Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 38.7 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 38.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 38.07 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 38.07

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 38
JUDGES: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 38.07
38.07 Effect of orders entered prior to disqualification; petition for reconsideration.When orders have been entered in any cause by a judge prior to the entry of any order of disqualification under s. 38.02 or s. 38.05, any party to the cause may, within 30 days after the filing in the cause of the order of the chief judge of the circuit or the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, as provided for in s. 38.09, petition the judge so designated for a reconsideration of the orders entered by the disqualified judge prior to the date of the entry of the order of disqualification. Such a petition shall set forth with particularity the matters of law or fact to be relied upon as grounds for the modification or vacation of the orders. Such a petition shall be granted as a matter of right. Upon the granting of the petition, notice of the time and place of the hearing thereon, together with a copy of the petition, shall be mailed by the attorney, or attorneys, of record for the petitioners to the other attorney or attorneys of record, or to the party or parties if they have no attorneys of record. This notice shall be mailed at least 8 days prior to the date fixed by the judge for the hearing. The judge before whom the cause is then pending may, after the hearing, affirm, approve, confirm, reenter, modify, or vacate the orders.
History.s. 8, ch. 16053, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 4155(7); s. 10, ch. 63-572; s. 30, ch. 81-259; s. 1, ch. 83-260.

F.S. 38.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 38.07 on CourtListener

Amendments to 38.07


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 38.07

Total Results: 10

Stephen Sultenfuss, Charles McMulling v. Wayne Snow, Jr., James T. Morris, Mobley Howell, Michael H. Wing, Bettye O. Hutchings, Michael J. Bowers

35 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 27817, 1994 WL 538702

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 5, 1994 | Docket: 2034125

Cited 46 times | Published

and delivered to a resident of Georgia, O.C.G.A. § 38-7-11 acts to invalidate an underinsured coverage

Barber v. MacKenzie

562 So. 2d 755, 1990 WL 62853

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1990 | Docket: 1231931

Cited 14 times | Published

citing as authority section 38.07, Florida Statutes (1989).[1] While section 38.07 does provide for such

In Re Seminole Walls & Ceilings Corp.

388 B.R. 386

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2008 | Docket: 1100962

Cited 11 times | Published

has a duty to act pursuant to the contract. Id. § 38.7. "True conditions subsequent are very rare in the

State v. Marks

758 So. 2d 1131, 2000 WL 313507

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2000 | Docket: 1404151

Cited 4 times | Published

of Jud. Conduct, Canon 3 B(7) (1995). [5] See § 38.07 Fla. Stat. (1999) (upon assignment of successor

Tyler v. State, Governor Chiles

718 So. 2d 811, 1997 WL 719319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 19, 1997 | Docket: 466238

Cited 3 times | Published

judicial orders entered by Judge Durrance. See § 38.07, Fla. Stat. (1995); Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.160(h)

Schlesinger v. Chemical Bank

707 So. 2d 868, 1998 WL 88339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1998 | Docket: 1260093

Cited 2 times | Published

voidable not void. Appellant's reliance on section 38.07, Florida Statutes (1995) is misplaced because

Brinkley v. State

898 So. 2d 1175, 2005 WL 762622

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2005 | Docket: 1732301

Cited 1 times | Published

indication that he was denying the motions. Section 38.07, Florida Statutes (2001), provides: When orders

Musselman v. Stanonik

388 B.R. 386, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27540

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2008 | Docket: 65516256

Published

has a duty to act pursuant to the contract. Id. § 38.7. "True conditions subsequent are very rare in the

Rath v. Network Marketing, L.C.

944 So. 2d 485, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 20345, 2006 WL 3498427

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2006 | Docket: 64848246

Published

recused judge as a matter of right, citing to section 38.07, Florida Statutes. However, that statute applies

Neely v. Bruten

339 So. 2d 1126, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1976 | Docket: 64556128

Published

Judge Blount, newly assigned to both the estate, § 38.07, F.S., and to the Neelys’ newly-filed independent