 times | Published

to distribute it, 21 U.S.C. § 841, 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 The court set a sentencing hearing two

Bryant v. School Bd. of Duval County, Fla.

399 So. 2d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1981 | Docket: 1167108

Cited 14 times | Published

common law of the state pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Harrell v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.

361 So. 2d 715

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1978 | Docket: 1288139

Cited 14 times | Published

common law of the state pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01. Kluger v. White, 281 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1973). The

Pacheco v. Pacheco

246 So. 2d 778

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1971 | Docket: 2485885

Cited 14 times | Published

121 Fla. 130, 163 So. 401 (1935). When Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A. adopted the English common law down to

Gaston v. Pittman

224 So. 2d 326

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1969 | Docket: 1248028

Cited 14 times | Published

if she were unmarried.' "Despite the mandate of § 2.01, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., adopting the English common

Quality Shell Homes & Supply Company v. Roley

186 So. 2d 837, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5420

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1966 | Docket: 533034

Cited 14 times | Published

which was adopted by statute in this state (Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, F.S: A.), and its operation

In Re Levy's Estate

141 So. 2d 803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1962 | Docket: 1476267

Cited 14 times | Published

129 Fla. 630, 176 So. 537, 538. Under Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A. the Common Law of England is expressly

State v. Barnum

921 So. 2d 513, 2005 WL 2296638

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2006 | Docket: 1755994

Cited 13 times | Published

This category of law changes was adapted from Section 2.1(a)(vi) of the ABA Standards Relating to Post-Conviction

State Ex Rel. Clayton v. Board of Regents

635 So. 2d 937, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 209, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 581, 1994 WL 137879

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1994 | Docket: 1705429

Cited 13 times | Published

the acts of the legislature of this State. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). In addition, the common law

Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Toy Loft, Inc.

684 F.2d 821, 215 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 745

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 3, 1982 | Docket: 66192137

Cited 13 times | Published

Cir. 1980). See generally 1M. Nimmer, Copyright § 2.01 (1981). Although the originality concept defies

United States v. Thomas Hartwell Liles, Michael Harold Jones, John Richard Salane

670 F.2d 989, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21041

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 15, 1982 | Docket: 928662

Cited 13 times | Published

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 955a and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 We affirm. On December 10, 1980 the

Sonny Boy, LLC v. Asnani

879 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8418, 2004 WL 1175221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2004 | Docket: 1514421

Cited 12 times | Published

Poliakoff, The Law of Condominium Operations (1998); § 2:01. [5] Some say it goes back to Roman times and

Sonny Boy, LLC v. Asnani

879 So. 2d 25, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8418, 2004 WL 1175221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2004 | Docket: 1514421

Cited 12 times | Published

Poliakoff, The Law of Condominium Operations (1998); § 2:01. [5] Some say it goes back to Roman times and

Behm v. Saeli

560 So. 2d 431, 1990 WL 62012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1990 | Docket: 1739582

Cited 12 times | Published

Ely, "The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land" § 2.01 (1988). Unless prevented by the terms of its creation

Carr v. Broward County

505 So. 2d 568, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1987 | Docket: 1455214

Cited 12 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Rudd v. State

386 So. 2d 1216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1980 | Docket: 1518299

Cited 12 times | Published

"investment contract" as that term is used in section 2(1), Securities Act of 1933, as amended by section

Clark v. State

114 So. 2d 197, 80 A.L.R. 2d 261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 1959 | Docket: 2519070

Cited 12 times | Published

been adopted by statute as the law of Florida. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. As stated by our Supreme

Solomon v. Liberty County, Fla.

957 F. Supp. 1522, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4043, 1997 WL 154619

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1997 | Docket: 1148957

Cited 11 times | Published

legislative history to the 1982 amendment to section 2. 1. Resolving The Racial Bias Dilemma: Justice

Fullerton v. Hospital Corp. of America

660 So. 2d 389, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9710, 1995 WL 544154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 1639625

Cited 11 times | Published

State, 648 So.2d 302, 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). Accordingly, we conclude that

Doe v. State of Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission

748 F. Supp. 1520, 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1433, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13957, 1990 WL 156846

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 1990 | Docket: 1792615

Cited 11 times | Published

inescapable that the asserted justification for section 2.1-37.13 is very closely related to the content

Snowten v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co.

475 So. 2d 1211, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 433

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 1301699

Cited 11 times | Published

immunity is a rule of common law adopted by section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1981), petitioner argues

Barnes v. BK Credit Service, Inc.

461 So. 2d 217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1984 | Docket: 1514619

Cited 11 times | Published

become a part of Florida's common law pursuant to section 2.01, Florida Statutes. Sasso v. Ram Property Management

Ard v. Ard

395 So. 2d 586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1981 | Docket: 1692961

Cited 11 times | Published

Florida in 1829 by the enactment of what is now section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1977). Corren v. Corren,

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176

83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 2012 | Docket: 60306488

Cited 10 times | Published

Cal. Const, art. XXI, § 2(d)(2).; Colo.Rev.Stat. § 2-1-102(1 )(a)(II); 10 Ill. Comp. Stat. 120/5-5(a),

City of Key West v. Florida Keys Community College

81 So. 3d 494, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 519, 2012 WL 126858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 2012 | Docket: 2414874

Cited 10 times | Published

Passenger Corp., 908 So.2d 459, 471 (Fla.2005) (citing § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2004)). Despite the doctrine's expansive

Brooks v. Miller

158 F.3d 1230, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27881, 1998 WL 758365

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 74773

Cited 10 times | Published

requirement for primary elections does not violate § 2. 1. Discriminatory Purpose Plaintiffs

Margarita Rosa De Cuellar v. Nicholas F. Brady as Secretary of the Treasury of the U.S. And Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Margarita Rosa De Cuellar v. Nicholas F. Brady as Secretary of the Treasury of the U.S. And Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company

881 F.2d 1561

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 821310

Cited 10 times | Published

Regulations defines "securities" by reference to section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. Sec

Margarita Rosa De Cuellar v. Nicholas F. Brady as Secretary of the Treasury of the U.S. And Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, Margarita Rosa De Cuellar v. Nicholas F. Brady as Secretary of the Treasury of the U.S. And Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company

881 F.2d 1561

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 821310

Cited 10 times | Published

Regulations defines "securities" by reference to section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. Sec

SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. & CLINICS v. Smith

480 So. 2d 1366, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 81, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6033

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1985 | Docket: 1667306

Cited 10 times | Published

question. At the outset, it should be noted that section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1983), originally enacted

Stephen Bodzo Realty, Inc. v. WILLITS INTERN. CORP.

428 So. 2d 225

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1983 | Docket: 1375457

Cited 10 times | Published

abrogation or modification of the common law. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1975), provides: The common

Estate of Roberts

388 So. 2d 216

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1980 | Docket: 1520900

Cited 10 times | Published

part of the common law of the state pursuant to section 2.01, Florida Statutes, the legislature is without

DeGeorge v. State

358 So. 2d 217

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1978 | Docket: 1311649

Cited 10 times | Published

to its common law meaning. Florida Statutes, Section 2.01 (Supp., 1975) provides that the common laws

In Re Lubbe's Estate

142 So. 2d 130, 95 A.L.R. 2d 1246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1962 | Docket: 1514270

Cited 10 times | Published

adoption, later became law in Florida. Fla. Stat. § 2.01 F.S.A.; Redfearn on Wills and Administrations of

Williams v. American Optical Corp.

985 So. 2d 23

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2008 | Docket: 2509350

Cited 9 times | Published

Legislature may substantively change prospectively. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2007) ("The common laws of England

Brandsmart of West Palm Beach v. Dr Lakes

901 So. 2d 1004, 2005 WL 1163001

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2005 | Docket: 646836

Cited 9 times | Published

agreement was implicit in the incorporation of section 2.1 of the Purchase Agreement into the Stipulation

Vencor Hospitals v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island

284 F.3d 1174, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2908, 2002 WL 340687

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 26, 2002 | Docket: 1280118

Cited 9 times | Published

agreement and any attached amendments.” (BCBS Policy, § 2.1). On June 11, 1996, the Court entered Final

Hardick v. Homol

795 So. 2d 1107, 2001 WL 1172590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2001 | Docket: 1673422

Cited 9 times | Published

110 So.2d 470, 472 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)(citing section 2.01 of the Florida Statutes),[1] or where the reason

Cuban American Bar Ass'n v. Christopher

43 F.3d 1412, 1995 WL 16410

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 418222

Cited 9 times | Published

[as refugees] of those in need.” Id. § 2.1(4); see also id. § 2.2(1). UNHCR has

Velazquez v. State

648 So. 2d 302, 1995 WL 3017

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1995 | Docket: 1701768

Cited 9 times | Published

years of age" under section 794.011(2); however, section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1991), provides that the

In Re TACP

609 So. 2d 588, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 691, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1932, 1992 WL 324714

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1992 | Docket: 1473559

Cited 9 times | Published

imported into our own common law by operation of section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1991). The parties cite to

Jenks v. State

582 So. 2d 676, 1991 WL 105517

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1715916

Cited 9 times | Published

has adopted the necessity defense pursuant to Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1989), which provides: The

Peeler v. INDEP. LIFE & ACCIDENT INS.

206 So. 2d 34

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1967 | Docket: 1327572

Cited 9 times | Published

negligence are correctly stated in 65 C.J.S. Negligence § 2(1), which recites: "In every case involving negligence

Ducksworth v. Boyer

125 So. 2d 844

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 1960 | Docket: 1690207

Cited 9 times | Published

and was brought forward as a part of our law by § 2.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See State ex rel. Wilson

Morgenthaler v. First Atlantic National Bank

80 So. 2d 446, 54 A.L.R. 2d 353

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1955 | Docket: 1440691

Cited 9 times | Published

the acts of the legislature of this state." Section 2.01, F.S. 1951, F.S.A. [5] Collocation of the English

School Board of Broward County v. Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville

137 So. 3d 1059, 2014 WL 1031461, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2014 | Docket: 60240150

Cited 8 times | Published

"Project Consultant Services and Responsibilities”; section 2.1 is entitled "Basic Services.” . The school

Baillie v. Dept. of Natural Resources

632 So. 2d 1114, 1994 WL 64957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 1994 | Docket: 462624

Cited 8 times | Published

Constitution of the State of Florida." 281 So.2d at 4. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, declares certain "common

Byrd v. Lohr

488 So. 2d 138, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1986 | Docket: 1685403

Cited 8 times | Published

common law of England as of July 4, 1776. *140 See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1983). Punitive damages were not allowed

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 323 v. Coral Electric Corp.

576 F. Supp. 1128, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24943

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1984 | Docket: 211497

Cited 8 times | Published

Article III of the prehire contract. Article II, Section 2.01 provides: No member of the International Brotherhood

Leffler v. Smith

388 So. 2d 261

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1980 | Docket: 419746

Cited 8 times | Published

and the acts of the Legislature of this state. § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1979). However, it is not necessary

Eason v. Lau

369 So. 2d 600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1978 | Docket: 470919

Cited 8 times | Published

until the adoption in 1957 of F.S. 768.041. (See F.S. 2.01; Prosser, Law of Torts, 3rd Ed. 1964, page 69;

Davis v. Roos

326 So. 2d 226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1976 | Docket: 1434481

Cited 8 times | Published

S., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Florida Statute 2.01. [2] Carlton v. Phelan, 100 Fla. 1164,

In Re DuVal's Estate

174 So. 2d 580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1965 | Docket: 1714303

Cited 8 times | Published

Sellars v. Parker, 1924, 87 Fla. 181, 100 So. 260; Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.), on which date probate

City of St. Petersburg v. Earle

109 So. 2d 388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1959 | Docket: 1360041

Cited 8 times | Published

court, had this to say, in part [62 So.2d 734]: "Section 2.01, F.S.A., provides that the common and statute

McGriff v. McGill

62 So. 2d 28, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1869

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1952 | Docket: 1251623

Cited 8 times | Published

findings of the Master was entirely correct. See Section 2.01, F.S.A.; Florida Statutes 1941, Vol. III, p

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. SAMUEL J. MCROBERTS

257 So. 3d 1023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2018 | Docket: 8015486

Cited 7 times | Published

(4th ed.); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (Am. Law Inst. 2006). To establish actual authority

Bolous v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

210 So. 3d 691, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16218

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2016 | Docket: 60261828

Cited 7 times | Published

Certificatehold-ers under this Agreement.” Additionally, section 2.01 of the pooling and servicing agreement, titled

Toye v. State

133 So. 3d 540, 2014 WL 228639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2014 | Docket: 60238802

Cited 7 times | Published

Standards Relating to Post^Conviction Remedies § 2.1(a)(vi) (Approv. Draft 1968)). In addition, each

League of Women Voters v. Florida House of Representatives

132 So. 3d 135, 2013 WL 6570903

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 2013 | Docket: 60238383

Cited 7 times | Published

in Florida by the terms of another statute. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (2013), provides that the

T.M.H. v. D.M.T.

79 So. 3d 787

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2011 | Docket: 60305382

Cited 7 times | Published

than cite a law review article as the source. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, cited in the dissent, simply

Advocacy Center for Persons With Disabilities, Inc. v. Woodlands Estates Ass'n

192 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3403, 2002 WL 377133

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2002 | Docket: 2285899

Cited 7 times | Published

proposed use of the home was in violation of Section 2.01, and may potentially violate Section 2.25, of

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Physicians Guardian Unit Investment Trust Ex Rel. Physicians Guardian, Inc.

72 F. Supp. 2d 1342, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16920, 1999 WL 997317

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1999 | Docket: 2206316

Cited 7 times | Published

Investment Trust units are securities as defined by Section 2(1) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77b(1), and

In RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLA. BAR-1-3.1 (A) AND RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMIN.-2.065 (LEGAL AID)

573 So. 2d 800, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 651, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1726, 1990 WL 207496

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1990 | Docket: 479178

Cited 7 times | Published

forth in 11 Hen. 7, c[h]. 12, as adopted by section 2.01, Florida Statutes, the power of judicial assignment

Edelsberg v. Thompson McKinnon Securities Inc. (In Re Edelsberg)

101 B.R. 386, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 909

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jun 7, 1989 | Docket: 1646313

Cited 7 times | Published

bond is a security as that term is contemplated by § 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Florida Statutes

Portee v. State

253 So. 2d 866

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1971 | Docket: 1451028

Cited 7 times | Published

invalidate the grand jury system. See Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A.; Cotton v. State, 85 Fla. 197, 95 So. 668

State Ex Rel. Ervin v. Massachusetts Company

95 So. 2d 902

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1957 | Docket: 470983

Cited 7 times | Published

King's prerogative in wreck or derelicts through Section 2.01 Florida Statutes 1955[1], F.S.A., it is not

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. Ward

141 So. 3d 236, 2014 WL 2852971, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9544

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2014 | Docket: 60241829

Cited 6 times | Published

England ... down to the 4th day of July, 1776,” § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2013), not the law of another American

Campbell v. State

125 So. 3d 733, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 727, 2013 WL 5641531, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2290

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 2013 | Docket: 60236060

Cited 6 times | Published

subsequent to sentencing that were set forth in section 2.1, Pleas of Guilty, American Bar Association Standards

City of Freeport v. Beach Community Bank

108 So. 3d 684, 2013 WL 598417, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2509

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2013 | Docket: 60229200

Cited 6 times | Published

development at issue is River-walk Phase I. Article 2, section 2.01.05(I)(2)(d) of the City’s Land Development Code

Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NA

89 So. 3d 923, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4471, 2012 WL 933060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 60308850

Cited 6 times | Published

statute into a modified one-ac.tion rule). . Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (2008), provides that the

MDS (Canada), Inc. v. Rad Source Technologies, Inc.

822 F. Supp. 2d 1263, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113273, 2011 WL 4591186

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2011 | Docket: 1995405

Cited 6 times | Published

were turned over to Best Medical. D.E. E. 63. Section 2.1 of the Asset Purchase Agreement, titled "Purchase

Nieminski v. State

60 So. 3d 521, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6058, 2011 WL 1599572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 2011 | Docket: 60300260

Cited 6 times | Published

Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment § 2.1(c) (4th ed. 2004). In Mr. Nieminski’s case, as will

World Capita Communications, Inc. v. Island Capital Management, LLC (In Re Skyway Communications Holding Corp.)

389 B.R. 801, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 394, 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1889, 2008 WL 2553308

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2008 | Docket: 1482647

Cited 6 times | Published

against any Creditor or other third party." (Plan, § 2.1.1, p. 13). Under these circumstances, the Defendant

Rhodes v. BLP Associates, Inc.

944 So. 2d 527, 2006 WL 3735157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 2488889

Cited 6 times | Published

and in excess of the Bank Loan described in Section 2.1(c) hereof, are needed to carry out the purposes

Bridge Capital Investors, II v. Susquehanna Radio Corp.

458 F.3d 1212, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19305, 2006 WL 2129501

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 1, 2006 | Docket: 1029998

Cited 6 times | Published

amount, in addition to the amount set forth in Section 2.1, as follows: (c) If the CP is for a Class C-3

Thomas v. Suwannee County

734 So. 2d 492, 1999 WL 303403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 1999 | Docket: 1731085

Cited 6 times | Published

County Land Development Regulations as defined in § 2.1 of the Suwannee County Land Development Regulations

Overseas Private Investment Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County

826 F. Supp. 1564, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9823, 1993 WL 263440

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 27, 1993 | Docket: 1066616

Cited 6 times | Published

principal and interest totaled $864,351.46. In section 2.1(a), the agreement specifically identifies this

Shova v. Eller

606 So. 2d 400, 1992 WL 213124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 1992 | Docket: 132066

Cited 6 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Consol. Gas Co. of Fla. v. City Gas Co. of Fla.

665 F. Supp. 1493, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6926

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1987 | Docket: 1256628

Cited 6 times | Published

theory we think Plaintiff has proven a violation of § 2. 1. The Essential Facilities Doctrine To begin with

Lloyd v. Farkash

476 So. 2d 305, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2311

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1985 | Docket: 1277750

Cited 6 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

City of Coconut Creek v. Fowler

474 So. 2d 820, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 1985 | Docket: 1470253

Cited 6 times | Published

the Common Law as it existed on July 4, 1776, Section 2.01, Florida Statutes. Thus, it has never been the

Sikes v. Boone

562 F. Supp. 74, 116 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2172, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20016

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1983 | Docket: 1136633

Cited 6 times | Published

expressly adopted in the State of Florida. Fla.Stat. § 2.01.

Stottler Stagg & Associates, Inc. v. Argo

403 So. 2d 617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1981 | Docket: 809146

Cited 6 times | Published

contract" and, therefore a "security" as defined by section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933[1] and section

State v. Steffani

398 So. 2d 475

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 1981 | Docket: 1326685

Cited 6 times | Published

dispossession of the owner"); 1 La Fave, Search and Seizure § 2.1 (1978). [3] The thus-overruled holding to this

KP v. State

327 So. 2d 820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1976 | Docket: 1716129

Cited 6 times | Published

the acts of the legislature of this state." (F.S. 2.01) Appellant argues that the rebuttable presumption

French v. French

303 So. 2d 668

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1974 | Docket: 1314072

Cited 6 times | Published

21 years to 18 years, the second sentence of Section 2[1] allows the Court to require support beyond 18

Florida House of Representatives Ex Rel. Kriseman v. Expedia, Inc.

85 So. 3d 517, 2012 WL 1033662, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4933

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2012 | Docket: 1935046

Cited 5 times | Published

state continues to recognize the common law. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, provides in material part

Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc. (In Re Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc.)

416 B.R. 801, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 77, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2374, 2009 WL 2710266

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 2009 | Docket: 1492740

Cited 5 times | Published

pages long. (J. Ex. 239, Trade Contract Agreement, § 2.1; J. Ex. 239, Attach. III.) Various provisions of

Downing v. Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Alabama

321 F.3d 1017, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2697, 91 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 78, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,418

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 13, 2003 | Docket: 740933

Cited 5 times | Published

Stat. 253, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (a), was amended by § (2)(1) of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972

Herzfeld v. Herzfeld

781 So. 2d 1070, 2001 WL 252252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2001 | Docket: 1690470

Cited 5 times | Published

Florida in 1829 by the enactment of what is now section 2.01, Florida Statutes.[18] "As a general rule, that

Sexton v. United States

132 F. Supp. 2d 967, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20034, 2000 WL 33226170

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 2000 | Docket: 2329530

Cited 5 times | Published

between aircraft operating in the system. ATC Manual, § 2-1-1. An air traffic controller must give first priority

Vencor Hospitals South, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island

86 F. Supp. 2d 1155, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2921, 2000 WL 280037

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2000 | Docket: 14463

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement and any attached amendments." (BCBS Policy, § 2.1). On June 11, 1996, the Court entered Final Judgment

Grantham v. Blount, Inc.

683 So. 2d 538, 1996 WL 546313

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1996 | Docket: 1515031

Cited 5 times | Published

common law permitted such actions on July 4, 1776. § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). We have found no English common

Bjy v. Ma

617 So. 2d 1061, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 265, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 711, 1993 WL 132258

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1993 | Docket: 1512503

Cited 5 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Meek v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.

805 F. Supp. 967, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14555, 1992 WL 259754

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1992 | Docket: 241852

Cited 5 times | Published

outcome shall be determined by lot." County Charter, § 2.01(B). [10] In relying on the evidence of registered

Bradley v. Guy

438 So. 2d 854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 1983 | Docket: 1731734

Cited 5 times | Published

impose an obligation or liability by statute. See § 2.01 Fla. Stat. (1981); Florida E.C.R. Co. v. McRoberts

Zacharakis v. Howerton

517 F. Supp. 1026, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13459

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1981 | Docket: 2232242

Cited 5 times | Published

implementing congressional policy. See 8 C.F.R. § 2.1; cf. I.N.S. v. Wang, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 101 S.Ct

Farrell v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.

361 So. 2d 408

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 1978 | Docket: 1288559

Cited 5 times | Published

viable in the courts of this State by virtue of Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1975), which provides: The

Van Hoose v. Robbins

165 So. 2d 209

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1964 | Docket: 1405691

Cited 5 times | Published

said Chapter 83, viewed in the light of Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A.,[7] effectively superseded common law distress

Wester v. Rigdon

110 So. 2d 470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1959 | Docket: 1409889

Cited 5 times | Published

of Actions, § 291. [5] Supra note 3. [6] F.S. § 2.01, F.S.A. [7] F.S. Chs. 674-676, F.S.A. [8] F.S

Wax v. Wilson

101 So. 2d 54

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1958 | Docket: 1696728

Cited 5 times | Published

statute having been adopted as the law of Florida by § 2.01. Florida Statutes [F.S.A.], and second, that she

Earl Holmes v. Florida A&M University, by and through etc.

260 So. 3d 400

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2018 | Docket: 8283795

Cited 4 times | Published

periods ended prior to the end dates set out in section 2.1 of the employment agreements. The FAMU president’s

CitiBank, N.A. v. Manning

221 So. 3d 677, 2017 WL 2665072, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8968

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2017 | Docket: 60268338

Cited 4 times | Published

the complaint, the Bank introduced the PSA. Section 2.01 of the PSA, titled “Conveyance of Mortgage Loans

Kelly v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC

211 So. 3d 340, 2017 WL 697746, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2413

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 60262589

Cited 4 times | Published

therefore held the wife could not recover. See also § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2015) (“The common and statute laws

Hoover v. Bank of American Corp.

286 F. Supp. 2d 1326, 2003 WL 22300499

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 24, 2003 | Docket: 2386285

Cited 4 times | Published

amendment added Exchange as a "Prior Employer" under section 2.1(c)(33) of the Plan; made its pension plan as

Florida Public Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. City Of Miami Beach

321 F.3d 1046, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2699

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 13, 2003 | Docket: 1425182

Cited 4 times | Published

Right-of-Way Ordinance in turn. 1. Section 2(1) — Statement of Purpose 22

Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Corcoran

679 So. 2d 291, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7578, 1996 WL 396083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1996 | Docket: 1215114

Cited 4 times | Published

part of the common law ... pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

San Pedro v. United States

79 F.3d 1065, 1996 WL 132006

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 9, 1996 | Docket: 1220564

Cited 4 times | Published

of the INS. 8 U.S.C. § 1103(a) and (b); 8 C.F.R. § 2.1 (1995); INS v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183, 185 n.

Enterprise Financial Corp. v. Winn (In Re Wincorp, Inc.)

185 B.R. 914, 9 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 98, 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1148

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jul 24, 1995 | Docket: 1766228

Cited 4 times | Published

court noted that in accordance with Florida Statute § 2.01 and various English decisions which recognized

Department of Revenue v. Printing House

644 So. 2d 498, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 534, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1547, 1994 WL 570652

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1994 | Docket: 1248660

Cited 4 times | Published

and the acts of the Legislature of this state. § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1991). [3] Ordinary revenue was generated

Folmar v. Young

591 So. 2d 220, 1991 WL 110841

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1991 | Docket: 541563

Cited 4 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Avila v. Rivkind

724 F. Supp. 945, 1989 WL 136206

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1989 | Docket: 1034325

Cited 4 times | Published

law.[5] 8 U.S.C. § 1103(a). Furthermore, 8 C.F.R. § 2.1, the regulation which describes the Commissioner's

Clayton v. Willis

489 So. 2d 813, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1986 | Docket: 1528883

Cited 4 times | Published

Constitution of the United States or of Florida. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1985). In State v. Egan, the court

Pohlman v. Mathews

440 So. 2d 681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1983 | Docket: 1430810

Cited 4 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

United States v. Raul Saldivar, Sr., Raul Saldivar, Jr.

710 F.2d 699, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25571, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 803

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 25, 1983 | Docket: 956179

Cited 4 times | Published

1824(a)(2) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. 1 The appellants correctly say that

Girardeau v. State

403 So. 2d 513

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1981 | Docket: 1251033

Cited 4 times | Published

267 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1972). See, additionally, Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, declaring the common and

United States v. Diecidue

448 F. Supp. 1011, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19104

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1978 | Docket: 2251541

Cited 4 times | Published

Criminal Justice, Discovery and Procedure Before Trial § 2.1(d), the Supreme *1017 Court had no difficulty in

Emma Gayle Weaver, etc. v. Stephen C. Myers, M.D.

229 So. 3d 1118

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 2017 | Docket: 6220622

Cited 3 times | Published

common law of the, State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Martinez v. Hernandez

227 So. 3d 1257, 2017 WL 4273433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6158999

Cited 3 times | Published

office of Mayor provides, in pertinent part: Section 2.01.—Mayor. [[Image here]] (b) Election

GDG Acquisitions LLC v. Government of Belize

849 F.3d 1299, 2017 WL 766915, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3598

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 28, 2017 | Docket: 4611271

Cited 3 times | Published

agent so to act.” Restatement (Third) of Agency § 2.01 (2006). In this case, however, we need not

Christine C. Peterson v. Commissioner of IRS

827 F.3d 968, 2016 WL 3648473

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2016 | Docket: 4109119

Cited 3 times | Published

Years of NSD Service.” Family Program art. II, § 2.1(h). . " 'Normal Form' means the payment of a retirement

People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Miami Seaquarium

189 F. Supp. 3d 1327, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179354, 2016 WL 7409712

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 64309062

Cited 3 times | Published

activities” supports this conception of “take.” MMPA § 2(1), Pub. L. No. 92-522, 86 Stat. 1027 (1972) (findings

Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. v. Mid-South Capital, Inc.

690 F.3d 1216, 2012 WL 3289078

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 14, 2012 | Docket: 765529

Cited 3 times | Published

precedent quoting Restatement (Second) of Contracts, § 2(1).) A party’s conduct can result in a promise.

Zinn v. United States

835 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137566, 2011 WL 6202890

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2011 | Docket: 65977910

Cited 3 times | Published

accordingly”). In this case, FAA Order 7110.65P, section 2-1-1, provides that the issuance of weather information

Hot Developers, Inc. v. Willow Lake Estates, Inc.

950 So. 2d 537, 2007 WL 837180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2007 | Docket: 1752043

Cited 3 times | Published

contained a "time is of the essence" provision. Section 2.1 of the agreement required Hot Developers to deposit

Airplanes of Boca, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Federal Aviation Administration

254 F. Supp. 2d 1304, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10257

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 2003 | Docket: 2378422

Cited 3 times | Published

Traffic Control Manual (ATCM), FAA Order 7110.65J, § 2-1-1 states: The primary purpose of the ATC system

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

165 F. Supp. 2d 1322, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21588, 2001 WL 1044897

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2001 | Docket: 2385575

Cited 3 times | Published

Beach from enforcing Art. 11 § 4.1 and Art. 17 § 2.1 of the City's Land Development Code which apply

Gainer v. City of Winter Haven, Fla.

170 F. Supp. 2d 1225, 17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1792, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16775, 2001 WL 1301706

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2001 | Docket: 2248215

Cited 3 times | Published

the following policies and procedures: *1230 a. § 2.01(B) and (E), Standards of Conduct; b. § 2.12, Use

Pinellas County v. Eight is Enough in Pinellas

775 So. 2d 317, 2000 WL 639326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2000 | Docket: 1667848

Cited 3 times | Published

was approved by the voters in a referendum.[1] Section 2.01 of the charter states that Pinellas County has

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Unique Financial Concepts, Inc.

119 F. Supp. 2d 1332, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23044

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1998 | Docket: 2197706

Cited 3 times | Published

are securities under federal securities law. Section 2(1) of the Securities Act and Section 3(a)(10) of

Sowell v. State

738 So. 2d 333, 1998 WL 64945

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1998 | Docket: 1752221

Cited 3 times | Published

several years before the decision in Jenks. [2] Section 2.01, Florida Statutes.

Waite v. Waite

593 So. 2d 222, 1991 WL 87223

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1992 | Docket: 446529

Cited 3 times | Published

of all common and statutory law of England. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1989). B. THE EMANCIPATION ACTS

BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD v. Matthews

473 So. 2d 831, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1912, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15204

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 1985 | Docket: 451496

Cited 3 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 323

703 F.2d 501, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2226, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28772

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 18, 1983 | Docket: 923934

Cited 3 times | Published

EMPLOYER RIGHTS — UNION RIGHTS Section 2.01. No member of the International Brotherhood

& SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal

194 So. 3d 311, 2016 WL 3191086

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2016 | Docket: 3072274

Cited 2 times | Published

of the common law of the State pursuant to [section 2.01, Florida Statutes], the Legislature is without

Optima Tobacco Corp. v. US Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers, Inc.

171 F. Supp. 3d 1303, 2016 WL 1045838, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34030

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2016 | Docket: 64307705

Cited 2 times | Published

GUN®-branded cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco, see id. § 2.1, with Optima serving as a customer service liaison

Florida Carry, Inc. v. University of Florida

180 So. 3d 137, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16115, 2015 WL 6567665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2015 | Docket: 60252329

Cited 2 times | Published

firearm anywhere else on campus is prohibited. § 2.001(3)(a) (emphasis added). - As indicated, possession

Maronda Homes, Inc. v. Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass'n

127 So. 3d 1258, 2013 WL 3466814

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 2013 | Docket: 60236682

Cited 2 times | Published

it is modified or superseded by statute (citing § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1957))). Therefore, we address whether

Telli v. Broward County

94 So. 3d 504, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 342, 2012 WL 1623041, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 933

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2012 | Docket: 60310906

Cited 2 times | Published

state constitution. Pinellas Cnty. Charter art. II, § 2.01, 2.06. In 1996, Clair Johnson, a resident and registered

Tmh v. Dmt

79 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20502, 2011 WL 6437247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2011 | Docket: 138267

Cited 2 times | Published

than cite a law review article as the source. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, cited in the dissent, simply

Tmh v. Dmt

79 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20502, 2011 WL 6437247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2011 | Docket: 138267

Cited 2 times | Published

than cite a law review article as the source. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, cited in the dissent, simply

G.C. v. R.S.

71 So. 3d 164, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2011 | Docket: 60302909

Cited 2 times | Published

neither does it exclude the common law defense. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2010) (common law remains in effect

Westchester General Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services

770 F. Supp. 2d 1286, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28069, 2011 WL 976612

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2011 | Docket: 2336852

Cited 2 times | Published

and not subject to the exceptions set forth in § 2.1(d) of this part must be addressed to the Agency

In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Contract Litigation

716 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2010 WL 2164183

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1929991

Cited 2 times | Published

the Credit Agreement]" and in accordance with Section 2.1, make its pro rata share of the requested loans

Kozak v. Hillsborough Public Transportation Commission

695 F. Supp. 2d 1285, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13241

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2010 | Docket: 2231130

Cited 2 times | Published

Laws 299 (the "Special Act" or "Ch. 2001-299") § 2(1); Dkt. 119, ¶ 4(g).[1] The Special Act defines a

Fontainebleau Las Vegas, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings, LLC)

417 B.R. 651, 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 3, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94481, 2009 WL 3125548

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1449328

Cited 2 times | Published

Loan, and the Revolving Loan facilities. [Cr. Agr. § 2.1]. Each facility respectively provided for a total

Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts B v. v. Consorcio Barr, S.A.

613 F. Supp. 2d 1362, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39802, 2009 WL 1321411

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 12, 2009 | Docket: 151247

Cited 2 times | Published

complete construction of the Hotel. Loan Agreement, § 2.1-2.2. Consorcio's access to a credit facility was

Seminole County v. City of Winter Springs

935 So. 2d 521, 2006 WL 1459775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 1671163

Cited 2 times | Published

statutes."). As argued by the County, Article II, Section 2.1 of the County's charter provides that: "The legislative

Red-Eyed Jack, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

322 F. Supp. 2d 1361, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12223, 2004 WL 1444723

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2004 | Docket: 2435073

Cited 2 times | Published

enforcing Article 11, Section 4.1 and Article 17, Section 2.1 of the LDC. The former section permits adult

Baker County Press, Inc. v. BAKER COUNTY MEDICAL SERV., INC.

870 So. 2d 189, 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1939, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2673, 2004 WL 393189

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 2004 | Docket: 1330638

Cited 2 times | Published

sufficient to justify the breadth of the exemption: Section 2. (1) The Legislature finds that it is a public necessity

Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P.

835 So. 2d 1091, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 980, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2458

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 64820153

Cited 2 times | Published

prior to Florida's statehood is codified in section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1993). . See 28 U.S.C.

Harris v. State

879 So. 2d 1223, 2002 WL 731699

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2002 | Docket: 463814

Cited 2 times | Published

Criminal Justice, Discovery and Procedure Before Trial § 2.1(d). Giglio v. U.S., 405 U.S. 150, 154, 92 S.Ct.

Crum v. State of Alabama

198 F.3d 1305, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 34492, 77 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,212, 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 950

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 395633

Cited 2 times | Published

Stat. 253, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a), was amended by § 2(1) of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972

State v. Ashley

670 So. 2d 1087, 1996 WL 124657

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1996 | Docket: 1671486

Cited 2 times | Published

the Supreme Court under limited circumstances. § 2.01 Fla.Stat. (1993); Waite v. Waite, 618 So.2d 1360

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Comcoa Ltd.

855 F. Supp. 1258, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8569

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1994 | Docket: 1801055

Cited 2 times | Published

investment contracts, hence securities, as defined by Section 2(1) of the Securities Act and Section 3(a)(10) of

PMI Investment, Inc. v. Rose (In Re Prime Motor Inns, Inc.)

167 B.R. 261

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 12, 1994 | Docket: 1604099

Cited 2 times | Published

63. Indeed, Mr. Utley testified that although Section 2.1 of the Intercreditor Agreement contained a clause

Tavormina v. Timmeny

561 So. 2d 681, 1990 WL 62895

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 1481008

Cited 2 times | Published

Agreement provided only two termination options: section 2.1, where the "Employee refuses without reasonable

De Cuellar v. Brady

881 F.2d 1561, 1989 WL 91563

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 66246554

Cited 2 times | Published

Regulations defines "securities" by reference to section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77b(l)

Villeneuve v. Advanced Business Concepts Corp.

698 F.2d 1121, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30322

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 66192858

Cited 2 times | Published

purchaser agreement is a security as defined by section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 and section 3(a)(10)

Newman v. Eli Witt Co. (In Re Eli Witt Co.)

20 B.R. 778, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4130

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 14, 1982 | Docket: 1425753

Cited 2 times | Published

Eli Witt. "Normal Retirement Date" is defined in § 2.01, page 5, as the first day of the month following

City of Jacksonville Beach v. Albury

291 So. 2d 82

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1973 | Docket: 1505595

Cited 2 times | Published

"ARTICLE 2 "General And Urban Service Districts "Section 2.01. Services Districts and Their Areas. The territory

Coleman v. Davis

120 So. 2d 56

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1960 | Docket: 1286906

Cited 2 times | Published

the annotation referred to in footnote 3. [5] Section 2.01, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A. [6] 15 C.J.S

Peterbrooke Franchising of Am., LLC v. Miami Chocolates, LLC

312 F. Supp. 3d 1325

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2018 | Docket: 64318871

Cited 1 times | Published

Competitive Business (as that term is defined in Section 2.1.2 of the Franchise Agreement) located or operating

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Marciano

190 So. 3d 166, 2016 WL 1385903, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5424

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2016 | Docket: 3054141

Cited 1 times | Published

which predated the filing of the complaint. Section 2.01 of the PSA, in turn, provides that “the Depositor

Bennett v. Walton County

174 So. 3d 386, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9448, 2015 WL 3824197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 2015 | Docket: 60250422

Cited 1 times | Published

the preservation of residential neighborhoods. Section 2.01.03(L)(3)(á)(iii) of the LDC provides that “[n]on-residential

Provident Group-Continuum Properties, L.L.C. Ex Rel. University of Florida v. Crapo

157 So. 3d 409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2015 | Docket: 2630635

Cited 1 times | Published

L. Ascher, Scott & Ascher on Trusts, § 2.1.8, at 40; § 4.2, at 179 (5th ed. 2006). In

Estate of Michelle Evette McCall v. United States

134 So. 3d 894, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 104, 2014 WL 959180, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 933

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2014 | Docket: 402403

Cited 1 times | Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Avenue CLO Fund Ltd. v. Bank of America, NA

709 F.3d 1072, 2013 WL 617060

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 20, 2013 | Docket: 2189037

Cited 1 times | Published

satisfied certain conditions. Specifically, under section 2.1(c)(iii) of the Credit Agreement, “each Revolving

Gc v. Rs

71 So. 3d 164, 2011 WL 4104731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 2011 | Docket: 2356634

Cited 1 times | Published

neither does it exclude the common law defense. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2010) (common law remains in effect

Melton v. State

56 So. 3d 868, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3211, 2011 WL 831135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2011 | Docket: 60298681

Cited 1 times | Published

1776, are declared to be of force in this state." § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2010). See State v. Egan, 287 So.2d

Johnson v. Gulf County

26 So. 3d 33, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19943, 2009 WL 4912595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2009 | Docket: 2410890

Cited 1 times | Published

The County's subdivision ordinance provides in section 2.1 that a "[s]ubdivision shall mean the platting

Darwish v. State

937 So. 2d 789, 2006 WL 2621781

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2006 | Docket: 459679

Cited 1 times | Published

provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (2004), provides, with certain

Stroemel v. Columbia County

930 So. 2d 742, 2006 WL 1168779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2006 | Docket: 1469547

Cited 1 times | Published

electrical generating facilities; or water supply." § 2.1, Columbia County Code (emphasis added). Canoeing

USA Interactive v. Dow Lohnes & Albertson, P.L.L.C.

328 F. Supp. 2d 1294, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15608, 2004 WL 1769263

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 2004 | Docket: 92564

Cited 1 times | Published

a single entity to exercise the option.[49] Section 2.1 of the option provides that "[t]he Company [Jovon]

Gainer v. City of Winter Haven, Fla.

134 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20190, 2000 WL 33245459

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2000 | Docket: 2316535

Cited 1 times | Published

violated the following policies and procedures: (a) § 2.01(B) and (E), Standards of Conduct; (b) § 2.12, Use

Gainer v. City of Winter Haven, Fla.

134 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20190, 2000 WL 33245459

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 2000 | Docket: 2316535

Cited 1 times | Published

violated the following policies and procedures: (a) § 2.01(B) and (E), Standards of Conduct; (b) § 2.12, Use

Crum v. State of Alabama

198 F.3d 1305

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 29, 1999 | Docket: 395634

Cited 1 times | Published

253, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a), was amended by § 2(1) of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of

Brooks v. Miller

158 F.3d 1230

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 237180

Cited 1 times | Published

requirement for primary elections does not violate § 2. 1. Discriminatory Purpose Plaintiffs

In Re Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.

233 B.R. 497, 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 2070, 1997 WL 1100227

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1997 | Docket: 1842617

Cited 1 times | Published

purchase, the "Acquired Assets" (as defined in Section 2.01 of the Asset Purchase Agreement) free and clear

Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Ltd. Ex Rel. Florida Panthers Hockey Club, Inc. v. Miami Sports & Exhibition Authority

939 F. Supp. 855, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14233, 1996 WL 550103

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1996 | Docket: 1046145

Cited 1 times | Published

violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2.[1] *857 II. FINDINGS OF FACT The Panthers is a

SOUTHWEST FLA. REGIONAL MED. CTR. v. Connor

643 So. 2d 681, 1994 WL 551490

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 1994 | Docket: 1492930

Cited 1 times | Published

with the constitution of the United States. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1993). I do not question the authority

Ocean Bank v. LA ESQUINA PRESIDENCIAL

623 So. 2d 520, 20 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1050, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5964, 1993 WL 182525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1993 | Docket: 1183729

Cited 1 times | Published

other. John F. Dolan, The Law of Letters of Credit § 2.01 (2d ed. 1990). Two of the cases relied on by the

Arnold v. Board of Education of Escambia County

880 F.2d 305

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 10, 1989 | Docket: 66246441

Cited 1 times | Published

Civil Liberties Litigation, the Law of Section 1983 § 2.01 at 73 (2nd ed. 1986). In addition, to state a claim

Hutchens v. MAXICENTERS, USA

541 So. 2d 618, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 986, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2375, 1988 WL 34665

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1989 | Docket: 1516516

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida and is of force in this state by virtue of section 2.01, Florida Statutes. In Florida since the adoption

United States v. Dallas County Commission

850 F.2d 1430

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 13, 1988 | Docket: 66236369

Cited 1 times | Published

of members to the County Commission violates section 2).1 The government contends that a single-member

In re Forfeiture of 1978 Chevrolet Van Vin: CGD1584167858

493 So. 2d 433, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 432, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2455

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 1986 | Docket: 64621310

Cited 1 times | Published

is further supported by section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1983). Section 2.01 provides: The common and

United Engines, Inc. v. Citmoco Services, Inc.

418 So. 2d 409, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 1982 | Docket: 1288777

Cited 1 times | Published

file its action in Hillsborough County, Florida. § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1981). The appellant contends that

Amendola v. Amendola

118 So. 2d 13

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1960 | Docket: 60194340

Cited 1 times | Published

if she were unmarried.” Despite the mandate of § 2.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., adopting the English common

Soud v. Hike

56 So. 2d 462, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1004

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 1952 | Docket: 1355356

Cited 1 times | Published

questions, we must look to our common law. By F.S. § 2.01, F.S.A., this includes designated portions of the

Stevens, Stevens v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2025 | Docket: 71227608

Published

the Legislature of this state." Fla. Stat. § 2.01 (2025). This is no support, then, for the conclusion

Stevens, Stevens v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2025 | Docket: 71227608

Published

the Legislature of this state." Fla. Stat. § 2.01 (2025). This is no support, then, for the conclusion

Tania Almagro v. School Board of Miami-Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2025 | Docket: 70892209

Published

p. 50. See also Fla. Terr. Acts 1823, p. 111; § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1829); Am. Home Assurrance Co., 908

Eugene Gartman and Adrienne Gartman v. Southern Tactical Range, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; And BITN, LLC, A

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2025 | Docket: 70890930

Published

common law of the Statute pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to

Sarah Steinmetz v. Lindsey Pickholtz

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2025 | Docket: 70513831

Published

plaintiff’s innocence is a favorable termination”); § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2024) (“The common and statute laws

Brandon J. Bartels v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 7, 2025 | Docket: 70186680

Published

traditions still govern appellate practice today. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (“The common and statute laws of England

Raulerson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 69996619

Published

the common law of England as of July 4, 1776. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. Even so, as explained in the concurring

United States v. Marion Michael O'Steen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2025 | Docket: 68310299

Published

Argued: Mar 5, 2024

substantive extortion offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 I agree with the court that Count

United States v. Marion Michael O'Steen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 4, 2025 | Docket: 68310299

Published

Argued: Mar 5, 2024

substantive extortion offense. See 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 I agree with the court that Count

January Littlejohn v. School Board of Leon County Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 12, 2025 | Docket: 67133768

Published

Argued: Apr 17, 2024

“Controversies.” U.S. Const. art. III, § 2. 1 Dicta, however, are statements or observations

State of Florida, Agency for Persons With Disabilities v. Sally Toal

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2025 | Docket: 69674137

Published

adoption of the English common law. Id. (citing § 2.01, Fla. Stat.). As the Florida Supreme Court

Village of Palmetto Bay, Florida v. Miami-Dade County, Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2024 | Docket: 69435416

Published

” Miami-Dade County, Fla., Code Ch. 2, Art. I, § 2-1, R. 4.01(n) (2020). The four-day rule governs

United States v. Reginald Graham

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 2, 2024 | Docket: 66744898

Published

Argued: Jan 19, 2023

Orenstein, Trial Objections Handbook 2d § 2:1 (2023) (“Rule 401 adopts a very broad concept

PAJ Investment Group, LLC v. El Lago N.W. 7th Condominium Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69266598

Published

p. 50; see also Fla. Terr. Acts 1823, p. 111; § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (1829). This included common law concepts

City of Tampa v. Foottit, Foottit

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 2024 | Docket: 69265872

Published

Passenger Corp., 908 So. 2d 459, 471 (Fla. 2005), section 2.01, Florida Statutes (2022), was memorialized in

ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC. v. SARASOTA COUNTY, VENICE HMA, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2024 | Docket: 68998441

Published

Home Assurance Co., 908 So. 2d at 471; see also § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2011). Predicated on the principle

Pinellas County, Florida v. Gary Joiner, etc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2024 | Docket: 68891393

Published

908 So. 2d 459, 471 (Fla. 2005) (noting that section 2.01 of the Florida Statutes incorporated common

University of Florida Board of Trustees, and The Florida Board of Governors v. Browning, Boisse

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2024 | Docket: 68404274

Published

codified by the Florida Legislature.” Id. (citing section 2.01, Florida Statutes). There are three policy

H.S., the Father v. Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2024 | Docket: 68403491

Published

because they have not been abrogated by statute. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2023) (“The common . . . laws of England

Katina Paese v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2024 | Docket: 68290564

Published

with a person’s personal property or chattels. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2020) (“The common and statute laws

Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 2023 | Docket: 66681963

Published

Argued: Jun 21, 2023

sessors); Act of July 14, 1798, ch. 75, § 2, 1 Stat. 597, 598 (1798) (“That the said tax

Consumers' Research v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 2023 | Docket: 66681963

Published

Argued: Jun 21, 2023

sessors); Act of July 14, 1798, ch. 75, § 2, 1 Stat. 597, 598 (1798) (“That the said tax

AFP 103 CORP. v. COMMON WEALTH TRUST SERVICES, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2023 | Docket: 67912623

Published

community.” Restatement (Third) of Prop.: Servitudes § 2.1(1) (Am. L. Inst. 2000). An express easement

Karyn D. Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 11, 2023 | Docket: 67723572

Published

Argued: Aug 24, 2023

statute of limitations. Pub. L. 111-2. § 2(1)–(2), 123 Stat. 5. Now, a claim for discriminatory

Perry Hodges v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 18, 2023 | Docket: 67273561

Published

Argued: Apr 27, 2023

Tower’s airspace. Speciﬁcally, they rely on section 2-1-1 of the ATCM, which provides that “[t]he primary

Javier Garcia-Bengochea v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 2023 | Docket: 66711797

Published

Bittker on Regulation of Interstate Commerce § 2.01 (Aspen Pub. 2d ed 2022). See Epic Sys. Corp. v

Javier Garcia-Bengochea v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 2023 | Docket: 66711797

Published

Bittker on Regulation of Interstate Commerce § 2.01 (Aspen Pub. 2d ed 2022). See Epic Sys. Corp. v

Javier Garcia-Bengochea v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 23, 2022 | Docket: 65856894

Published

Denning, Bittker on Regulation of Interstate Commerce § 2.01 (Aspen Pub. 2d ed 2022). See Epic Sys. Corp. v

PHYSICIANS CARE CENTERS OF FLORIDA, LLC v. PNC NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898835

Published

included specific provisions for Purchased Assets (Section 2.01), Excluded Assets (Section 2.02), Assumed Liabilities

1000 BRICKELL, LTD., etc. v. CITY OF MIAMI

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2022 | Docket: 63369338

Published

v. Holman, 33 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1948). See also § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2022) (“The common and statute laws

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY v. BRYAN RINTOUL, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Edward Caprio

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2022 | Docket: 63301697

Published

Florida in absence of clear statutory guidance. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2022). The legislature also created

1000 BRICKELL, LTD., etc. v. CITY OF MIAMI

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2022 | Docket: 63232259

Published

v. Holman, 33 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 1948). See also § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2022) (“The common and statute laws

Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Christopher Alfieri

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 20, 2022 | Docket: 62612424

Published

federal court sat. Process Act of 1789, ch. 21, § 2, 1 Stat. 93, 93. And “the laws of the several states

Mr. Eddie I. Sierra v. City of Hallandale Beach Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2021 | Docket: 59885695

Published

created by statute. See Act of May 31, 1790, ch. 15, § 2, 1 Stat. 124, 124–25 (imposing statutory damages for

SARA SHAKE v. YES WE ARE MAD GROUP, INC. and MARC APTAKIN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 2021 | Docket: 59840430

Published

agreement to wind up and dissolve the company. Section 2.1 of the agreement provided the respondent shall

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 28, 2020 | Docket: 18582664

Published

monetary loss. See Act of May 31, 1790, ch. 15, § 2, 1 Stat. 124, 124–25. Justice Story, riding circuit

Christine D'Onofrio v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 6, 2020 | Docket: 17324057

Published

Jnt. Exh. 1, p. 11) (Costco Employee Agreement, § 2.1.)). D’Onofrio “thought ‘it [was] vital [] to have

U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commissioner v. Robert Escobio

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 6, 2020 | Docket: 16659217

Published

or otherwise.” 1 DAN B. DOBBS, LAW ON REMEDIES, § 2.1(1), at 56 (2d ed. 1993). Others are coercive; commanding

GARY W. JOINER, SUCCESSOR TO MIKE WELLS v. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2019 | Docket: 16243974

Published

Corp., 908 So. 2d 459, 471 (Fla. 2005) (citing § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2004)). In Florida, the legislature

LEWIS DARREN FRANKLIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

275 So. 3d 192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 2019 | Docket: 15835855

Published

Thus, courts must look to the common law. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2017). Prior to the 1998 adoption

In re Pina

602 B.R. 72

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jun 25, 2019 | Docket: 65791423

Published

Internal Revenue Service, total claim is Part One Section 2.1 and priority claim is $0 $6,000 and priority

GARY W. JOINER, SUCCESSOR TO MIKE WELLS v. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2019 | Docket: 15048697

Published

Corp., 908 So. 2d 459, 471 (Fla. 2005) (citing § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2004)). In Florida, the legislature

ROBERTO ESTAPE v. STANLEY B. SEIDMAN, PH.D. and STANLEY B. SEIDMAN PH.D., P.A.

269 So. 3d 565

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2019 | Docket: 14988989

Published

inconsistent with the acts of the legislature. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2016). Section 490.0147, Florida

Goodwin v. Walton County Florida

248 F. Supp. 3d 1257, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49681

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 2017 | Docket: 64313782

Published

recreational purposes is hereby protected.” Id. § 2.1. It prohibits any “individual, group, or entity

SC13-1976 Bradley Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc. and City of St. Petersburg, etc. v. Bradley Westphal – Corrected Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2016 | Docket: 4108655

Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power

Christine C. Peterson v. Commissioner of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2016 | Docket: 3066692

Published

Years of NSD Service.” Family Program art. II, § 2.1(h). 11 “‘Normal Form’ means the payment of a

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company

192 So. 3d 431, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 197, 2016 WL 1700521, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 885

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2016 | Docket: 3059072

Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A.,-the Legislature is without power to abolish

Jensen v. Pinellas County

198 So. 3d 754, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2864, 2016 WL 746442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2016 | Docket: 3039678

Published

other valuable consideration. (Ord. No. 99-6, § 2,1-26-99) Sec. 86-87. — Application and enforcement

Lender Ann Hamilton v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation

157 So. 3d 1096, 2015 WL 873531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2015 | Docket: 2638636

Published

an Administrative Expense Request pursuant to Section 2.1(a) of the Plan and fail to do so by February

Emery v. American Airlines, Inc.

56 F. Supp. 3d 1284, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148656, 2014 WL 5341881

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2014 | Docket: 64298093

Published

Employee in the Service of the Employer.” Plan, § 2.1(af). Section 5.4 of the Plan provides that the existence

Industrial Engineering & Development, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.

45 F. Supp. 3d 1311, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118140, 2014 WL 4206584

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2014 | Docket: 64297183

Published

agreement. According to Plaintiffs, pursuant to section 2.1.9 of the cross-license agreement, only a finding

Krauser v. Evollution IP Holdings, Inc.

975 F. Supp. 2d 1247, 2013 WL 5313403, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134888

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2013 | Docket: 65994619

Published

Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. 112-29, § 2(1), 125 Stat. 284, 284(2011). . Evollution, which

Forgione v. HCA Inc.

954 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 2013 WL 3784160, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102765

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2013 | Docket: 65992419

Published

Regulation Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, § 2.1(a)(b)(e), permission to depose the three AHCA employees

Florida House of Representatives v. Romo

113 So. 3d 117, 2013 WL 2232315, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2013 | Docket: 60231434

Published

extent "not inconsistent with the Constitution.” § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2012). See also Matthews v. McCain

Samples v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass'n

114 So. 3d 912, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 317, 2013 WL 2096260, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1001

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60232016

Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Interface Kanner, LLC v. JP Morgan CHase Bank, N.A.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 2013 | Docket: 2903645

Published

limitation, when read together with language from section 2.1, which provides that “[JPMorgan] agrees to pay

City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20

98 So. 3d 1236, 2012 WL 4511607, 194 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2457, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2012 | Docket: 60312143

Published

executes contracts and other instruments. Under section 2.1 of the CBA, the City Manager (or his designee)

Berman v. Dillard's

91 So. 3d 875, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9600, 2012 WL 2149775

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2012 | Docket: 60309998

Published

common law of the State pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

FHR TB, LLC v. TB Isle Resort, LP.

865 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 2011 WL 4914715, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155752

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2011 | Docket: 65981729

Published

The “Operating Term” of the HMA is 25 years. HMA § 2.1. In addition, the Operating Term is extended for

Smith v. Williams

819 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2011 | Docket: 2016079

Published

appointed by the Employer (Orion) (doc. # 43-2, § 2.1(a)), is one of the "Named Fiduciaries," (id. at

Langfitt v. Federal Marine Terminals, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 29, 2011 | Docket: 2906043

Published

14 See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 2(1) (defining a “master,” that is, an employer); see

United States v. Martin J. Bradley, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2011 | Docket: 2906240

Published

the other rulings in section 2. 1. We review the

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 16, 2011 | Docket: 3257797

Published

regular session of the Florida Legislature. 14 Section 2(1)(a), SB 1598, supra. 15 See s. 1.01(8), Fla.

Harrell's, LLC v. Agrium Advanced (U.S.) Technologies, Inc.

795 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62693, 2011 WL 2418892

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2011 | Docket: 2001179

Published

based on Section 2.1.2 of the Supply Agreement.[4]Id. at 13; see Doc. # 10-1 at *1330 5, § 2.1.2. Harrell's

Sturdivant v. State

84 So. 3d 1044, 2010 WL 3464410, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2010 | Docket: 60306575

Published

e.g., State v. Egan, 287 So.2d 1, 6 (Fla.1973); § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2007). To the extent pertinent, the

Citizens for Smart Growth v. Peters

716 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54284, 2010 WL 1817332

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 3, 2010 | Docket: 2403903

Published

E. 83 at 6); (D.E. 80 at 6); see also (FEIS Section 2.1 "Project Description," AR 7265.) The study area

World Capita Communications, Inc. v. Island Capital Management, LLC (In Re Skyway Communications Holding Corp.)

415 B.R. 859, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 59, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2924, 2009 WL 3018090

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 18, 2009 | Docket: 1084407

Published

reorganized pursuant to the Plan." (Main Case Doc. 420, § 2.1). Additionally, Article 8 of the Plan, entitled

US Ex Rel. Wesco Distribution v. American Bridge

473 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22511, 2007 WL 438771

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2007 | Docket: 2197989

Published

the equipment is fully assembled. For example, Section 2.1 of the manual states: "Outdoor assemblies are

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 3255672

Published

Sincerely, Bill McCollum, Attorney General 1 Section 2(1), Ch. 2001-299, Laws of Florida. 2 Section 3(24)

Revelex Corp. v. World Travel Holdings, Inc.

511 F. Supp. 2d 1320, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3026, 2007 WL 141158

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2007 | Docket: 2313606

Published

website. Plaintiff asserts that the language of Section 2.1 allowing "Customer" to use other booking engines

Bartlett v. State

929 So. 2d 1125, 2006 WL 1409122

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 2006 | Docket: 1421725

Published

the adoption of the common law of England. See § 2.01, Fla. Stat. (2005). Under the common law, the title

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 13, 2005 | Docket: 3258989

Published

Florida has adopted the English common law. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, provides: "The common and

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 1, 2005 | Docket: 3258951

Published

special act as an independent special district.1 Section 2(1) of Chapter 01-299, Laws of Florida, creates

In Re Fifth Taste Concepts Las Olas, LLC

325 B.R. 42, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 199, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 870, 44 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 220

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: May 2, 2005 | Docket: 1378286

Published

which shall be calculated in accordance with Section 2.1 below. Tenant shall exercise its options to renew

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 3257470

Published

Section 1(1)(a), Ch. 01-246, Laws of Fla. 2 Section 2(1), Ch. 01-246, Laws of Fla. 3 See Wood v. Marston

YNN Holding Corp. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.

354 F. Supp. 2d 1334, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1423, 2005 WL 237771

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2005 | Docket: 2290632

Published

25, 2009. (Credit Facility Agreement at 5.) Section 2.1 states that subject to the terms and conditions

Rollison v. City of Key West

875 So. 2d 659, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5218, 2004 WL 784473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2004 | Docket: 1684073

Published

neighborhoods." City of Key West Ordinance 98-31, § 2.[1] After Ordinance 98-31 was adopted, the City took

John Acevedo v. First Union National Bank

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 26, 2004 | Docket: 397875

Published

including cashier’s checks. In relevant part, section 2.1 of the Assistance Agreement provides:

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 3, 2003 | Docket: 3257740

Published

Section 19, Ch. 2003-382, Laws of Florida. 5 Section 2.1.(1), Ch. 2003-382, Laws of Florida. 6 See, Op

Coocen & Sons, Co. v. Rosenthal

842 So. 2d 307, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5460, 2003 WL 1889146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2003 | Docket: 64822023

Published

AFFIRMED. PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur. . Section 2.01. Commencement of Term — The term of this Lease

Florida Public Telecommunications Ass'n v. City of Miami Beach

321 F.3d 1046, 2003 WL 302103

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 13, 2003 | Docket: 65655213

Published

Ordinance in turn. 1. Section 2(1) — Statement of Purpose FPTA argues that parts of section 2(1) of the Right-of-Way

Downing v. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama

321 F.3d 1017, 2003 WL 302222

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 13, 2003 | Docket: 65655211

Published

Slat. 253, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (a), was amended by § (2)(1) of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972

Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. MCImetro Access Transmission Services, Inc.

278 F.3d 1223, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 373, 2002 WL 27099

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 10, 2002 | Docket: 238746

Published

W. Huber et al., Federal Telecommunications Law § 2.1.3 (2d ed.1999). The regulation would be provided

United States v. Judy Weaver

275 F.3d 1320

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 18, 2001 | Docket: 75911

Published

violation of 20 U.S.C. § 1097(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 1 Flagler was a wholly-owned subsidiary

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 19, 2001 | Docket: 3258525

Published

Ocala City Charter was adopted prior to 1973.4 Section 2.01(d) of that charter provided when the council

Turner v. City of Clearwater

789 So. 2d 273, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 233, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 732, 2001 WL 359524

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2001 | Docket: 64806654

Published

and safety of the citizens of the City, that Section 2.01(d) of the City Charter does not require that

3679 Waters Avenue Corp. v. Water Street Ovens, Ltd.

779 So. 2d 349, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1457

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2000 | Docket: 64804115

Published

directs our attention to the following language in section 2.01 of the lease: The parties recognize that Oumer

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Aug 5, 1999 | Docket: 3257716

Published

83-423, Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 1983.1 Section 2(1) of the act vests in the commission the authority

Loeffler v. Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation

739 So. 2d 150, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10439, 1999 WL 562148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1999 | Docket: 64790153

Published

adopted by statute in the State of Florida. See, § 2.01, Fla. Stat., and Quality Shell Homes & Supply Co

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 11, 1999 | Docket: 3257016

Published

RAB/tjw 1 See, Ch. 82-375, Laws of Florida. 2 Section 2(1), Ch. 82-375, supra, as amended by s. 2(1), Ch

EPL, Inc. v. USA Federal Credit Union

173 F.3d 1356, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8227, 1999 WL 252383

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037318

Published

Software Support Services as specified in Part II, Section 2.01 from October 1, 1989 to January 1, 1990. This

EPL, Inc. v. U.S.A. Federal Credit

173 F.3d 1356

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 29, 1999 | Docket: 2037276

Published

Support Services as specified in Part II, Section 2.01 from October 1, 1989 to January 1, 1990

United States v. Diaz

55 F. Supp. 2d 1362, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10616, 1999 WL 499122

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1999 | Docket: 2220670

Published

abetting statute, Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.[1] All ten of the charged defendants were part

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 14, 1998 | Docket: 3258173

Published

1.6.6, by-laws. 7 Section 1.6.8, by-laws. 8 Section 2.1, by-laws. 9 The public directors are: the City

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Mar 30, 1998 | Docket: 3258129

Published

1.6.6, by-laws. 6 Section 1.6.8, by-laws. 7 Section 2.1, by-laws. 8 Section 3.3, by-laws. 9 Section 3

Arena Development Co. v. Broward County

708 So. 2d 976, 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 843, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2651, 1998 WL 117540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 64780023

Published

the order of the trial court and hold that section 2.01, Ordinance No. 83-72 does not prevent the application

United States v. Vaghela

970 F. Supp. 1018, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9920, 1997 WL 393102

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1997 | Docket: 1211080

Published

1320a-7(b)(1)(A), and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.[1] (Docket No. 1). In another portion of the indictment

United States v. Vaghela

970 F. Supp. 1018, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9920, 1997 WL 393102

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1997 | Docket: 1211080

Published

1320a-7(b)(1)(A), and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.[1] (Docket No. 1). In another portion of the indictment

Amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar

695 So. 2d 312, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 308, 1997 Fla. LEXIS 730, 1997 WL 297683

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1997 | Docket: 64774188

Published

admission. 1-20 Florida Board of Bar Examiners Section 2. 1-21 Membership. There is hereby created a The

Berman v. U.S. Financial Acceptance Corp.

669 So. 2d 1116, 29 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 542, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2627, 1996 WL 120239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1996 | Docket: 64763215

Published

satisfaction of the debt. Bryan. In any event, section 2.01 of the Florida Statutes (1993), declares that

Warren Publishing v. Microdos Data

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 23, 1995 | Docket: 210491

Published

Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01 [B], at 2-13 (1996). And [O]riginality for

Warren Publishing v. Microdos Data

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 23, 1995 | Docket: 2191339

Published

B. Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 2.01[B], at 2-13 (1996). And [O]riginality

Cuban American Bar v. Christopher

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 418230

Published

6 those in need." Id. § 2.1(4); see also id. § 2.2(1). UNHCR has participated

Bernas v. Knowles

648 So. 2d 272, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 54, 1995 WL 1639

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 1995 | Docket: 64753256

Published

during the probationary period without a hearing. Section 2(1) of the Special Act provides that the sheriff

B.J.Y. v. M.A.

617 So. 2d 1061

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 29, 1993 | Docket: 64696106

Published

the common law of the State pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A., the Legislature is without power to abolish

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 19, 1993 | Docket: 3257692

Published

as amended by Ch. 87-529, Laws of Florida. 2 Section 2(1), Ch. 85-376, Laws of Florida. 3 Section 2(3)

In re T.A.C.P.

609 So. 2d 588

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1992 | Docket: 64692560

Published

imported into our own common law by operation of section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1991). The parties cite to

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 5, 1992 | Docket: 3257608

Published

forth the legislative findings and intent. 7 Section 2(1), Ch. 92-277, Laws of Florida, tentatively assigned

Hall v. Holder

955 F.2d 1563, 1992 WL 43136

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 25, 1992 | Docket: 66270411

Published

Bleckley County’s sole commissioner system violates § 2. (1) Size and Geographic Compactness of Minority Group

Bilic v. New Fairway Investments of Florida, Inc.

593 So. 2d 530, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 139, 1992 WL 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1992 | Docket: 64665247

Published

park in Brevard County. The loan agreement in section 2.1 contained the following provision: 2.1 Commitment:

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 3256407

Published

Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General RAB/tjw 1 Section 2(1), Ch. 82-375, Laws of Florida. 2 The special

Grant v. Coaliron Mining Program (In re Marcon Enterprises, Inc.)

75 B.R. 125, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 965

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1987 | Docket: 65779402

Published

limited partnership. 9. Pursuant to Article VI, Section 2.1, of the Certificate and Agreement of Limited

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 6, 1986 | Docket: 3255700

Published

relating to the Pinellas County Planning Council. Section 2.01 of the charter generally provides that a county

Aurora Group, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue

487 So. 2d 1132, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 950, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7383

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1986 | Docket: 64619057

Published

the Legislature has not acted to change it. See § 2.01, Fla.Stat. (1983). Despite Aurora’s compelling

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 24, 1985 | Docket: 3257348

Published

Hillsborough County, or (4) It is authorized under section 2.01. (e.s.) Section 10.05 of the Charter provides

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 18, 1985 | Docket: 3257207

Published

cooperation with the function of the county. Section 2. (1) of Ch. 82-375. The governing body of the district

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 26, 1984 | Docket: 3257694

Published

Authority of the City of Fort Lauderdale. See, section 2(1) of SB 776. You also note that, as provided in

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 12, 1984 | Docket: 3255607

Published

83-423, Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 1983. Section 2(1) of Ch. 83-423 vests in the Commission the authority

Villeneuve v. Advanced Business Concepts Corp.

730 F.2d 1403, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23093

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 1984 | Docket: 66196787

Published

contract and therefore a security as defined in section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77b(l)

Rosen ex rel. Rosen v. Zorzos

449 So. 2d 359, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 1984 | Docket: 64604439

Published

has become a part of the common law pursuant to § 2.01, Fla.Stat. See Harrell v. State Dept. of Health

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 7, 1983 | Docket: 3255172

Published

DEFINITION OF "LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER" SET FORTH IN SECTION 2(1) OF CH. 83-115, LAWS OF FLORIDA? 2. IS THE

West v. Coogler

427 So. 2d 813, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1983 | Docket: 64595452

Published

likewise relate only to intestate estates. . § 2.01, Fla.Stat. (1981). . Lindsay v. Platt, 9 Fla

Cerf v. Cerf

421 So. 2d 1100, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1982 | Docket: 64593315

Published

legislature of this state; and that by virtue of Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1981), declaring the common

Cerf v. Cerf

421 So. 2d 1100, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1982 | Docket: 64593315

Published

legislature of this state; and that by virtue of Section 2.01, Florida Statutes (1981), declaring the common

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 25, 1982 | Docket: 3257876

Published

the office shall be paid to the supervisor. Section 2(1), Ch. 82-202, Laws of Florida. Section 2(2),

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 25, 1982 | Docket: 3257876

Published

the office shall be paid to the supervisor. Section 2(1), Ch. 82-202, Laws of Florida. Section 2(2),

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Apr 7, 1980 | Docket: 3255086

Published

possess the prescribed qualifications for office. Section 2(1), (2), and (3), ch. 69-1215. When the language

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 12, 1978 | Docket: 3257766

Published

of their delivery by the enabling resolution. Section 2.01 of Article II of the resolution states that

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jul 26, 1977 | Docket: 3255112

Published

governing head of the county hospital system. Section 2(1) of Ch. 71-789, Laws of Florida, authorized the

In Interest of K. P. v. State

327 So. 2d 820

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1976 | Docket: 64552670

Published

the acts of the legislature of this state.” (F.S. 2.01) Appellant argues that the rebuttable presumption

State v. McFarlane

318 So. 2d 449, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1975 | Docket: 64549028

Published

relating to discovery and procedure before trial. Section 2.1(a) (iii) of these Standards specifically requires

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 27, 1975 | Docket: 3258134

Published

professional schools not otherwise regulated. Section 2(1), Ch. 74-360. Bar review and C.P.A. exam courses

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Feb 19, 1975 | Docket: 3257522

Published

conducted under the following conditions: . . . . [Section 2(1).] "His agency" refers to the particular law

R.I.D.C. Industrial Development Fund v. Snyder

387 F. Supp. 466, 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1324, 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14432

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1975 | Docket: 66102518

Published

with respect to assets or inventory covered by Section 2.01 and/or Articles V and VII of the SRM Agreement

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Nov 13, 1974 | Docket: 3258565

Published

leaseholds as personalty has been abrogated. Section 2.01, F.S., declares the common law to be in force

Reed v. State

267 So. 2d 70, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3357

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1972 | Docket: 64527762

Published

invalidate the grand jury system. See Fla.Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A.; Cotton v. State, 85 Fla. 197, 95 So. 668

Godshall v. Unigard Insurance Co.

267 So. 2d 383, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1972 | Docket: 64527962

Published

are a part of the law of this state. See F.S. Section 2.01, F.S.A.1971. Such a modification of substantive

In re Florida Appellate Rules

245 So. 2d 624, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3984

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1971 | Docket: 64519411

Published

(B), which is in pertinent part as follows: “Section 2. (1) Under the procedures specified herein, the

Brooks v. City of West Miami

246 So. 2d 115, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6761

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1971 | Docket: 64519663

Published

Wester v. Rigdon, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 470; § 2.-01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and 6 Fla.Jur. Common Law §

Gates v. Foley

233 So. 2d 190, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1970 | Docket: 64513804

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See F.S. Section 2.01; F.S. A., Ripley v. Ewell, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 420. CROSS

Gaston v. Pittman

285 F. Supp. 645, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9208

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 23, 1968 | Docket: 66047824

Published

legislature of the state, are in force in Florida. F.S. 2.01, F.S.A. . Florida’s position is that the legislature

State v. Peterson

192 So. 2d 293, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4615

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 1966 | Docket: 64498769

Published

by fine not exceeding four hundred dollars.” Section 2.01, F.S.A., provides, with certain exceptions,

MacArthur v. North Palm Beach Utilities, Inc.

187 So. 2d 681, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1966 | Docket: 64497090

Published

July 4, 1776, is adopted as the law of Florida. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A. We look then

MacArthur v. North Palm Beach Utilities, Inc.

187 So. 2d 681, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1966 | Docket: 64497090

Published

July 4, 1776, is adopted as the law of Florida. Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, 1965, F.S.A. We look then

State ex rel. Elder v. City Commission of Lighthouse Point

186 So. 2d 823, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1966 | Docket: 64496866

Published

of Florida, Special Acts 57-1534, Article II, Section 2(1). The Special Act, supra, also provides for initiative

DuVal v. Kirk

174 So. 2d 580, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4105

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1965 | Docket: 64492936

Published

Sellars v. Parker, 1924, 87 Fla. 181, 100 So. 260; Section 2.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.), on which date probate

Thoman v. Ashley

170 So. 2d 332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1964 | Docket: 64491602

Published

Presbyterian Church, 1869, 13 Fla. 592, 593. . Section 2.01, B’la.Stat., E.S.A. “The common and statute

Jacksonville Expressway Authority v. Bennett

149 So. 2d 74

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1963 | Docket: 60209964

Published

Laws 1955, c. 29615, § 17; Laws 1959, c. 59-450, § 2.” 1 It is noted from the foregoing statute that the

Goodstein v. Levy

141 So. 2d 803, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1962 | Docket: 60205079

Published

129 Fla. 630, 176 So. 537, 538. Under Fla. Stat. § 2.01, F.S.A. the Common Law of England is expressly

Burcham v. Kamoraski

142 So. 2d 130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1962 | Docket: 60205193

Published

adoption, later became law in Florida. Fla.Stat. § 2.01 F.S. A.; Redf earn on Wills and Administrations

Shaw v. Armour & Co.

175 F. Supp. 213, 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2931

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1959 | Docket: 66011757

Published

modified, the common law prevails in Florida (F.S.A. § 2.01, 1957) Thomas v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

Gay v. Blocker

73 So. 2d 855, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1741

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 1954 | Docket: 64485883

Published

to the original Act by amendment in 1947. See Section 2 (1), Chapter 23959, Acts of 1947.) - The administration

Shinn v. McLeod

58 F. Supp. 440, 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2661

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1945 | Docket: 66162127

Published

Fla. 551, 121 So. 886; Florida Statutes 1941, Section 2.01, F.S.A. Decisions under notes 1 to 6, inclusive