Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 45.075 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 45.075 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 45.075

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 45
CIVIL PROCEDURE: GENERAL PROVISIONS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 45.075
45.075 Expedited trials.Upon the joint stipulation of the parties to any civil case, the court may conduct an expedited trial as provided in this section. Where two or more plaintiffs or defendants have a unity of interest, such as a husband and wife, they shall be considered one party for the purpose of this section. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to by the parties with approval of the court, an expedited trial shall be conducted as follows:
(1) All discovery shall be completed within 60 days after the court enters an order adopting the joint expedited trial stipulation.
(2) All interrogatories and requests for production must be served within 10 days after the court enters the order adopting the joint expedited trial stipulation, and all responses must be served within 20 days after receipt.
(3) The court shall determine the number of depositions required.
(4) The case may be tried to a jury.
(5) The case may be tried within 30 days after the 60-day discovery cutoff, if such schedule would not impose an undue burden on the court calendar.
(6) The trial must be limited to 1 day.
(7) The jury selection must be limited to 1 hour.
(8) The plaintiff will have no more than 3 hours to present its case, including the opening, all testimony and evidence, and the closing.
(9) The defendant will have no more than 3 hours to present its case, including the opening, all testimony and evidence, and the closing.
(10) The jury may be given “plain language” jury instructions at the beginning of the trial as well as a “plain language” jury verdict form. The parties must agree to the jury instructions and verdict form.
(11) The parties may introduce a verified written report of any expert and an affidavit of the expert’s curriculum vitae instead of calling the expert to testify at trial.
(12) At trial the parties may use excerpts from depositions, including video depositions, regardless of where the deponent lives or whether the deponent is available to testify.
(13) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Florida Evidence Code and the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure apply.
(14) The court may refuse to grant continuances of the trial absent extraordinary circumstances.
History.s. 6, ch. 99-225.

F.S. 45.075 on Google Scholar

F.S. 45.075 on Casetext

Amendments to 45.075


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 45.075
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 45.075.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 45.075

Total Results: 10

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2024-05-23T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: (2) actions proceeding under section 45.075, Florida Statutes; (3) actions subject

Five Seas Investors v. Guzman

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-11-27T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: perimetrical boundaries lying within the elevation of +45.75 feet and +115.00 feet relative to the National

MARCUS STRONG v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-06-20T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: departure from the lowest permissible sentence of 45.75 months in prison. He was nineteen at the time of

Musur Monique Wallace v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-07-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 197 So. 3d 1204, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10923

Snippet: Florida’s statutory guidelines prescribed a minimum 45.75 month prison sentence. Mr. Wallace asked the court

State v. Isom

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-06-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 36 So. 3d 936, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9122, 2010 WL 2508859

Snippet: scoresheet reflected a minimum permissible sentence of 45.75 months' prison. Although the State objected

Lowry v. CENTRAL LEASING MANAGEMENT, INC.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2008-05-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 18 So. 3d 550, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 6952, 2008 WL 1930055

Snippet: benefits secured for Lowry in the amount of $11,045.75. In this as-applied "constitutional"

Lebron v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1998-07-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 717 So. 2d 72, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9462, 1998 WL 412480

Snippet: sentence showing a sentence of 45.75 years instead of the orally announced 45.75 months. We direct that this

City of New Smyrna Beach v. Fish

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-07-17T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 384 So. 2d 1272

Snippet: Court of Appeal holding that Ordinances 40-76 and 45-75 of the City of New Smyrna Beach are unconstitutional…quot; In October of 1975 the City passed Ordinance 45-75, amending Ordinance 907. The ordinance increased…1976 Ordinance 40-76 was passed amending Ordinance 45-75. As the City was running a deficit for the collection…discriminatory rates established by Ordinances 40-76, and 45-75. The trial court found that, (1) the classification

Fish v. City of New Smyrna Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1979-04-19T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 382 So. 2d 307, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16369

Snippet: classified separately from residences under ordinance 45-75, which imposed rates for refuse collection at businesses…difference between the City’s charges under ordinance 45-75 for service to the dumpsters of businesses, and …City truck in the same way. But under ordinance 45-75 a business pays $45.00 per month for that service…businesses differently for the same service. Ordinances 45-75 and 40-76 operate in an unlawful discriminatory

Security Mutual Casualty Co. v. Grice

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-03-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 172 So. 2d 834

Snippet: the plaintiff has suffered a dollar loss of $44,045.75; in addition to the loss of earnings, the plaintiff