Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 56.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 56.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 56.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 56
FINAL PROCESS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 56.09
56.09 Executions against corporate judgment debtors; generally.On any judgment against a corporate judgment debtor, the judgment creditor may have an execution levied on the current money as well as on the goods and chattels, lands and tenements of the corporate judgment debtor.
History.s. 4, Feb. 11, 1834; RS 1210; GS 1640; RGS 2844; CGL 4531; s. 11, ch. 67-254; s. 6, ch. 2016-33.
Note.Former s. 55.23.

F.S. 56.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 56.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 56.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 56.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 56.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 56.09

Total Results: 14

SARA ROSENBERG, etc. v. U.S. BANK, N.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-05-03

Snippet: at 507, was a section 56.29 fraudulent 7 § 56.09, Fla. Stat. (allowing execution on a corporate judgment

In Re: Amendments to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.510

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-07-08

Snippet: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. -9-

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-04-29

Snippet: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.” -9- The Movant’s

In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-03-09

Citation: 83 So. 3d 597, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 181, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 507, 2012 WL 753122

Snippet: 95 (57.7%), District 102 (52.1%), District 107 (56.9%), District 108 (62.9%), and District 109 (50.6%)

Valdes v. GALCO CONST.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-01-26

Citation: 922 So. 2d 252, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 826, 2006 WL 176731

Snippet: claims determined that claimant's counsel secured $56,009.73 for Mr. Valdes in past permanent total disability

State v. Scott

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-08-06

Citation: 879 So. 2d 99, 2004 WL 1749529

Snippet: Scott's Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet reflected 56.9 total sentence points with a resulting lowest permissible

HUMANA HEALTH INS. CO. OF FLA. INC. v. Chipps

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-12-26

Citation: 802 So. 2d 492, 2001 WL 1643915

Snippet: expert testified that Humana's net worth ranged from $56.9 million in 1994 to $43.4 million in 1998. However

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2001-03-23

Snippet: Section 228.056(4)(f), Fla. Stat. 6 Section 228.056(9), Fla. Stat. 7 Section 228.056(7), Fla. Stat. 8

Orange Ave. Charter School v. ST. LUCIE SCHOOL BD.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-26

Citation: 763 So. 2d 531, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9413, 2000 WL 1022970

Snippet: Section 228.056(9)(b), Florida Statutes, demonstrates that the criteria set forth in Section 228.056(9)(a)1

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1998-07-31

Snippet: Section 228.056(9), Fla. Stat. 9 Section 228.056(9)(a)6. and 14., Fla. Stat. 10 Section 228.056(9)(d), Fla

Flynn v. McGinty

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-11-04

Citation: 61 So. 2d 318, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1762

Snippet: one here involved. The cases collected under Note 56, 9 C.J., Brokers, Sec. 101, page 622, have been examined

Simpson v. Bohon

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1947-07-11

Citation: 31 So. 2d 406, 159 Fla. 280, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 769

Snippet: second and third floors of said building comprising 56.9% of the floor space of said building, was used by

Croissant v. DeSoto Improvement Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1924-06-02

Citation: 87 Fla. 530, 101 So. 37

Snippet: Senate Resolution, Relating to Senate Bill No. 56, 9 Colo. 632, 21 Pac. Rep. 475, the supreme court of

First National Bank v. Perkins

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-03-15

Citation: 81 Fla. 341, 87 So. 912

Snippet: Hundred and Thirty-seven and 56/100 Dollars ($2,137.56). “9. That on the 5th day of May, 1916, the said Bank