The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 26
CIRCUIT COURTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 26.20

26.20 Availability of judge for hearings in chambers.—In circuits having more than one circuit judge, at least one of said judges shall be available as nearly as possible at all times to hold and conduct hearings in chambers. In each circuit, there must be at least one judge available on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, and after hours on weekdays to hear motions for a temporary injunction ex parte in domestic violence cases. The chief judge may assign a judge for this purpose.

History.—s. 4, ch. 17085, 1935; CGL 1936 Supp. 4738(4); s. 2, ch. 91-210.

F.S. 26.20 on Google Scholar

F.S. 26.20 on Casetext

Amendments to 26.20

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 26.20

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 26.20.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SEVEN SIGNATURES GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, v. IRONGATE AZREP BW LLC,, 871 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (D. Haw. 2012)

. . . appropriateness of an award of attorneys’ fees as follows: ATTORNEY HOURS RATE TOTAL ~ Terence O’Toole 26.20 . . . the request for attorneys’ fees. . 29.90-1.70 (time entry discrepancies)-2.00 (duplicative time) = 26.20 . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CITY FT. LAUDERDALE GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, v. MECHEL OAO,, 811 F. Supp. 2d 853 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Following these remarks, the Company’s shares fell 25.5% from $26.20 to $19.50 a share. . . .

WOODARD, v. ANDRUS,, 272 F.R.D. 185 (W.D. La. 2010)

. . . For example, the East Baton Rouge clerk charged plaintiff Della Gatzke $26.20 for filing a pretrial order . . .

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ESPEED, INC. LLC,, 750 F. Supp. 2d 962 (N.D. Ill. 2010)

. . . of attendance at trial using a per diem rate of $237.00 (Def.’s Obj. at 5). eSpeed argues that only $26.20 . . .

FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC, BY TAX MATTERS PARTNER, v. UNITED STATES a LLC, v., 747 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D. Mass. 2010)

. . . The fair market value of the McData shares was $26.20 per share, or $13,681,640. . . .

Co. v. US LLC,, 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 980 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . EN 81.04 specifically excludes “slag, ash and residues from the manufacture of magnesium (heading 26.20 . . .

TIANJIN MAGNESIUM INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD. v. UNITED STATES, US LLC,, 722 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . EN 81.04 specifically excludes “slag, ash and residues from the manufacture of magnesium (heading 26.20 . . .

CREDIT ONE CORPORATION v. CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, INC., 661 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (C.D. Cal. 2009)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, MCCARTHY ON TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION, § 26.20 (4th ed. 2002). . . .

K. HARLOW, v. J. ASTRUE,, 610 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (D. Neb. 2009)

. . . 2,133.00 Jan. 2006 (198.3) 0.20 159.20 31.84 Feb. 2006 (198.7) 0.60 159.52 95.71 Mar. 2006 (199.8) 26.20 . . . In the present case, Plaintiff's counsel spent 26.20 hours preparing a reply brief. . . . .

ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 559 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . waste of metal pickling liquors of a kind used for the recovery of metals or metal compounds (heading 26.20 . . .

v., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 343 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . waste of metal pickling liquors of a kind used for the recovery of metals or metal compounds (heading 26.20 . . .

In CALDWELL VSR, INC., 353 B.R. 130 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2005)

. . . Moore et al, Moore’s Manual: Federal Practice and Procedure § 26.20 (2005). . . .

GLOW INDUSTRIES, INC. a v. LOPEZ, a, 252 F. Supp. 2d 962 (C.D. Cal. 2002)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 26.20 (4th ed.2002). . . .

N. ROTTER, v. D. LEAHY, Jr. D. Jr. v. L., 93 F. Supp. 2d 487 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . contracts at $28.00 30 contracts at $29.00 10 contracts at $29.85 14 contracts at $29.80 1 contract at $26.20 . . .

McNEIL, v. TIME INSURANCE COMPANY,, 205 F.3d 179 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 26.20(e), 26 T.A.C. § 26.27, and 28 T.A.C. § 21.702, but these are agency regulations and do not . . .

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL v. NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION,, 950 F. Supp. 1227 (N.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . . § 26.20. . . . in the case because grievant was not terminated for the use of drugs in the workplace. . 10 C.F.R. 26.20 . . . Determination of the need to review and evaluate the individual's past-safety related work. 10 CFR 26.20 . . .

CARRIGER, v. L. STEWART,, 95 F.3d 755 (9th Cir. 1996)

. . . . ¶¶ 26.19-26.20) found him competent to be sentenced. Id. at ¶¶ 26.19-26.20; ER Exs. 39-41. . . .

ATLANTIC COAST DEMOLITION RECYCLING, INC. v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF ATLANTIC COUNTY,, 931 F. Supp. 341 (D.N.J. 1996)

. . . Utilities Authority, and Union County Utilities Authority, the total fixed costs ranged from $17.89 to $26.20 . . .

PLANNED PARENTHOOD, SIOUX FALLS CLINIC J. M. D. s P. C. v. D. MILLER, W., 70 F.3d 517 (8th Cir. 1995)

. . . Dara Klassel 92.9 $210 $19,509 Beth Otten 12.25 200 2,450 Roger Evans 7.0 260 1,820 Colleen Connell 26.20 . . .

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INCORPORATED, v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, 51 F.3d 405 (4th Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 26.20(a) (prohibiting the consumption of alcohol by employees of Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensees . . .

In HECK S, INC., 112 B.R. 775 (Bankr. S.D. W. Va. 1990)

. . . Banks’ Jointly Secured Claim 18.20 © 26.20 8.I0 5. PNB’s Judicial Lien Claim 34.30 6. 7. . . .

FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS, FA v. M I BANK OF MENOMONEE FALLS FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS, F. A., 865 F.2d 561 (3d Cir. 1989)

. . . Bailey, Brady on Bank Checks § 26.20 (6th ed. 1987) (“where no loss results from payment on a forged . . .

CHABAL, Jr. v. REAGAN,, 841 F.2d 1216 (3d Cir. 1988)

. . . Nealon which relates that Chief Deputy Reynolds had delivered to Judge Nealon’s chambers a bill for $26.20 . . .

T. ROGERS, v. KELLY,, 674 F. Supp. 1372 (E.D. Ark. 1987)

. . . Court will therefore award him his requested fee of $2,660.50, as well as expenses in the amount of $26.20 . . .

G. SKELTON, Jr. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, NEWTON, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION,, 661 F. Supp. 1368 (N.D. Ill. 1987)

. . . Corinblit $200/hr. 26.20 $12,590.00 -0- (P) $ 14,321.11 M. . . .

v., 85 T.C. 172 (T.C. 1985)

. . . estimated that after obtaining the right to manufacture cyanuric chloride, Ardsley could manufacture it for 26.20 . . .

HUEBSCHEN, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES,, 547 F. Supp. 1168 (W.D. Wis. 1982)

. . . typing of initial complaint 44.70 Brown’s Bookstore, cassette reproduction of Personnel Commission tapes 26.20 . . .

BUGHER v. SOUTHLAND FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC., 452 F. Supp. 870 (W.D. La. 1978)

. . . 37.00 7.40 Morris LaCombe 63 24.57 15.75 3.15 Larry Whatley (T) 39 34.71 22.25 4.45 524 0 204.36 131.00 26.20 . . .

SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, INC. A. v. SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, 452 F. Supp. 306 (N.D. Tex. 1978)

. . . Jack Horn indicated that documents 1 through 19 would be released on payment of reproduction costs of $26.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARDEN,, 529 F.2d 443 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 26.20 of the Anniston ordinances provides as follows: Loitering on streets. . . .

YOUNGER, v. GLAMORGAN PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, a, 418 F. Supp. 743 (W.D. Va. 1976)

. . . of white counterparts $6,628.88 claimant's daily rate of pay $27.40 white counterparts' daily rate $26.20 . . . of white counterparts $6,628.88 claimant's daily wage rate $"24.29 white counterparts' daily rate $26.20 . . . of white counterparts $6,628.88 claimant's daily rate of pay $22.50 white counterparts' daily rate $26.20 . . .

WOLGIN v. ATLAS UNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION S. BLUMENFELD v. ATLAS UNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, 397 F. Supp. 1003 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . 52.20 7/31/74 2.083 47.00 8/15/74 2.083 41.80 8/31/74 2.083 36.60 9/15/74 . 2,083 31.40 9/30/74 2.083 26.20 . . .

RODWAY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 514 F.2d 809 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . 55 years ............................... 6.80 29.50 55-75 years ............................... 6.00 26.20 . . .

ALLENTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT, a v. SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a, 372 F. Supp. 422 (E.D. Wis. 1974)

. . . . § 26.20(9) provides for civil penalties for failure to comply with the standards imposed by § 26.20 . . .

W. McKEE v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. DAVID ROUND SON, INC., 50 F.R.D. 502 (M.D. Ga. 1970)

. . . privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter in the pending action.’ ” 4 Moore’s Federal Practice jf 26.20 . . .

BRANNON, L. H. v. C. MAKIN,, 159 So. 2d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($3,500.00) for attorneys fees, and TWENTY-SIX DOLLARS and 20/100 ($26.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. TANKEL Co., 221 F. Supp. 230 (D. Conn. 1963)

. . . Customs Duty of $26.20, Intourist Fee of $2.50, Service Charge of $11, U. S. . . .

UNITED STATES v. STAPF B. T. II, H. STAPF B. T. II, H. v. UNITED STATES, 309 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1962)

. . . Mertens’ Law of Federal Gift and Estate Taxation, § 26.20. . . .

v., 28 T.C. 1090 (T.C. 1957)

. . . See sec. 26.20 of T. D. 5000, sufra. This was while the amendment of June 28,1940, was in force. . . .

DAVID F. SAMPLES, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES In W. L. J. J. v. ROY A. ANDERSON, ET. AL. v. THE UNITED STATES In O v. HERBERT BEEBE, ET. AL. v. THE UNITED STATES In B. v., 135 Ct. Cl. 548 (Ct. Cl. 1956)

. . . Compensation for overtime hours (EXH)_$26.20 L. Total compensation (I+J+K)-$83.20 M. . . .

S. SHANKMAN, P. v. NORTHWEST AIR LINES,, 18 F.R.D. 436 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)

. . . Cf. 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., pars. 26.10, 26.20. . 4 Moore’s Fed.Prac., pars. 26.10, 26.20, 34.07 . . .

STATE LIFE INS. CO. OF INDIANAPOLIS, IND. v. MITCHELL MITCHELL v. STATE LIFE INS. CO. OF INDIANAPOLIS, IND, 126 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1942)

. . . This premium had been reduced by a dividend credit of $26.20. . . . It also included a refund of the policy dividend in the sum of $26.20. . . .

In WESTERN PAC. R. CO. WESTERN PAC. R. CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, 124 F.2d 136 (9th Cir. 1941)

. . . James Company would receive $26.20 of income bonds, $41.08 of new preferred stock and 6.021 shares of . . .

v. Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 535 (Cust. Ct. 1939)

. . . was paid for by a firm in Bremen which had purchased tobacco in the United States; that the price of 26.20 . . .

In STANDARD GAS ELECTRIC CO., 26 F. Supp. 636 (D. Del. 1939)

. . . Petitioner as local counsel for the Allen committee asks for an allowance of $2,500 and $26.20 expenses . . . counsel he will be allowed one thousand dollars ($1,000) and twenty-six dollars and twenty cents ($26.20 . . .

J. H. v., 14 B.T.A. 805 (B.T.A. 1928)

. . . The record shows that McCallum and his associate had expended $26.20 in the Otto Creek Oil Co. project . . .

ROSS LUMBER CO. v. HUGHES LUMBER CO., 264 F. 757 (5th Cir. 1920)

. . . The base price, delivered in Chicago, was $26.20 per 1000 feet, taking one order as an example. . . .

COPPER PROCESS CO. v. CHICAGO BONDING INS. CO., 262 F. 66 (3d Cir. 1920)

. . . Copper Company and Iron Company, for the purchase and sale, monthly, of 2,000 tons of pig iron at $26.20 . . . actually called for by the contracts, but 2,000 tons a month at what was then about the market price of $26.20 . . .

ODELL v. FLOOD, 18 F. Cas. 575 (S.D.N.Y. 1876)

. . . prior to December 10th, 1873, the indebtedness of the bankrupt to Parsons for lumber was increased §26.20 . . .