Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 16.57 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 16.57 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 16.57

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 16
ATTORNEY GENERAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 16.57
16.57 Office of Civil Rights.There is created in the Department of Legal Affairs an Office of Civil Rights. The office may investigate and initiate actions authorized by chapter 760. In investigating violations of constitutional and statutory rights under chapter 760, the Attorney General may administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses or matter, and collect evidence.
History.s. 5, ch. 91-74; s. 3, ch. 2003-396.

F.S. 16.57 on Google Scholar

F.S. 16.57 on Casetext

Amendments to 16.57


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 16.57
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 16.57.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. GODINEZ- PEREZ,, 839 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . 180.9 grams 180.8 grams 7/16/14 Search of Vehicle 436 grams 419.3 grams 7/16/14 Search of Apartment 16.57 . . . Lastly, the 16.57 grams of methamphetamine that were seized from Cano-Bahena’s apartment later that same . . .

TEXAS L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. L. L. C. L. P. NRG L. L. C. v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 829 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . EPA’s replacement reasonable progress goals instead demanded 16.57 dv, 16.26 dv, and 21.33 dv. 81 Fed . . .

DESERET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 112 Fed. Cl. 438 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . In 1998 and 1999, KZLA’s revenue was $17.25 million and $16.57 million, respectively. . . .

SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. RAZMILOVIC,, 822 F. Supp. 2d 234 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . price of Symbol stock on the date of exercise would have been sixteen dollars and fifty-seven cents ($16.57 . . .

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, LLC,, 443 F.3d 94 (D.C. Cir. 2006)

. . . Ormesa thus sought certification at a capacity of 16.57 MW. . . . ); 71 Fed.Reg. at 7852-60, 7865 (implementing 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3(n)). . 19.95 (Gross) — 3.38 (ii) = 16.57 . . .

S. JACOBS, v. J. SCHIFFER,, 47 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 1999)

. . . . § 16.57(b) (the Privacy Act and parallel DOJ regulations); 7 U.S.C. § 136h and 18 U.S.C. § 1905 (concerning . . . disclosure of matters occurring before a federal grand jury). .See 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) and 28 C.F.R. § 16.57 . . .

PILON, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 73 F.3d 1111 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . . § 16.57(b) (”[A]n employee of the Department of Justice shall ... . . .

F. KNIGHT, Jr. S. T. D. S. S. Jr. L. Dr. W. Y. N. S. Dr. Jr. v. STATE ALABAMA M. Jr. S. Jr. B. H. J. P. Dr. D. III, F. A. A. Sr. A. G. A M W. Dr. A M Jr. W. M. H. B. L. A. R. C. Dr. V. Dr. E. B. F. W. Jr. W. T. Jr. R. R. E. W. A. C. J. D. Jr. T. B. Jr. O. H. Jr. T. Jr. E. G. Jr. S. H. Jr. B. Dr. A. UNITED STATES v. STATE OF ALABAMA A M a a a a a a a a a a, 787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Ala. 1991)

. . . University at Montgomery the mean ACT score for those students listing AUM as their first choice was 16.57 . . .

L. WATERS, v. THORNBURGH,, 888 F.2d 870 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

. . . . § 16.57(b)(3). Moreover, the Act is fundamentally concerned with privacy. . . .

KNOP, II, T. v. M. JOHNSON, Jr., 712 F. Supp. 571 (W.D. Mich. 1989)

. . . 95.25 Total $185.25 Witness Item Fee Rundel Trial 10-22-86 Witness fee $ 30.00 Air fare 560.00 Food 16.57 . . .

In UNIMET CORPORATION, 74 B.R. 156 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1987)

. . . Value With Land $ 18.96 $ 15.00 $ 20.22 $ 16.57 Subject property: 46,401 S.F. at $14.00/S.F. $649,614 . . .

KETCHUM, v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS,, 630 F. Supp. 551 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . For example, in the 22nd Ward, Whites account for 16.57% of the total population, while they account . . .

B. SHAPIRO J. v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,, 721 F.2d 215 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . See OMB Report at 40 Fed.Reg. 56742-43 (1975); Justice Department Regulation at 28 C.F.R. 16.57. . . .

SHAW, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FENSTERWALD, Jr. v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 559 F. Supp. 1053 (D.D.C. 1983)

. . . . § 16.57(c). . . .

GREENTREE, v. U. S. CUSTOMS SERVICE, GREENTREE, v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,, 674 F.2d 74 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 16.57(b). . . . See Source Book at 1173-88. . 28 C.F.R. § 16.57(a): Issuance of this section and actions considered or . . . At present, OMB’s policy is consistent with the policy of 28 C.F.R. § 16.57(b), i.e., an individual’s . . . Oct. 9, 1975).] 22 See 28 CFR § 16.57[.] 22a Letter of GPO Order Div. . . .

D. GREENTREE, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE,, 515 F. Supp. 1145 (D.D.C. 1981)

. . . . § 16.57(b) (1980). . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. TEXAS INTERNATIONAL COMPANY,, 498 F. Supp. 1231 (N.D. Ill. 1980)

. . . senior creditors was negated by TI’s statement that the trade creditors received the equivalent of $16.57 . . .

L. FRANK, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,, 480 F. Supp. 596 (D.D.C. 1979)

. . . . § 16.57. . . .

BARRETT v. CRAVEN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a, 70 F.R.D. 466 (E.D.N.C. 1976)

. . . the School Years 1970-71 through 1974-75, students in the western portion of Craven County received $16.57 . . .

CISNEROS v. CORPUS CHRISTI INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 350 F. Supp. 1241 (S.D. Tex. 1972)

. . . This two-mile distance is apparently considered important because of the provisions of Section 16.57( . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, W. S. H. L. H. L. Jr. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, R. W. A. M. H. D. MPS LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, R. W. A. M. CONTINENTAL OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 373 F.2d 816 (D.C. Cir. 1967)

. . . with the highest temporarily certificated price of 18.00 cents per Mcf produces an in-line price of 16.57 . . .

C. J. v., 56 Cust. Ct. 152 (Cust. Ct. 1966)

. . . importations there in controversy, as shown in the Customs Court’s decision, C.D. 1872, supra, was 16.10 and 16.57 . . . The silicon content of the two importations there involved was 16.10 and 16.57 per centum, respectively . . .

E. SCOTT, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, a, 173 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 16.57, Illustrations, states: “Illustrative of the discussion in the preceding sections, the . . .

C. J. v., 46 C.C.P.A. 36 (C.C.P.A. 1958)

. . . The actual silicon contents of the two importations of ferrosilicon in controversy are 16.10 and 16.57 . . .

C. J. v., 38 Cust. Ct. 257 (Cust. Ct. 1957)

. . . and found the silicon content of car NYC-634321 to be 16.10 per centum and of car NYC-712931 to be 16.57 . . . asked if the Vanadium Corp. produced ferrosilicon “within the grade of approximately 16.10 per cent to 16.57 . . . products, in which ferrosilicon was utilized, and stated that a ferrosilicon with a content of 16.10 to 16.57 . . . furnace ferrosilicon in controversy are as determined by the collector of customs, namely, 16.10 and 16.57 . . .

RETAIL CREDIT ASS N OF MINNEAPOLIS v. UNITED STATES, 30 F. Supp. 855 (D. Minn. 1938)

. . . income taxes for the years ending August 31, 1933, 1934 and 1935, in the respective sums of $81.09, $16.57 . . .

Co. v., 20 B.T.A. 525 (B.T.A. 1930)

. . . respondent asserts deficiencies in income taxes for the years 1925 and 1926 in the respective amounts of $16.57 . . .

GEORGE M. STUDEBAKER CLEMENT STUDEBAKER, JR., 2 B.T.A. 1020 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Studebaker involves deficiencies in income and profits tax for the years 1918 and 1919 of $16.57 and . . .

v. Co., 5 Ct. Cust. 398 (C.C.P.A. 1914)

. . . Protest No. 713219: Lead, 17.80; copper, 18.59; iron, 25.6; sulphur, 16.57. . . .