Florida Statute 6.081 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 6.081

6.081 Florida-Alabama boundary redefined.—

(1) The middle of the Perdido River at its mouth, as defined by the Constitutions of the States of Alabama and Florida, is at latitude 30°16′53″ N. and longitude 87°31′06″ W. as the control point; the boundary line at the mouth of the Perdido River is fixed, as nearly as may be, in the axis of the mouth of said river, passing through the control point and running north and south and having as its northern terminus a point of latitude 30°17′02″ N. and longitude 87°31′06″ W., and as its southern terminus a point 1,000 feet due south of the control point; from the northern terminus of the boundary line at the mouth of the river, the boundary up the lower portion of said river be a straight line to a point at latitude 30°18′00″ N., longitude 87°27′08″ W., thence by a straight line to a point in the center line of the intracoastal canal at longitude 87°27′00″ W.; the seaward boundary between Florida and Alabama extends from the south end of the boundary line at the mouth of the Perdido River, thence south 0°01′00″ W. to the seaward limit of each respective state; and shall be deemed, taken and declared, and is hereby deemed, taken and declared to be the boundary line between the States of Florida and Alabama, at the mouth of the Perdido River and adjacent thereto, and shall be deemed and taken as such by the authorities and people of this state.

(2) Nothing herein contained, nor any operations of the provisions of this section, shall prejudice the rights or claims of private individuals to any of the lands herein involved whether such rights or claims arise or exist upon the basis that the lands herein defined as being within the boundaries of the State of Alabama were previously a part of the State of Florida or included within the boundaries of the State of Florida or otherwise.

History.—ss. 2, 5, ch. 28141, 1953.

Note.—Boundary.—Consent given by 68 Stat. 182, May 6, 1954.

F.S. 6.081 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.081 on Casetext

Amendments to 6.081

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 6.081

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 6.081.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.081

Total Results: 16

Hollister v. Hollister

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-09-26

Citation: 965 So. 2d 341, 2007 WL 2781121

Snippet: 50,000 "new SARs" having a base equity value of $6.81 per share. A letter dated March 1, 2003, from the

Tyler v. Price

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-06-19

Citation: 821 So. 2d 1121, 2002 WL 1332482

Snippet: make it available.' Pogue v. *1126 Simon, 47 Or. 6, 81 P. 566, 567, 114 Am. St. Rep. 903, 8 Ann. Cas. 474

Melgares v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-06-28

Citation: 762 So. 2d 921, 1999 WL 1016002

Snippet: were, and was told that his score was 81.8 months (6.81 years). The State requested a fifteen-year habitual

Fla. Fern Growers Ass'n v. Concerned Citizens

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-04-02

Citation: 616 So. 2d 562, 1993 WL 95476

Snippet: these other defenses. Noerr, 365 U.S. at 132, n. 6, 81 S.Ct. at 525-27, n. 6. *567 In United Mine Workers

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Niagara Asset Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-05-08

Citation: 598 So. 2d 1074, 1992 WL 92441

Snippet: activities are necessary to understand this case: 06/81 Lakewood delivered a first mortgage to Sunshine

McIntosh v. Althouse

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-03

Citation: 472 So. 2d 1257, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15099, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1646

Snippet: 1981 Consumer Price Index to 1972 Consumption 12/72 6/81 Consumer Price Index Food at Home 124.1 268.7 2

City of Treasure Island v. Landt

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-01-18

Citation: 462 So. 2d 124, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 226, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11921

Snippet: water except docks, davits and/or lifts.” Section 6-81.1 of the code provides that “no dock or wharf, pier

Burke v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-09-20

Citation: 456 So. 2d 1245

Snippet: 8/6/81 7/28/81 Grand Theft Committed 8/6/81 6/2/83

Ross v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-03-02

Citation: 411 So. 2d 247, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19355

Snippet: boundaries of the State of Florida, see Sections 6.081 and 6.09, Florida Statutes (1979), and the State

South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Atlantic National Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-04-29

Citation: 222 So. 2d 275, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5808

Snippet: the mortgage and bonds as of July 15, 1968, was $6,081,-220.58. The motion for summary judgment and that

Wilson v. McCune

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-04-22

Citation: 222 So. 2d 230, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5779

Snippet: if accepted by the Member as provided in 6.73.” “6.81 Prior to a formal hearing on the Chapter Committee’s

Pinellas County v. Mayo

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-02-12

Citation: 218 So. 2d 749, 77 P.U.R.3d 526, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2499

Snippet: that the rate of return for the test period was 6.81%; that accordingly the utility’s revenues should

Nolan v. City of North Miami

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1960-05-26

Citation: 121 So. 2d 153

Snippet: 4(2), Florida Constitution; F.A.R. Rule 4.5(c) (6), 81 F.S.A.

George E. Sebring Co. v. O'Rourke

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1931-02-13

Citation: 134 So. 556, 101 Fla. 885

Snippet: to make it available." Pogue v. Simon, 47 Or. 6, 81 P. 566, 8 Ann. Cas. 474, 114 Am. St. Rep. 903. "Equitable

Saucer v. Vincent

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-10-20

Citation: 82 Fla. 296, 89 So. 802

Snippet: final judgment in the sum of $255.20, principal, $6.81 interest and $7.33 costs. On the 7th of March the

Moody v. R. Hoe & Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1886-01-15

Citation: 22 Fla. 314

Snippet: county against one T. A. Darby for .$342.55 and $6.81 cents costs, which was levied on seventeen head