Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.42 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 7.42 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.42

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.42
7.42 Marion County.The boundary lines of Marion County are as follows: Beginning in the thread of the Withlacoochee River, at the range line dividing ranges seventeen and eighteen east; thence north to the township line dividing townships fourteen and fifteen south; thence east on said township line to the middle of township fourteen south, range nineteen east; thence north to the line dividing townships eleven and twelve south; thence east on said township line to Orange Lake; thence down said lake along its southern margin to Orange Creek; thence northerly and easterly down the thread of said creek to its junction with the Oklawaha River; thence northeasterly down the south side of the Oklawaha River at low-water mark to a point on the south side of the Oklawaha River at low-water mark, where the range line dividing ranges twenty-four and twenty-five east in township eleven south, crosses said river; thence south on said range line to where it intersects the township line dividing townships eleven and twelve south; thence east on said township line to where it intersects the section line dividing sections two and three, in township twelve south, of range twenty-five east; thence south on said section line and other section lines to the southwest corner of section twenty-three of said township twelve south, of range twenty-five east; thence east on the section line dividing sections twenty-three and twenty-six and other section lines to the range line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six east; thence south on said range line to the southwest corner of section seven, township thirteen south, range twenty-six east; thence east on the section line dividing sections seven and eighteen, township thirteen south, range twenty-six east, and other section lines to the west shore of Lake George; thence southwardly along the shore of Lake George to the mouth of Sulphur Spring; thence along the western bank of Lake George until it arrives at range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence south on said range line to township line dividing townships seventeen and eighteen south; thence due west on the said township line to the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence northwesterly down the thread of said last mentioned river to the place of beginning.
History.s. 1, Mar. 14, 1844; s. 1, ch. 106, 1846; s. 1, ch. 548, 1853; s. 1, ch. 923, 1859; s. 1, ch. 3060, 1877; s. 1, ch. 3767, 1887; RS 39; GS 37; RGS 40; CGL 42.

F.S. 7.42 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.42 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.42


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.42
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.42.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.42

Total Results: 18

H. R. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-11-15

Snippet: Florida Statutes (2017), and Polk County Ordinance 07-042 because the cost is not authorized when adjudication

Humana Medical Plan, Inc. v. Reale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-12-02

Snippet: § 405(h), which states, in relevant part: 7 42 U.S.C. § 1395ii is found in Part E of the Medicare

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2011-10-04

Snippet: Supp. 1556 (S.D. Fla. 1995); Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 07-42 (2007). 10 Fine v. Moran, 77 So. 533, 536 (Fla.

Reaves v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-03-13

Citation: 4 So. 3d 1256, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1978, 2009 WL 634036

Snippet: 2008, in Madison County Circuit Court case number 07-42-CF. Among other things, Reaves alleges that he mailed

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2008-10-21

Snippet: 1012.467(1)(a), Fla. Stat. Cf. Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 07-42 (2007) which concluded that in light of the mandatory

Free v. Free

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-08-04

Citation: 936 So. 2d 699, 2006 WL 2190777

Snippet: following pertinent terms: $108,000.00 Note at 7%—$42,000.00 Existing Bank Note paid by Buyer. The final

Schonau v. GEICO General Ins. Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-06-08

Citation: 903 So. 2d 285, 2005 WL 1335125

Snippet: case, even if other bills remained besides the $7,042.44, the plaintiff could seek recovery of those bills

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2005-01-27

Snippet: but died in the Florida House of Representatives. 7 42 U.S.C. 5106a(c)(6). 8 Article VI, U.S. Const. 9

Brown v. Butterworth

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-10-11

Citation: 831 So. 2d 683, 2002 WL 31355246

Snippet: legislative destruction). [6] 42 U.S.C. § 1971 et seq. [7] 42 U.S.C. § 1973(2)(b) (1982). [8] In House Joint

Johnson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-05-08

Citation: 696 So. 2d 326, 1997 WL 228421

Snippet: States, 168 U.S. 532, 542-3, 18 S.Ct. 183, 186-7, 42 L.Ed. 568 (1897); Harris v. Dugger, 874 F.2d 756

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1987-01-05

Snippet: regarding medical assistance in particular. Rule 10C-7.42, F.A.C., sets forth those prescribed drug services

Farmworker Rights Org. v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND REHAB. SERVICES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-04-14

Citation: 430 So. 2d 1

Snippet: of the Department of Health and Human Services. [7] 42 C.F.R. § 123.410 (1982) provides in pertinent part:

Remsen v. University of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-15

Citation: 429 So. 2d 1228, 10 Educ. L. Rep. 1258, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18829

Snippet: pursuant to Section 120.57; (b) pursuant to Rule 6C1-7.42; or (c) before the AFTC. According to Rule 6C1-7

Silverthorne v. City of Port Orange

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-03-07

Citation: 356 So. 2d 36, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15512

Snippet: 1975); 2 E. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations § 7.42 (3d ed. 1966). No error appears in the trial court’s

Florida Bar v. Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-02-16

Citation: 355 So. 2d 778, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4696

Snippet: fact, he had received his court awarded fee of $7,042.00 by a check dated 3 April 1974. (TR 13, 29, 32

MacKinlay v. City of Stuart

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-11-14

Citation: 321 So. 2d 620

Snippet: 392, 170 So. 100, 105 (1936); McQuillan, supra, § 7.42. In orally stating the reasons for denying the appellants

Pierce v. Dekle

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1911-01-15

Citation: 61 Fla. 390

Snippet: v. Norton, 9 Mich. 207; Lord v. Lord, 58 N. H. 7, 42 Am. Rep. 565; Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Brown

City of Tampa v. Tampa Waterworks Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1903-01-15

Citation: 45 Fla. 600

Snippet: therein and making exhibits-thereto ordinances Nos. 7, 42 and .51, alleging, in substance that the water company