Florida Statute 35.05 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.05

35.05 Headquarters.—

(1) The headquarters of the First Appellate District shall be in the Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Leon County; of the Second Appellate District in the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Pinellas County; of the Third Appellate District in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County; of the Fourth Appellate District in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; of the Fifth Appellate District in the Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, Volusia County; and of the Sixth Appellate District in the Tenth Judicial Circuit, Lakeland, Polk County. Although each district must have a headquarters as set forth in this subsection, the Legislature intends for policies and practices to be implemented to encourage top applicants for judicial vacancies from throughout each entire district and to provide opportunities for remote workplaces for judges and staff who may not live near the headquarters of the district. Further, it is the intent of the Legislature to ensure that the district courts operate as efficiently as possible through the use of leading technologies and by adopting policies and practices that encourage innovation and workforce flexibility.

(2) A district court of appeal may designate other locations within its district as branch headquarters for the conduct of the business of the court and as the official headquarters of its officers or employees pursuant to s. 112.061.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 1, ch. 65-294; ss. 1, 2, 3, 4, ch. 67-29; s. 8, ch. 71-355; s. 3, ch. 79-413; s. 1, ch. 80-123; s. 22, ch. 2000-237; s. 11, ch. 2008-4; s. 7, ch. 2013-25; s. 9, ch. 2022-163.

F.S. 35.05 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.05 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.05

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.05

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.05.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 35.05

Total Results: 20

SARA CRISTINA BABUN, etc. v. STOK KON + BRAVERMAN, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-10-27

Snippet: 3D20-1374, 3D20-1894, and 3D21-0035. 5 Cristina and not the Estate

50 State Security Service, Inc. v. Giangrandi

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-27

Citation: 132 So. 3d 1128, 2013 WL 6212039, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18916

Snippet: guardhouse at 1:11:15 a.m., 1:34:04 a.m., and 1:35:05 a.m.; Prestwick at 1:42 a.m.; Torfin at 1:47 a.m

Cathedral Arts Project, Inc. v. Department of Economic Opportunity

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-08-20

Citation: 95 So. 3d 970, 2012 WL 3553315, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733

Snippet: final and binding. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 73B-10.035(5)(a)l. As such, the Agency did not err in dismissing

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-09

Citation: 83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Snippet: with a black VAP of 33.1% and a Hispanic VAP of 35.5%. District 12 retained 49.0% of its predecessor

Town of Oakland v. Mercer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-08-01

Citation: 851 So. 2d 266, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11727, 2003 WL 21766236

Snippet: Odometer fraud is a third degree felony, section 319.35(5), Fla. Stat.2000, which provides a possible basis

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2002-09-30

Snippet: Section 932.701(2)(a)2., Fla. Stat. Cf., s. 849.35(5), Fla. Stat. defining "gambling paraphernalia" as

Maxwell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-06-08

Citation: 785 So. 2d 1277, 2001 WL 627598

Snippet: and a bag containing a cigarette pack filled with 35.5 grams of marijuana was confiscated. The Florida

Florida Dept. of Revenue v. MLS

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-18

Citation: 756 So. 2d 125, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1455, 2000 WL 192140

Snippet: evidence of the facts stated therein. See § 382.35(5), Fla. Stat. (1985). [2] Although at the time of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-06-26

Snippet: Stat. 5 Section 849.36(1), Fla. Stat. 6 Section 849.35(5), Fla. Stat. 7 Compare, s. 849.231(1), Fla. Stat

Bulone v. United Services Auto. Ass'n

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-09-15

Citation: 660 So. 2d 399, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9705, 1995 WL 544879

Snippet: 665 P.2d 891 (1983); Widiss, supra, §§ 5.8, 33.8, 35.5. [5] Travelers Insurance Co. v. Chandler, 569 So

Department of Insurance & Treasurer v. Administrators Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-08-18

Citation: 603 So. 2d 1359, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9159, 1992 WL 197778

Snippet: officer held that he was constrained by Rule 22I-6.035(5)(a) to disregard the late response and grant the

In Re Constitutionality of Senate J. Res.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-06-25

Citation: 601 So. 2d 543

Snippet: HISPANIC Senator Thomas 60.4% 35.5% 4.1% 17.0% Senator Curt Kiser

Hamilton County Bd. of Com'rs v. State, Dept. of Env. Regulation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-10

Citation: 587 So. 2d 1378

Snippet: filed, although the applicable rule, rule 22I-6.035(5)(a), provides that DER "shall" file its response

STATE, DEPT. OF ENV. REGULATION v. Puckett Oil Co., Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-04-03

Citation: 577 So. 2d 988, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3176, 1991 WL 46857

Snippet: provisions of Florida Administrative Code Rule 22I-6.035(5)(a), requiring that the agency file its response

Western Auto v. Moore

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-10-02

Citation: 567 So. 2d 972, 1990 WL 146908

Snippet: per hour. 70.10 (hours) divided by 2 (weeks) = 35.05 hours per week. [5] Pay stub for two-week period

Employer's Cas. Ins. Co. v. Manfredo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-05-09

Citation: 542 So. 2d 1365, 1989 WL 47194

Snippet: from 100%, leaving a negative percentage of minus 35.5%. Thus, when we next turn to the benefits paid by

Snippet: penalties, for violations of the act. Subsection 812.035(5) specifically confers upon any state attorney the

Syfert Injury Law Firm