Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 23.20 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 23.20 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 23.20 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 23.20

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
Chapter 23
MISCELLANEOUS EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 23.20
23.20 Legislative intent with respect to paperwork reduction.The Legislature finds that:
(1) The paperwork burden associated with collecting information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments may have a significant economic impact on these entities as they attempt to comply with the state’s information reporting requirements.
(2) These information-reporting requirements are found in most interactions between state government and these entities, such as application and permitting processes, title registration, various licensure processes, environmental monitoring, growth management, and tax collection.
(3) The failure of state agencies to identify information they are collecting and to share that information with other agencies, as well as with local governments, has increased the paperwork burden on other entities.
(4) The state must minimize the paperwork burden by evaluating its need for information, determining whether it already has access to the necessary information, and coordinating data collection initiatives at their source.
(5) The collection of information by state government must be done in a manner that balances the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of government with the cost and convenience to individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments providing the information.
History.s. 3, ch. 96-390.

F.S. 23.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 23.20 on CourtListener

Amendments to 23.20


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 23.20

Total Results: 3

Browning v. Angelfish Swim School, Inc.

1 So. 3d 355, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 553, 2009 WL 187694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2009 | Docket: 1653430

Cited 6 times | Published

adequacy to merge); see generally Moore’s, supra at § 23.20. The analysis made here could just as well have

Sandstrom v. City of Fort Lauderdale

133 So. 2d 755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1961 | Docket: 1602122

Cited 4 times | Published

shows that they do not appertain to attorneys. Section 23-20 concerns hotels, rooming houses, and the like

O'Donnell v. Broward County

417 So. 2d 1043, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22220

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 64591614

Published

designated and marked. (Res. of 9-30-69, § 1). .Section 23-20.4 provides: Restricted parking zone. (a) No