Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 30.075 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 30.075 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 30.075

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 30
SHERIFFS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 30.075
30.075 Review boards.
(1) Each sheriff shall establish a review board to review, pursuant to appeals taken under ss. 30.071-30.079, terminations taken by the sheriff against regularly appointed deputy sheriffs for lawful off-duty political activity or for discriminatory reasons.
(2) Each member of a review board shall be selected on the basis of fairness, objectivity, and impartiality. The board shall have no investigative powers and shall function in the capacity of a fact finder in an effort to arrive at a fair and equitable recommendation in all matters brought before it. A member shall not be involved in the issue under consideration. Membership on the board is voluntary and without remuneration. Members may not discuss matters to be heard before the board until the board convenes.
(3) A review board may receive verbal or written testimony concerning any matter considered relevant by the board and may receive any records, including, but not limited to, performance evaluations and disciplinary files.
(4)(a) The review board of an agency having 150 or more deputy sheriffs shall be comprised of:
1. Two members selected by the sheriff from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.
2. Two members selected by the deputy sheriff who is appealing the termination action from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.
3. One member selected by the other members of the board and acting as the chairperson of the board.
4. If an impartial local chairperson cannot be agreed upon within 10 working days after the appeal is submitted, then the parties shall jointly request the American Arbitration Association to furnish a panel of seven names from which each party shall have the option, within 5 days of receipt, of striking three names in alternating fashion. The seventh or remaining name shall be the chairperson. The parties shall jointly notify the arbitrator of his or her selection. Either party may object to all names on the list, provided the objection is made prior to the commencement of the striking process. If this occurs, the objecting party may request the American Arbitration Association to furnish another list of arbitrators. No more than two lists may be requested. The costs of the arbitrator shall be shared by both parties.
(b) The review board of an agency having fewer than 150 deputy sheriffs shall be comprised of:
1. One member selected by the sheriff from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.
2. One member selected by the deputy sheriff who is appealing the termination from among the certified law enforcement officers within the sheriff’s jurisdiction.
3. One member selected by the other members of the board and acting as the chairperson of the board.
(5) The chairperson of a review board shall:
(a) Conduct each meeting using parliamentary rules of order.
(b) Request that the deputy sheriff who is appealing provide the names of his or her witnesses, if any.
(c) Schedule and provide written notice of each meeting to the Internal Affairs Bureau, witnesses, board members, and deputies.
(d) Provide copies of all charges to the board members.
(6) The scope of the review board is limited to terminations.
History.s. 6, ch. 94-143; s. 1328, ch. 95-147; s. 2, ch. 95-155.

F.S. 30.075 on Google Scholar

F.S. 30.075 on Casetext

Amendments to 30.075


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 30.075
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 30.075.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 30.075

Total Results: 12

Hicks v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-04-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 112 So. 3d 567

Snippet: reduced the lowest permissible sentence from 37.5 to 30.75 months. The record does not show that the court

The Florida Bar v. Behm

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-07-01T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 41 So. 3d 136

Snippet: except those specifically exempted." Id. at 429-30, 75 S.Ct. 473. The United States Supreme Court expressly

McDougall v. Van House

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-10-30T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 801 So. 2d 118

Snippet: than those prescribed by this act." Section 30.075(1) provides that "[e]ach sheriff shall establish…account the limitation language contained in sections 30.075 and 30.076. Those sections reflect that the protections

Griffin v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1999-02-18T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 729 So. 2d 423

Snippet: in prison; the correct range is 18.45 months to 30.75 months in prison. This court holds that if a sentencing

Carter v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-12-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 664 So. 2d 62

Snippet: reflects 52.7 points for a maximum sentence of 30.75 months in prison. The sentence imposed was five

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1986-05-30T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: operating needs of the sheriff's office"); 83-30, 75-194, 75-35 and 72-346. Space for the storing of

Jones v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1980-07-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 387 So. 2d 401

Snippet: under 5 grams 1-30-75 SO, Orange Co., 9-25-75 Contempt of Court

Dreyer v. Florida Real Estate Commission

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-05-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 370 So. 2d 95

Snippet: for $1700 on 5/14/75, and Behrendt for $800 on 9/30/75. Checks payable to Dreyer Real Estate, Inc. from

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kelley

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1976-12-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 340 So. 2d 953

Snippet: were written the following figures: 15%, 10%, 30%, 75%, 50% and 60%. On another slip these figures were

State Ex Rel. Peters v. Hendry

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1947-06-24T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 31 So. 2d 254, 159 Fla. 210

Snippet: -------- 20 1/2 hours at $1.50 per Hr. 30.75 Operator 20 1/2 Hours at $1.25 per Hr.

Laney v. State Ex Rel. Farrior

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1930-11-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 130 So. 715, 100 Fla. 1141

Snippet: to accrue in favor of the sheriff in the sum of $30.75. There is no contention that there is an error or

Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1917-03-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 73 Fla. 665

Snippet: . W. Rep. 574; Brock v. Insurance Co., 106 Iowa 30, 75 N. W. Rep. 683. He did not proceed to adjust the