Florida Statute 25.041 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 25
SUPREME COURT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 25.041

25.041 Power to execute its judgments, decrees, and determinations.—

(1) The Supreme Court is vested with all the power and authority necessary for carrying into complete execution all its judgments, decrees and determinations in the matters before it, agreeable to the usage and principles of law.

(2) No judgment of the Supreme Court shall take effect until the decision of the court in such case shall be filed with the clerk of said court.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-274; (2) former s. 6, Art. XVI of the State Constitution of 1885, as amended; converted to statutory law by s. 10, Art. XII of the State Constitution as revised in 1968.

F.S. 25.041 on Google Scholar

F.S. 25.041 on Casetext

Amendments to 25.041

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 25.041

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 25.041.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 25.041

Total Results: 20

Sherley Joseph v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14

Snippet: standard of review. Arbelaez v. State, 898 So. 2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005) (whether a motion to disqualify a

Randy W. Tundidor v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-13

Snippet: objectively reasonable.” Arbelaez v. State, 898 So. 2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005) (first alteration in original) (quoting

KAREN ERREN v. EDUARDO MARIN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-08

Snippet: legally sufficient. Arbelaez v. State, 898 So. 2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005). The legally sufficient standard “requires

Wright v. Wright

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-06

Citation: 260 So. 3d 494

Snippet: reasonable. Id. (citing Arbelaez v. State , 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005) ). Our review of the legal sufficiency

Wright v. Wright

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-06

Citation: 260 So. 3d 494

Snippet: reasonable. Id. (citing Arbelaez v. State , 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005) ). Our review of the legal sufficiency

Law Offices of Herssein and Herssein, P.A., etc. v. United Services Automobile Association

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-15

Citation: 271 So. 3d 889

Snippet: objectively reasonable." Arbelaez v. State , 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005) (first alteration in original) (quoting

Pena v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-09

Citation: 259 So. 3d 223

Snippet: sufficient. Id. (quoting Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005) ). If the motion is legally sufficient

YORLAN ESPINOSA PENA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-09

Snippet: sufficient. Id. (quoting Arbelaez v. State, 898 So. 2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005)). If the motion is legally sufficient

A.M. v. Dept. of Children and Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-08-01

Citation: 252 So. 3d 797

Snippet: fair hearing. See Arbelaez v. State, 898 So. 2d 25, 41 (Fla. 2005). Further, “[a] mere ‘subjective fear

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Amat

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-19

Citation: 198 So. 3d 730, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2412, 2016 WL 670189

Snippet: damages of $167,165.77 and prejudgment interest of $25,041.43 for a total of $192,207.20. In all other respects

Diaz v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-21

Citation: 132 So. 3d 93, 2013 WL 6170645

Snippet: (Fla.2008) (quoting Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005)). A defendant does not satisfy either

Gregory v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-06-27

Citation: 118 So. 3d 770, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 471, 2013 WL 3214455, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1308

Snippet: objectively reasonable.” Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005) (quoting Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d

Braddy v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-11-15

Citation: 111 So. 3d 810, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 703, 2012 WL 5514368, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2357

Snippet: objectively reasonable.” Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005). When determining whether Braddy’s fear

Ault v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-09-30

Citation: 53 So. 3d 175, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 527, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1631, 2010 WL 3781991

Snippet: at 1171 (quoting Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005)). As we explained in Rivera v. State

D.H. Ex Rel. J.R. v. Department of Children & Families

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-05-19

Citation: 12 So. 3d 266, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5803, 2009 WL 1383344

Snippet: disqualification. See Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005); State v. Ballard, 956 So.2d 470, 472

Barnhill v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-10-25

Citation: 971 So. 2d 106, 2007 WL 3101754

Snippet: objectively reasonable." Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005). The statement was made in the context

J.R. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-07-11

Citation: 959 So. 2d 833, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10674, 2007 WL 1988955

Snippet: court de novo. See Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005). Rucks v. State, 692 So.2d 976 (Fla

Mansfield v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-07-07

Citation: 911 So. 2d 1160, 2005 WL 1577910

Snippet: objectively reasonable." Arbelaez v. State, 898 So.2d 25, 41 (Fla.2005) (quoting Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d

General Motors Corp. v. McGee

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-03-05

Citation: 837 So. 2d 1010

Snippet: (1991); Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Jeter, 832 So.2d 25, 41-42 (Ala.2001); State v. Moorhead State Univ., 455

Reinish v. Clark

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-20

Citation: 765 So. 2d 197, 2000 WL 991017

Snippet: State Comptroller of New York, 254 U.S. 122, 124-25, 41 S.Ct. 43, 65 L.Ed. 170 (1920). As the United States