11.12

Salary, subsistence, and mileage of members and employees; expenses authorized by resolution; appropriation; preaudit.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

11.12 Salary, subsistence, and mileage of members and employees; expenses authorized by resolution; appropriation; preaudit.—

(1) The Chief Financial Officer is authorized to pay the salary, subsistence, and mileage of the members of the Legislature as the same shall be authorized by law. The Chief Financial Officer may pay the compensation of employees of the Legislature, together with reimbursement for their authorized travel as provided in s. 112.061, and such expense of the Legislature as shall be authorized by law, a concurrent resolution, a resolution of either house, or rules adopted by the respective houses, provided the total amount appropriated to the legislative branch shall not be altered, upon receipt of such warrant therefor. The number, duties, and compensation of the employees of the respective houses and of their committees shall be determined as provided by the rules of the respective house or in this chapter. Each legislator may designate no more than two employees to attend sessions of the Legislature, and those employees who change their places of residence in order to attend the session shall be paid subsistence at a rate to be established by the President of the Senate for Senate employees and the Speaker of the House of Representatives for House employees. Such employees, in addition to subsistence, shall be paid transportation expenses in accordance with s. 112.061(7) and (8) for actual transportation between their homes and the seat of government in order to attend the legislative session and return home, as well as for two round trips during the course of any regular session of the Legislature.

(2) All vouchers covering legislative expenses shall be preaudited by the Chief Financial Officer, and, if found to be correct, state warrants shall be issued therefor.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 12077, 1927; CGL 103; ss. 1, 2, ch. 21933, 1943; s. 1, ch. 23638, 1947; s. 1, ch. 24157, 1947; s. 1, ch. 24997, 1949; s. 1, ch. 29627, 1955; s. 1, ch. 57-15; ss. 2, 3, ch. 67-371; s. 4, ch. 69-52; s. 1, ch. 79-2; s. 1, ch. 85-61; s. 1, ch. 88-6; s. 1, ch. 90-252; s. 1, ch. 91-34; s. 11, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 98-136; s. 1, ch. 2003-261.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2021 · leading case: Conax Florida Corp. v. Astrium Ltd.

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Conax Florida Corp. v. Astrium Ltd. (2007) flmd · cites it 2× “11, § 11.12; see also Guenthardt Aff., ¶ 13).”

In Re Celotex Corp. (1996) flmb “Section 11.12 of the Plan provides as follows: “It shall be a condition precedent to the determination, allowance or payment of any Allowed Asbestos Claim, irrespective of the manner of resolution thereof, that any insurer or indemnitor from whom coverage, reimbursement or…”

Ferk Family, Lp v. Frank (2018) fladistctapp “Section 11.12 of the Agreement provides: Additional Remedies.”

Acopian v. Haley (1980) fladistctapp “§ 11.12, Florida Real Property Practice III, The Florida Bar, C.”

Dozier v. Wood (1983) fladistctapp “§ 11.12, Florida Real Property Practice III, The Florida Bar, C.”

Carlson v. Kantor (1980) fladistctapp “Avondale, supra) and similar holdings had been questioned because the focal point in the determination should be whether the intent of the original parties and their purpose in restricting the land had been frustrated by a change in conditions, not who owned the parcel sought to…”

Porpoise Point Partnership v. St. Johns County (1988) fladistctapp “Anderson, American Law of Zoning § 11.12 (3d ed. 1986). This type of development requires cooperation between the property owners and the zoning authority *729 in creating an overall plan.”

Beck-Ford Construction, LLC v. TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (2017) flsd · cites it 2× “24-11 at § 11.12; D.E. 24-11 at § 9.14; D.E. 24-11 at § 16(h); D.”

Keys v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Ret. Plan (2019) flmd “…to, then future disability payment will be reduced by the amount of the overpayment." Doc. 22 at p. 4 (citing Plan § 11.12).”

Andersen v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd (2021) flsd “[81-4] ¶ 40 (citing ASTM F1166-07 (Reapproved 2013), Standard Practice for Human Engineering Design for Marine Systems, Equipment, and Facilities, Section 11.12.1.2) (emphasis added). Dr. Kadiyala’s test measured a “wet slip index was 0.”

PMI Mortgage Insurance Co. v. Kahn (2009) fladistctapp “The Florida Bar, Creditors' and Debtors' Practice in Florida § 11.12, at 11-15 (3d. ed. 2007) (citing § 56.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.