Florida Statute 2.4 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title I
CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTES

Chapter 2
COMMON LAW IN FORCE; REPEALED STATUTES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 2.04

2.04 Repealed statute not revived by implication.—No statute of this state which has been repealed shall ever be revived by implication; that is to say, if a statute be passed repealing a former statute, and a third statute be passed repealing the second, the repeal of the second statute shall in no case be construed to revive the first, unless there be express words in the said third statute for this purpose.

History.—Nov. 2, 1829; RS 62; GS 62; RGS 74; CGL 90.

F.S. 2.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 2.04 on CourtListener

Amendments to 2.04

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 2.04

Total Results: 133

United States v. Chastain

198 F.3d 1338

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 30, 1999 | Docket: 2349200

Cited 167 times | Published

C. § 46306(c)(2) and (c)(3)7 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 4 (...continued) with intent to manufacture

United States v. Alejandro Castellanos

904 F.2d 1490, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10069, 1990 WL 81732

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 13, 1990 | Docket: 996045

Cited 122 times | Published

841(a)(1) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. 4 .In this opinion, for convenience

Craig Pittman v. J. Anthony McLain

267 F.3d 1269, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21376, 2001 WL 1167749

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 3, 2001 | Docket: 397099

Cited 119 times | Published

Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4.3 (3d ed.1999) (noting that "[t]he interaction of

United States v. Carlos Simon

964 F.2d 1082, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 14863, 1992 WL 131177

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 1992 | Docket: 179587

Cited 112 times | Published

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242 and 18 U.S.C. § 2; (4) Simon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), knowingly

Trotter v. State

576 So. 2d 691, 1990 WL 252108

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1990 | Docket: 1669806

Cited 109 times | Published

safety and assuring an element of punishment." Id. § 2(4) (emphasis added). Probation is the noncustodial

Willie Earl McSWAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

814 F.2d 617, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4913, 17 Soc. Serv. Rev. 121

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1987 | Docket: 1394753

Cited 91 times | Published

met the standard for statutory blindness under § 2.04 of the listing of impairments, which is a percentage

Askew v. Cross Key Waterways

372 So. 2d 913, 9 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1978 | Docket: 1695808

Cited 90 times | Published

K. Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies, § 2.04, at 30 (1976). Appellants maintain that the broad

Zack v. State

753 So. 2d 9, 2000 WL 14472

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2000 | Docket: 466839

Cited 87 times | Published

safety and assuring an element of punishment." Id. § 2(4) (emphasis added). Probation is the noncustodial

United States v. Mark Fisher, United States of America v. Devon Sutton, A.K.A. Devon Daniel Sutton, United States of America v. Arthur Robertson

289 F.3d 1329

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 670029

Cited 79 times | Published

law enforcement problem.” Pub. Law No. 106-172, § 2(4) (2000). In addition, Congress added GBL to

United States v. James A. Adams, United States of America v. Otto J. Runkel, United States of America v. Buddy Davis A/K/A Indian Philip Cohron Joe Wayne Jones and James A. Adams

1 F.3d 1566, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24259

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 22, 1993 | Docket: 429368

Cited 74 times | Published

and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. 4 Count 2, conspiracy to possess

Joseph Richard Redner v. Charles S. Dean, Sheriff of Citrus County, Florida, Robert A. Butterworth

29 F.3d 1495, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, 1994 WL 419484

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 1994 | Docket: 167120

Cited 72 times | Published

agency conducts an investigation. Id. § 2^4(a). If any of these investigations reveals that

Tanner Advertising Group, L.L.C. v. Fayette County

451 F.3d 777, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 14191, 2006 WL 1567244

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 9, 2006 | Docket: 180411

Cited 63 times | Published

window signs and flags in residential districts. Id. § 2-4. The only provision challenged by Tanner in the

United States v. William Thomas Martin

747 F.2d 1404, 55 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 422, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16183

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 5, 1984 | Docket: 221349

Cited 63 times | Published

7212(a) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2. 4 Count III charged that Martin

United States v. Jean-Marie Rosemond Dulcio

441 F.3d 1269, 2006 WL 551557

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 8, 2006 | Docket: 76541

Cited 55 times | Published

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 4 .The sentences were based on three alternatives:

United States v. Ricardo Elias Camargo-Vergara, Antonieta Maria Sanchez, Santos Efrain Dominguez

57 F.3d 993, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16752, 1995 WL 368442

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 1995 | Docket: 105117

Cited 54 times | Published

U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1), (b); 18 U.S.C. § 2. 4 . 21 U.S.C. § 846. 5

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots

119 F.3d 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562

Cited 51 times | Published

responsibility for, inter alia, keeping records, see § 2.4 ("Records"), preparing and distributing periodic

Wilderness Society v. Alcock

83 F.3d 386, 26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21401, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11704, 1996 WL 229229

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 1996 | Docket: 1118648

Cited 44 times | Published

Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4.1 (1989). When determining ripeness, a court asks

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. U.S. Department of Agriculture

789 F.3d 1206, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10036, 2015 WL 3653162

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 15, 2015 | Docket: 2664899

Cited 34 times | Published

Animal Welfare, 32 Fed.Reg. 3270 (Feb. 24, 1967). Section 2.4 was titled “Issuance of licenses,” and USDA could

Donna J. Beaulieu v. City of Alabaster

454 F.3d 1219, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16465, 2006 WL 1791401

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2006 | Docket: 1115746

Cited 30 times | Published

permit” by the Building Official. Id. § 2.4. A provision in the zoning ordinance, captioned

United States v. Billy Eugene Gossett, Jr., United States of America v. William Rector

877 F.2d 901, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10338

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 19, 1989 | Docket: 920228

Cited 25 times | Published

. 18 U.S.C.A. § 113(a) and 18 U.S.C.A. § 2. 4 . 18 U.S.C.A. § 1111 and 18 U.S.C.A

Alabama Power Co. v. United States Department of Energy

307 F.3d 1300, 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20055, 55 ERC (BNA) 1001, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20199

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 24, 2002 | Docket: 397514

Cited 24 times | Published

Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4.1 (3d ed.1999) (internal footnote omitted).

United States v. Carlos Arturo Arango, Simeon Rojas-Lopez and Sixto Mario Arango, Defendants

853 F.2d 818, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11767

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 29, 1988 | Docket: 521003

Cited 24 times | Published

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 4 . Appellant Carlos Arango does not challenge

Bramlett v. Peterson

307 F. Supp. 1311, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8750

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1969 | Docket: 898293

Cited 24 times | Published

the new law as required by Florida Statutes, section 2.04 (1967), F.S.A. Consequently, this Court finds

United States v. Gunby

112 F.3d 1493, 1997 WL 228566

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 22, 1997 | Docket: 73837

Cited 23 times | Published

because he was a judge of a small claims court. § 2(4). 3 . Gunby has continued to argue

Orr v. Trask

464 So. 2d 131, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 132

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1985 | Docket: 406287

Cited 23 times | Published

See K. Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies § 2.04 at 30 (1976). We decline to adopt this thesis.

United States v. Douglas B. Cole, James Hawkins, James Hensley, Carl Holley

704 F.2d 554, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28366

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 1983 | Docket: 526041

Cited 23 times | Published

was a distribution). Under 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 4 however, appellants are responsible

Raimbeault v. Accurate Machine & Tool, LLC

302 F.R.D. 675, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140318, 2014 WL 5795187

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2014 | Docket: 66053857

Cited 22 times | Published

above, the “Permitted Pavement Conditions”). Section 2.4 Subordinated Debt Standstill Provisions. Until

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Florida-Texas Freight, Inc.

357 F. Supp. 977, 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13994, 1973 WL 302630

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 1973 | Docket: 2024930

Cited 22 times | Published

tariff. The parties have further stipulated that Section 2.4.8 of Tariff No. 260 specifically provides for

Ivax Corp. v. B. Braun of America, Inc.

286 F.3d 1309, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6019, 2002 WL 480099

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 2002 | Docket: 64092830

Cited 18 times | Published

following the stock purchase. In particular, section 2.4 of the Agreement stated that if the ACOI for

Ivax Corp. v. B. Braun of America, Inc.

286 F.3d 1309, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 6019, 2002 WL 480099

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 2002 | Docket: 64092830

Cited 18 times | Published

following the stock purchase. In particular, section 2.4 of the Agreement stated that if the ACOI for

Dade County v. Young Democratic Club of Dade County

104 So. 2d 636

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1958 | Docket: 1312870

Cited 14 times | Published

which he voted or will vote in any election. "Section 2.04 Qualifications and Filing Fee. "All candidates

Davis v. State

520 So. 2d 572, 1988 WL 15148

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1988 | Docket: 1300278

Cited 13 times | Published

Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases § 2.04(a).[*] During closing argument, defense counsel

Branford State Bank v. Hackney Tractor Co.

455 So. 2d 541, 39 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1134, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1834, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14884

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1984 | Docket: 2561904

Cited 13 times | Published

Law of Secured Transactions in Personal Property § 2.04 (1980); Zaretsky, Lapse of Perfection in Secured

Remp v. State

248 So. 2d 677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1970 | Docket: 1293385

Cited 13 times | Published

Standards Relating to Post-Conviction Remedies, § 2.4, page 48 (tentative draft)." 269 F. Supp. at 992

Robinson v. Loyola Foundation, Inc.

236 So. 2d 154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1970 | Docket: 456762

Cited 13 times | Published

1966), 186 So.2d 786. [3] 12 A.L.R.2d 789, 790, § 2. [4] Marten v. Credit Adjustment Service, Inc., Okl

Nellen v. State

226 So. 2d 354

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1969 | Docket: 449674

Cited 12 times | Published

158 (1926). [3] 14 Am.Jur.2d 779, Certiorari, § 2. [4] Art. V, § 7(3), Constitution of Florida. [5]

Jay Palmer v. Brg of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, D/B/A Bar/bri

874 F.2d 1417

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 29, 1990 | Docket: 988696

Cited 11 times | Published

section 2 violations of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 2.4 The allegations were: conspiracy to monopolize in

United States v. Jones

57 F.3d 1020, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16757, 1995 WL 368461

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 7, 1995 | Docket: 235550

Cited 9 times | Published

(discriminatory purge of voters from polls violated Section 2) 4 ; Welch v. McKenzie, 765

Harry Rich Corp. v. Feinberg

518 So. 2d 377, 1987 WL 3376

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 1987 | Docket: 1778149

Cited 8 times | Published

standard." Model Business Corporation Act Annotated § 2.04, at 131 (3d ed. 1987). This court, in Ratner v

North Am. Mtg. Investors v. Cape San Blas

378 So. 2d 287

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1979 | Docket: 1795315

Cited 8 times | Published

interest penalties as to corporate borrowers. Section 2.04, Florida Statutes (1975), provides: *295 No

Ramos v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.

714 So. 2d 1146, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9078, 1998 WL 406298

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1998 | Docket: 461577

Cited 7 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 2.4, at 38 (2d ed.1997) (footnote omitted); see also

Marr v. State

470 So. 2d 703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1985 | Docket: 1241540

Cited 7 times | Published

State, 338 So.2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). [3] Section 2.04, Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal

James Joseph Brown v. United States

748 F.3d 1045

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 7, 2014 | Docket: 195817

Cited 6 times | Published

court, except [for those listed in this section 2 4 ] . . . . *1055

Rhodes v. BLP Associates, Inc.

944 So. 2d 527, 2006 WL 3735157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2006 | Docket: 2488889

Cited 6 times | Published

each $600 of funds loaned to the partnership. Section 2.4 of the agreement also established a hierarchy

Bridge Capital Investors, II v. Susquehanna Radio Corp.

458 F.3d 1212, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19305, 2006 WL 2129501

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 1, 2006 | Docket: 1029998

Cited 6 times | Published

$10 million additional payment set forth in Section 2.4.1 We affirm. I. BACKGROUND The Federal Communications

Dascott v. Palm Beach County

877 So. 2d 8, 2004 WL 840607

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 2004 | Docket: 1284973

Cited 5 times | Published

Commissioners." Palm Beach County, Fla., Charter art. II, § 2.4. Pursuant to the Palm Beach County Code, the County

Feldman v. Palmetto General Hospital, Inc.

980 F. Supp. 467, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15869, 1997 WL 629228

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1997 | Docket: 1497286

Cited 5 times | Published

shall be deemed guilty of a felony." 15 U.S.C. § 2. [4] The analysis of antitrust injury for a section

Pensacola Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Costa

195 So. 2d 250

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 1967 | Docket: 1198863

Cited 5 times | Published

2d 402, 404. [3] 23 Fla.Jur. 374 New Trial, § 2. [4] 6A Moore's Federal Practice 3707, § 59.02 (2d

Roe v. Butterworth

958 F. Supp. 1569, 1997 WL 144966

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1997 | Docket: 1494699

Cited 4 times | Published

harm. See Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4.1 (1989). When determining ripeness, a court asks

Ward v. State

636 So. 2d 68, 1994 WL 84173

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1994 | Docket: 356486

Cited 4 times | Published

632 (Ala. 1992); LaFave, 1 Search & Seizure 2d § 2.4 (1987). [9] Compare Kirsch v. State, 10 Md. App

Key Enterprises of Delaware, Inc. v. Venice Hospital

703 F. Supp. 1513, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 610, 1989 WL 4508

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 1989 | Docket: 1254792

Cited 4 times | Published

commerce among the several States...." 15 U.S.C. § 2. [4] Of course, under § 1 (as opposed to § 2), it

In Re Apportionment of Law

281 So. 2d 484

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1973 | Docket: 1676747

Cited 4 times | Published

mathematical preciseness." 1972 Laws of Florida, SJR 1305, § 2(4). Since our apportionment decision, the United States

City of Palm Bay v. Palm Bay Greens, LLC

969 So. 2d 1187, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 19320, 2007 WL 4269035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2007 | Docket: 2031058

Cited 3 times | Published

PHILIP J. PADOVANO, FLORIDA APPELLATE PRACTICE, § 2.4 (2005). The Landowner's argument that the Board's

Hot Developers, Inc. v. Willow Lake Estates, Inc.

950 So. 2d 537, 2007 WL 837180

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2007 | Docket: 1752043

Cited 3 times | Published

extended pursuant to the provisions of § 2.4." Pursuant to section 2.4, Hot Developers extended the closing

Hagberg v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. of Boston

321 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11324, 2004 WL 1368396

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2004 | Docket: 2283289

Cited 3 times | Published

" AR 1009, Group Disability Income Policy, Section 2. [4] Independent Medical Examination [5] These

Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services v. Miami-Dade County

790 So. 2d 555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2001 | Docket: 1411686

Cited 3 times | Published

open fields. Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 2.4(a) (3d ed.1996).

United States v. Derenak

27 F. Supp. 2d 1300, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18791, 1998 WL 839863

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1998 | Docket: 2175133

Cited 3 times | Published

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 4. DEA computerized records show that five forfeiture

Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc.

119 F.3d 888, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1625, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 20761, 1997 WL 437161

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 766056

Cited 3 times | Published

responsibility for, inter alia, keeping records, see § 2.4 (“Records”), preparing and distributing periodic

Kane v. Aetna Life Insurance

893 F.2d 1283

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 7, 1990 | Docket: 66250798

Cited 3 times | Published

period. See W. Meyer, Life & Health Insurance Law § 2:4 (1971) (noting the rule with respect to insurance

In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420

68 So. 3d 228, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 414, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1573, 2011 WL 2637473

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2011 | Docket: 2357064

Cited 2 times | Published

P. 3.712; §§ 921.231(1)(i), 948.015(9), Fla. Stat. (2)-(4) [No change] (e)-(i) [No change] Committee

Westchester General Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services

770 F. Supp. 2d 1286, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28069, 2011 WL 976612

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2011 | Docket: 2336852

Cited 2 times | Published

letter then states: In accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 2.4, we disagree that the information sought is unavailable

In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Contract Litigation

716 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2010 WL 2164183

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 28, 2010 | Docket: 1929991

Cited 2 times | Published

at ¶ 33); (Avenue Compl. at ¶ 119); (Cr. Agmt. § 2.4(a)). Upon receipt of each Notice of Borrowing, the

Kozak v. Hillsborough Public Transportation Commission

695 F. Supp. 2d 1285, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13241

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2010 | Docket: 2231130

Cited 2 times | Published

1994); Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4.1 (3d ed.1999), quoted in Alabama Power Co., 307

Fontainebleau Las Vegas, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Fontainebleau Las Vegas Holdings, LLC)

417 B.R. 651, 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 3, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94481, 2009 WL 3125548

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2009 | Docket: 1449328

Cited 2 times | Published

Borrowing to the Administrative Agent. [Cr. Agr. § 2.4(a)]. Upon receipt of the Notice of Borrowing, the

Estate of Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc.

637 F. Supp. 2d 1029, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46444

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2009 | Docket: 2226785

Cited 2 times | Published

acting within the scope of their employment." Id. § 2.04. The use of the term "employee," or "servant" in

Greenberg v. National Geographic Society

533 F.3d 1244, 87 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1768, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13832, 2008 WL 2571333

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2008 | Docket: 65658747

Cited 2 times | Published

B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.04[C] (2008). The 1980 amendments to the Copyright

Schmidt v. Multimedia Holdings Corp.

361 F. Supp. 2d 1346, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27066, 2004 WL 3246524

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2004 | Docket: 2367489

Cited 2 times | Published

see also ERWIN CHEMERINSKI, FEDERAL JURISDICTION § 2.4 (4th ed.2003). Also derived from Article III's case-or-controversy

American Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Regulation, Inc. v. Pinellas County

997 F. Supp. 1476, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2570, 1998 WL 97363

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1998 | Docket: 1014438

Cited 2 times | Published

regulation of charitable solicitations pursuant to Section 2.04(o), Pinellas County Charter, Laws of Florida

Bingham, Ltd. v. William French Smith, Attorney General of the United States

774 F.2d 1069, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 24416

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 29, 1985 | Docket: 536994

Cited 2 times | Published

privileges and immunities clause of Article IV, Section 2; (4) appellant’s guarantee of the pursuit of hap

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Associated Telephone Directory Publishers

756 F.2d 801, 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 899

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 1985 | Docket: 66205068

Cited 2 times | Published

(footnotes omitted). See 1 Nimmer on Copyright, § 2.04[B] at 2-41 (1984). Independent works brought together

City of Homestead v. RANEY CONST., INC.

357 So. 2d 749, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15763

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 1978 | Docket: 454060

Cited 2 times | Published

by law and the Charter of the city. (Code 1958, § 2-4.)" [Emphasis supplied by appellant] The question

Emery v. Allied Pilots Ass'n

227 F. Supp. 3d 1292, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4818, 208 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3129, 2017 WL 190887

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2017 | Docket: 64312097

Cited 1 times | Published

” Def. Ex. 1, art. I, § 4, subsec. (B). 11. Section 2.04 (B) of the Policy Manual states the “APA will

FF Cosmetics FL Inc. v. City of Miami Beach

129 F. Supp. 3d 1316, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118719, 2015 WL 5145548

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2015 | Docket: 64304095

Cited 1 times | Published

102-385 (Code 1964, § 25-86.1; Ord. No. 2012-3756, § 2, 4-U-12) Secs. 74-2 — 74-35. Reserved. ORDINANCE

Santiago-Lebron v. Florida Parole Commission

767 F. Supp. 2d 1340, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23487, 2011 WL 755599

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2011 | Docket: 2341801

Cited 1 times | Published

consultation with the Education Department (see Section 2.4.5) and evidence is documented that the inmate

Hacienda Villas, Inc. v. MIA Consulting Group, Inc.

47 So. 3d 848, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15045, 2010 WL 3894028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2010 | Docket: 2402047

Cited 1 times | Published

parties." Philip J. Padovano, Florida Civil Practice § 2:4 (2010); see 56 Fla. Jur.2d Venue § 67 (2010). "[T]he

Dann v. Dann

24 So. 3d 791, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20564, 2009 WL 5150074

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2009 | Docket: 1648744

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 2.4 (2007-08 ed.) ("If the untimely rehearing motion

Romano v. Mechaia Investments, LLC

201 So. 3d 4, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12834

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 2, 2009 | Docket: 60257018

Cited 1 times | Published

Philip J. Padovano, Florida Appellate Practice § 2:4 (2009). She contends that her notice of appeal has

Valdes v. State

959 So. 2d 300, 2007 WL 1342225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2007 | Docket: 1525699

Cited 1 times | Published

Valdes appeals. The jury instructions from Section 2.04[1] and 3.9[2] differ in only one respect with

Discount Fireworks of Central Florida, Inc. v. Sarasota County

922 So. 2d 433, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3445, 2006 WL 572007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2006 | Docket: 64842632

Cited 1 times | Published

violations of chapter 791 within twelve months. Id. at § 2(4). Apparently, at all relevant times, the County

Bird v. Eastman Kodak Co.

390 F. Supp. 2d 1117, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28415, 2005 WL 1054450

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 2005 | Docket: 37349

Cited 1 times | Published

1978 Plan Doc. § 2.6 [EK00007]; 1997 Plan Doc. § 2.04(b) [EK00062]. See also Benefits Application (1979)

Martin K. Eby Construction Co. v. Jacksonville Transportation Authority

436 F. Supp. 2d 1276, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42793

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2005 | Docket: 2314330

Cited 1 times | Published

approximately at the locations indicated." (Ex. 23 at 10, § 2-4.) The standard specification further stated that

Rectory Park, L.C. v. City of Delray Beach

208 F. Supp. 2d 1320, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10770, 2002 WL 1292016

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 2002 | Docket: 2428560

Cited 1 times | Published

[subsequently set forth], the required findings of Section 2.4.5(E), and other applicable standards of the Comprehensive

Smith v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

799 So. 2d 319, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14131, 2001 WL 1187050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2001 | Docket: 2547561

Cited 1 times | Published

Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-22.012, § 2-4, presently R. 33-601.314, § 2-4, which is the rule against fighting

University Books & Videos, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County

78 F. Supp. 2d 1327, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15835

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1999 | Docket: 2434760

Cited 1 times | Published

lighting within these establishments. See id. at § 2(4). Presumably to ease in monitoring and enforcement

American Charities for Reasonable Fundraising Regulation, Inc. v. Pinellas County

997 F. Supp. 1481, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7721, 1998 WL 188181

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 15, 1998 | Docket: 1014486

Cited 1 times | Published

regulation of charitable solicitations, pursuant to Section 2.04(o), Pinellas County Charter, Laws of Florida

City of Delray Beach Florida v. John Deleonibus, Sally Deleonibus, and 1250 Crain Highway LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2024 | Docket: 68209015

Published

Commission on Homeowners’ requested extension. See § 2.4.7(E), DELRAY BEACH, LAND DEV. REGULS. (2019).

RICHARD DIMOSI DIASOLWA v. ALEXA BURNEIKIS

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2022 | Docket: 66575232

Published

rehearing was untimely. See Padovano, supra, at § 2:4 (“A motion can suspend rendition only if it is directed

PHYSICIANS CARE CENTERS OF FLORIDA, LLC v. PNC NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2022 | Docket: 64898835

Published

Liabilities (Section 2.03), and Excluded Liabilities (Section 2.04). Under Section 2.01(c) of the Asset Purchase

SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective v. Governor of the State of Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63655668

Published

legal recogni- tion to an unborn child.” H.B. 481 § 2(4). That “legitimate interest[] provide[s] a rational

SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective v. Governor of the State of Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63890902

Published

legal recogni- tion to an unborn child.” H.B. 481 § 2(4). That “legitimate interest[] provide[s] a rational

Georgia Advocacy Office v. Theodore Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 14, 2021 | Docket: 60057759

Published

“tailoring stage.” Dan B. Dobbs, Law of Remedies § 2.4(6), at 113–14 (2d ed. 1993). The fundamental principle

Georgia Advocacy Office v. Theodore Jackson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 14, 2021 | Docket: 60056453

Published

“tailoring stage.” Dan B. Dobbs, Law of Remedies § 2.4(6), at 113–14 (2d ed. 1993). The fundamental principle

Mr. Eddie I. Sierra v. City of Hallandale Beach Florida

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 6, 2021 | Docket: 59885695

Published

citizens of different States.” U.S. Const. art. III, § 2. 4 But despite the oft-repeated invocations

MONICA SAMARA v. TENET FLORIDA PHYSICIAN SERVICES, LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2021 | Docket: 59296222

Published

J. Padovano, 2 Fla. Prac., Appellate Practice § 2:4 (2019 ed.) (“A motion can suspend rendition of an

In re Pina

602 B.R. 72

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jun 25, 2019 | Docket: 65791423

Published

7 years at H&M Builders for 1 month Part Two Section 2/4 Monthly gross wages, salary, and Monthly gross

Asa College v. Dezer Intracoastal Mall

250 So. 3d 731

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2018 | Docket: 7225321

Published

Common Utility Facilities referred to in Section 2.4) for the benefit of the Office Parcel

McGrath v. Martin Jr.

225 So. 3d 293, 2017 WL 1278065, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4637

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2017 | Docket: 4669322

Published

therein. 2 Fla. Prac., Appellate Practice § 2:4 (2016 ed.)

City of Oldsmar v. Trinh

210 So. 3d 191, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2016 | Docket: 4483499

Published

Enforcement Officer’s approval, as provided in Section 2.4 of this Exhibit B, Scope of Work, of the Notice

City of Oldsmar v. Trinh

210 So. 3d 191, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 16012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2016 | Docket: 4483499

Published

Enforcement Officer’s approval, as provided in Section 2.4 of this Exhibit B, Scope of Work, of the Notice

Discount Sleep of Ocala, LLC v. City of Ocala

200 So. 3d 156, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2016 WL 3364655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2016 | Docket: 3082135

Published

imposition of the fire service fees. See § 2.04, Fla. Stat. (2014). Therefore, while Ordinance

Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. Estée Lauder Companies

946 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 2013 WL 2303764

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 9, 2013 | Docket: 65991397

Published

S. airport duty-free stores in violation of Section 2.4 Both § 1 and § 2 conspiracy claims “require the

Towbin v. Antonacci

885 F. Supp. 2d 1274, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187259, 2012 WL 3541703

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2012 | Docket: 65984241

Published

(citing Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction, § 2.4, p. 115 (1994))). In a facial challenge grounded

Quail Cruises Ship Management, Ltd. v. Agencia de Viagens CVC Tur Limitada

847 F. Supp. 2d 1333, 2012 A.M.C. 2556, 2012 WL 204290, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7871

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2012 | Docket: 65979614

Published

for within the agreement itself: Harseo bought Section 2.04’s fourteen pages of representations. Unlike

Smith v. Williams

819 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2011 | Docket: 2016079

Published

conclusive and binding upon all persons." (Doc. #43-2, § 2.4.) The Administrator also has the duty and discretion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 28, 2010 | Docket: 3259055

Published

Cfm. 2 See s. 2(1), Ch. 86-392, Laws of Fla. 3 Section 2 (4) (h), (i), and (j), Ch. 86-392 and Ch. 2010-268

In Re S & I Investments

421 B.R. 569, 62 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1749, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 3246

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 7, 2009 | Docket: 1797183

Published

further defined herein. [3] 1962 Amendment at Section 2. [4] The Court notes that Ms. Vreeland and Lori

Greenberg v. National Geographic Soc.

497 F.3d 1213

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 30, 2008 | Docket: 1982808

Published

B. Nimmer & David Nimmer, 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 2.04[C] (2008). The 1980 amendments to the Copyright

US Ex Rel. Wesco Distribution v. American Bridge

473 F. Supp. 2d 1227, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22511, 2007 WL 438771

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2007 | Docket: 2197989

Published

equipment from moisture and dampness. For example, Section 2.4 of the manual states in part: "An indoor switchgear

Goswami v. Lennox Industries, Inc.

947 So. 2d 1221, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 2007 WL 187704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 26, 2007 | Docket: 64848782

Published

Section 2.0b. of this Agreement. [[Image here]] Section 2.04 Liabilities Assumed. On the Closing Date, subject

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

875 So. 2d 683, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 7052, 2004 WL 1123367

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2004 | Docket: 64831093

Published

against fighting in Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.314, § 2-4 was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad);

United States v. Pepper's Steel & Alloys, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 397403

Published

law enforcement problem.” Pub. Law No. 106-172, § 2 (4) (2000). 8 The DEA’s Final Rule

Georgia Electric Membership v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.

286 F.3d 1309

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 2002 | Docket: 2038682

Published

following the stock purchase. In particular, section 2.4 of the Agreement stated that if the ACOI for

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

752 So. 2d 59, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 923, 2000 WL 125937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 2000 | Docket: 64795401

Published

Admin. Code. R. 33-601.314, § 2-4 (formerly Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-22.012, § 2-4) (the fighting rule). A

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 11, 1999 | Docket: 3257016

Published

sewage, water, and lighting[.]"4 In addition, section 2.4(h) of the district's enabling legislation authorizes

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 11, 1999 | Docket: 3257016

Published

sewage, water, and lighting[.]"4 In addition, section 2.4(h) of the district's enabling legislation authorizes

horizon/cms Healthcare v. Southern Oaks

732 So. 2d 1156, 1999 WL 218410

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Docket: 1513351

Published

court decree; or (h) on the date specified in Section 2.4. The term "irreconcilable difference" used in

Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098

Published

responsibility for, inter alia, keeping records, see § 2.4 (“Records”), preparing and distributing periodic

Roe v. Butterworth

958 F. Supp. 1569, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3717

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1997 | Docket: 66011920

Published

harm. See Erwin Chemerinsky, Federal Jurisdiction § 2.4.1 (1989). When determining ripeness, a court asks

Don Miele Shirley Miele v. Prudential Bache Securities Roger A. Jones Doug Haas

62 F.3d 1315, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24459, 1995 WL 488550

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 1995 | Docket: 599972

Published

State of Florida. 1992 Fla. Laws ch. 92-85, § 2. 4 . In light of the Florida Supreme Court’s

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re R.D.I.

581 So. 2d 27, 1991 WL 37629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 1991 | Docket: 64659452

Published

character_” Fla. Sup.Ct. Bar Admiss. Rule, art. Ill, § 2.4 Therefore, it is the applicant’s burden to satisfy

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 10, 1989 | Docket: 3256407

Published

of such personnel, equipment or facilities. 3 Section 2(4)(g), Ch. 82-375, Laws of Florida. Compare, s

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Aug 27, 1986 | Docket: 3256037

Published

functions or services which the act authorizes. Section 2(4)(a)-(g) and (i)-(k), Ch. 82-375, Laws of Florida

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Dec 7, 1983 | Docket: 3255172

Published

4. TO WHAT DO THE WORDS "SAID SUM" RELATE IN SECTION 2(4)(a) OF CH. 83-115 — THE $50,000.00 CASH BENEFIT

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Oct 25, 1982 | Docket: 3257876

Published

budget accounts and records falls to him or her. Section 2(4), Ch. 82-202, Laws of Florida. Therefore, pending

Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Jacksonville Electric Authority

419 So. 2d 1092, 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2547

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1982 | Docket: 64592224

Published

passage disproves the appellants’ assertion. Section 2.4.2(iv) of the agreement provides: (iv) the approval

Collins v. State

418 So. 2d 318, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1982 | Docket: 64591771

Published

was patently erroneous and in fact contrary to Section 2.04 of the Florida Standard Jury Instructions in

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jan 16, 1979 | Docket: 3257126

Published

officers and employees of the utilities authority. Section 2(4) of Ch. 69-1215 merely provides that `[e]ach

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Jun 8, 1978 | Docket: 3256506

Published

however, has been changed by statute in Florida. Section 2.04, F. S., provides: No statute of this state

City of Hollywood v. Hollywood Lodge 21

329 So. 2d 366, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1976 | Docket: 64553006

Published

quotation of the following portion of Chapter 69-1152, § 2.-4: “The money required to meet all obligations of

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Sep 5, 1974 | Docket: 3255254

Published

require the approval of the Board of Regents." Section 2, 4.1 Board of Regents Operating Manual. It is axiomatic

State v. Barney

239 So. 2d 882, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1970 | Docket: 64516836

Published

misdemeanors, which arise in Pinellas County”. § 2(4) Ch. 65-720. The instant case being a prosecution

State v. Hardy

239 So. 2d 279, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 16, 1970 | Docket: 64516545

Published

misdemeanors, which arise in Pinellas County”. Section 2(4), Ch. 65-720. Thus that Court lacks jurisdiction

State v. Williams

238 So. 2d 140, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 22, 1970 | Docket: 64516028

Published

misdemeanors, which arise in Pinellas County.” Section 2(4), Ch. 65-720, 1965 Laws of Florida. Although