The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . By the end of the day, SunEdison's stock closed at $ 17.08 per share. . . .
. . . following method: In Exxon's internal "Allocation Base," the Baytown refinery and chemical plant made up 17.08 . . .
. . . Hil-linger, Chapter 11 Theory and Practice, A Guide to Reorganization §§ 17.03-17.08. . . . .
. . . RHI’s Property and Water and Sewer Service Category Change Applications The 17.08 acre property purchased . . .
. . . . § 17.08 (specifying methods by which sufficient written notice can be provided). . . .
. . . The 17.08-acre Property is comprised of two parcels of land, and there is a wooded area in the rear parcel . . .
. . . 2004 hearing on Plaintiffs’ applications, Walthour prepared a hearing report pursuant to District Rule 17.08 . . .
. . . Robinson, II, Robinson on North Carolina Corporation Law, § 17.08 (2005). . . .
. . . operators in Department 911 earned, during the same week, per hour, $18.10, $17.93, $17.32, $17.32, and $17.08 . . .
. . . Indeed, the compensatory award in Boerner was 8.54 or 17.08 times larger than the compensatory award . . .
. . . See Nimmer § 17.08[A], at 17-48.2. . . .
. . . Lee, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.08 (5th ed. 2000). . . .
. . . to February 1, 2003 $ 7 months @ $529.71/mo. 3707.97 February 2, 2003 to February 6, 2003 $ 4 days @ 17.08 . . .
. . . prepared by a private management consultant firm at the request of the Navajo, advocated a rate of between 17.08 . . . The Tribe identifies a single federal coal lease with a royalty rate of 17.08 percent, see Brief for . . .
. . . prepared by a private management consultant firm at the request of the Navajo, advocated a rate of between 17.08 . . . The Tribe identifies a single federal coal lease with a royalty rate of 17.08 percent, see Briel for . . .
. . . prepared by a private management consultant firm at the request of the Navajo, advocated a rate of between 17.08 . . . The Tribe identifies a single federal coal lease with a royalty rate of 17.08 percent, see Brief for . . .
. . . occurred, African-Americans and Whites were selected at less than 80% of the Hispanic selection rate (17.08% . . .
. . . lien against the property in the amount of $151,921.80 as of April 1, 2000, together with interest at $17.08 . . . Ill We hold that FSA has a valid lien in the amount of $151,921.80 plus $17.08 per diem as of April 1 . . .
. . . Silberberg, Civil Practice in the Southern District of New York, § 17.08 at 17-24 (2d ed.2001). . . .
. . . interest as of April 1, 2000, after accruing interest, of $151,912.22 plus a per diem interest accrual of $17.08 . . . , is $82,631.03, fór a total subrogated amount of $151,912.80, with a per diem interest accrual of $17.08 . . . Accrued interest to date, as set forth above, is $82,631.03 through April 1, 2000, with a $17.08 per . . . Accrued interest is $82,631.03 through April 1, 2000, with a $17.08 per diem interest accrual thereafter . . .
. . . , overstated the “amount financed” by $17.08 and understated the “annual percentage rate;” (2) Coleman . . . (I)(A)(1) Effects of the Alleged $17.08 Understatement of the “Finance Charge” This claim centers on . . . Brown contends Coleman Toyota violated TILA by including the $17.08 up-charge in the “amount financed . . . Coleman Toyota understated the “finance charge” disclosed to Brown by $17.08 in violation of 15 U.S.C . . . This conflict between the documents does not make it “apparent” that $17.08 of the $40 is allegedly a . . .
. . . for a “license fee” that actually cost $22.92, Coleman Toyota understated the “finance charge” by $17.08 . . . , overstated the “amount financed” by $17.08 and understated the “annual percentage rate;” (2) Coleman . . . Toyota failed to disclose the fact of or amount of the $17.08 upeharge in the “license fee;” and (3) . . . the “license fee” when the actual cost of the “license fee” was $22.92, amounting to an up-charge of $17.08 . . . charge,” Coleman Toyota necessarily overstated the “amount financed” disclosed to Brown and Gomes by $17.08 . . .
. . . Conte, 3 NEWBERG ON CLASS ACTIONS, § 17.08 (2d d.1985) at 374 n. 66)(size of class may be difficult to . . .
. . . In particular, Francis Russo told Bell that Russo could no longer afford to pay the existing $17.08 hourly . . . The company nevertheless continued to pay its employees an hourly wage of $17.08. . . .
. . . O’Malley, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.08 (4th ed.1992). . . .
. . . The language of this section requires us to consider the provisions of Section 17.08 entitled "Enforced . . . Therefore, LSGI could not seek the benefit of the extension for performance provided under Section 17.08 . . .
. . . O’Malley, 1 Federal Jury Practice & Instructions: Civil and Criminal, § 17.08, at 661-62 (4th ed. 1992 . . .
. . . petitions to amend the charter are required to be executed in the same manner as provided in section 17.08 . . . Section 17.08 provides that copies of a petition may be used, but in such a case, “one of the signers . . . The charter, section 17.08, clearly calls for affirmation under oath of each petition by “one of the . . . The duty of the Supervisor, under section 17.08, is confined to the ascertainment of “whether the petition . . . matter, however, it would appear to us that through the exercise of the authority found in section 17.08 . . .
. . . . 357, 69 L.Ed. 739 (1925), 1A Collier on Bankruptcy (14th ed. 1978) ¶¶ 17.02, 17.03, 17.04, 17.05, 17.08 . . .
. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.08 (3d ed. 1977). . . . .
. . . jurisdictions which appoint school board members through the SBSC, and school boards in these jurisdictions are 17.08% . . .
. . . .-04, 17.08 and 17.09. . . .
. . . consider that a limiting instruction is, of course, required, and I will give one taken from Paragraph 17.08 . . .
. . . Moore, supra, ¶ 17.08 at 17-81. . . .
. . . Moore, supra, ¶ 17.08 at 17-81. . . .
. . . Id. at § 17.02[1] at 17-10.2, § 17.08 at 17-49 — 17.50.2. . . .
. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice And Instructions § 17.08 (3d ed.1977). . . .
. . . .1972)); earlier contradictory statements are admissible to impeach the credibility of a witness (§ 17.08 . . .
. . . Rosenberg, Patent Law Fundamentals § 17.08 (2d ed. 1985). . . .
. . . Kurland, Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure [hereinafter cited as Moore’s Manual] § 17.08 . . .
. . . -June, 1983(C) 11.94 12,69 8.19 10.62 Average(P) 15.40 17.08 11.34 11.59 Composite Average 13.85% (A) . . .
. . . . § 17.08, and an instruction cautioning the jury to weigh the testimony of co-conspirators with great . . .
. . . .-24, at 17.08 (14th ed. 1976). . . .
. . . Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.08 (3d ed. 1977). . . .
. . . . § 17.08. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 17.08 (Supp. 1970). . . .
. . . Forsyth, 43 U.S. (2 How.) 202, 11 L.Ed. 236 (1844); 1A Cullier on Bankruptcy ¶ 17.24, at 17.08 (14th . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, Vol. 2, §§ 17.07, 17.08 (1958); L. . . .
. . . in determining whether diversity exists.” 57 F.R.D. 503 at 505. .See 3A Moore’s Federal Practice Ufl 17.08 . . . name joining if necessary, the assignor, the owner of the legal right. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 17.08 . . .
. . . Section 17.08 provides for recall by the voters of any “officer elected in any consolidated government . . .
. . . .) § 10.01 at page 187 and § 17.08 at page 321, or this instruction given in Pope v. . . .
. . . See 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, If 17.08 at p. 262; If 17.09[1.-1], If 17.13[1]. . . .
. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 17.08 (2d ed. 1970). We disagree. . . .
. . . the jury in arriving at a verdict as to guilt or innocence. 1 Devitt & Black-mar, supra note 20, at § 17.08 . . .
. . . such it was subject to the tax on the transfer thereof. 2 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 17.08 . . .
. . . See also Davis, Administrative Law § 17.08 (1970 Supp.), where Professor Davis observes: “Surely the . . .
. . . for $1,565.44 (cashed April 11, 1961) paid all invoices for the months of February and March (the $17.08 . . .
. . . 243442-A, $18.29 each, plus packing, for 243443-A, 243444r-A and 243445-A, for bicycles marked “A”, $17.08 . . . 243442-A, $18.29 each, plus packing, for 243443-A, 243444-A, and 243445-A, for bicycles, marked “A,” $17.08 . . .
. . . percentage amounts claimed, petitioner, in 1949, for example, would have had to pay all officers at least 17.08 . . .
. . . numbers 3850, 3864, 3950, and 4024, containing the following percentages of silicon, respectively, 17.08 . . .
. . . The average tare weight of one case, therefore, is 17.08 kilos. . . .
. . . discloses the following percentages : Operating Percentage Percentage Ratio of Profit of Loss 1936 117.08% 17.08% . . .
. . . United States, 3 Cir., 1948, 171 F.2d 374; Moore’s Federal Practice, § 17.08. . . .
. . . Otis Elevator Co., D.C.W.D.S.C. 1941, 40 F.Supp. 11; 2 Moore, Federal Practice § 17.08, p. 2057 (1938 . . . See Note, 96 A.L.R. 879, sec. b (1935). 2 Moore, Federal Practice § 17.08, p. 2057 (1938); 2 Williston . . .
. . . The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income tax for the calendar year 1936 in the amount of $17.08 . . .
. . . delivery as follows: January 25, 1917 200 bales at 16.83 cents per pound 400 16.84 27 200 17.06 29 400 17.08 . . .