Florida Statute 6.09 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 6.09

6.09 Boundary between Florida and Georgia.—

(1) The line run and marked by B. J. Whitner, Jr., on the part of Florida, and G. J. Orr, on the part of Georgia, is the permanent boundary line between the States of Florida and Georgia.

(2) The boundary line between the States of Florida and Georgia as described in subsection (1) herein shall be extended from a point 37 links north of Ellicott’s Mound on the Saint Marys River; thence down said river to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the middle of the presently existing Saint Marys entrance navigational channel to the point of intersection with a hypothetical line connecting the seawardmost points of the jetties now protecting such channel; thence along said line to a control point of latitude 30°42′45.6″ N., longitude 81°24′15.9″ W.; thence due east to the seaward limit of Florida as now or hereafter fixed by the Congress of the United States; such boundary to be extended on the same true 90° bearing so far as a need for further delimitation may arise.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1017, 1859; Resolution No. 16, Feb. 8, 1861; RS 3; GS 3; RGS 3; CGL 3; s. 1, ch. 69-4.

Note.—Boundary.—Consent given by 84 Stat. 1094, October 22, 1970.

F.S. 6.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.09 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.09

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.09

Total Results: 32

Ericsson GE Mobile Communications, Inc. v. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.

120 F.3d 216, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22375, 1997 WL 447358

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 22, 1997 | Docket: 421217

Cited 99 times | Published

district court concluded that the Mayor had violated § 6.09 of the Mayor-Council Act of 1955 by negotiating

Staten v. State

519 So. 2d 622, 1988 WL 8455

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1988 | Docket: 1332290

Cited 59 times | Published

W. LaFave & A. Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 6.9, at 169 (1986); R. Perkins & R. Boyce, Criminal

Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.

563 So. 2d 622, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 246, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 588, 1990 WL 55937

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1990 | Docket: 1682886

Cited 39 times | Published

J. Sackman, Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 6.09, at 6-55 (rev. 3rd ed. 1985) ("The modern, prevailing

Alabama Department of Economic & Community Affairs v. Ball Healthcare-Dallas, LLC (In Re Lett)

632 F.3d 1216

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 10, 2011 | Docket: 410061

Cited 29 times | Published

subject to existing liens and encumbrances. Ala.Code § 6-9-211. Lett acknowledged as much in his proposed plan

DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. Polk

568 So. 2d 35

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 1526579

Cited 24 times | Published

undisturbed. 2 Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 6.09, at 6-55 (rev. 3d ed. Dec. 1983) (emphasis supplied)

In Re Peter WRENN, Debtor. Peter WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

40 F.3d 1162, 32 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 987, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36073, 1994 WL 682436

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 22, 1994 | Docket: 378763

Cited 22 times | Published

lien on both properties. See Ala.Code § 6-9-211 (1993). ACIPCO *1164 also undertook

Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala

634 F.3d 1340, 2011 WL 832222

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 11, 2011 | Docket: 1062135

Cited 19 times | Published

... except as hereinafter provided." Ordinance § 6-9(b). An "alcohol beverage establishment" is a "bottle

Rubano v. Department of Transp.

656 So. 2d 1264, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 286, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1043, 1995 WL 368411

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1995 | Docket: 1283710

Cited 16 times | Published

L. Sackman, Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain § 6.09[2] (rev. 3d ed. 1995). In other words: *1271 Consequential

In Re Starling

251 B.R. 908, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 293, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 937, 36 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 152

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Aug 9, 2000 | Docket: 1084827

Cited 13 times | Published

330 (quoting Lundin, K.M., Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, § 6.9, 6-4 and 6-5). In the instant case, Chase properly

Department of Transp. v. Weisenfeld

617 So. 2d 1071, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3309, 1993 WL 87246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1993 | Docket: 457943

Cited 9 times | Published

J. Sackman, Nichol's The Law of Eminent Domain § 6.09, at 6-55 (rev. 3rd ed. 1985) ("The modern prevailing

American Druggists Ins. Co., Inc., and John H. Brown v. Joseph I. Bogart, Clerk of the Court, Southern District of Florida

707 F.2d 1229, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 26606

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 20, 1983 | Docket: 225202

Cited 7 times | Published

power to revoke the authority of sureties. 6 USCA § 6,9. It has not been granted to the courts.... Surety

Garcia v. Andonie

101 So. 3d 339, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 613, 2012 WL 4666458, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1923

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 4, 2012 | Docket: 60226264

Cited 5 times | Published

for under the plain language of article VII, section 6.9 *346We note that the Department of Revenue, the

Jim Gall Auctioneers, Inc. v. City of Coral Gables

210 F.3d 1331, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8193, 2000 WL 491741

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 2000 | Docket: 395773

Cited 4 times | Published

household may be sold or offered for sale.” Zoning Code § 6-9.

Hill v. DEERING BAY MARINA ASS'N, INC.

985 So. 2d 1162, 2008 WL 2511348

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2008 | Docket: 497982

Cited 3 times | Published

Users," section 6.6, "Payment of Use fees," section 6.9; "NON-PLAINTIFF HOMEOWNERS RIGHT OF PURCHASE

Schvaneveldt v. MASTEC NORTH AMERICA, INC.

306 F. Supp. 2d 1177, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2242, 2004 WL 305594

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2004 | Docket: 2389687

Cited 1 times | Published

in addition to any restrictions set forth in Section 6.9 and to applicable Laws (as defined in Section

Arnold v. Board of Education of Escambia County

880 F.2d 305

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 10, 1989 | Docket: 66246441

Cited 1 times | Published

2d 1471, 1480-81 (11th Cir.1989); Nahmod, supra, § 6.09-6.10. . Section 1981 provides: All persons within

WM Mobile Bay Environmental Center, Inc. v. The City of Mobile Solid Waste Authority

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 2020 | Docket: 17481597

Published

against whom such judgment is entered.” Ala. Code § 6-9-1; see also id. §§ 6-9-20 to -27 (establishing the

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n)

560 B.R. 824, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 21, 2016 | Docket: 65789302

Published

therein stated to have been paid. (PI. Ex. 1 at Section 6.09). Further, the Master Declaration required the

Diaz v. Lopez

167 So. 3d 455, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6206, 2015 WL 1930318

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 2015 | Docket: 2653017

Published

Stat. (2015). 9 Sweetwater Charter section 6.09 expressly incorporates the resign-to-run law

Bankshot Billiards, Inc. v. City of Ocala

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 11, 2011 | Docket: 2906514

Published

. except as hereinafter provided.” Ordinance § 6-9(b). An “alcohol beverage establishment” is a “bottle

Alabama Department of Economic & Community Affair v. Ball Healthcare-Dallas LLC

632 F.3d 1216

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 10, 2011 | Docket: 2906587

Published

subject to existing liens and encumbrances. Ala.Code § 6-9-211. Lett acknowledged as much in his proposed plan

BANKSHOT BILLARDS, INC. v. City of Ocala

692 F. Supp. 2d 1343, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12559, 2010 WL 557714

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2010 | Docket: 2246574

Published

assault in this case. The core provision of Section 6-9 of Ordinance 5650, entitled "Patron Age Restrictions

Hill v. Deering Bay Marina Ass'n

985 So. 2d 1162, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2008 | Docket: 64855203

Published

Users,” section 6.6, "Payment of Use fees,” section 6.9; "NON-PLAINTIFF HOMEOWNERS RIGHT OF PURCHASE

Jim Gall Auctioneers, Inc. v. City of Coral Gables

210 F.3d 1331

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 2000 | Docket: 395766

Published

household may be sold or offered for sale.” Zoning Code § 6-9. 2 which

Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Polk

568 So. 2d 35, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 511, 1990 Fla. LEXIS 1194, 1990 WL 141446

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1990 | Docket: 64653739

Published

undisturbed. 2 Nichols’ The Law of Eminent Domain § 6.09, at 6-55 (rev. 3d ed. Dec. 1983) (emphasis supplied)

Metropolitan Dade County v. Worsham Bros. Co.

563 So. 2d 1107, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594, 1990 WL 88099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 26, 1990 | Docket: 64651492

Published

constituted default. The agreement further provided at section 6.9 that “[notwithstanding remedies that may otherwise

United States v. Four Parcels of Real Property on Lake Forrest Circle in Riverchase

870 F.2d 586

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 19, 1989 | Docket: 66242330

Published

of Shelby County on April 2, 1984. See Ala.Code § 6-9-211 (1975). Such a lien does not relate back to

United States v. Fiorella

869 F.2d 1425, 1989 WL 25694

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 10, 1989 | Docket: 66242314

Published

court located in Alabama.5 Further, Alabama Code § 6-9-190 provides that a judgment cannot be revived after

In re Florida Board of Bar Examiners re Amendment to Rules of Supreme Court of Florida Relating to Admissions to the Bar

524 So. 2d 643, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 549, 1988 WL 42438

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1988 | Docket: 64634616

Published

change under Article IV, Section l.b. Article V, Section 6-9 as they currently appear: Section 6. The Applicant's

Geddes v. Livingston

804 F.2d 1219, 16 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 38, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33946

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 25, 1986 | Docket: 66221338

Published

Livingston’s debts without her permission. Ala.Code § 6-9-40 (1975). III. THE ESTATE IN RELATION TO 11 U.S

United States v. $41,305.00 in Currency & Traveler's Checks

802 F.2d 1339, 7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1402

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 1986 | Docket: 66220688

Published

477 So.2d 328 (Ala.1985) (construing Ala.Code § 6-9-211). . Prior to 1978, a claimant of funds seized

Gardner v. Gardner

467 So. 2d 407, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 869, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1985 | Docket: 64611357

Published

Horowitz and H. Davidson, Legal Rights of Children, § 6.09 (1984). Dr. Gardner then sought to have the mother