The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 38
JUDGES: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 38.07

38.07 Effect of orders entered prior to disqualification; petition for reconsideration.—When orders have been entered in any cause by a judge prior to the entry of any order of disqualification under s. 38.02 or s. 38.05, any party to the cause may, within 30 days after the filing in the cause of the order of the chief judge of the circuit or the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, as provided for in s. 38.09, petition the judge so designated for a reconsideration of the orders entered by the disqualified judge prior to the date of the entry of the order of disqualification. Such a petition shall set forth with particularity the matters of law or fact to be relied upon as grounds for the modification or vacation of the orders. Such a petition shall be granted as a matter of right. Upon the granting of the petition, notice of the time and place of the hearing thereon, together with a copy of the petition, shall be mailed by the attorney, or attorneys, of record for the petitioners to the other attorney or attorneys of record, or to the party or parties if they have no attorneys of record. This notice shall be mailed at least 8 days prior to the date fixed by the judge for the hearing. The judge before whom the cause is then pending may, after the hearing, affirm, approve, confirm, reenter, modify, or vacate the orders.

History.—s. 8, ch. 16053, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 4155(7); s. 10, ch. 63-572; s. 30, ch. 81-259; s. 1, ch. 83-260.

F.S. 38.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 38.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 38.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 38.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 38.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In UNITED STATES v. O- D. ROBERTS, U. S., 75 M.J. 696 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2016)

. . . sometimes a witness competency rule will result in acquittals in the same instances in which Article 38.07 . . .

LEE, v. KUCKER BRUH, LLP D., 958 F. Supp. 2d 524 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . March 2012 rent, $30.37 still owed for February 2012 rent and eight months of fuel charges each for $38.07 . . .

FLOWERS, v. WRAY,, 511 F. App'x 576 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Zilavy responded by imposing on R Place a “Chief of Police Security Plan” under § 38.07(13) of the Madison . . .

MENDEZ, TDCJ v. QUARTERMAN,, 625 F. Supp. 2d 415 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Ann. art. 38.07 (Vernon 2005); see also Garcia v. . . .

ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 561 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

. . . Explanatory Note 38.07(c) makes clear that “vegetable pitches” for purposes of heading 3807 are those . . . In full, Explanatory Note 38.07(C) is as follows: (C) Vegetable pitch. . . .

CARMELL, v. QUARTERMAN,, 292 F. App'x 317 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . Carmell’s argument rested on article 38.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, which, prior to a . . . Ann. art. 38.07 (Vernon 1992) (emphasis added). . . . Consequently, her outcry was not timely under the 1992 version of article 38.07. . . . Ann. art. 38.07 (Vernon 1993)). . . . The Court compared the 1993 amended version of article 38.07, which was applied by the Texas Court of . . .

ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 559 F. Supp. 2d 1347 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . EN 38.07(C) (2002). . . . EN 38.07(C) (2002). . . . See EN 38.07(C) (2002). . . .

v., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 343 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . EN 38.07(C) (2002). . . . EN 38.07(C) (2002). . . . See EN 38.07(C) (2002). . . .

I. WADA, v. Y. TOMLINSON,, 517 F. Supp. 2d 148 (D.D.C. 2007)

. . . was charged AWOL and administrative leave, rather than annual leave, Plaintiff ultimately received $38.07 . . .

RATH, M. D. v. NETWORK MARKETING, L. C. f k a, 944 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . entitled to reconsideration of prior rulings by the recused judge as a matter of right, citing to section 38.07 . . .

KITTELSON, v. DRETKE,, 426 F.3d 306 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 38.07. . . .

J. BRINKLEY, v. STATE, 898 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 38.07, Florida Statutes (2001), provides: When orders have been entered in any cause by a judge . . .

In J. FOLSOM, J. v., 315 B.R. 161 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . During 2001 Plaintiff made two payments of $38.07 on her loans. (Def.’s Ex. 11B.) . . . Plaintiff made only two payments of $38.07 on her student loans even though she earned over $24,000.00 . . .

ACOSTA, v. MASTER MAINTENANCE, v., 192 F. Supp. 2d 577 (M.D. La. 2001)

. . . Marcello • Talbot, Carmouche & (B.3696-3711) 557.75 Marcello • Talbot, Carmouche & (B.3696 — 3711) 38.07 . . .

CARMELL v. TEXAS, 529 U.S. 513 (U.S. 2000)

. . . Ann., Art. 38.07 (Vernon 1983). Article 38.07 was amended in 1993. . . . Ann., Art. 38.07 (Vernon Supp. 2000). . . . The effect of Article 38.07 in sexual offense prosecutions is plain. . . . In 1975, Article 38.07 was enacted substantially in its present form. . . . Ann., Art. 38.07 (Vernon 1979). . . . Ann,, Art. 38.07 (Vernon 1983). . . . Texas amended Article 38.07, effective September 1,1993. . . . Article 38.07 is simply not a witness competency rule. . . . by another version of Article 38.07. . . . Ann., Art. 38.07, as amended by Act of May 29, 1993, 73d Leg., Reg. . . .

STATE v. MARKS, P. A., 758 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . See § 38.07 Fla. . . .

TRANSITIONAL HOSPITALS CORPORATION OF LOUISIANA, INC. v. E. SHALALA,, 40 F. Supp. 2d 6 (D.D.C. 1999)

. . . The average length of stay for the first cost reporting period was 38.07 days for THC-Arlington and 46.68 . . .

SCHLESINGER, v. CHEMICAL BANK G E II, 707 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Appellant’s reliance on section 38.07, Florida Statutes (1995) is misplaced because that statute applies . . .

R. TYLER, v. STATE GOVERNOR CHILES Of R. J. L. CEO L. M. D. A. M. D. J., 718 So. 2d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 38.07, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(h). . . .

LOWERY, v. COLLINS,, 988 F.2d 1364 (5th Cir. 1993)

. . . —Houston (14th Dist.) 1985, pet. ref'd); see Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 38.07; Clark v. . . .

L. BARBER, v., 562 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . treatises have stated that there is a right to move for reconsideration, citing as authority section 38.07 . . . Section 38.07, Florida Statutes, enacted after section 38.10, see Brown v. St. . . . and Florida law provides in all other contexts either that reconsideration is available by motion, § 38.07 . . .

UNITED STATES Sr. D. v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSION, DALLAS COUNTY, ALABAMA, J. Jr. R. Dr. R. J., 850 F.2d 1433 (11th Cir. 1988)

. . . that in Dallas County, Alabama, or anywhere else it requires 61.03 percent black citizens to equal 38.07 . . .

F. BYGOTT, Jr. O v. LEASEWAY TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION,, 637 F. Supp. 1433 (E.D. Pa. 1986)

. . . 20.5 Motion to Dismiss 4.5 6.0 Motion for Summary Judgment 20.0 Other Pretrial Motions and Preparation 38.07 . . .

In CLAUSEL, 32 B.R. 805 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1983)

. . . per month 48 (c) According to the Bank, the debtors have paid approximately 38 payments. 8662.53 = 38.07 . . . months paid. 227.52 (d) The interest paid prior to the filing of the petition is 38.07 x $60.23 per . . .

M. D. VICKERMAN, v. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT, WILSON, v. HENNEPIN COUNTY PROBATE COURT,, 543 F. Supp. 165 (D. Minn. 1982)

. . . a multiplier of 50% ($233,617.50), 70.2 hours of employee assistance concerning non-class data at $38.07 . . . expenses ($6,204.34) consist of $2,672.51 for employee assistance concerning non-class data (70.2 hours X $38.07 . . . Messinger’s request of $4,008.75 for employee assistance concerning non-class data (70.2 hours X $38.07 . . .

M. ROSEN, v. DICK, R. L. R. I II D. S. A. H. Co. Co. ARTHUR ANDERSEN CO. v. ARISTOCRAT ANGUS RANCH, R. D., 639 F.2d 82 (2d Cir. 1980)

. . . 1977), aff’d on other grounds, 439 U.S. 322, 99 S.Ct. 645, 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); 5 Moore’s, supra, ¶ 38.07 . . .

E. NEELY L. v. BRUTEN, D. B. N., 339 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . , for he had become disqualified, but to Circuit Judge Blount, newly assigned to both the estate, § 38.07 . . .

ROSS TRUSTEES v. BERNHARD, 396 U.S. 531 (U.S. 1970)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 38.07 [1] and cases cited therein. . . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 38.07 [1] and cases cited therein. . . .

In NATIONAL RADIATOR CO., 29 F. Supp. 804 (W.D. Pa. 1939)

. . . Trust Company claimed compensation in the sum of $2,500 and reimbursement of expenses to the amount of $38.07 . . .

MATTIE W. JACKSON, WIDOW, ET AL. v. THE UNITED STATES, 47 Ct. Cl. 579 (Ct. Cl. 1912)

. . . 1892. 48.29 45.73 41.90 48.45 44.85 48.1 48.8 1893. 49.33 47.92 41.85 48.30 44.10 46.8 47.7 1894. 37.0 38.07 . . .