The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 38
JUDGES: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 38.09

38.09 Designation of judge to hear cause when order of disqualification entered.—Every judge of this state shall advise the chief judge of the circuit upon the entry of an order of disqualification. An order of assignment shall then be entered as provided by the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration. In the event any judge is disqualified as herein provided, upon application for any temporary writ of injunction or habeas corpus, the judge shall immediately enter an order of disqualification, whereupon the cause may be presented to any other judge of a court of the same jurisdiction as the court in which that cause is pending; and it shall be the duty of any such judge to hear and determine such matters until a substitute judge is so designated.

History.—s. 10, ch. 16053, 1933; CGL 1936 Supp. 4155(9); s. 11, ch. 63-572; s. 20, ch. 73-333; s. 2, ch. 83-260; s. 211, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 38.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 38.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 38.09

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 38.09

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 38.09.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

WEST VIRGINIA PIPE TRADES HEALTH WELFARE FUND, AG, v. MEDTRONIC, INC. A. L. E. W., 139 F. Supp. 3d 976 (D. Minn. 2015)

. . . The plaintiffs contend that these disclosures led to a drop in Medtronic stock by $.92 to close at $38.09 . . .

WEST VIRGINIA PIPE TRADES HEALTH WELFARE FUND, AG, v. MEDTRONIC, INC. A. L. E. W. A. J. D., 57 F. Supp. 3d 950 (D. Minn. 2014)

. . . Plaintiffs allege that upon these disclosures, Medtronic’s stock dropped $.92 to close at $38.09 on June . . . Plaintiffs allege that after the June 28, 2011 issue, Medtronic’s stock declined $.92 per share to close at $38.09 . . .

LENARTZ, V. H. L. A. s LLC, v. AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORPORATION, S. O. R. Jr. B. W. Jr. Co. Co. J. A., 879 F. Supp. 2d 167 (D. Mass. 2012)

. . . out on July 12, 2011, closing at $8.12 per share, a drop of over 78% from the Class Period high of $38.09 . . .

v., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1152 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . heading 38.24 unless specially prepared for specific purposes (e.g., as textile dressings of heading 38.09 . . .

DEGUSSA CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 452 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

. . . heading 38.24 unless specially prepared for specific purposes (e.g., as textile dressings of heading 38.09 . . .

In R. M. SILVUS, In E. In B. A. In S., 329 B.R. 193 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2005)

. . . His request for fees was reduced to a total of $1,026.59 (itemized as $988.50 for compensation and $38.09 . . . He further states that even if he were paid his reduced fee of $988.50 and expenses of $38.09, general . . .

PAMLICO- TAR RIVER FOUNDATION, v. U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS U. S. LT. B. U. S. IV, U. S. EPA, U. S. EPA PCS, 329 F. Supp. 2d 600 (E.D.N.C. 2004)

. . . acres) Operating Cost (compared to B) Metric Tons Deferred (MM) A 3,075 272 -$ 5.5M 0 B 3,069 190 0 38.09 . . .

LONG TERM MANAGEMENT, INC. v. UNIVERSITY NURSING CARE CENTER, INC., 704 So. 2d 669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . of a judge to hear a cause when an order of disqualification has been entered is governed by section 38.09 . . .

CAVE, v. STATE, 660 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1995)

. . . Judicial Administration, rule 3.230 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and sections 38.01, 38.02, 38.09 . . . Sections 38.01, 38.02, 38.09 are likewise inapplicable since they pertain to issues not relevant to this . . .

J. STENDER, v. LUCKY STORES, INC., 803 F. Supp. 259 (N.D. Cal. 1992)

. . . Men most preferred Store Manager (score 55.58) and least preferred Deli/Bakery Clerk (score 38.09). . . .

In H. HARBOUR, W. HUFFMAN, v. M. PERKINSON N. Jr. t a a, 840 F.2d 1165 (4th Cir. 1988)

. . . House, 694 F.2d 861, 863 (1st Cir.1982). 5 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.09[5 — 4] (2d ed. 1982); Wright . . .

In H. HARBOUR, W. HUFFMAN, v. M. PERKINSON N. Jr. t a a, 840 F.2d 1165 (4th Cir. 1988)

. . . Hause, 694 F.2d 861, 863 (1st Cir.1982). 5 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 38.09[5-4] (2d ed. 1982); Wright . . .

In BSC AUDIO, INC. DAVIDSON, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 35 B.R. 722 (W.D. Ark. 1983)

. . . Morrison, supra; 2A Collier ¶ 38.09[2] (14th ed.). . . .

In METRO EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORP. A. WEICK, v. T. HELTZEL E. G., 28 B.R. 579 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1983)

. . . Section 46); 2A Collier on Bankruptcy 14th ed. paragraph 38.09[2] at 1428. . . .

In PACIFIC HOMES, a De La E. MATTHEWS, a v. UNITED METHODIST CHURCH,, 456 F. Supp. 851 (C.D. Cal. 1978)

. . . Collier’s treatise on bankruptcy law, 6 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 3.13, at 506 (14th ed. 1978); 2A id., ¶ 38.09 . . . See 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, H 23.15[7] (14th ed. 1978); See also 6 id., ¶ 3.13, at 506; 2A id., H 38.09 . . . possession of a third person claiming more than a colorable interest therein. 2A Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶| 38.09 . . .

ARMSTRONG L. B. H. L. G. v. J. O CONNELL, S. P. Jr. J. S. A. T. M. W. Jr. R. A., 451 F. Supp. 817 (E.D. Wis. 1978)

. . . . § 38.09(3) (1963); and Wis.Stats. § 38.09(3)(1949). F — 24. . . .

F. GRAY, v. MARTINDALE LUMBER COMPANY,, 515 F.2d 1218 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . . ¶ 38.09. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded. Reversed and remanded. . . . .

In W. MOUNTJOY, A. ROBINSON L. v. W. MOUNTJOY,, 368 F. Supp. 1087 (W.D. Mo. 1973)

. . . 112 F.2d 738 (2nd Cir. 1940); In re Clark, 257 F.Supp. 761 (E.D.Va. 1966); 2 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶ 38.09 . . .

In MYERS, a k a R. J., 383 F. Supp. 251 (W.D. Mo. 1973)

. . . Grubard, 112 F.2d 738 (2nd Cir. 1970); In re Clark, 257 F.Supp. 761 (E.D.Va.1966); 2 Collier, Bankruptcy ¶38.09 . . .

In KNOX, v. W. LINES,, 463 F.2d 561 (9th Cir. 1972)

. . . . § 66(6) ; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy 22.05, 38.09. . . . .

In METER MAID INDUSTRIES, INC. B G LIMITED, v. H. LEVIN,, 462 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1972)

. . . 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 920, 84 S.Ct. 677, 11 L.Ed.2d 615 (1964); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, flfl 38.09 . . .

MIDLAND ROSS CORPORATION v. SUNBEAM EQUIPMENT CORPORATION W., 52 F.R.D. 573 (W.D. Pa. 1971)

. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice § 38.09. . . .

In BRENDAN REILLY ASSOCIATES, INC. CAMBRIDGE FACTORS, TESCIUBA,, 372 F.2d 235 (2d Cir. 1967)

. . . Mora, 234 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1956); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 38.09 [3], 39.17 (14th ed. 1966). . . .

SHIREY D. v. LOUISVILLE NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY,, 327 F.2d 549 (5th Cir. 1964)

. . . Southern Railway Company, 5 Cir. 1963, 317 F.2d 532, 537; see also, 5 Moore’s Federal Practice 2nd ed., §§ 38.09 . . .

ROMAN MOSAIC TILE CO. v. THIOKOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, 218 F. Supp. 421 (E.D. Pa. 1963)

. . . New Jersey 10.80%, and Pennsylvania 5.20%); and that more gross tangible assets are located in Utah (38.09% . . .

DONROY, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, 301 F.2d 200 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . entitled to :90% of the net profits of the partnership, Transpat and Dostrey each being entitled to 38.09% . . .

E. PRITCHARD, v. LIGGETT MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY, 295 F.2d 292 (3d Cir. 1961)

. . . Scuka, 3 Cir., 1960, 279 F.2d 145; 5 Moore’s Federal Practice jf 38.09 et seq. (1951). . . .

S. CURRY, v. PYRAMID LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 271 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1959)

. . . D.C.N.J., 7 F.R.D. 596, 597; Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Ed., § 38.08 [6], 1958 Cumulative Supplement, § 38.09 . . .

In ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR, 86 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1956)

. . . We expressed the opinion that Sec. 38.09, Florida Statutes 1951, and F.S.A., furnished the authority . . .

PIERCE CONSULTING ENGINEERING CO. v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, VT. CENTURY INDEMNITY CO., 221 F.2d 607 (2d Cir. 1955)

. . . Secs. 38.09, 38.10. Cf. Zauderer v. Continental Casualty Co., 2 Cir., 140 F.2d 211, 214. . . .

L. LARSEN, v. D. POWELL,, 16 F.R.D. 322 (D. Colo. 1954)

. . . Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 5, Sec. 38.08 (6)-38.09, pp. 90-101; Herron v. Southern Pac. . . .

TEXAS N. O. R. CO. v. PHILLIPS, 211 F.2d 419 (5th Cir. 1954)

. . . Perry 5 Cir., 74 F.2d 371; Collier on Bankruptcy, Sec. 38.09, p. 1425. . . .

In ADVISORY OPINION TO THE GOVERNOR, 63 So. 2d 274 (Fla. 1953)

. . . These facts present the question of whether the Governor, acting under section 38.09, Florida Statutes . . . Small Claims Court of Putnam County or any county is brought to your attention as required by Section 38.09 . . . There is accordingly no authority for you to designate a judge to act under Section 38.09 until you have . . . When it becomes your duty to proceed under Section 38.09 to assign a judge to preside over the Civil . . .

In MANNINGTON POTTERY CO., 104 F. Supp. 506 (N.D.W. Va. 1952)

. . . Pottasch Brothers Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 79 F.2d 613, 101 A.L.R. 1182, Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Sec. 38.09 . . .

In PETROLEUM CONVERSION CORP., 99 F. Supp. 899 (D. Del. 1951)

. . . referee possesses the power to hear and determine the issues presented.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, par. 38.09 . . . court to decide any questions that may be lawfully interposed * * * ”, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, par. 38.09 . . .

H. v., 16 T.C. 960 (T.C. 1951)

. . . In acquiring title to the property petitioner incurred expenses and fees of $38.09. . . .

In BANCROFT, 64 F. Supp. 875 (N.D. Ohio 1946)

. . . , and from the proceeds of the sale, the bankrupt paid his debt to the Ohio Loan Company 'and paid $38.09 . . .

In COOK, 58 F. Supp. 361 (W.D. Ky. 1945)

. . . Cir., 93 F.2d 471; In re Miller, 6 Cir., 111 F.2d 28, 33; Collier on Bankruptcy, 14th Ed., Section 38.09 . . .