Florida Statute 17.27 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 17
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 17.27

17.27 Microfilming and destroying records and correspondence.—

(1) The Department of Financial Services may destroy general correspondence files and also any other records which the department may deem no longer necessary to preserve in accordance with retention schedules and destruction notices established under rules of the Division of Library and Information Services, records and information management program, of the Department of State. Such schedules and notices relating to financial records of the department shall be subject to the approval of the Auditor General.

(2) The Department of Financial Services may photograph, microphotograph, or reproduce on film such documents and records as it may select, in such manner that each page will be exposed in exact conformity with the original.

(3) The Department of Financial Services may destroy any of such documents after they have been photographed and filed in accordance with the provisions of subsection (1).

(4) Photographs or microphotographs in the form of film or prints of any records made in compliance with the provisions of this section shall have the same force and effect as the originals thereof would have, and shall be treated as originals for the purpose of their admissibility in evidence. Duly certified or authenticated reproductions of such photographs or microphotographs shall be admitted in evidence equally with the original photographs or microphotographs.

History.—ss. 1-3, ch. 23909, 1947; ss. 12, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 6, ch. 71-377; s. 1, ch. 77-102; s. 1, ch. 78-177; s. 2, ch. 86-163; s. 39, ch. 2003-261.

F.S. 17.27 on Google Scholar

F.S. 17.27 on Casetext

Amendments to 17.27

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 17.27

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 17.27.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 17.27

Total Results: 16

KYLE E. MCCLAMMA v. MARK GLASS, COMMISSIONER

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-03-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: requirements (quoting United States v. DiTomasso, 621 F.3d 17, 27 (1st Cir. 2010))); United States v. Goguen, 218

City of Tavares and Gallagher Bassett etc. v. Billy Harper

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-10-30T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: 7 17-0027 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

RENARDO SHAMRK FERGUSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2017-08-24T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: of timely filed motion for rehearing. 17-0027 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Amendments to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2006-09-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 940 So. 2d 409

Snippet: INCOME (Subtract line 26 from line 17) 27. $_________ … INCOME (Subtract line 26 from line 17) 27. $ __________ ======================

US Sugar Corp. v. Henson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-04-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 787 So. 2d 3

Snippet: inapplicable); and K-Mart Corp. v. Morrison, 609 N.E.2d 17, 27 n. 9 (Ind.App.1993)(requiring novel scientific

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure & Family Law Forms

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-09-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 810 So. 2d 1, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 13, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2272, 2000 WL 1352932

Snippet: NET MONTHLY INCOME (Subtract line 26 from line 17) 27. SECTION II. AVERAGE MONTHLY EXPENSES HOUSEHOLD

Amend. to Fl. Family Law Rules of Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-10-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 723 So. 2d 208

Snippet: line 26 from line 17) 27. $______ …line 26 from line 17) 27. $______

Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1998-02-25T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 713 So. 2d 1

Snippet: line 26. from line 17) 27. $_________ SECTION…line 26 from line 17) 27. $_________ SECTION II

Jones v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1997-10-20T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 701 So. 2d 76

Snippet: Execution Methods," Petitioner's Appendix, § 17. [27] Compare Fierro v. Gomez, 77 F.3d 301 (9th Cir

Davis v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1997-04-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 691 So. 2d 1180

Snippet: charged and the trial court sentenced him to serve 17.27 years in the state prison. We affirm the defendant

Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCrary

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-10-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 497 So. 2d 652

Snippet: .S. 20, 33-34, 104 S.Ct. 2199, 2208, 81 L.Ed.2d 17, 27 (1984): [A]n order prohibiting dissemination of

In Re Estate of Killinger

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-04-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 448 So. 2d 1187

Snippet: generally Fair v. Tampa Electric Co., 158 Fla. 15, 17, 27 So.2d 514, 515 (1946). We believe, under the circumstances

Siltzer v. North First Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-02-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 445 So. 2d 649

Snippet: 263 (5th Cir.1942); 1A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 17.27 at p. 1719 (14th Ed. 1978). Thus, the underlying

Heinlein v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-10-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 239 So. 2d 635, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7081

Snippet: appellants contend that Sections 17-23 through 17-27 of the Code unconstitutionally impair contractual…contended that the provisions of Sections 17-23 through 17-27 of the Code are so vague and uncertain that they… to show Section 17-23, 17-24, 17-25, 17-26 and 17-27 as applied to the plaintiffs are so unreasonably

Gables Racing Ass'n v. Persky

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-08-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 156 So. 392, 116 Fla. 77, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1017

Snippet: R. 520, 44 L. R. A. 243; Bank v. Mann, 94 Tenn. 17, 27 S.W. Rep. 1015, 27 L. R. A. 565; Denmark v. Avinger

Davidson v. Davis

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1910-01-15T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 59 Fla. 476

Snippet: First Nat. Bank of Johnson City v. Mann, 94 Tenn. 17, 27 S. W. Rep. 1015, 27 L. R. A. 565: “The difference