Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 23.20 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 23.20 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 23.20

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 23
MISCELLANEOUS EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 23.20
23.20 Legislative intent with respect to paperwork reduction.The Legislature finds that:
(1) The paperwork burden associated with collecting information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments may have a significant economic impact on these entities as they attempt to comply with the state’s information reporting requirements.
(2) These information-reporting requirements are found in most interactions between state government and these entities, such as application and permitting processes, title registration, various licensure processes, environmental monitoring, growth management, and tax collection.
(3) The failure of state agencies to identify information they are collecting and to share that information with other agencies, as well as with local governments, has increased the paperwork burden on other entities.
(4) The state must minimize the paperwork burden by evaluating its need for information, determining whether it already has access to the necessary information, and coordinating data collection initiatives at their source.
(5) The collection of information by state government must be done in a manner that balances the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of government with the cost and convenience to individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments providing the information.
History.s. 3, ch. 96-390.

F.S. 23.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 23.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 23.20


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 23.20
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 23.20.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 23.20

Total Results: 19

ALFRED BARR v. BEAZER PREOWNED HOMES, I I, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-02

Snippet: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ALFRED BARR, Appellant, v. BEAZER PREOWNED HOMES II, LLC, Appellee. No. 2D23-20 February 2, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Frances M. Perrone, Judge. Alfred

In Re: Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms 12.980(a), 12.980(f), 12.980(n), 12.980(q), and 12.980(t)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-24

Snippet: Repeat Violence (08/23) -20- 4. Physical

B. LITTLE & COMPANY, INC., etc. v. CHOI WAI PRINTING (HONG KONG) LIMITED, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-31

Snippet: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 31, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-0020 Lower Tribunal No. 22-4345 ________________ B. Little & Company, Inc., etc., Appellant

TERRELL KING vs FARAH & FARAH, P.A., EDDIE E. FARAH, AND CHARLIE E. FARAH

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-06

Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TERRELL KING, Appellant, Case No. 5D23-20 v. LT Case No. 2014-CA-001683 FARAH & FARAH, P.A., EDDIE E. FARAH, AND CHARLIE E

WILL TWIGG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-24

Citation: 254 So. 3d 464

Snippet: nursing pursuant to part I of chapter 464.” § 401.23(20), Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). Chapter 464

WILL TWIGG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-01

Snippet: nursing pursuant to part I of chapter 464.” § 401.23(20), Fla. Stat. (2015) (emphasis added). Chapter 464

SAFEWAY PREMIUM FINANCE CO. v. Sosa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-04-08

Citation: 15 So. 3d 8, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2876, 2009 WL 928434

Snippet: James Wm. Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.20 (3d ed. 2006).

Browning v. Angelfish Swim School, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-28

Citation: 1 So. 3d 355, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 553, 2009 WL 187694

Snippet: adequacy to merge); see generally Moore’s, supra at § 23.20. The analysis made here could just as well have

Newman v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-07-27

Citation: 602 So. 2d 1351, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8072, 1992 WL 175076

Snippet: Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction §§ 2.07, 23.20 (4th ed. 1985); 16 Am.Jur.2d Constitutional Law

O'Donnell v. Broward County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-07-21

Citation: 417 So. 2d 1043, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22220

Snippet: also sought the adjudication of sections 2-33 and 23-20.44 of the Code of Ordinances of Broward County as

Price v. Johnson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-04-29

Citation: 222 So. 2d 212, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5769

Snippet: payment by her to the Receiver of the sum of $22,023.20.” Regarding the Johnson stock, no material question

Hanemann v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1969-03-13

Citation: 221 So. 2d 228

Snippet: W.2d 606 (1935). [6] Gunter v. State, 111 Ala. 23, 20 So. 632 (1896). [7] Cf. Hearn v. State, 55 So

Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1961-10-11

Citation: 133 So. 2d 755

Snippet: of police. Indeed, a careful perusal of sections 23-20 and 23-30, cited by plaintiffs to support their

Foremost Properties, Inc. v. Gladman

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-02-04

Citation: 100 So. 2d 669

Snippet: 905, 908 it was held: "The statute (Section 95.23-20 year limitations) is obviously designed to allow

McLaughlin v. Barco

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-05-20

Citation: 159 Fla. 16, 30 So. 2d 632

Snippet: 119 S.E. 677; Nugent v. Powell, 4 Wyo. 201, 33 P. 23; 20 L.R.A. 199, 62 Am. St. Rep. 17; Jones v. Guy, 135

In Re: Adoption McLaughlin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-05-20

Citation: 30 So. 2d 632, 159 Fla. 16, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 672

Snippet: 119 S.E. 677; Nugent v. Powell, 4 Wyo. 201, 33 P. 23; 20 L.R.A. 199, 62 Am. St. Rep. 17; Jones v. Guy, 135

Florida Land Investment Co. v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1922-02-14

Citation: 83 Fla. 251

Snippet: 375, 41 N. E. Rep. 796; Henry v. Thomas, 118 Ind. 23, 20 N. E. Rep. 519; Indiana B. etc. Co. v. Quick, 109

Edenfield v. Sayre

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-03-19

Citation: 81 Fla. 367, 88 So. 607

Snippet: Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass’n v. Lohmiller, 74 Fed. Rep. 23, 20 C. C. A. 274; Wilson v. Hawthorne, 14 Colo. 530

Jacksonville & Atlantic Railroad v. Woodworth

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1890-06-15

Citation: 26 Fla. 368

Snippet: 00 1 extra column in building......... 5.00 $4,023.20 Rec’d by cash............ 1,100.00 2.923.20 *382The