Florida Statute 45.051 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 45
CIVIL PROCEDURE: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 45.051

45.051 Execution of supersedeas bond when required of the state or its political subdivisions.—

(1) When a supersedeas bond is required by the appellate court under Rule 9.310(b)(2), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or an appeal or other proceeding is taken in any court and there is no court rule or statute exempting the parties from giving supersedeas, cost, or other required bond, the parties are authorized to make and execute the required bond with a corporate surety thereon duly licensed to do business in this state. The premium or other cost for the bond may be paid from the general necessary and regular appropriation of the party taking the appeal, in the case of the state or any of its officers, boards, commissioners or other agencies, and from the county general fund, district school general fund, or otherwise as the case may be, in the case of a political subdivision of the state or any of its officers, boards, commissions or other agencies. The officers of the state and its political subdivisions and the executive officers of their boards, commissions, and other agencies aforesaid, are authorized to make and execute the bonds on behalf of the parties.

(2) In connection with an appeal taken by a state employee or official of a judgment against that employee or official in an individual capacity, as part of the legal defense being provided by the state risk management program, the Division of Risk Management may enter into an indemnification agreement for the purpose of securing an appellate supersedeas bond, provided that, under any such agreement, the liability of the State of Florida is limited to the amount of the judgment being appealed and any costs imposed by law or the appropriate court.

History.—s. 14, ch. 22854, 1945; s. 4, ch. 71-316; s. 10, ch. 95-280; s. 11, ch. 2001-266.

Note.—Former s. 59.14(3).

F.S. 45.051 on Google Scholar

F.S. 45.051 on Casetext

Amendments to 45.051

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 45.051

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 45.051.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 45.051

Total Results: 18

Miami Dade College v. Del Pino Allen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 271 So. 3d 1194

Snippet: restraint. Rorke v. Savoy Energy, LP, 677 N.W.2d 45, 51 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003); see also Wright v. City

Kaczmar v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-10-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 104 So. 3d 990, 2012 WL 4665829, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1922

Snippet: this testimony. See Kerlin v. State, 352 So.2d 45, 51-52 (Fla.1977) (finding the privilege extends only

Devon Medical, Inc. v. Ryvmed Medical, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-05-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 60 So. 3d 1125, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6661, 2011 WL 1775770

Snippet: Phases of Promissory Estoppel, 20 Seattle U. L. Rev. 45, 51 (1996) (same, and explaining that each approach

Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Escobio

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-02-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 6 So. 3d 638, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1447, 2009 WL 416518

Snippet: amended these provisions. See ch. 2006-290, §§ 45, 51, at 2957, 2965, Laws of Fla. Section 322.2615(1

Kasischke v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-07-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 991 So. 2d 803

Snippet: at 7; Fred Hapgood, Sex Sells, Inc. Tech., at 4, 45-51 (1996); Alvin Cooper, Sexuality and the Internet

CITY OF SWEETWATER FLORIDA v. St. Germain

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-11-14T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 943 So. 2d 259

Snippet: , section 45.021 provides that "[c]hapters 45-51 [addressing service of process] . . . apply to all

Milks v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2005-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 894 So. 2d 924

Snippet: dangerous again); Doe # 1 v. Williams, 167 F.Supp.2d 45, 51 (D.D.C.2001) ("It is beyond dispute that public

State v. Robinson

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2004-03-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 873 So. 2d 1205

Snippet: See, e.g., Doe No. 1 v. Williams, 167 F.Supp.2d 45, 51 (D.D.C. 2001) (noting that "[i]t is beyond

Healy v. Healy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-12-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 834 So. 2d 287, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18697, 2002 WL 31840883

Snippet: obligations. Lepis v. Lepis, 83 N.J. 139, 416 A.2d 45, 51 (1980) (noting that “[cjourts have consistently

Capital Associates, Inc. v. Hudgens

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1984-08-15T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 455 So. 2d 651

Snippet: title to the property by tendering the sum of $14,045.51 at any time before the sale. Capital subsequently

Rothschild v. Kisling

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-08-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 417 So. 2d 798, 220 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1010, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20771

Snippet: Sheldon v. Metro Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 106 F.2d 45, 51 (2d Cir. 1939), affirmed, 309 U.S. 390, 60 S.Ct

Jackson v. Stelco Employees' Credit Union

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-08-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 178 So. 2d 58, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4058

Snippet: v. Textile Workers Union, D.C.Del., 108 F.Supp. 45, 51. “In dealing with such a question under the equivalent

Coast Cities Coaches, Inc. v. Dade County

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1965-07-07T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 178 So. 2d 703

Snippet: . Textile Workers Union, D.C.Del., 108 F. Supp. 45, 51. "In dealing with such a question under the

Wallens v. Lichtenstein

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1964-01-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 159 So. 2d 912

Snippet: v. Textile Workers Union, D.C.Del., 108 F.Supp. 45, 51. “In dealing with such a question under the equivalent

Helsley v. City of St. Petersburg

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1963-08-28T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 156 So. 2d 171

Snippet: Morris & E. R. Co. v. Jersey City [63 N.J.Eq. 45], 51 Atl. [387], 389. Under the exposition of the law

Lehew v. Larsen

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-12-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 124 So. 2d 872, 85 A.L.R. 2d 821

Snippet: v. Textile Workers Union, D.C.Del., 108 F.Supp. 45, 51.” It then cited with approval an excerpt from Stuart

Olin's, Inc. v. Avis Rental Car System of Florida, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-09-29T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 2d 497

Snippet: . Textile Workers Union, D.C.Del., 108 F. Supp. 45, 51. *499 In dealing with such a question under the

Rhea v. Hackney

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1934-10-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 157 So. 190, 117 Fla. 62, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1191

Snippet: court. 20 Encyclopedia of Pleading Practice, 44, 45, 51 and 52; 49 Corpus Juris, 701, 702; 21 R. C. L.,