Syfert Injury Law Firm

NATIONAL CLAIMS FUNDING COMPANY, LLC v. SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-08-31T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: . Co. v. United Reconstruction Grp., 325 So. 3d 57, 61 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (“We reject without further

T. L. v. F. M.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-03-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: quoting Ward v. Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62 (1972))); cf. Lecates v. Justice of the Peace

CAROL PUHL n/k/a CAROL MORLEY v. THOMAS PUHL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-11-27T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: extraordinary burden.” Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So. 3d 57, 61–62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Shaw v. Nelson,

Yasar Korkmaz v. Anastasia Korkmaz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 200 So. 3d 263

Snippet: children.” Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). It also establishes “a presumption

Suni L. Reed, n/k/a Suni L. Meyers v. Christopher J. Reed

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-01-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 182 So. 3d 837

Snippet: children.” Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61 (Fla.4th DCA 2010). Accordingly, “there is a presumption

Rene George v. Matthew Lull

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 181 So. 3d 538

Snippet: . See Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61-62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Bon v. Rivera,

Sueiro v. Gallardo

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-12-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 3d 585

Snippet: time-sharing matters.”); Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“In seeking a modification

Welch v. Dececco

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-11-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 101 So. 3d 421

Snippet: and acceptance. See Mulato v. Mulato, 705 So.2d 57, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Here, the trial court concluded

Shavers v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-05-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 86 So. 3d 1218

Snippet: .Ed.2d 619 (2010); Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57, 61, 129 S.Ct. 530, 172 L.Ed.2d 388 (2008); Spellissy

Miller v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 852 So. 2d 904

Snippet: his burden of proof. See State v. King, 804 So.2d 57, 61 (La.Ct.App.2001); Davis v. Armenakis, 151 Or.App

Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-05-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 579 So. 2d 850

Snippet: Tax Title Corp. v. Viney, 120 Fla. 657, 163 So. 57, 61 (Fla. 1935), the procedure approved was presentation

The Florida Bar v. Diaz-Silveira

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1990-01-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 557 So. 2d 570

Snippet: answer the respondent admitted to allegations # 57-61, # 64, and the first sentence of # 65, but denied

SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. & CLINICS v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-12-29T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 480 So. 2d 1366

Snippet: not implicitly abrogated by statutes, see notes 57-61 and accompanying text); Duval v. Thomas, 114 So.2d

Sun Plaza West Development Corp. v. City of Holmes Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 465 So. 2d 542

Snippet: prescribed period.” Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57, 61-62 (Fla.1958). If the city can obtain title without

LAKE COUNTY COM'RS v. Walburn

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-01-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 409 So. 2d 153

Snippet: Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 57.61 at 10-164.90. Restated, the requisite causal relationship

Fellows, Read & Weber v. Lance

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-12-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 406 So. 2d 1286

Snippet: The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, Volume 2, § 57.61. The E/C has argued that there must be medical evidence

Hollywood, Inc. v. Zinkil

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-09-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 403 So. 2d 528

Snippet: entity of the public, see Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57, 61 (Fla. 1958), and it is the public which enjoys

Milton v. Smathers

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-10-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 389 So. 2d 978

Snippet: districts 57-61. There is one representative for every approximately 56,000 persons in districts 57-61. Approximately… applied to them in multimember House Districts 57-61 on its effective date. We found that their petition…the voting population of Florida House Districts 57-61 by denying to the members of the black minority …recommendation and our holding that multimember districts 57-61 do not violate the fourteenth or fifteenth amendments… are black registered voters in House Districts 57-61. In 1970 the total population of Pinellas County

Milton v. Smathers

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1977-06-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 351 So. 2d 24

Snippet: applied to petitioners in multi-member House District 57-61 on its effective date. Count two of the petition

Washington v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-05-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 210 So. 2d 290

Snippet: .2d 515, 516-18; Clinton v. State, 1908, 56 Fla. 57, 61-62, 47 So. 389, 390; Gray v. State, 1900, 42 Fla