Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 6.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 6.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 6.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 6.09
6.09 Boundary between Florida and Georgia.—
(1) The line run and marked by B. J. Whitner, Jr., on the part of Florida, and G. J. Orr, on the part of Georgia, is the permanent boundary line between the States of Florida and Georgia.
(2) The boundary line between the States of Florida and Georgia as described in subsection (1) herein shall be extended from a point 37 links north of Ellicott’s Mound on the Saint Marys River; thence down said river to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the middle of the presently existing Saint Marys entrance navigational channel to the point of intersection with a hypothetical line connecting the seawardmost points of the jetties now protecting such channel; thence along said line to a control point of latitude 30°42′45.6″ N., longitude 81°24′15.9″ W.; thence due east to the seaward limit of Florida as now or hereafter fixed by the Congress of the United States; such boundary to be extended on the same true 90° bearing so far as a need for further delimitation may arise.
History.—s. 1, ch. 1017, 1859; Resolution No. 16, Feb. 8, 1861; RS 3; GS 3; RGS 3; CGL 3; s. 1, ch. 69-4.
Note.—Boundary.—Consent given by 84 Stat. 1094, October 22, 1970.

F.S. 6.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 6.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 6.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 6.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.09

Total Results: 20

Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-30T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: ” I.T. v. Dep’t of Child. and Fams., 338 So. 3d 6, 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (alteration

Kayle B. Bates v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-10-24T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: imposed a death sentence. Bates v. State, 750 So. 2d 6, 9 (Fla. 1999). This Court affirmed. Id. at 18. Years

Jean-Philippe Schneider v. Christian Tirikian

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-25T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 338 So. 3d 6, 9 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“As it is well-settled

Harris v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: information” is a “low-risk technical violation[].” § 948.06(9)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The probation officer averred

Harris v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: information” is a “low-risk technical violation[].” § 948.06(9)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The probation officer averred

Harris v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: information” is a “low-risk technical violation[].” § 948.06(9)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The probation officer averred

Harris v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-08-21T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: information” is a “low-risk technical violation[].” § 948.06(9)(b)3., Fla. Stat. The probation officer averred

Williams IP Holdings LLC v. Claudia Schwarz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: , and improper charges [to Appellants] for over $6.9 million dollars” through unsupported invoices or

Williams IP Holdings LLC v. Claudia Schwarz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: , and improper charges [to Appellants] for over $6.9 million dollars” through unsupported invoices or

Christopher Pretzer v. Rick Swearingen, individually and in his official capacity, and Florida Department of Law Enforcement

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-19T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: attack on an FDLE rule—in particular, Rule 11C-6.009 of the Florida Administrative Code—and argued that…Pretzer denied that he was challenging Rule 11C- 6.009, and was instead challenging FDLE’s exercise of

The Florida Bar v. Miguel Fernando Mirabal

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-07-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: See Fla. Stds. Imposing Law. Sancs. 3.2(b)(2)- (6), (9). In mitigation, the referee found three

In Re: Amendments to Florida Probate Rules

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-07-03T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: the time of the decedent’s death; and (6)(9) any other facts in support of the petition.

JOSHUA M. COUNCIL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-01T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: this appeal, Council challenged the denial of six of the nine grounds he raised. We find merit to one of

State of Florida v. Mark A. Desimone

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: granting the motion to dismiss as to Counts 1, 4, 6, and 9 as multiplicitous. We reverse and remand for reinstatement

State of Florida v. Mark A. Desimone

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: granting the motion to dismiss as to Counts 1, 4, 6, and 9 as multiplicitous. We reverse and remand for reinstatement

State of Florida v. Mark A. Desimone

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-11-29T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: granting the motion to dismiss as to Counts 1, 4, 6, and 9 as multiplicitous. We reverse and remand for reinstatement

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure - 2023 Legislation

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-11-22T00:00:00-08:00

Snippet: Points: M=0.2, 1=0.5, 2=0.8, 3=1.6, 4=2.4, 5=3.6, 6=9, 7=14, 8=19, 9=23, 10=29) …Points: M=0.2, 1=0.5, 2=0.8, 3=1.6, 4=2.4, 5=3.6, 6=9, 7=14, 8=19, 9=23, 10=29)

SEDUCTION COSMETIC CENTER CORP. v. VON DUNBAR

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-10-18T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: Park Lodges (Tarpon Springs), Inc., 805 So. 2d 6, 9–10 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (reversing trial court’s

In Re: Code for Resolving Professionalism Referrals and Amendments to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 6-10.3

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2023-07-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: scheduled court appearance becomes unnecessary. 6.9 A lawyer should be punctual in attending all court

K.R., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-07-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: I.T. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 338 So. 3d 6, 9 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022). Section 39.013, Florida