Florida Statute 17.031 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.031

17.031 Security of Chief Financial Officer’s office.—The Chief Financial Officer may engage the full-time services of two law enforcement officers, with power of arrest, to prevent all acts of a criminal nature directed at the property in the custody or control of the Chief Financial Officer. While so assigned, such officers shall be under the direction and supervision of the Chief Financial Officer, and their salaries and expenses shall be paid from the general fund of the office of Chief Financial Officer.

History.—s. 1, ch. 71-174; s. 17, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.031 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.031 on CourtListener

Amendments to 17.031

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.031

Total Results: 5

Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County, Florida

148 F.3d 1231, 41 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 563, 28 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21546, 47 ERC (BNA) 1014, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17754

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 1998 | Docket: 1068987

Cited 50 times | Published

(1994) (the "take" prohibition); see 50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a) (1997) (the "take" prohibition applies to threatened

Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County

92 F. Supp. 2d 1296, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4283, 2000 WL 433482

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2000 | Docket: 2393786

Cited 7 times | Published

species listed as "threatened." See 50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a). Congress defined the statutory term "take"

Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County

148 F.3d 1231

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 1998 | Docket: 2036779

Cited 3 times | Published

(1994) (the “take” prohibition); see 50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a) (1997) (the “take” prohibition applies to threatened

Loggerhead Turtle v. Cty. Council

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 1998 | Docket: 999119

Published

(1994) (the “take” prohibition); see 50 C.F.R. § 17.31(a) (1997) (the “take” prohibition applies to threatened

P & T Electric Co. v. Spadea

227 So. 2d 234, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1969 | Docket: 64511746

Published

commenced. 1 Collier on Bankruptcy, 14 Ed., Section 17.31, p. 1749; 9 Am.Jur.2d, Bankruptcy § 815; and