Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 57.061 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 57.061 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 57.061

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 57
COURT COSTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 57.061
57.061 Costs; recovery of illegally exacted; procedure.
(1) SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS.Any person aggrieved by any charge for costs by any officer may have its correctness determined by a court and jury by giving 5 days’ notice to the officer making the charge, stating in the notice the time and place of trial. The judge shall enter the action for trial on the day specified in the notice unless he or she extends the time.
(2) VERDICT AND JUDGMENT.If the jury finds for plaintiff, it shall find the amount which has been improperly collected and the court shall enter judgment for 4 times the amount on which execution shall issue.
History.ss. 4, 5, 6, Mar. 10, 1843; s. 2, ch. 73, 1847; RS 1305; GS 1737; RGS 2952; CGL 4676; s. 13, ch. 67-254; s. 313, ch. 95-147.
Note.Former s. 58.06.

F.S. 57.061 on Google Scholar

F.S. 57.061 on Casetext

Amendments to 57.061


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 57.061
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 57.061.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 57.061

Total Results: 20

NATIONAL CLAIMS FUNDING COMPANY, LLC v. SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-08-31T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: . Co. v. United Reconstruction Grp., 325 So. 3d 57, 61 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (“We reject without further

T. L. v. F. M.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-03-13T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: quoting Ward v. Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62 (1972))); cf. Lecates v. Justice of the Peace

CAROL PUHL n/k/a CAROL MORLEY v. THOMAS PUHL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-11-27T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: extraordinary burden.” Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So. 3d 57, 61–62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Shaw v. Nelson,

Yasar Korkmaz v. Anastasia Korkmaz

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-10-04T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 200 So. 3d 263, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14745

Snippet: children.” Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). It also establishes “a presumption

Suni L. Reed, n/k/a Suni L. Meyers v. Christopher J. Reed

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-01-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 182 So. 3d 837, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 170

Snippet: children.” Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61 (Fla.4th DCA 2010). Accordingly, “there is a presumption

Rene George v. Matthew Lull

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 181 So. 3d 538, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16975

Snippet: . See Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61-62 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Bon v. Rivera,

Sueiro v. Gallardo

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-12-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 3d 585, 2012 WL 6682205, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 22046

Snippet: time-sharing matters.”); Sanchez v. Hernandez, 45 So.3d 57, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“In seeking a modification

Welch v. Dececco

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-11-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 101 So. 3d 421, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20588, 2012 WL 5969623

Snippet: and acceptance. See Mulato v. Mulato, 705 So.2d 57, 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Here, the trial court concluded

Shavers v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-05-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 86 So. 3d 1218, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6921, 2012 WL 1521534

Snippet: .Ed.2d 619 (2010); Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. 57, 61, 129 S.Ct. 530, 172 L.Ed.2d 388 (2008); Spellissy

Miller v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2003-08-13T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 852 So. 2d 904

Snippet: his burden of proof. See State v. King, 804 So.2d 57, 61 (La.Ct.App.2001); Davis v. Armenakis, 151 Or.App

Exceletech, Inc. v. Williams

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1991-05-16T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 579 So. 2d 850

Snippet: Tax Title Corp. v. Viney, 120 Fla. 657, 163 So. 57, 61 (Fla. 1935), the procedure approved was presentation

The Florida Bar v. Diaz-Silveira

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1990-01-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 557 So. 2d 570

Snippet: answer the respondent admitted to allegations # 57-61, # 64, and the first sentence of # 65, but denied

SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. & CLINICS v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-12-29T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 480 So. 2d 1366

Snippet: not implicitly abrogated by statutes, see notes 57-61 and accompanying text); Duval v. Thomas, 114 So.2d

Sun Plaza West Development Corp. v. City of Holmes Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-02-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 465 So. 2d 542, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 343, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14087

Snippet: prescribed period.” Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57, 61-62 (Fla.1958). If the city can obtain title without

LAKE COUNTY COM'RS v. Walburn

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-01-27T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 409 So. 2d 153

Snippet: Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 57.61 at 10-164.90. Restated, the requisite causal relationship

Fellows, Read & Weber v. Lance

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-12-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 406 So. 2d 1286, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21985

Snippet: The Law of Workmen’s Compensation, Volume 2, § 57.61. The E/C has argued that there must be medical evidence

Hollywood, Inc. v. Zinkil

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-09-02T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 403 So. 2d 528

Snippet: entity of the public, see Downing v. Bird, 100 So.2d 57, 61 (Fla. 1958), and it is the public which enjoys

Milton v. Smathers

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-10-23T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 389 So. 2d 978

Snippet: districts 57-61. There is one representative for every approximately 56,000 persons in districts 57-61. Approximately… applied to them in multimember House Districts 57-61 on its effective date. We found that their petition…the voting population of Florida House Districts 57-61 by denying to the members of the black minority …recommendation and our holding that multimember districts 57-61 do not violate the fourteenth or fifteenth amendments… are black registered voters in House Districts 57-61. In 1970 the total population of Pinellas County

Milton v. Smathers

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1977-06-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 351 So. 2d 24

Snippet: applied to petitioners in multi-member House District 57-61 on its effective date. Count two of the petition

Washington v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-05-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 210 So. 2d 290

Snippet: .2d 515, 516-18; Clinton v. State, 1908, 56 Fla. 57, 61-62, 47 So. 389, 390; Gray v. State, 1900, 42 Fla