The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . Child), 20.18(a) (Unlawful Possession of the Personal Identification Information of Another Person), 22.10 . . . and use as proposed, with a correction to the title and statutory citations, and instructions 10.20, 22.10 . . . Lastly, in instructions 22.10, 22.11, and 22.15, on our own motion, we replace the references to a repealed . . . Attempt 777.04(1) 5.1 Comment This instruction was adopted in 2016 [190 So.3d 614] and amended in 2018. 22.10 . . .
. . . Strokoff, The Legislative Drafter’s Desk Reference § 22.10, at 297-98 (2d ed. 2008) (“The terms ‘any, . . .
. . . ; 22.7 (Conducting a Lottery Drawing); 22.8 (Assisting in Lottery); 22.9 (Selling Lottery Tickets); 22.10 . . . First, regarding the lottery instructions, i.e., 22.5, 22.6, 22.7, 22.8, 22.9, 22.10, and 22.11, a citation . . . This instruction was adopted in 1981 ahd amended in 2015. 22.10 POSSESSING A LOTTERY TICKET § 849.09( . . .
. . . Nimmer, 3.04[A], at 3-22.10(1). . . .
. . . noted, the lawyers insist that the court erroneously deducted $35. 20 in printing fees, including $22.10 . . . Turning to the actual deductions, the court struck $22.10 for copies of deposition transcripts of three . . .
. . . (See id. 3 (citing Paratransit Contract ¶¶ 11.0, 22.9, 22.10 & 23)). . . .
. . . Bonsignore contends that § 22.10 of the Settlement Agreement provides for judicial review of the Arbitrator . . .
. . . . § 22.10). . . . Section 22.1002-1 (a subsection of § 22.10) of the Code of Federal Regulations provides, in relevant . . .
. . . Christina Alicea, Norma Ruiz and Celia Ruiz, Plaintiff also asks the Court to award him an additional $22.10 . . .
. . . Grot-heer, Jr., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 (19th ed. 1989)); N. Am. Mktg. Corp. v. K. . . . amount that included set-offs of certain controverted funds) (citing 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 . . .
. . . "Foundation Balance of Plant Procurement and Construction Contract, 22.10: No partnership created. . . .
. . . .5 = $7.37 x 6 hours = $44.22 x 4 weeks = $176.88 The remaining 6.7 overtime hours: $14.73 x 1.5 = $22.10 . . .
. . . and paid the following amounts: PHBP $694.29 DEN $ 63.23 ANN $200.00 E & C $ 2.89 NEBF $ 66.30 Dues $ 22.10 . . . Nonetheless, TAG previously paid Dues in the amount of $22.10 per week, see Sessa 7/3/08 Decl. Exs. . . .
. . . See 2 Insurance Claims and Disputes 5th § 11:22.10 & n. 28 (indicating that the term “arising out of’ . . .
. . . In Texas, notwithstanding that the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 22.10 applies certain civil . . .
. . . In Texas, notwithstanding that the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 22.10 applies certain civil . . .
. . . for inmate litigation. 22.9 Corporate Support Quality of support from district or regional office. 22.10 . . .
. . . Penal Code section 22.10 (Vernon 2005), “explicitly requires” knowing or intentional leaving as well . . .
. . . The debtors next claim that the annual percentage rate (“APR”) Tower charged, 22.10%, is an excessive . . . According to Binning, the program calculated an APR of 22.10% for the loan. . . . that the contract rate of interest charged the Williamses was 21.9%, although the APR was listed as 22.10% . . .
. . . Exxon/Mobil account, the amount sought by the Claimant exceeded the amount scheduled by the Debtor by $22.10 . . .
. . . (ii) commence legal proceedings (in which case the provisions of sections 22.10 and 22.11 governing jurisdiction . . . Section 22.10, referenced above, provides: The parties hereto irrevocably: (a) submit and consent to . . . by any court which may be called upon to enforce the judgment of the courts referred to in section 22.10 . . . Agreement § 22.10. . . .
. . . Harper, et al., The Law of Torts § 22.10, at 339 n. 17 (2d ed.1986); see also Dobbs, Law of Remedies . . .
. . . Stempel, Law of Insurance Contract Disputes § 22.10 (2d ed.2000). . . .
. . . See generally 2 Larson, supra, §§ 22.01 to 22.10, at 22-1 to 22-78. . . .
. . . The final provision of the contract is § 22.10: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in . . . (Agreement, at § 22.10.) . . . Analysis Elbe and Sogerma seek enforcement of § 22.10, which they believe is a forum selection clause . . . Under Seventh Circuit precedent, § 22.10 is a permissive forum selection clause that allows, but does . . . Because Elbe and Sogerma have not pressed this interpretation of § 22.10, any challenge to this Court . . .
. . . Lederer, Court-Martial Procedure § 2-22.10(b)(l), at 53 (1991)(citing Howard, 20 M.J. 353). . . .
. . . hearing he had accrued 1500 hours, and that he would be compensated for up to 700 hours at the rate of $22.10 . . .
. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions §§ 22.09-22.10 (2d ed.1985). C. . . .
. . . WEATHERSBY FEES: $81,555 Paralegal Hours Claimed: 27.50 Total Hours Deducted 5.40 Total Reasonable Hours: 22.10 . . .
. . . In re Seagate II, 843 F.Supp. at 1350; Herbert Newberg and Alba Conte, 4 New-berg on Class Actions § 22.10 . . .
. . . 27.90 20.478.60 2675 566 M ^
1,531 21.91 33,544.21 2810 514 ^ c
. . . Newberg, § 22.10 at 22-5. . . .
. . . See N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-22.10. . . .
. . . payment by a monthly disbursement check and maintained a savings balance of $99,000.00 in principal and $22.10 . . .
. . . Toulmin, Jr., Treatise on the Law of Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics §§ 22.5-22.10 (2d ed. 1963) (grouping . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 (2d ed. 1989). . . .
. . . Gray, The Law of Torts, § 22.10 at 342 (2d ed. 1986)). . . .
. . . Prac. and Proc., 1990 Ed., § 22.10, page 312. . . .
. . . Grotheer, Jr., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 (19th ed. 1989). . . .
. . . Subpart 22.10 of the FAR applies to all government service contracts and implements the provisions of . . .
. . . Co., 138 F.2d 327, 328 (3d Cir.1943); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 at 22-91 (2d ed. 1989). . . .
. . . The coverage in Subpart 22.10, Service Contract Act of 1965, and the contract clauses at 52.222-40 through . . .
. . . 984, 988, 88 Ill.Dec. 231, 234-35, 478 N.E.2d 546, 549-50 (1985); 4 Harper, James & Gray, supra, § 22.10 . . .
. . . Grotheer, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10, at 22-94 (1987) (it is necessary to give bond for “largest . . .
. . . Lucas, Moore’s Federal Practice § 22.10 (2d ed. 1986). . . . Fields Productions, Inc., 363 F.Supp. 903, 905 (S.D.N.Y.1973); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice § 22.10. . . .
. . . . § 22.10 (Supp.1984-1985) which states that registration and license fees and mileage taxes imposed . . .
. . . . * * * 33-22.10 Additional Time Limits: * * * (4) The thirty (30) day time limit for filing a grievance . . .
. . . Callman, Unfair Competition, Trademarks, and Monopolies, § 22.10 at n. 20. . . .
. . . James, The Law of Torts § 22.10, at 1227 (1956); W. . . . James, supra, § 22.10 at 1229-30. See also Schuller v. . . .
. . . See N.T. 22.10-22.16; 22.19. . . .
. . . For $22.10 (10% of which was retained by Mexicoach) they were issued tickets which contained disclaimers . . .
. . . Luster, 604 F.2d 31 (8th Cir. 1979) (per curiam); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10, at 22-99 (2d ed . . . Frankford Trust Co., 352 F.Supp. 130, 133 (E.D.Pa.1972); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ' 22.10, at 22-99 . . .
. . . . § 22.10, at 1228. . . .
. . . James, The Law of Torts § 22.10 at 1231-34 (1956); compare W. . . .
. . . . $22.10/hour — Davis v. . . .
. . . . $22.10/hour — Davis v. . . .
. . . Moore, supra, ¶ 22.10, and a defendant may be unwilling to put up a bond for the huge amounts normally . . .
. . . The challenged statute, Va.Code § 22.10.-8(a), is violative of the equal protection guarantees under . . .
. . . Miller, 229 F.Supp. 1018, 1021 (D.Minn.1964); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 (1974). . . .
. . . abuse its discretion in allowing every hour claimed while reducing the claimed rate from $50.00 to $22.10 . . .
. . . deposited with the Court in order for the plaintiff to be discharged. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 . . . Chase Manhattan Bank, 155 F.Supp. 30, 37 (S.D.N.Y.1957); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 n. 16. . . . See 7 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 1716 n. 77; 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 22.10 . . .
. . . .-6; 10-22.10 of the Illinois Revised Statutes. . . . .
. . . plaintiff could not recover for damages that a prompt alarm would have prevented. 2 Harper & James, Torts § 22.10 . . . Torts 2d § 465 at 511 and Illustration 1, and of the leading texts. 2 Harper & James, Torts, supra, § 22.10 . . . and the reasoning which generally prevails in this country today,” 2 Harper & James, Torts, supra, § 22.10 . . .
. . . trial of the merits and not at the stage of determining jui’isdiction.” 3A Moore’s Federal Practice If 22.10 . . .
. . . Subtotal at 15.025 psia 22.10 23.87 17. Area Gathering 0.51 0.51 18. Production Tax 2.30 2.30 19. . . .
. . . Corp., 288 F.2d 363 (2d Cir. 1961); 3A Moore, Federal Practice § 22.10, n. 3 (2d ed. 1970); 7 Wright . . .
. . . safeguarding the disputed fund and facilitating execution of judgment. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice f[ 22.10 . . . plaintiff to deposit or give bond for the largest amount that is in dispute. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice f 22.10 . . .
. . . (Emphasis in the original) See also 3A Moore’s Federal Practice (2d Ed.), p. 3080, § 22.10, and Kooman . . .
. . . Municipal Code of Chicago : See. 28-22.10)) On January 1, 1004 (or as soon thereafter as may be convenient . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 22.10, at 3081-3083 (2d ed. 1970); 15 Couch on Insurance 2d § 52:14 (1966); . . .
. . . Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 551. footnote 11. . 3A Moore, Federal Practice, ¶ 22.10 . . .
. . . See 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, (2d ed.), p. 3080, § 22.10. . . .
. . . See Restatement of Torts 2d § 463 (1965) ; 2 Harper & James, Torts § 22.10 (1956); Prosser, Torts § 64 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §22.09 (1958), §§22.09-22.10 (1965 Supp.); Jaffe, Standing to Secure . . .
. . . Corp., 288 F.2d 363 (2d Cir. 1961); 3 Moore Federal Practice § 22.10, p. 3080 (2d ed. 1967). . . .
. . . duty’ to mitigate damages or the rule of avoidable consequences.” 2 Harper & James, The Law of Torts § 22.10 . . .
. . . Julio 99.57 Murillo, Florencio 147.52 Murillo, Socorro A. 21.87 Obando, Manuel A. 10.00 Padilla, Benito 22.10 . . .
. . . thereof is a condition precedent to obtaining interpleader jurisdiction. 3 Moore, Federal Practice § 22.10 . . .
. . . Review, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 635, 666 (1966); 3 Davis, Administrative Law, § 22.09, at 243 (1958) and § 22.10 . . .
. . . settlements reached were as follows: 2 dissenters settled for $17.50 per share. 6 18.50 12 22.00 2 22.10 . . .
. . . . § 15.4, at 883, § 17.2, at 972, § 22.10, at 1228. Whether Mrs. . . .
. . . See 10 Collier, Bankruptcy, § 22.10 (1965). . . .
. . . O.Od. 5.10.0d. 4s.0d. 48. 4.0d. 2 AN/H 22.10.0d. 6.5.0d. 15.12.6d. 7.12.6d. 4s.Od. 52. 4.0d. 2AN/HP 22.10 . . .
. . . See Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1958, vol. 3, §§ 22.09, 22.10; Jaffe, Standing to Secure Judicial . . .
. . . See Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1958, vol. 3, §§ 22.09, 22.10; Jaffe, Standing to Secure Judicial . . .
. . . . * * * Seo. 22.10 Decision in the Commission — (a) By whom made; contents. . . . Sec,. 22.10(b) Copy of decision furnished appellant and agency; appeal to Commissioners. . . . Sec. 22.10(c) Eeport by agencies to Commission of action taken or proposed to be taken on finding favorable . . . hearing and (2) it failed to comply with the requirements (a) of the Commission’s regulations (§ § 22.10 . . . Section 22.10(a) of the regulations (finding 28) required the decision on appeal to be made by the Regional . . .
. . . condition precedent to obtaining interpleader jurisdiction. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice (2nd Edition) § 22.10 . . .
. . . Navy withheld sums from his retirement pay for taxes, the total amount withheld for the year being $22.10 . . . Notice of this assessment together with demand for payment, less the $22.10 withheld, was made upon Freeman . . .
. . . . § 1346(a) (1) and the amount sought to be recovered was $22.10. . . . Navy withheld sums from his retirement pay for taxes, the total amount withheld for the year being $22.10 . . . Notice of this assessment together with demand for payment, less the $22.10 withheld, was made upon Freeman . . .
. . . the first 11 months and 11 days of his service on the SS Gerontas Rodriguez is entitled to recover $22.10 . . .
. . . the “Manager and not by the Chief Law Officer of the Regional Office”, as allegedly required by 5 CFR 22.10 . . . This regulation reads: § 22.10 Decision in the Commission — (a) By whom made; contents. . . .
. . . See 5 CFK. 22.10(a), 22.11(d), (1947 Supp.). . See Mulligan v. Andrews, D.C.Cir., 211 F.2d 28. . . .
. . . See 5 CFR 22.10 (a), 22.11 (d), (1947 Supp.). See Mulligan v. . . .
. . . .; 28 Comp.Gen. 489 ; 29 Comp.Gen. 209; 5 C.F.R., 1951 Supp, § 22.10(a). . . .
. . . E., 1951 Supp, § 22.10 (a). . . .
. . . Act has provided expressly for the alternative of filing a bond. 3 Moore, Federal Practice ff22.06, 22.10 . . .
. . . 10.17 22.13 USC......... 31.1 9.86 . 21.24 30.9 9.91 20.99 Q10 ......... 31.5 9.25 22.25 32.3 10.20 22.10 . . .
. . . The unit prices in Belgian francs are as follows: “29.02, 29.02, 23.40, 23.40, and 22.10.” . . .
. . . measured the distance traveled by the claimant over said route No. 1 and that the same was in fact 22.10 . . . Lockwood’s corner to West Greenville_ 2.20 West Greenville to Greenville xsost office-.94 Total distance-22.10 . . . in delivering the mail on said route, in accordance with the map thereof, and found the same to- be 22.10 . . . Under date of November 11, 1909, said inspector reported that he found the route to be 22.10 miles in . . .
. . . properly refused because it appears from the counterclaim that the plaintiff owed the defendants some $22.10 . . . would be but a matter of computation of the amount due thereon after deducting the undisputed item of $22.10 . . .