|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 15.0915.09 Fees.—(1) The fees, except as provided by law, to be collected by the Department of State, are:(a) For providing a certificate with seal, $8.75; however, no fee shall be charged for providing a certificate with seal to any officer appointed to an office requiring Senate confirmation. (b) For furnishing statistical information and for copying any document not mentioned, $1 per page or fraction thereof. (2) The department may in its discretion establish a reasonable fee for filing or copying any document or instrument not mentioned herein or provided for in other laws. (3) All fees arising from certificates of election or appointment to office and from commissions to officers shall be paid to the Chief Financial Officer for deposit in the General Revenue Fund. (4) All funds collected by the Division of Corporations of the department shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund. History.—s. 1, ch. 2089, 1877; RS 80; GS 81; RGS 96; CGL 118; s. 6, ch. 28086, 1953; s. 2, ch. 29841, 1955; s. 1, ch. 69-292; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 1, ch. 71-114; s. 22, ch. 76-209; s. 4, ch. 81-260; s. 3, ch. 83-217; s. 1, ch. 84-147; s. 55, ch. 90-132; s. 2, ch. 90-267; s. 11, ch. 95-430; s. 22, ch. 96-420; s. 24, ch. 97-153; ss. 30, 38, ch. 98-46; s. 21, ch. 99-218; ss. 39, 53, ch. 99-228; s. 6, ch. 2000-118; s. 10, ch. 2003-261; s. 2, ch. 2003-401; s. 1, ch. 2008-141.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 15.09
Total Results: 18
698 F.2d 1174, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 30316
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 477309
Cited 52 times | Published
then convicted of a criminal offense, See Ala.Code § 15-9-63 (1975). It is clear that a WPP official has
419 So. 2d 1058
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 1982 | Docket: 1555149
Cited 38 times | Published
Ed.2d 794 (1970); 3 S. Gard, Jones on Evidence, § 15:9 (6th ed. 1972).
To allow the defendant to present
1 F.3d 1558, 1993 WL 330599
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 17, 1993 | Docket: 64014270
Cited 33 times | Published
than upon a valid warrant of arrest as required by § 15-9-35, Code of Alabama (1975). The policy, practice
139 F.3d 1456, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8421, 1998 WL 213802
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 1, 1998 | Docket: 668814
Cited 15 times | Published
acted within the jurisdiction conferred by O.C.G.A. § 15-9-31, which authorizes probate courts to grant administration
77 F.3d 407, 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 352, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4455, 1996 WL 82501
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 13, 1996 | Docket: 419636
Cited 13 times | Published
jurisdiction centered on paragraph (2) of O.C.G.A. § 15-9-31, which provides:
15-9-31. Authority of
407 So. 2d 932
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1981 | Docket: 1515405
Cited 13 times | Published
result of the City's failure to comply with Section 15.[9]
Lastly, we find no merit in appellant's argument
364 So. 2d 73
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1978 | Docket: 2514460
Cited 13 times | Published
clearly stating its purpose. 1 Couch On Insurance 2d, § 15.9 et seq. (1959). There would appear to be no objection
796 F.2d 390, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27952
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 11, 1986 | Docket: 970607
Cited 5 times | Published
Mandatory Disposition of Detainer Act, Ala.Code § 15-9-80
et. seq.
Appellant acknowledges that
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 9, 2024 | Docket: 65586124
Published
Argued: Nov 16, 2023
of the Court 22-13444
§ 15-9-30(b). To determine whether a probate judge is
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2022 | Docket: 63011797
Published
(Fla. 1989); see also art. V, § 15,
-9-
Fla. Const. At the same time
230 So. 3d 912
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2017 | Docket: 6182905
Published
Padovano, Continuance, 5 Fla. Prac., Civil Practice § 15:9 (2016-2017 ed.) (“[Tjhere are situations in which
822 F.3d 1201, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7698, 2016 WL 1697665
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 28, 2016 | Docket: 3059160
Published
certify the question of the proper interpretation of § 15-9-31(2) to the Georgia Supreme Court than speculate
163 F.3d 1257
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 31, 1998 | Docket: 395034
Published
acted within the jurisdiction conferred by O.C.G.A. § 15-9-31, which authorizes probate courts to
grant administration
163 F.3d 1257
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 31, 1998 | Docket: 395020
Published
acted within the jurisdiction conferred by O.C.G.A. § 15-9-31,
which authorizes probate courts to grant administration
163 F.3d 1257, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 33146, 1998 WL 909963
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 31, 1998 | Docket: 395052
Published
The Plaintiff contends that pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 15-9-31 the Georgia Probate Court acted within its jurisdiction
163 F.3d 1257
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 31, 1998 | Docket: 2462523
Published
The Plaintiff contends that pursuant to O.C.G.A.
§ 15-9-31 the Georgia Probate Court acted within its jurisdiction
682 So. 2d 653, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11486, 1996 WL 636046
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 1996 | Docket: 64768754
Published
procedure outlined in the statute. See S.C.Code Ann. § 15-9-710(2) and (8) (1976), replacing S.C.Code § 10-451
934 F.2d 1460
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 17, 1991 | Docket: 66265071
Published
App. 87, 172 S.E.2d 879 (1970); cf. Ga.Code Ann. § 15-9-86.1(d) (1990) (specifying delivery by "regular
