Florida Statute 43.27 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 43
COURTS: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 43.27

43.27 Office hours of clerks of court.—With the advice and consent of the chief judge of the circuit, the clerks of the courts of the several counties may establish the hours during which the office of clerk may be open to the public. The hours should conform as nearly as possible to the customary weekday hours of business prevailing in the county. The clerk may prescribe that the office be open such additional hours as public needs require. The clerk of court may not close any office of the clerk of court during customary weekday hours without the consent of the chief judge of the circuit.

History.—s. 1, ch. 72-238; s. 261, ch. 95-147; s. 9, ch. 2009-204.

F.S. 43.27 on Google Scholar

F.S. 43.27 on Casetext

Amendments to 43.27

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 43.27

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 43.27.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 43.27

Total Results: 17

Nelson v. Osgood

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-03-25

Citation: 689 So. 2d 1286, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2735, 1997 WL 131573

Snippet: other parent for a year); Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946) (primary residential custody rotated

Wilking v. Reiford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-27

Citation: 582 So. 2d 717, 1991 WL 111482

Snippet: disfavors rotating custody. Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946); Wonsetler v. Wonsetler, 240 So

Gerner v. Gerner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-08-09

Citation: 529 So. 2d 1226, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1912, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3627, 1988 WL 81835

Snippet: 3d DCA 1983). See also Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946); Scott v. Scott, 401 So.2d 879

Frey v. Wagner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-06-21

Citation: 433 So. 2d 60

Snippet: their parents. See, e.g., Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946); Scott v. Scott, 401 So.2d 879

Gerscovich v. Gerscovich

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-12-07

Citation: 406 So. 2d 1150

Snippet: upon) the children. In Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946) the custody of a child three years

Bienvenu v. Bienvenu

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-03-11

Citation: 380 So. 2d 1164

Snippet: not be sustained. E.g., Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946); Unger v. Unger, 306 So.2d 540

Unger v. Unger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-01-14

Citation: 306 So. 2d 540

Snippet: undesirable for the child. Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 *542 (1946); Rudolph v. Rudolph, Fla

Anderson v. Anderson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-01-08

Citation: 309 So. 2d 1

Snippet: So.2d 529 (1946); and Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946). The trial court found that respondent-husband

Brust v. Brust

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-07-06

Citation: 266 So. 2d 400

Snippet: (1946), a 2-year-old girl; Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 (1946), a 3-year-old child; Dobbs v.

Wonsetler v. Wonsetler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-10-30

Citation: 240 So. 2d 870

Snippet: So.2d 440. Hurst v. Hurst, Fla. 1946, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749, was a case similar to the case in consideration

Hare v. Potter

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-03-25

Citation: 233 So. 2d 653, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6717

Snippet: child’s welfare.” Hurst v. Hurst, 1946, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749; McCann v. McCann, 1934, 167 Md. 167

Julian v. Julian

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-07-20

Citation: 188 So. 2d 896

Snippet: So.2d 479; *901 Hurst v. Hurst, 1946, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749; Teel v. Sapp, Fla. 1951, 53 So.2d 635;

Bargeon v. Bargeon

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-04-24

Citation: 153 So. 2d 10

Snippet: paramount consideration. Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749; Bennett v. Bennett, Fla., 73 So.2d 274

Rudolph v. Rudolph

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-11-13

Citation: 146 So. 2d 397

Snippet: interests of the minor. Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749. Divided custody which involves periodic

Duggar v. Duggar

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-06-29

Citation: 143 So. 2d 40, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3709

Snippet: 197 So. 530, and in Hurst v. Hurst, [158] Fla. [43], 27 So.2d 749, and other cases of that sort. There

Nevins Drug Co. v. Bunch

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1953-02-24

Citation: 63 So. 2d 329, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1104

Snippet: 416, 421, 19 L.Ed. 166; Kann v. King, 204 U.S. 43, 27 S.Ct. 213, 51 L.Ed. 360; Abrams v. Watson, 59 Ala

Belford v. Belford

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-10-31

Citation: 32 So. 2d 312, 159 Fla. 547, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 838

Snippet: 886,197 So. 530, and in Hurst v. Hurst, 158 Fla. 43, 27 So.2d 749 and other cases of that sort. There are