Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.40 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 7.40 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 7.40 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.40

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.40
7.40 Madison County.The boundary lines of Madison County are as follows: Beginning at the point where the west boundary line of lot number one hundred forty-three of fifteenth district Georgia fractions intersects with the Georgia state line and run thence due south along the west boundary line of lots numbers one hundred forty-three and one hundred eighty to the southwest corner of lot one hundred eighty; thence easterly along the south line of lot number one hundred eighty to the east line of section twenty-seven, township three north, range seven east; thence due south to the southeast corner of section ten, township two north, range seven east; thence due west to the southwest corner of said section ten; thence due south to the southeast corner of section sixteen, township two north, range seven east; thence due west to the southwest corner of said section sixteen; thence due south to the southeast corner of section twenty, township two north, range seven east; thence due west to the southwest corner of section nineteen, township two north, range seven east; thence due south to the southeast corner of section twenty-five, township two north, range six east; thence due west to the southwest corner of section twenty-six, township two north, range six east; thence due south to the southwest corner of section thirty-five, township two north, range six east; thence due west to the thread of the Big Aucilla river; thence southerly along the thread of said river to the middle line of township two south, range five east, or the north boundary line of Taylor County; thence east, concurrent with the north boundary line of Taylor County, on said middle township line to the range line dividing ranges eight and nine east; thence south on said range line to the township line dividing townships two and three south; thence east on said township line to the range line dividing ranges nine and ten east, or the northwest corner of Lafayette County; thence east, concurrent with the north boundary line of Lafayette County, on said township line to the thread of the Suwannee River; thence north and easterly, concurrent with the west boundary line of Suwannee County, along the thread of said Suwannee River to where it joins the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence northerly, concurrent with the west boundary line of Hamilton County, along the thread of the said Withlacoochee River to the boundary line between the States of Georgia and Florida; thence west along said boundary line to the place of beginning.
History.s. 1, Dec. 26, 1827; s. 11, Nov. 23, 1828; s. 1, Feb. 5, 1844; s. 1, ch. 806, 1856; RS 24; GS 22; RGS 24; s. 1, ch. 9361, 1923; CGL 26.

F.S. 7.40 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.40 on CourtListener

Amendments to 7.40


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.40

Total Results: 4

Monsanto Co. v. Campuzano

206 F. Supp. 2d 1252, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16341, 2002 WL 1292000

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 2305820

Cited 8 times | Published

Holding Human Food"; 21 C.F.R. Part 7, sub-part C. § 7.40 et seq. entitled "Recalls (Including Product Corrections)

Monsanto Co. v. Campuzano

206 F. Supp. 2d 1239, 2002 WL 1291995

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 2, 2002 | Docket: 2449360

Cited 3 times | Published

Holding Human Food"); 21 C.F.R. Part 7, sub-part C, § 7.40 et seq. entitled "Recalls (Including Product C

Winner v. Cataldo

559 So. 2d 696, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2437, 1990 WL 40340

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 1990 | Docket: 64649637

Cited 2 times | Published

reasonable foundation.” 2 Model Bus.Corp. Act Ann. § 7.40, at 720. Accord Grizzard v. Petkas, 155 Ga.App

H.B. Holding Co. v. Girtman

96 So. 2d 781, 1957 Fla. LEXIS 3585

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 1957 | Docket: 64489406

Published

Orman v. Day, 5 Fla. 385; 69 C.J.S. Party Walls § 7; 40 Am.Jur., Party Walls, Sec. 7. In Nabers v. Wise