The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Financial Indemnity asserted that Section 17.12 "requires insurers to charge only the rates that are . . .
. . . Code §§ 17.12, et seq.; Rhode Island Unfair Trade Practice and Consumer Protection Act, R.G.G.L. §§ 6 . . .
. . . See 4 Moore’s Federal Practice 3D § 17.12[l][c] (“If join-der or substitution of, or ratification by, . . .
. . . See § 17.12 Endangered Native Wildlife, 39 Fed. Reg. 1175, 1175 (Jan. 4, 1974). . . .
. . . . § 17.11 and 17.12, respectively, see 50 C.F.R. § 402.01, including the piping plover. . . . determined to be endangered or threatened under section 4 of the [ESA] * * * [and] are found in 50 CFR 17.11-17.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 17.11-17.12 (listing species). . . . .
. . . See 4 American Law of Property § 17.12; 5 Tiffany’s Real Property § 1287. See also McCannon v. . . .
. . . Silberberg, Civil Practice in the Southern District of New York § 17.12 at 17-39 (2d ed. 2000) (citing . . .
. . . 1.05 of the Delafield Ordinances provides that “[appointed officials may be removed as provided in §§ 17.12 . . . Section 17.12(l)(c) of the Wisconsin Statutes states that city officers may be removed as follows: “[ . . . Stat. § 17.12. . . .
. . . . § 17.12 (listing Sebastopol meadowfoam as an endangered plant species). . . .
. . . . § 17.12 (listing Sebastopol meadowfoam as an endangered plant species). . . .
. . . . § 17.12 (2010)). . . .
. . . The lake reached a maximum elevation of 17.12 feet in 2005. Ferguson 2d Suppl. Deck Table 2. . . .
. . . Pursuant to § 17.12 of the dealer franchise agreements, Michigan law governs the agreements. 11. . . . Pursuant to § 17.12 of the dealer franchise agreements, Michigan law governs the agreements. . . . Accordingly, GM asserts and the Court finds that pursuant to § 17.12 of the dealer franchise agreements . . .
. . . See PCC ch. 18E.30 (originally codified at PCC ch. 17.12). . . . .
. . . . §§ 17.1-17.12 to the letter sent to Medina. . . .
. . . B, "Standard Provisions," § 17.12; see Complaint ¶ 10. . . .
. . . timely fashion here—waives the point, at least where as here the failure has been prejudicial. 4 Moore § 17.12 . . .
. . . Operators 333 50.00% 341 50.44% AfricanAM Female Operators 9.91% 67 9.91% Total Female Operators 114 17.12% . . .
. . . multi-blanking of coated, "hot-dipped” galvanized, .029 gauge prime steel on a 55" wide coil into 3 mults of 17.12 . . .
. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions, § 17.12 at 17-32 (3d ed.1992)). . . .
. . . of a property interest, must ordinarily be proved by clear and convincing evidence. 2 McCarthy, at § 17.12 . . .
. . . Dixon’s starting pay in January 1996 was $16.62 per hour, and increased to $17.12 per hour in May 1996 . . .
. . . value of timber or known income from land sales, defendant calculated the diminution of value to be 17.12% . . .
. . . Eliah Chernabaeff appeals the judgment entered following his jury trial conviction for importation of 17.12 . . .
. . . alleged that Keels, on a particular date, obtained “goods and services” from the victim in the amount of $17.12 . . . Because the information alleged that Keels used the credit card to obtain $17.12 worth of goods and services . . .
. . . This is because of the express choice of law provision contained in Article 17.12 of the Dealer Agreement . . .
. . . Newberg & Alba Conte, Newberg on Class Actions § 17.12 at 17-32 (3d ed.1992). . . .
. . . because on remand the bankruptcy court must reconsider the plan’s feasibility in light of the new $17.12 . . .
. . . McCarthy on Trademarks, supra at § 17.12. . . .
. . . substitution under Rule 7025, upon which the Committee previously relied. 4 Moore’s Federal Practioe § 17.12 . . .
. . . . §§ 17.11 & 17.12. . . .
. . . . §§ 17.11 & 17.12. . . .
. . . Article 17.12 of the Dealer Agreement clearly states that Michigan law governs the Agreement. . . . Jury Interrogatories, Questions 1-5. . 17.12 Applicable Law. . . .
. . . Article 17.12 of the parties’ agreement provides that the Dealer Agreement "is governed by the laws of . . .
. . . See, e.g., 3 Newberg & Conte, supra, § 17.12 at 17-31. . . .
. . . Stern et al., Supreme Court Practice § 17.12 at 675 (7th ed. 1993). . . .
. . . . § 17.12(1)(c). Due to this statute, should Ms. . . .
. . . . § 17.12. . . .
. . . See 4 American Law of Property § 17.12; 5 Tiffany’s Real Property § 1287. See also McCannon v. . . .
. . . See 4 American Law of Property § 17.12; 5 Tiffany’s Real Property § 1287. See also McCannon v. . . .
. . . Anahuac del Golfo, S.A., 1.64%; (2) Cementos Guadalajara, S.A., 5.13%; (3) Cementos de Chihuahua, S.A., 17.12% . . .
. . . Anahuac del Golfo, S.A., 1.64%; (2) Cementos Guadalajara, S.A., 5.13%; (3) Cementos de Chihuahua, S.A., 17.12% . . .
. . . Guadalajara, S.A., 5.13%; (2) Cementos Anahuac del Golfo, S.A., 1.64%; (3) Cementos de Chihuahua, S.A., 17.12% . . .
. . . Guadalajara, S.A., 5.13%; (2) Cementos Ana-huac del Golfo, S.A., 1.64%; (3) Cementos de Chihuahua, S.A., 17.12% . . .
. . . See, also, Devitt & Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions: Criminal § 17.12 (3d ed. 1977), . . .
. . . See 4 American Law of Property § 17.12 (1952). . . . Kelly, 100 Vt. 318, 137 A. 196 (1926); see American Law of Property § 17.12 (1952). . . .
. . . relates to "possible future targets for retaliation.” 2 O'Reilly, Federal Information Disclosure § 17.12 . . .
. . . 29.76 23.91 10.68 51.96 6.95 13.95 37.50 36.26 27.33 37.35 5.45 22.01 25.65 26.81 36.16 22.68 33.08 17.12 . . .
. . . . § 17.12. . . . Section 17.12(1), Wis.Stats., provides in relevant part: Officers of cities ... may be removed as follows . . .
. . . Evans, Raible Ex. 737) 17.12.Unpaid Vendors. . . . (Findings of Fact 17.11, 17.12, supra pp. 71-73) ix. . . .
. . . Flack chose not to exercise his authority under paragraph 17.12 of the subcontractor listing clause and . . . Paragraph 17.12 of the clause states (in part): The Contracting Officer shall have the right to require . . . The contracting officer testified clearly at trial that he was aware of the provisions of paragraph 17.12 . . . have questioned Rock Hill regarding the sequence of events pursuant to his authority under paragraph 17.12 . . . Officer’s refusal to approve a substitution pursuant to the provisions of subparagraphs (17.10) and (17.12 . . .
. . . Flack chose not to exercise his authority under paragraph 17.12 of the subcontractor listing clause and . . . Paragraph 17.12 of the clause states (in part): The Contracting Officer shall have the right to require . . . The contracting officer testified clearly at trial that he was aware of the provisions of paragraph 17.12 . . . have questioned Rock Hill regarding the sequence of events pursuant to his authority under paragraph 17.12 . . . Officer’s refusal to approve a substitution pursuant to the provisions of subparagraphs (17.10) and (17.12 . . .
. . . 17(a) which “goes far beyond any common law notion of trustee”, 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, Section 17.12 . . .
. . . Section 17.12 of the Indenture provides in pertinent part as follows: This Indenture and each and every . . .
. . . Murphy, Creditors’ Rights in Bankruptcy, §§ 17.12 et seq. (1980); Aaron, “The Bankruptcy Reform Act of . . .
. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 17.12 (3d ed. 1977), and cases cited therein. . . . .
. . . See § 17.12. . . .
. . . of 1933; (3) § 4b of the Commodity Exchange Act; (4) § 33 A(2) of the Texas Securities Act; (5) §§ 17.12 . . .
. . . voters reside in Bristol County; 8.06% reside in Newport County; 8.79% reside in Washington County; 17.12% . . .
. . . such cowhide gloves had a Carla Trading price of $16.75 per dozen pairs and an appraisal value of $17.12 . . .
. . . delivery from SIT to the residence, less the credit to the defendant referred to in paragraph (b) for the $17.12 . . .
. . . Cavalliotis, 276 F. 565 (E.D.N.Y.1921); Cf. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 17.12, n. 20. . . .
. . . 1960 560,972.02 23.5 1961 543,233.18 19.79 1962 547,472.81 18.2 1963 574,797.20 16.74 1964 552.114.92 17.12 . . .
. . . the following provisions relating to this question of the jurisdiction of the Joint Port Committee: “17.12 . . .
. . . See generally 2 Mertens §§ 17.05-.05a, 17.12; 3 Id. §§ 20.161-.163, 20.165; 7 Id. §§ 38.11-.13. . . . .
. . . Acme Poultry Corporation, supra; 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 17.12 and ¶ 17.14; 2 Barron and Holtzoff . . .
. . . IV, § 17.12; Tiffany, Real Property, 3d ed., Vol. 5, § 1287. . Pond v. . . .
. . . IV, § 17.12; Tiffany, Real Property, 3d ed., Vol. 5, § 1287. Pond v. . . .
. . . Lilleberg_ 77, 040 17.12 Jake Graybeal_ 77,040 17.12 Total_ 450, 000 100 In February 1959, 200,000 shares . . .
. . . representative normally controls for diversity purposes. 3 Moore, Fed.Pract., Parags. 17.03, 17.04, 17.12 . . .
. . . In 6 Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, 3d Ed., § 17.12, page 86, it is stated: “The impleading of third . . .
. . . . § 4.39‡ § 12.61 def § 20.48 § 36.23 § 39.17* 3Y2 shares new Common............. 11.20 def 17.12 28.98 . . .
. . . . § 17.12. . . .
. . . of the season, running from 10.08 to 19.44 per cent., except that in the fourth division there was 17.12 . . .
. . . this matter, 29.96%; the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, 22.88%; the Central Railroad of New Jersey, 17.12% . . .
. . . contracted with tire Guaranty Trust Company and the Temple Iron Company to buy at par 29.96 per cent., 17.12 . . . the Lehigh Valley, 22.88 per cent.; the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western, 19.52 per cent.; the Central, 17.12 . . .
. . . illustration of this is found in the charge of $873.12 for 51 days’ loss of work on scow No. 10 at $17.12 . . . aggregating $465.04; in other words, an allowance of 51 days to do $465 of work, and charging lor such time $17.12 . . .
. . . Brown proceeded to act and informed him that he had closed it out at $17.12. . . .