|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
F.S. 7.177.17 Escambia County.—The County of Escambia comprehends all that part of the State of Florida lying to the west and south of a line beginning at the Alabama line where said line crosses the Escambia River; running thence down the thread of said river to Escambia Bay; thence along said bay to Deer Point, at the intersection of Santa Rosa Sound with said bay; thence up said Santa Rosa Sound to a line parallel to and exactly 1 mile west of the range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven west, thence south along such parallel line to the waters of the Gulf of America; and the Counties of Escambia and Santa Rosa shall have concurrent jurisdiction of any offenses committed on the waters of Santa Rosa Sound.History.—s. 1, Ord. July 21, 1821; s. 1, Aug. 12, 1822; s. 1, Dec. 9, 1825; s. 8, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, Feb. 18, 1842; RS 11; GS 9; RGS 9; CGL 11; s. 1, ch. 23867, 1947; s. 1, ch. 57-834; s. 1, ch. 83-130; s. 1, ch. 91-310; s. 6, ch. 2025-8.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 7.17
Total Results: 9
688 F.2d 1337, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24900
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 12, 1982 | Docket: 234393
Cited 26 times | Published
collected in
Davis Treatise, supra,
at § 7:17. This court has never expressly endorsed the substantial
158 F.3d 1230, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 27881, 1998 WL 758365
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 74773
Cited 10 times | Published
Ann. tit. 26, § 1-103 (West 1991); S.C.Code Ann. § 7-17-600 (Law.Coop.1977); Tex. Elec.Code Ann. § 172
74 So. 3d 517, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16358, 2011 WL 4949835
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 2352845
Cited 8 times | Published
agreement.
At issue in this case is the effect of Section 7.17 of the asset purchase agreement, titled "Entire
95 So. 2d 902
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1957 | Docket: 470983
Cited 7 times | Published
within the boundaries of Escambia County, See Section 7.17, Fla. Stat. 1955, F.S.A., it is within the purview
158 F.3d 1230
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 1998 | Docket: 237180
Cited 1 times | Published
Ann. tit. 26, § 1-103 (West 1991); S.C. Code Ann. § 7-17-600 (Law. Co-op.
1977); Tex. Elec. Code Ann. §
992 F.2d 1548, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13641
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 1993 | Docket: 1018119
Cited 1 times | Published
Okla.Stat. tit. 26, § 1-103 (1991); S.C.Code Ann. § 7-17-600 (1991); S.D.Codified Laws Ann. § 12-6-51.1
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2025 | Docket: 69546095
Published
Any person who commits an act prohibited by section 7-17 of
this article may be charged with a
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 24, 2024 | Docket: 68058590
Published
Argued: Dec 7, 2023
of Fed. Civ.
Discovery and Disclosures § 7:17 (4th ed. & July 2023 update) (“The
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2022 | Docket: 62984891
Published
Stat. (2019). That said, Palm Beach County Code section 7-17(b)(2) makes
it unlawful for a person who is