Florida Statute 30.075 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 30
SHERIFFS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 30.075

30.075 Review boards.—

(1) Each sheriff shall establish a review board to review, pursuant to appeals taken under ss. 30.071-30.079, terminations taken by the sheriff against regularly appointed deputy sheriffs for lawful off-duty political activity or for discriminatory reasons.

(2) Each member of a review board shall be selected on the basis of fairness, objectivity, and impartiality. The board shall have no investigative powers and shall function in the capacity of a fact finder in an effort to arrive at a fair and equitable recommendation in all matters brought before it. A member shall not be involved in the issue under consideration. Membership on the board is voluntary and without remuneration. Members may not discuss matters to be heard before the board until the board convenes.

(3) A review board may receive verbal or written testimony concerning any matter considered relevant by the board and may receive any records, including, but not limited to, performance evaluations and disciplinary files.

(4)(a) The review board of an agency having 150 or more deputy sheriffs shall be comprised of:

1. Two members selected by the sheriff from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.

2. Two members selected by the deputy sheriff who is appealing the termination action from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.

3. One member selected by the other members of the board and acting as the chairperson of the board.

4. If an impartial local chairperson cannot be agreed upon within 10 working days after the appeal is submitted, then the parties shall jointly request the American Arbitration Association to furnish a panel of seven names from which each party shall have the option, within 5 days of receipt, of striking three names in alternating fashion. The seventh or remaining name shall be the chairperson. The parties shall jointly notify the arbitrator of his or her selection. Either party may object to all names on the list, provided the objection is made prior to the commencement of the striking process. If this occurs, the objecting party may request the American Arbitration Association to furnish another list of arbitrators. No more than two lists may be requested. The costs of the arbitrator shall be shared by both parties.

(b) The review board of an agency having fewer than 150 deputy sheriffs shall be comprised of:

1. One member selected by the sheriff from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.

2. One member selected by the deputy sheriff who is appealing the termination from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.

3. One member selected by the other members of the board and acting as the chairperson of the board.

(5) The chairperson of a review board shall:

(a) Conduct each meeting using parliamentary rules of order.

(b) Request that the deputy sheriff who is appealing provide the names of his or her witnesses, if any.

(c) Schedule and provide written notice of each meeting to the Internal Affairs Bureau, witnesses, board members, and deputies.

(d) Provide copies of all charges to the board members.

(6) The scope of the review board is limited to terminations.

History.—s. 6, ch. 94-143; s. 1328, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-155.

F.S. 30.075 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.075 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.075

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.075

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.075.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 30.075

Total Results: 12

Hicks v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-04-10

Citation: 112 So. 3d 567, 2013 WL 1440056, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5732

Snippet: reduced the lowest permissible sentence from 37.5 to 30.75 months. The record does not show that the court

The Florida Bar v. Behm

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-07-01

Citation: 41 So. 3d 136, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 419, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1044, 2010 WL 2612335

Snippet: except those specifically exempted." Id. at 429-30, 75 S.Ct. 473. The United States Supreme Court expressly

McDougall v. Van House

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-31

Citation: 801 So. 2d 118, 2001 WL 1334303

Snippet: greater than those prescribed by this act." Section 30.075(1) provides that "[e]ach sheriff shall establish

Griffin v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-02-18

Citation: 729 So. 2d 423, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1499, 1999 WL 73967

Snippet: in prison; the correct range is 18.45 months to 30.75 months in prison. This court holds that if a sentencing

Carter v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-08

Citation: 664 So. 2d 62, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12625, 1995 WL 725341

Snippet: reflects 52.7 points for a maximum sentence of 30.75 months in prison. The sentence imposed was five

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1986-05-30

Snippet: normal operating needs of the sheriff's office"); 83-30, 75-194, 75-35 and 72-346. Space for the storing of

Jones v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-07-30

Citation: 387 So. 2d 401

Snippet: under 5 grams 1-30-75 SO, Orange Co., 9-25-75 Contempt of Court

Dreyer v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-05-02

Citation: 370 So. 2d 95, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14556

Snippet: for $1700 on 5/14/75, and Behrendt for $800 on 9/30/75. Checks payable to Dreyer Real Estate, Inc. from

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kelley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1976-12-10

Citation: 340 So. 2d 953, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16099

Snippet: were written the following figures: 15%, 10%, 30%, 75%, 50% and 60%. On another slip these figures were

State Ex Rel. Peters v. Hendry

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-06-24

Citation: 31 So. 2d 254, 159 Fla. 210, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 756

Snippet: ------------ 20 1/2 hours at $1.50 per Hr. 30.75 Operator 20 1/2 Hours at $1.25 per Hr.

Laney v. State Ex Rel. Farrior

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-11-05

Citation: 130 So. 715, 100 Fla. 1141

Snippet: to accrue in favor of the sheriff in the sum of $30.75. There is no contention that there is an error or

Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-03-20

Citation: 73 Fla. 665

Snippet: W. Rep. 574; Brock v. Insurance Co., 106 Iowa 30, 75 N. W. Rep. 683. He did not proceed to adjust the