Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 7.46 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 7.46 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 7.46

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.46
7.46 Okaloosa County.The boundary lines of Okaloosa County are as follows: Beginning on the Alabama state line where same is intersected by range line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six west; thence east on said state line to the intersection of said state line with the range line dividing ranges twenty-one and twenty-two west; thence south on said range line to the Gulf of Mexico; thence in a westerly direction following the meanderings of said gulf, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six west; thence north on said range line to the place of beginning; provided that the counties of Escambia, Santa Rosa and Okaloosa shall have concurrent jurisdiction of any offenses committed on the waters of Santa Rosa Sound.
History.s. 1, ch. 6937, 1915; RGS 12; CGL 14; s. 2, ch. 23867, 1947.

F.S. 7.46 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.46 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.46


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.46
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.46.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 7.46

Total Results: 11

Jason Andrew Simpson v. State of Florida & Jason Andrew Simpson v. Ricky D. Dixon, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-01-13

Snippet: three-minute power outage at Simpson’s mother’s house at 7:46 a.m. on July 16, 1999. JEA also received a call

Thomas Rigterink v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-21

Citation: 193 So. 3d 846, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 177, 2016 WL 1592714, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 835

Snippet: and received the female eyewitness’s call at 3:07:46 p.m. The recording of the first call reveals:

The League of Women Voters of Florida, etc. v. Ken Detzner Opinion

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-09

Citation: 172 So. 3d 363, 2015 WL 4130852

Snippet: Kelly. This is well within the range of the 42.7%, 46.7%, and 46.9% BVAP percentages that were addressed

Loper v. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-06-24

Citation: 203 So. 3d 898, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9564

Snippet: law); ■ see generally 3 Williston on Contracts §'7:46 (4th ed.) (“Forbearance, such as will constitute

Rigterink v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-06-16

Citation: 66 So. 3d 866, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 273, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1343, 2011 WL 2374188

Snippet: and received the female eyewitness’s call at 3:07:46 p.m. The recording of the first call reveals: 911

Rigterink v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-30

Citation: 2 So. 3d 221, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 132, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 151, 2009 WL 217966

Snippet: and received the female eyewitness’s call at 3:07:46 p.m. The recording of the first call reveals: 911

Gilbert v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-02

Citation: 868 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 4297, 2004 WL 689362

Snippet: outgoing calls to Gilbert’s cell phone number at 7:46 a.m., 7:48 a.m., 7:52 a.m, and 7:54 a.m. The testimony

The Florida Bar v. Gersten

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-03-05

Citation: 707 So. 2d 711, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 127, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 382, 1998 WL 90876

Snippet: completed. Judgment for costs in the amount of $3,007.46 is hereby entered against Gersten, for which sum

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1997-02-28

Snippet: development taxes.11 Under the provisions of section 1-7-46(d)(5)d., Charlotte County Code, when a tourist development

Duval Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-01-14

Citation: 519 So. 2d 1035, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 187, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 89

Snippet: The judgment awarding appel-lee the sum of $11,007.46, plus interest, is therefore reversed. See Snead

Delgado v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-12-23

Citation: 229 So. 2d 651, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6514

Snippet: See, e. g., Raybon v. State, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 7, 46 A.L.R.2d 1381. Our review of the record convinces