Florida Statute 35.065 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.065

35.065 Review of judgment or order certified by county court to be of great public importance.—Pursuant to s. 34.017, a district court of appeal may review any order or judgment of a county court which is certified by the county court to be of great public importance.

History.—s. 4, ch. 84-303; s. 7, ch. 2020-61.

F.S. 35.065 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.065 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.065

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.065

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.065.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 35.065

Total Results: 7

State v. Pierre

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-29T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 854 So. 2d 231

Snippet: jurisdiction. Art. V, § 4(b)(1), Fla. Const. § 35.065, Fla. Stat. (2002), Fla. R.App. P. 9.160. We restate

Carpenter v. B & G Resort Properties, Ltd.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2001-04-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 784 So. 2d 520, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5250, 2001 WL 395357

Snippet: Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Bd., 258 Cal.App.2d 35, 65 Cal.Rptr. 429 (2d Dist.1968), see also Ricketts

Colony Ins. Co. v. G & E TIRES & SERVICE, INCORPORATED

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2000-12-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 777 So. 2d 1034

Snippet: reasoned in Buss v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.4th 35, 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 366, 939 P.2d 766, 775-77 (1997) (citations

State v. Ayers

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1995-12-07T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 665 So. 2d 296

Snippet: question of great public importance. See §§ 26.012(1), 35.065, Fla. Stat. (1993). [2] The statute provides:

Widman v. Duggan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1994-07-13T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 639 So. 2d 1071, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6890

Snippet: Essentially all marital assets were split on a 35%/65% basis [she-35%; he-65%]. Both parties complied

Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-03-04T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 616 So. 2d 66, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2426

Snippet: questions to district courts of appeal. See §§ 34.017, 35.065, Fla.Stat. (1991). Thus, the circuit court lacked

FLORIDA DEPT. OF HRS v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-03-03T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 616 So. 2d 66

Snippet: questions to district courts of appeal. See §§ 34.017, 35.065, Fla. Stat. (1991). Thus, the circuit court lacked