Florida Statute 19.52 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 19
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 19.52

19.52 Stamps or tags.—Whenever under the law, stamps are now required to be used in connection with inspection fees, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services is authorized to use and direct the use of either stamps or tags as it shall determine to be for the best interest of the state, and all laws or regulations now applicable to such stamps shall be applicable to tags whenever used instead of stamps under such direction of the department.

History.—s. 1, ch. 14671, 1931; CGL 1936 Supp. 222(1); ss. 14, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 19.52 on Google Scholar

F.S. 19.52 on Casetext

Amendments to 19.52

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 19.52

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 19.52.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 19.52

Total Results: 7

EDWIN JESUS LATALLADI v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-03

Snippet: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT EDWIN JESUS LATALLADI, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D19-52 [October 3, 2019] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Daliah

Murphy Arnold Brockington Jr. v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-05

Snippet: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D19-0052 _____________________________ MURPHY ARNOLD BROCKINGTON JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Phillip A. Pena, Judge. August 5, 2019 PER CURIAM In this

Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida & SC18-1321 Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-04

Citation: 265 So. 3d 462

Snippet: evidence (No. SC18-1321). See majority op. at 19-52.19 However, I dissent from affirming the postconviction

Barth v. City of Miami

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1941-04-08

Citation: 1 So. 2d 574, 146 Fla. 542, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1187

Snippet: So. 372; City of Tallahassee v. Fortune, 3 Fla. 19, 52 A. M. Dec. 358. What are governmental functions

City of Tampa v. Easton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1940-11-26

Citation: 198 So. 753, 145 Fla. 188, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 927

Snippet: So. 372; City of Tallahassee v. Fortune, 3 Fla. 19, 52 Am. Dec. 35. What are governmental functions and

City of Tallahassee v. Hawes

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-02-08

Citation: 81 Fla. 123, 87 So. 765

Snippet: not. See City of Tallahassee v. Fortune, 3 Fla. 19, 52 Am. Dec. 358; 13 R. C. L. p. 311; City of Jacksonville

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-03-12

Citation: 73 Fla. 609

Snippet: relied on in City of Tallahassee v. Fortune, 3 Fla. 19, 52 Amer. Dec. 358. Evidently the Railroad Commissioners