Florida Statute 6.10 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 6.10

6.10 Confirmation of certain grants of Georgia.—The titles of bona fide holders of land under any grant from the State of Georgia prior to December 22, 1859, in the territory formerly claimed by the said state, which land is within the State of Florida by the line specified in s. 6.09 remain confirmed so far as this state had the right and power to confirm the same as provided by the act of December 22, 1859.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1017, 1859; RS 456; GS 645; RGS 1229; CGL 1785.

F.S. 6.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.10 on CourtListener

Amendments to 6.10

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 6.10

Total Results: 29

Frazier v. CitiFinancial Corp., LLC

604 F.3d 1313, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8960, 2010 WL 1727446

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 30, 2010 | Docket: 569977

Cited 135 times | Published

that the mortgage was invalid under Alabama Code § 6-10-3,[2] thus entitling Mrs. Frazier to rescission

United States v. John Terrance Garcia, Phillip G. Jackman

672 F.2d 1349, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1480, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 20240, 10 Fed. R. Serv. 359

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 12, 1982 | Docket: 1338943

Cited 64 times | Published

S.C. § 1509(b) and 19 C.F.R. *1368 § 6.10. 31 Hence, the search was statutorily

Robert McK Foster, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Almon O. Thompson, Deceased, and Doris E. Thompson, Deceased v. United States

768 F.2d 1278, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21342

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 16, 1985 | Docket: 284844

Cited 39 times | Published

party. See Weintraub, supra, § 6.10 p. 287-88. Florida has little interest in deterring

In Re Peter WRENN, Debtor. Peter WRENN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

40 F.3d 1162, 32 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 987, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 36073, 1994 WL 682436

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 22, 1994 | Docket: 378763

Cited 22 times | Published

(1988). Section 522(b) operates with Alabama Code § 6-10-2 to provide debtors in Alabama a $5,000 homestead

Chames v. DeMayo

972 So. 2d 850, 2007 WL 4440212

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2007 | Docket: 1650710

Cited 20 times | Published

include Alabama: Ala. Const. art. X, § 210; Ala.Code. § 6-10-120 (2005); Broadway v. Household Fin. Corp., 351

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. James D. Watkins

934 F.2d 1180, 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 284, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 13217

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 315802

Cited 19 times | Published

process.") 5 Section 6-10-7 reads in part: "The wages, salaries or other

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Evie's Tavern Ellenton, Inc.

772 F.3d 1254, 112 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1918, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22034

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 21, 2014 | Docket: 2608113

Cited 13 times | Published

B. Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 6.10[A][l]-[2][a] (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed.) (noting

Amcor, Incorporated, a Florida Corporation v. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor

780 F.2d 897, 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 815, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21844

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 21, 1986 | Docket: 185175

Cited 11 times | Published

thereto as provided in Section 6.12.” 29 C.F.R. § 6.10(b). Without discussing this issue of timely

Daniel G. Hamm v. Tomeka Scott James

406 F.3d 1340

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 21, 2005 | Docket: 398275

Cited 10 times | Published

for individual debtors. See Ala.Code § 6-10-11 (1975) (stating that in bankruptcy cases, “there

Florida Power & Light Co. v. Fleitas

488 So. 2d 148, 1 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1456, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1117, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 1986 | Docket: 1287331

Cited 10 times | Published

(5th ed. 1984); Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 6.10, at 501 (1956). Intentional interference with a

Glassroth v. Moore

347 F.3d 916

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 2003 | Docket: 397733

Cited 8 times | Published

displays in the building. See Ala. Const. Amend. 328, § 6.10; Ala.Code § 41-10-275. Chief Justice Moore placed

Callahan v. Point Clear Holdings, Inc.

579 F.3d 1207, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17949, 2009 WL 2450286

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 12, 2009 | Docket: 659354

Cited 4 times | Published

purchase."); Restatement (Third) of Prop.: Servitudes § 6.10 cmt. f ("[C]ommunity members acting collectively

Glassroth v. Moore

335 F.3d 1282, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13412, 2003 WL 21499258

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 2003 | Docket: 65655556

Cited 4 times | Published

displays in the building. See Ala. Const. Amend. 328, § 6.10; Ala.Code § 41-10-275. Chief Justice Moore placed

McElhaney v. Uebrich

699 So. 2d 1033, 1997 WL 599650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1997 | Docket: 1321570

Cited 2 times | Published

In using Florida Standard Jury Instructions section 6.10 (1995), on reduction to present money value

Burdine-Coakley v. Capital Bank

542 So. 2d 1019, 9 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1311, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 782, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1577, 1989 WL 27904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 1989 | Docket: 468840

Cited 2 times | Published

Fonseca, The Law of Modern Commercial Practices § 6:10 (rev. ed. 1981): The common law and general rule

Wright v. Frankel

965 So. 2d 365, 2007 WL 2847951

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2007 | Docket: 1509002

Cited 1 times | Published

certification of the election returns pursuant to Section 6.10 of the City Charter. The Committee also filed

In Re Cauley

374 B.R. 311, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 535, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2563, 2007 WL 2193915

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 2007 | Docket: 1109943

Cited 1 times | Published

bonus.[4] Alabama's wage exemption, Alabama Code § 6-10-7, provides in pertinent part: (a) The wages, salaries

Kapila v. CTS Equities Limited Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2025 | Docket: 71038143

Published

000 million wire transfers. Consistent with Section 6.10 of the Credit Agreement, TCB deposited the $115

GARY PASH, Trustee of the HEBERT AND MINNIE PASCH FAMILY TRUST DATED MAY 12, 1996, etc. v. MAHOGANY WAY HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2021 | Docket: 45654127

Published

functions under this Declaration. Furthermore, Section 6.10 of the Declaration provides: Written

WM Mobile Bay Environmental Center, Inc. v. The City of Mobile Solid Waste Authority

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 26, 2020 | Docket: 17481597

Published

such property is exempt from execution under section 6-10-10 of the Alabama Code or, alternatively, Alabama

Microf LLC v. Paul L. Cumbess

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 3, 2020 | Docket: 17220394

Published

See Chapter 13 Practice and Procedure, supra, at § 6:10 (stating that under one view of § 365, even “[i]f

14269 BT, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation v. VILLAGE OF WELLINGTON, FLORIDA, a Florida Municipal Corporation

240 So. 3d 1

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2018 | Docket: 6261387

Published

bin. The farm was also cited for violating LDR section 6.10.12, which limits the number of barns that can

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n)

560 B.R. 824, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 179, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3797

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Oct 21, 2016 | Docket: 65789302

Published

interest, and the cost of collection (Id. at Section 6.10-13). The Master Association was also empowered

Miller v. Bowen (In Re Miller)

352 B.R. 908, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2528, 2006 WL 2848594

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2006 | Docket: 1863752

Published

the contention of counsel for Mr. Bowen that Section 6-10-3 of the Code of Alabama, 1975, as amended,

R.G. v. Department of Children & Families

869 So. 2d 617, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3082, 2004 WL 442889

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2004 | Docket: 64829163

Published

charged. Wayne R. LaFave, et al., Criminal Procedure § 6.10(e), at 625-26 (2d ed.1999). Accord, In re Pittman

Bosarge v. United States Department of Education

5 F.3d 1413

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 1, 1993 | Docket: 64015087

Published

process for the collection of debts.” Ala. Code § 6-10-6 (1975).' Analysis Because the federal tax refund

Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. Watkins

934 F.2d 1178

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 66265040

Published

*1189Mobile was exempt as wages under Alabama Code § 6-10-7.5 Second, Chamberlain claims that $2,826.00 of

Sullivan v. Woodward

582 So. 2d 31, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5574, 1991 WL 104638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1991 | Docket: 64659962

Published

states concerning the same piece of property. Section 6.10, Florida Statutes (1989), “The Confirmation

Milliron v. City of Madison

575 So. 2d 732, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1722, 1991 WL 27206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1991 | Docket: 64656862

Published

application for a “restricted use” permit pursuant to Section 6.10 of the City’s zoning regulations, to allow construction