Florida Statute 23.22 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 23
MISCELLANEOUS EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 23.22

23.22 Paperwork reduction; activities of departments.—

(1) In order to reduce the amount of paperwork associated with the collection of information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments and to provide more efficient and effective assistance to such individuals and organizations in completing necessary paperwork required by the government, each department head shall, to the extent feasible:

(a) Integrate information systems between programs and departments to reduce the paperwork burden on such individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments.

(b) Implement a department-wide paperwork review process designed to achieve the following outcomes:

1. Streamline information-collection processes that balance the cost and efficiency desired by the department with the cost and convenience to the reporting entities.

2. Ensure the reporting entities’ participation in the identification of data elements, the estimation of the paperwork burden on them, and the design of information-collection instruments and processes.

3. Collect information necessary for the performance of agency functions without duplicating other information accessible to the agency.

(d) Design information collection forms and similar instruments to make them easy to understand and “user-friendly” to the individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments that are required to complete and return them. Departmental telephone numbers or electronic mail addresses for the public to obtain assistance in completing the forms must be provided on each form.

(e) Evaluate existing and prospective statutes and rules for the paperwork burden they generate and seek modification of the statutes and rules to reduce the paperwork burden being placed on individuals, private sector organizations, and local government.

(f) Collaborate with the Division of Library and Information Services, pursuant to s. 119.021(2), to identify and index records retention requirements placed on private sector organizations and local governments in Florida, clarify and reduce the requirements, and educate the affected entities through various communications media, including voice, data, video, radio, and image.

(2) Departments shall make available, upon request, a list of the initiatives taken to reduce paperwork associated with collecting information from individuals, private sector organizations, and local governments.

History.—s. 3, ch. 96-390; s. 30, ch. 2004-335; s. 480, ch. 2011-142.

F.S. 23.22 on Google Scholar

F.S. 23.22 on Casetext

Amendments to 23.22

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 23.22

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 23.22.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 23.22

Total Results: 20

AUTUMN DAWN BRETON v. ELPIDIO AUGUSTO BRETON

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-07

Snippet: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT AUTUMN DAWN BRETON, Appellant, v. ELPIDIO AUGUSTO BRETON a/k/a Jose Breton, Appellee. No. 2D23-22 February 7, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Brian Gnage, Judge. Autumn Dawn Breton

In Re: Amendments to Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms 12.980(a), 12.980(f), 12.980(n), 12.980(q), and 12.980(t)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-24

Snippet: Repeat Violence (08/23) -22- f. prohibiting

ZADYE THOMAS vs ST. VINCENT'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-08-11

Snippet: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ZADYE THOMAS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D23-22 LT Case No. 16-2017-CA-007534 ST. VINCENT'S MEDICAL CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA

BARTON HILL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-17

Snippet: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 17, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-22 Lower Tribunal No. F09-25236 ________________ Barton Hill, Appellant,

Sean Alonzo Bush v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-05-14

Snippet: still photo images—the first captured on June 5 at 23:22:22, and the second captured on June 6 at 07:30:40—to

Lawson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-04-13

Citation: 898 So. 2d 1206, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5072, 2005 WL 840465

Snippet: record did not include documentation to support 23.22 additional points which were referred to as “supplement

Winkler v. Moore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-04-25

Citation: 831 So. 2d 63, 2002 WL 717819

Snippet: the "advanceable pool," see Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-22.006(10)(b)-(c), and began awarding him control release

Lewis v. Moore

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-17

Citation: 753 So. 2d 1242, 2000 WL 185433

Snippet: accept control release. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-22.006(25). Thereafter, Lewis violated his control

Verdelotti v. Moore

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-03-30

Citation: 730 So. 2d 373, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3982, 1999 WL 169745

Snippet: that he had refused control release under Rule 23-22.006(25), Florida Administrative Code.2 Upon review

Gomez v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-24

Citation: 733 So. 2d 499, 1998 WL 892663

Snippet: 146(2), Fla. Stat. (1989); Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-22.006-22.008. The Commission assigned "non-advanceable"

Gay v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-10-23

Citation: 700 So. 2d 1220, 1997 WL 656234

Snippet: 947.146, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. Admin. Code R. 23-22.013 (Parole Commission rules describing Control

Bowles v. Singletary

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-06-26

Citation: 698 So. 2d 1201, 1997 WL 348105

Snippet: accepting early release. See also Fla.Admin.Code R. 23-22.006(25). Bowles signed the acceptance provision

Sol v. Sol

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-07-12

Citation: 656 So. 2d 206, 1995 WL 316529

Snippet: 2d 110 (1984); Lonabaugh v. Lonabaugh, 46 Wyo. 23, 22 P.2d 199 (1933) (support obligation modified when

Burns v. Hodges

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-12-29

Citation: 629 So. 2d 324, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12903, 1993 WL 540192

Snippet: agree and reverse. Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-22-014 establishes the procedure for a ease-by-case

State v. Florida Parole Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-09-03

Citation: 624 So. 2d 324, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8981, 1993 WL 347703

Snippet: right to control release.” See Fla.Admin.Code R. 23-22.010(4). Those inmates who are deemed to pose the

Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-11-04

Citation: 607 So. 2d 491, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11339, 1992 WL 322979

Snippet: Properties) to the date of trial, October, 1991, was $23,022.73. Expenses unpaid by Rosner's from the date Rosner’s

McBride v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-07-10

Citation: 601 So. 2d 1335, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7447, 1992 WL 157495

Snippet: commission cites Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-22.008(3)(a)(7) as authority rendering appellant ineligible

Hampton v. State Board of Education

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-06-27

Citation: 105 So. 323, 90 Fla. 88

Snippet: without its consent. Marshall v. Clark, 22 Tex. 23[22 Tex. 23]; Miller Supply Co. v. *Page 104 State

Henderson Waits Lumber Co. v. Croft

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-02-18

Citation: 103 So. 414, 89 Fla. 119

Snippet: Rep. 1; Dayton Coal Iron Co. v. Barton, 183 U.S. 23, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 5; Keokee Consol. Coke Co. v. Kelly

St. Johns County v. Triay

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-02-08

Citation: 73 Fla. 289, 74 So. 405

Snippet: E. and along the northern line of Sections 24, 23, 22, 21 and 20 to a creek in the northwest quarter