Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 7.15 (2025)
Dixie County.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
7.15 Dixie County.—The boundary lines of Dixie County are as follows: Beginning at a point where township line between townships seven and eight south, intersects the Suwannee River, thence southerly down the thread of the main stream of said Suwannee River to the Gulf of America; thence along said Gulf of America, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the mouth of the Steinhatchee River; thence northerly along the thread of the said Steinhatchee River to the point where it is intersected by the section line between sections fifteen and sixteen, in township eight, south of range ten east; thence north on said section line and other sections to the township line between townships seven and eight south; thence east on said township line dividing townships seven and eight south, to the point of beginning.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1969–2025 · leading case: Abdoney v. York, 903 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).
Abdoney v. York, 903 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “Nelson, Real Estate Finance Law, § 7.15, at 573 (4th ed. 2001). The lien of the senior mortgagee is likewise not extinguished by the irregular foreclosure action; instead, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale “becomes virtually an equitable assignee of the mortgage and of the…”
Kovach v. McLellan, 564 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). “II, § 7.15 (2d ed). Recission and damages were both pled here as defenses and as grounds for seeking affirmative relief.”
Ballantrae Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 203 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). “Nelson, Real Estate Finance Law, § 7.15, at 573 (4th ed.2001)). Here, the servicers who foreclosed the first mortgages on behalf of Fannie Mae did not name the Association in the foreclosure actions.”
Seawalk Investments, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2021). “The Mediated Settlement Agreement supersedes Section 7.15 of the Debtor’s Plan to the extent Section 7.”
Home Owners Ins. v. Charles Sales Corp., 222 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). “577 (1933); Sterns on Suretyship, § 7.15, page 218 (5th ed. 1951). Appellant presents an additional point urging that the trial court erred in assessing interest upon the account from the date the account became delinquent.”
Seawalk Investments, LLC (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2025). “The Third Amended Plan also added § 7.15, which provided that if Debtor defaulted on its plan payments, it had six months to list the Property, enter into a binding contract for the sale of the Property, and sell the Property.”
Wendella69, Inc., f/k/a Sw. Florida Veterinary Specialists, Inc.; Wendy G. Arsenault; & Michael J. Arsenault v. PetVet Operating, LLC, f/k/a PetVet Care Centers (Florida), LLC (M.D. Fla. 2025). “] Plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief in this action because they have failed to satisfy conditions precedent to commencing this action, including complying with and exhausting the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 7.15 of the [Agreement], and, to the…”
Erd v. Picerne Dev. Corp., 27 Fla. Supp. 2d 50 (Fla. Orange Cty. Ct. 1988). “Fla. Stat. 7.15.07(2)(a)5d. Fla. Stat. 715.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.