Florida Statute 61.404 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 61.404

61.404 Guardians ad litem; confidentiality.—The guardian ad litem shall maintain as confidential all information and documents received from any source described in s. 61.403(2) and may not disclose such information or documents except, in the guardian ad litem’s discretion, in a report to the court, served upon both parties to the action and their counsel or as directed by the court.

History.—s. 4, ch. 90-226.

F.S. 61.404 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.404 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.404

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.404

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.404.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 61.404

Total Results: 3

In Re Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-11-22

Citation: 663 So. 2d 1049, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 581, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1953, 1995 WL 689537

Snippet: hearing. For further information, see §§ 61.401-61.404, Florida Statutes. *1193 A person who is NOT

Metcalfe v. Metcalfe

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-05-31

Citation: 655 So. 2d 1251

Snippet: guardian's investigation of this case. Section 61.404, Florida Statutes (1993), provides that a "guardian

Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Klawans

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1962-02-05

Citation: 137 So. 2d 230

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The appellant, defendant in the trial court, by interlocutory appeal seeks review of an order denying its motion to dismiss and has preserved for review before this court the following points: (1) Jurisdiction over the subject matter and the defendant; (2) Whether the complaint states a cause of action within the scope of the declaratory decree statute; and (3) Whether the chancellor erroneously issued a temporary injunction without notice. As to the first point, this contention was