The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 59
APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 59.29

59.29 Amendment of appellate proceedings.—The appellate court may, at any time, in the furtherance of justice, upon such terms as may be just, permit appellate proceedings to be amended.

History.—s. 2, ch. 11890, 1927; CGL 4636; s. 29, ch. 22854, 1945.

F.S. 59.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 59.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 59.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 59.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 59.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. C. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 371 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . Foreign Policy is represented as follows: Year APS In-House Total 2004 $132.60 No Evidence $132.60 2005 $59.29 . . . No Evidence $59.29 2006 $110.29 No Evidence $110.29 2007 $83.39 No Evidence $83.39 2008 $0.00 No Evidence . . .

ARDIS, v. PENSACOLA STATE COLLEGE,, 128 So. 3d 260 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Instead, the motion relies on section 59.29, Florida Statutes, which authorizes appellate proceedings . . .

HORSLEY COMPANY, LLC, v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY,, 939 F. Supp. 2d 927 (E.D. Wis. 2012)

. . . Wisconsin Statute § 59.29(29)(b) provides an exemption from procedure outlined in subsection (29)(a), . . .

BALSAMO v. GRUPPO CERAMICHE RICCHETTI, S. P. A. BMI, 862 So. 2d 812 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . We recognize the broad scope allowed in an action under sections 59.29 and 726.102, Florida Statutes. . . .

ARELLANO v. BISSON J., 847 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Finally, it is undisputed that appellants satisfied the procedural requirements of section 59.29. . . .

v., 118 T.C. 181 (T.C. 2002)

. . . . $612,220 $357,904 58.46 Sim Leasing Co. 4,736,241 2,808,118 59.29 666 Leasing Co. 4,084,197 2,580,396 . . .

In PANTELIAS, v., 265 B.R. 788 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2001)

. . . February 2000 were: Big Lots 855.10 Big Lots 19.47 Food Lion 141.59 K-Mart 214.41 Rio Bravo 18.22 Bi-Lo 59.29 . . .

J. HASTERT, E. M. J. H. v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, J. M. A. E. E. D. L. NIEVES, Al D. L. D. Jr. V. A. v. ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS, J. M. A. E. E. D. L. COLLINS, N. S. B. L. v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, J. M. A. P. E. E. D. ROSEBROOK, v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, J. M. A. E. E. D. L. CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE, R. C. v. STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, J. M. A. P. E. E. D. L., 777 F. Supp. 634 (N.D. Ill. 1991)

. . . The Rose-brook plan contains corresponding concentrations of 65.01% total and 59.29% voting age African-American . . . Rosebrook 571,529 155,843 (27.27) 371,545 (65.01) 24,665 (4.32) -VAP 409,268 134,380 (32.83) 242,655 (59.29 . . .

LILLEY, v. BTM CORPORATION,, 759 F. Supp. 1248 (E.D. Mich. 1991)

. . . 12.17 131.02 Telephone 96.49 180.26 2.55 60.01 Postage 60.83 963.70 928.27 3,269.34 Computer Research 59.29 . . .

BURR, BURR v. SOBOL, As, 748 F. Supp. 97 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . Discount 5.8 $ 928 Sullivan DO o bo #v 05 22.0 $2,860 Saideman tO <1 co ^ CO 2.4 $ 540 Semmel to ^ Try CO 59.29 . . .

A. RUDDY, v. ASHTON,, 554 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . Supplementary proceedings are governed by section 59.29, Florida Statutes. . . .

KIRBY FOREST INDUSTRIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 467 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1984)

. . . See, e. g., United States v. 59.29 Acres of Land, 495 F. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN HARDIN AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES, STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, C., 696 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . made by a district court in another case involving the Big Thicket National Preserve, United States v. 59.29 . . . See also United States v. 59.29 Acres of Land, supra. . . .

JORDAN On v. WINTER, T. H. III, J. C. B. H. BROOKS, H. R. E. E. v. F. WINTER, A., 541 F. Supp. 1135 (N.D. Miss. 1982)

. . . counties as the 1956 plan, combined with 13 other counties to form old District 2, which then had a 59.29% . . . Computations show that, under 1980 census figures, the formerly 59.29% black majority district is now . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN COUNTY OF MARIN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, W. C. R. S. W., 671 F.2d 336 (9th Cir. 1982)

. . . 520 F.Supp. at 79; United States v. 97.19 Acres, 511 F.Supp. 565, 567 (D.Md.1981); United States v. 59.29 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN HARDIN AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES, STATE OF TEXAS,, 520 F. Supp. 75 (E.D. Tex. 1981)

. . . United States, supra; United States v. 59.29 Acres of Land, 495 F.Supp. 212, 214 (E.D.Tex.1980). . . . United States v. 59.29 Acres of Land, supra, at 214. . . . In United States v. 59.29 Acres of Land, supra, the “taking” question was confronted in a case which . . . United States v. 59.29 Acres of Land, supra, at 215. . . . S. v. 59.29 Acres of Land, supra. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ORANGE COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ORANGE COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN ORANGE COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, KWW, 507 F. Supp. 589 (E.D. Tex. 1981)

. . . United States, 261 U.S. 299, 306, 43 S.Ct. 354, 356, 67 L.Ed. 664 (1923); United States v. 59.29 Acres . . . 8th Cir. 1908), appeal dismissed, 215 U.S. 618, 30 S.Ct. 410, 54 L.Ed. 351 (1910); United States v. 59.29 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN HARDIN COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS, E. M., 495 F. Supp. 212 (E.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . UNITED STATES of America v. 59.29 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN HARDIN COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS . . . This tract is some 59.29 acres of land, situated in Hardin County, Texas, and is owned by defendants . . .

SALINA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, v. DINER S CLUB, INC., 382 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Purdy, 272 So.2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Section 59.29, Florida Statutes (1977). . . .

In CRATEO, INC. v. INTERMARK, INC., 536 F.2d 862 (9th Cir. 1976)

. . . ), the intervening creditors took on the status of petitioning creditors. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy r 59.29 . . .

JEFFERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 183 Ct. Cl. 720 (Ct. Cl. 1968)

. . . mean [linear feet] sea level] Unit 2: D1 59.63 El 57.41 El 57. 56 0. 94 G1 57.21 4.19 E3 59.04 3.46 59.29 . . .

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED,, 350 F.2d 795 (D.C. Cir. 1965)

. . . Nature and Basis of Legal Good Will, 24 Ill.L.Rev. 20 (1929); 10 Mertens, Federal Income Taxation § 59.29 . . . See generally 10 Mertens, op.cit.supra Note 8 at §§ 59.29-.37. . 47 D.C.Code § 1551c(l). . . .

A. T. MILLER A. A. T. A. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 333 F.2d 400 (8th Cir. 1964)

. . . See: Merten’s Law of Federal Income Taxation, Section 59.29, page 78. . . .

v. M. V., 24 Cust. Ct. 517 (Cust. Ct. 1950)

. . . 53.79 60.16 Tongue and Groove_ 55. 20 55. 29 61. 66 Splits, 1"_ 55.45 55.54 61.91 Necks, #3_ 59.20 59.29 . . .

MURRAY v. CHAMBERS, 151 F. 142 (C.C.W.D. Pa. 1907)

. . . receiver of a' national bank to recover certain of its assets, in which a verdict was rendered for $59.29 . . .