Florida Statute 17.08 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.08

17.08 Accounts, etc., on which warrants drawn, to be filed.—All accounts, vouchers, and evidence, upon which warrants have heretofore been, or shall hereafter be, drawn upon the treasury by the Chief Financial Officer shall be filed and deposited in the office of Chief Financial Officer or the office of the Chief Financial Officer’s designee, in accordance with requirements established by the Secretary of State.

History.—ch. 351, 1851; RS 100; GS 104; RGS 117; CGL 147; s. 4, ch. 95-312; s. 2, ch. 97-96; s. 25, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.08 on CourtListener

Amendments to 17.08

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.08

Total Results: 20

Cargill v. Turpin

120 F.3d 1366, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22315, 1997 WL 473579

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 21, 1997 | Docket: 1118683

Cited 130 times | Published

clearly would have been improper. See Ga.Code Ann. § 17-8-76(a) (1990) (prohibiting attorneys from informing

Bernard Depree v. A.G. Thomas, Warden and Michael J. Bowers

946 F.2d 784, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 26153, 1991 WL 209793

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 5, 1991 | Docket: 833276

Cited 100 times | Published

try them jointly. See Ga.Code Ann. § 17-8-4 (1990) (formerly Ga.Code Ann. § 27-2101 (1971))

Richard Tucker v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent

762 F.2d 1496

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 23, 1985 | Docket: 146614

Cited 69 times | Published

declaration of mistrial upon objection. Ga.Code Ann. § 17-8-76 (1982). See also, Tucker v. State, 245 Ga. 68

Hammond v. Hall

586 F.3d 1289, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24209, 2009 WL 3617765

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 4, 2009 | Docket: 399526

Cited 63 times | Published

mistrial shall constitute reversible error. O.C.G.A. § 17-8-76. When asked later why he did not ask for a mistrial

Charles Thomas Corn, Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Jackson Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-Appellee

708 F.2d 549

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 11, 1983 | Docket: 225280

Cited 55 times | Published

Ann. § 27-2401, (recodified as Off. Code Ga.Ann. § 17-8-5 (1982)), the court reporter records the entire

William Boyd Tucker v. Walter D. Zant

724 F.2d 882, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24498

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 15, 1984 | Docket: 1226589

Cited 50 times | Published

informed of the possibility of parole. O.C.G.A. § 17-8-76(a). In California v. Ramos, - U.S. -, 103 S

75 Acres, LLC v. Miami-Dade County

338 F.3d 1288, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14873, 2003 WL 21715867

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 25, 2003 | Docket: 397725

Cited 31 times | Published

Nowak, Treatise on Constitutional Law § 17.8 (3d ed.1999). By contrast, if government conduct

Richard Tucker v. Robert Francis, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center

723 F.2d 1504, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24497

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 15, 1984 | Docket: 780576

Cited 28 times | Published

prohibits argument on the issue of parole, Ga.Code Ann. § 17-8-76 (1982). These inflammatory statements were improper

Johnny Swanson, III v. The State of Alabama

490 F.3d 894, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15519, 2007 WL 1859323

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 29, 2007 | Docket: 398940

Cited 27 times | Published

first Tuesday in June. See Ala.Code § 17-8-2.1 (2005) (current version at Ala.Code § 17-6-22);

The New Alliance Party of Alabama Michael Jeter and Nathaniel Ivory v. Perry A. Hand, Secretary of State for the State of Alabama

933 F.2d 1568, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 12933, 1991 WL 95279

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 24, 1991 | Docket: 1003281

Cited 26 times | Published

party ballot petitions were due in July, Ala.Code § 17-8-2.1(b), although signature petitions for independent

Christopher A. Burger, Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-Appellee

753 F.2d 930, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28157

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 5, 1985 | Docket: 306278

Cited 20 times | Published

of the trial. (R. 67) (emphasis added). O.C.G.A. § 17-8-71 (1982) specifies that ”[i]f the defendant introduces

Amendments to Fla. Rules of Final Arguments

957 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1285808

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2007 | Docket: 1679417

Cited 14 times | Published

Last Word?, 29 Nova L.Rev. 99, 121 n. 199 (2004); § 17-8-71, Ga.Code Ann. (West 2006).

Henry Willis, III v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent

838 F.2d 1510, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1792, 1988 WL 12727

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 1988 | Docket: 979251

Cited 10 times | Published

27-2206 (1981) (recodified as amended at Ga.Code Ann. § 17-8-76 (1982)). 22 Defense counsel made

Orange State Oil Co. v. Jacksonville Express. Auth.

110 So. 2d 687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1959 | Docket: 1409888

Cited 10 times | Published

Orgel: 1 Valuation under Eminent Domain (2nd Ed.) § 17. [8] Supra note 2. [9] See: F.S. § 73.11, F.S.A

Holzendorf v. Bell

606 So. 2d 645, 1992 WL 221495

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1992 | Docket: 129868

Cited 7 times | Published

submitted was not properly signed as required under section 17.08 of the charter. Although this issue may be moot

Hall v. Warden, Lee Arrendale State Prison

686 F. App'x 671

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 20, 2017 | Docket: 65964807

Cited 1 times | Published

defendant. The prosecutor identified Georgia Code § 17-8-55 as authority for this procedure. The Georgia

Jenna Dickenson v. NPAS Solutions, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 3, 2022 | Docket: 64866355

Published

was $11,697 (or $14,371 in 2021 dollars). Newberg § 17:8. USCA11 Case: 18-12344 Date Filed: 08/03/2022

Watson Construction Co. v. City of Gainesville

433 F. Supp. 2d 1269, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32432, 2006 WL 1418947

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 23, 2006 | Docket: 2397046

Published

& JOHN E. NOWAK, TREATISE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW § 17.8 (3d ed.1999)). This distinction between legislative

Johnson v. Johansen

338 So. 2d 1300, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 1976 | Docket: 64555725

Published

*130267-1320, §§ 7.102, 12.504, Fla.Laws. Section 17.08 provides for recall by the voters of any “officer

Florida Industrial Commission v. Neal

224 So. 2d 774, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1969 | Docket: 64510578

Published

presently constituted, the act further provides in Section 17(8) thereof that there is created within the Division