Syfert Injury Law Firm

Citizens of the State of Florida, etc. v. Andrew Giles Fay, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-14

Snippet: in the SPP Rule. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 25-6.030. 4 Paragraph (3) of that rule requires that utilities’

Rauniel Quintero v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-31

Snippet: identification number plate, in violation of section 319.30(4), Florida Statutes (2020). The crux of the grand

Elizabeth Sentz v. Bonefish Grill, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-11-15

Snippet: husband to sue. 605 So. 2d at 528–30. 4 First, the wife testified

ROBERTO SANCHEZ III v. MICHELLE M. SAENZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-12

Snippet: any extension and continuance. 3 Section 741.30(4) states that “[u]pon the filing of the petition

ASHLEY NICOLE MCKENZIE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-02

Snippet: 3 While appellant scored 30.4 points and her lowest permissible sentence was any

YERAL ANDALIA RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-12-02

Snippet: medical records. See §§ 456.057(7); 395.3025(4); 401.30(4), Fla. Stat. (2018). Each of those statutes permits

STACEY WALKER v. KRISTI WALKER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-05-31

Citation: 274 So. 3d 1156

Snippet: from his gross income as required by section 61.30(4). Based upon our review of the child support guidelines

Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-05

Snippet: March 21, 2019). Cats, again, were a close second at 30.4%. Id. These data make clear that employers should

Sedgwick CMS and The Hartford/Sedgwick CMS v. Tammitha Valcourt-Williams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-05

Citation: 271 So. 3d 1133

Snippet: March 21, 2019). Cats, again, were a close second at 30.4%. Id. These data make clear that employers should

Regalado Lopez v. Regalado

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-10

Citation: 257 So. 3d 550

Snippet: process prior to the entry of its orders. Section 741.30(4), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that in a cause

Michael Levandoski v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-06-07

Citation: 245 So. 3d 643

Snippet: section 847.0135(3) and (4). Additionally, section 948.30(4) applies only to probationers whose crimes were

Thomas Daugherty v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-19

Citation: 211 So. 3d 29, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 106

Snippet: conviction, and intent was disputed at trial. Id. at 30.4 The State argues that Daugherty is not entitled

Michael Vaught v. Kathleen Vaught

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-04-20

Citation: 189 So. 3d 332, 2016 WL 1579251, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5992

Snippet: personally served with a copy of the petition.” § 741.30(4), Fla. Stat. The statute also provides that “[t]he

State v. Cotton

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-02-26

Citation: 198 So. 3d 737, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2859, 2016 WL 746359

Snippet: pursuant to Florida Rule of. Appellate Procedure 9.030(4)(a), providing for review of final orders of the

In Re AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING the FLORIDA BAR-STANDARDS FOR BOARD CERTIFICATION IN CONDOMINIUM AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LAW

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-01-21

Citation: 183 So. 3d 348, 2016 WL 281800

Snippet: (Definitions); 6-30.3 (Minimum Standards); and 6-30.4 (Recertification). The proposed amendments were

Ervin v. Florida Department of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-12-22

Citation: 152 So. 3d 1261, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20725, 2014 WL 7243144

Snippet: See § 61.30(3)(a)-(g), Fla. Stat. (2013); § 61.30(4), Fla. Stat. (2013). The trial court must then determine

Parrish v. Parrish

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-08-01

Citation: 161 So. 3d 501, 2014 WL 3765819, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11772

Snippet: statute), or whether a hearing pursuant to section 741.30(4) is required under the facts presented,

Curtis v. Curtis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-12

Citation: 113 So. 3d 993, 2013 WL 1482837, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5900

Snippet: been a victim of domestic violence. Section 741.30(4) states that, upon the filing of the petition, “the

Cliff Berry, Inc. v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-01-04

Citation: 116 So. 3d 394, 2012 WL 10846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 37

Snippet: 301(16), F.S. (1993).” Fla. Admin. Code R. 62-740.030(4). Section 376.301(16), Florida Statutes (1993),

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. v. Outpatient Surgery Center of St. Augustine

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-15

Citation: 66 So. 3d 952, 2011 WL 1449514

Snippet: documentation submitted.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 59A-12.030(4)(a) (emphasis added). Moreover, once Maximus determines