Florida Statute 17.27 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.27

17.27 Microfilming and destroying records and correspondence.—

(1) The Department of Financial Services may destroy general correspondence files and also any other records which the department may deem no longer necessary to preserve in accordance with retention schedules and destruction notices established under rules of the Division of Library and Information Services, records and information management program, of the Department of State. Such schedules and notices relating to financial records of the department shall be subject to the approval of the Auditor General.

(2) The Department of Financial Services may photograph, microphotograph, or reproduce on film such documents and records as it may select, in such manner that each page will be exposed in exact conformity with the original.

(3) The Department of Financial Services may destroy any of such documents after they have been photographed and filed in accordance with the provisions of subsection (1).

(4) Photographs or microphotographs in the form of film or prints of any records made in compliance with the provisions of this section shall have the same force and effect as the originals thereof would have, and shall be treated as originals for the purpose of their admissibility in evidence. Duly certified or authenticated reproductions of such photographs or microphotographs shall be admitted in evidence equally with the original photographs or microphotographs.

History.—ss. 1-3, ch. 23909, 1947; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 6, ch. 71-377; s. 1, ch. 77-102; s. 1, ch. 78-177; s. 2, ch. 86-163; s. 39, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.27 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.27 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.27

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.27

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.27.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.27

Total Results: 16

KYLE E. MCCLAMMA v. MARK GLASS, COMMISSIONER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-27

Snippet: requirements (quoting United States v. DiTomasso, 621 F.3d 17, 27 (1st Cir. 2010))); United States v. Goguen, 218

City of Tavares and Gallagher Bassett etc. v. Billy Harper

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-30

Citation: 230 So. 3d 918

Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CITY OF TAVARES and NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO GALLAGHER BASSETT FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND SERVICE, INC., DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellants, CASE NO. 1D17-0027 v. CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1 BILLY HARPER,

RENARDO SHAMRK FERGUSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-08-24

Snippet: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RENARDO SHAMRK FERGUSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-27 [August 24, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Krista Marx,

Amendments to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-09-28

Citation: 940 So. 2d 409

Snippet: INCOME (Subtract line 26 from line 17) 27. $_________

US Sugar Corp. v. Henson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-04-20

Citation: 787 So. 2d 3, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5255, 2000 WL 1880340

Snippet: inapplicable); and K-Mart Corp. v. Morrison, 609 N.E.2d 17, 27 n. 9 (Ind.App.1993)(requiring novel scientific

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure & Family Law Forms

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-09-21

Citation: 810 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2272, 2000 WL 1352932

Snippet: NET MONTHLY INCOME (Subtract line 26 from line 17) 27. SECTION II. AVERAGE MONTHLY EXPENSES HOUSEHOLD:

Amend. to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-10-29

Citation: 723 So. 2d 208, 1998 WL 765134

Snippet: line 26 from line 17) 27. $______

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-02-26

Citation: 713 So. 2d 1, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 105, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 475, 1998 WL 166533

Snippet: line 26. from line 17) 27. $_________ SECTION

Jones v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-20

Citation: 701 So. 2d 76, 1997 WL 652073

Snippet: in Execution Methods," Petitioner's Appendix, § 17. [27] Compare Fierro v. Gomez, 77 F.3d 301 (9th Cir

Davis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-04-23

Citation: 691 So. 2d 1180, 1997 WL 194120

Snippet: charged and the trial court sentenced him to serve 17.27 years in the state prison. We affirm the defendant's

Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-10-29

Citation: 497 So. 2d 652

Snippet: S. 20, 33-34, 104 S.Ct. 2199, 2208, 81 L.Ed.2d 17, 27 (1984): [A]n order prohibiting dissemination of

In Re Estate of Killinger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-04-18

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1187

Snippet: generally Fair v. Tampa Electric Co., 158 Fla. 15, 17, 27 So.2d 514, 515 (1946). We believe, under the circumstances

Siltzer v. North First Bank

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-02-15

Citation: 445 So. 2d 649, 38 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 379

Snippet: 263 (5th Cir.1942); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.27 at p. 1719 (14th Ed. 1978). Thus, the underlying

Heinlein v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-10-06

Citation: 239 So. 2d 635, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081

Snippet: appellants contend that Sections 17-23 through 17-27 of the Code unconstitutionally impair contractual

Gables Racing Ass'n v. Persky

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-08-02

Citation: 156 So. 392, 116 Fla. 77, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1017

Snippet: R. 520, 44 L. R. A. 243; Bank v. Mann, 94 Tenn. 17, 27 S.W. Rep. 1015, 27 L. R. A. 565; Denmark v. Avinger

Davidson v. Davis

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1910-01-15

Citation: 59 Fla. 476

Snippet: First Nat. Bank of Johnson City v. Mann, 94 Tenn. 17, 27 S. W. Rep. 1015, 27 L. R. A. 565: “The difference