Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 15.1 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 15.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 15.01 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 15.01

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 15
SECRETARY OF STATE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 15.01
15.01 Duties.
(1) The Secretary of State shall serve as the state protocol officer. In consultation with the Governor and other governmental officials, the Secretary of State shall develop, maintain, publish, and distribute the state protocol manual.
(2) The Department of State shall have the custody of the constitution and Great Seal of this state, and of the original statutes thereof, and of the resolutions of the Legislature, and of all the official correspondence of the Governor. The department shall keep in its office a register and an index of all official letters, orders, communications, messages, documents, and other official acts issued or received by the Governor or the Secretary of State, and record these in a book numbered in chronological order. The Governor, before issuing any order or transmission of any official letter, communication, or document from the executive office or promulgation of any official act or proceeding, except military orders, shall deliver the same or a copy thereof to the Department of State to be recorded.
History.s. 1, ch. 1, 1845; ch. 1845, 1871; RS 73; GS 74; RGS 88; CG; s. 1, ch. 28086, 1953; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 41, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 2000-258; s. 1, ch. 2020-93.

F.S. 15.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 15.01 on CourtListener

Amendments to 15.01


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 15.01

Total Results: 37

Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of Alabaster

881 F.2d 1570, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13245

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 18326

Cited 419 times | Published

Zoning Ordinance, City of Alabaster, Article VI, Section 15.1 (1986). The PDD is designed "to encourage coordinated

Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

350 F.3d 1181, 2003 WL 22682603

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 14, 2003 | Docket: 599937

Cited 258 times | Published

violated section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 1 , and section one of the Sherman Antitrust

John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-Appellee

711 F.2d 966, 219 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 515, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25133

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 8, 1983 | Docket: 956466

Cited 258 times | Published

meaning. 1 J.T. McCarthy, supra, § 15:1. On appeal, Clarke does not argue that Harland’s

United States v. Pedro Cruz-Valdez, Reuben Martin-Gonzalez and Manuel Fortunado Ariza-Fuentes

773 F.2d 1541, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23775

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 18, 1985 | Docket: 286948

Cited 163 times | Published

Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 15.01 (3d ed. 1977) 1980 Cumulative Pocket Part;

Panola Land Buyers Ass'n v. Shuman

762 F.2d 1550

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 12, 1985 | Docket: 66207104

Cited 60 times | Published

operations. The procedures delineated at 7 C.F.R. § 15.1-15.143 (1984) are directed at reviewing claims

Bank of New York v. Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc. (In Re Sunshine-Jr. Stores, Inc.)

456 F.3d 1291, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17990, 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 224

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 18, 2006 | Docket: 12794

Cited 33 times | Published

§§ 77aaa-77bbbb (2005). 5 . Section 15.01 of the Trust Indenture Agreement provided that

Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

432 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98760, 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 692, 2006 WL 1495222

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2006 | Docket: 58449

Cited 26 times | Published

545 (5th Cir.1974)); Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 15.01 ("It is fundamental that even if defendant's actual

Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alabaster

881 F.2d 1570, 1989 WL 91569

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 1, 1989 | Docket: 66246555

Cited 23 times | Published

Zoning Ordinance, City of Alabaster, Article VI, Section 15.1 (1986). The PDD is designed “to encourage coordinated

Florida Citrus Commission v. United States

144 F. Supp. 517, 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3982, 1956 WL 92564

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 1956 | Docket: 2521271

Cited 20 times | Published

order was issued under Section 15(1) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 15(1), and that no notice

Shadler v. State

761 So. 2d 279, 2000 WL 12841

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2000 | Docket: 1299977

Cited 17 times | Published

codified in the Florida Administrative Code. Section 15-1.003(5)(d) of the Code provides: "The Chief of

Banco Espirito Santo Intern. v. Bdo Intern.

979 So. 2d 1030, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3457, 2008 WL 649585

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 1714426

Cited 12 times | Published

authorized representative signed the MFA, and section 15.1 of the MFA obligated BDO Seidman to assure that

Irvine v. DUVAL COUNTY PLANNING COM'N

466 So. 2d 357, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1985 | Docket: 1524962

Cited 10 times | Published

Yokley, Zoning Law and Practice (Third Edition), § 15-1, pages 124, 125.[4] As previously noted by this

State v. Rios

409 So. 2d 241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1982 | Docket: 526210

Cited 10 times | Published

receiving stolen property) Texas: Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 15.01 (Vernon 1974) Utah: Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-101(3)

Sunbeam Television Corp. v. Nielsen Media Research, Inc.

711 F.3d 1264, 41 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1525, 2013 WL 776361, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 4, 2013 | Docket: 532465

Cited 8 times | Published

Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15. 1 The district court held that Sunbeam lacked

Brown v. State

790 So. 2d 389, 2001 WL 578457

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2000 | Docket: 1734359

Cited 8 times | Published

Crim.App. 1999) (citing Texas Penal Code Ann. § 15.01); State v. Vigil, 842 P.2d 843 (Utah 1992); Johnson

In Re Colony Square Company, Debtor. Colony Square Company v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

843 F.2d 479, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5571, 1988 WL 31422

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 27, 1988 | Docket: 491774

Cited 8 times | Published

the notice and cure provisions of the lease. Section 15.1 of the lease required Colony Square to furnish

Griffin v. AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO.

752 So. 2d 621, 1999 WL 1015149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1999 | Docket: 1279977

Cited 7 times | Published

Russ and Thomas F. Segalla, Couch on Insurance 3d § 15.1 (1997); Life Ins. Co. of North America v. Cichowlas

Estate of Tippett v. City of Miami

645 So. 2d 533, 1994 WL 617203

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1994 | Docket: 1222758

Cited 5 times | Published

Ziegler, Rathkopf's The Law of Zoning and Planning § 15.01, at 15-4 (4th ed. 1994). Further, "in fifteen years

First Pullen Commodity Services, Inc. v. a G. Becker-Kipnis & Co.

507 F. Supp. 770, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10612

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1981 | Docket: 2103244

Cited 5 times | Published

1391(b) and the venue provisions found in 15 U.S.C. § 15.[1] Title 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) states that civil actions

City of Miami Beach v. State Ex Rel. Pickin'Chicken of Lincoln Road, Inc.

129 So. 2d 696

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 1961 | Docket: 1737120

Cited 4 times | Published

rooms, or in bona fide restaurants as defined in section 15.1 of this Code, no license shall be issued to

Nash v. Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees

213 So. 3d 363, 2017 WL 697748, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2017 | Docket: 60263502

Cited 3 times | Published

arbitrator found that the University violated Section 15.1(c) of the CBA, which stated that decisions relating

Roberts v. Gordy

359 F. Supp. 3d 1231

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2019 | Docket: 64322712

Cited 2 times | Published

Hustlin' remained with Roberts, because: (1) Section 15.01 of the Sony/ATV Agreement provides that upon

Lyantie Townsend, etc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company

192 So. 3d 1223, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 269, 2016 WL 3191105, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1195, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 269

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2016 | Docket: 3072270

Cited 2 times | Published

prescribed at the time the judgments were entered....”); § 15-1—4(3)(c), Utah Code Ann. (1999) ("The postjudgment

100 Lincoln Rd SB, LLC v. Daxan 26 (FL), LLC

180 So. 3d 134, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15991, 2015 WL 6499331

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2015 | Docket: 3007731

Cited 2 times | Published

refusal on sale or transfer is clearly stated in section 15.01 of the Declaration. Walgreens obviously found

United States v. James LeRay McIntosh

704 F.3d 894, 2013 WL 57858, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 422, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1792

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 7, 2013 | Docket: 1405543

Cited 2 times | Published

Wayne *905R. LaFave et al., Criminal Procedure § 15.1(b) (3d ed.2000) (describing the proposed grand-jury

B & H Travel v. Dept of Com. Affairs

602 So. 2d 1362, 1992 WL 176971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1992 | Docket: 1694150

Cited 2 times | Published

transaction of business." Redington Beach, Fla.Code § 15-1(d)(7).

Matter of Truffles of Sarasota, Inc.

30 B.R. 666, 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 6051

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 1983 | Docket: 1395131

Cited 2 times | Published

three-year extensions. Section 15.1 of the lease provides in pertinent part: Section 15.1 "EVENTS OF DEFAULT

In Re Nissan Motor Corp. Antitrust Litigation

471 F. Supp. 754, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13388

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1979 | Docket: 1379439

Cited 2 times | Published

violation of § 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15.[1] Once this suit was filed, several others were

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor

724 F.2d 1482, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25527

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 13, 1984 | Docket: 727473

Cited 1 times | Published

had this authority pursuant to former 49 U.S.C. § 15(1)(6), now 49 U.S.C. § 10705(a)(1) (West U.S.C.A

Liberty New v. Charles Bennett

249 So. 3d 704

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 4, 2018 | Docket: 7024337

Published

contempt subject to imprisonment. (See Ga. Code Ann. § 15-1-4.)” Correctly, the Florida trial court applied

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Forbes/Cohen Florida Properties, L.P.

223 So. 3d 292, 2017 WL 2983290, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2017 | Docket: 6088816

Published

Restatement (Second) of Prop.: Landlord & Tenant § 15.1 (Am. Law Inst. 1977) (“The interests of the landlord

United States ex rel. Phalp v. Lincare Holdings, Inc.

116 F. Supp. 3d 1326, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 99285, 2015 WL 4528955

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2015 | Docket: 64303044

Published

also CMS Medicare Program Integrity Manual Ch. 15 § 15.1.1 DE 195-4). ’ ' .The NPPES was formerly known

FHR TB, LLC v. TB Isle Resort, LP.

865 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 2011 WL 4914715, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155752

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2011 | Docket: 65981729

Published

5 of the HMA; g. Changing the Resort’s name, Section 15.1 and 15.4 of the HMA; h. Attempting to remove

Harrell's, LLC v. Agrium Advanced (U.S.) Technologies, Inc.

795 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62693, 2011 WL 2418892

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 2011 | Docket: 2001179

Published

"Termination and Dissolution," provides the following: Section 15.01 Impasse. In the event that the Members or the

Nigeria National Petroleum Corp. v. S/V Seabulk Merlin

410 F. Supp. 2d 1218, 2005 A.M.C. 1092, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11336, 2005 WL 3671974

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2005 | Docket: 1434475

Published

generally T. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law § 15-1 (4th ed.2001) (reviewing background of limitation

Warner v. Walker

500 So. 2d 645, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 146, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1986 | Docket: 64624263

Published

(6th ed.) vol. III, ch. 15. In Jones, vol. III, § 15.1, p. 2, the authors describe a category of this

King v. United States

101 F. Supp. 941, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1926

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1951 | Docket: 65998230

Published

Commission under provisions of Section 13(3, 4) and Section 15(1) of the Interstate Commerce Act, Title 49 U